How are the papalotrous reacting to Benedict XVI’s reflections?
Let’s look at Twitter.
I pray that Benedict lives long enough to write another substantial work of theology.
Because if he dies tomorrow and this stands his last published opus it will be a very sad coda indeed. https://t.co/djARYkPBrg
— David Gibson (@GibsonWrites) April 11, 2019
And
What world did (does) this man live in? “The mental collapse was also linked to a propensity for violence. That is why sex films were no longer allowed on airplanes because violence would break out among the small community of passengers.” https://t.co/rH48sjplvX
— Robert Mickens (@robinrome) April 11, 2019
This fellow seems to be reading a different letter…
6/8 To me, most important part is III (3), in which he rejects seeing the Church as something that has to be redesigned in light of abuse mishandling. This as a direct rejection of Napa Institute, Red Hat report, and all the other US Viganò/corporate-type “reforms”. pic.twitter.com/MwuDUupKJL
— Austen Ivereigh (@austeni) April 11, 2019
Nut jobs…
How many people believe this “intervention” is the authentic and unadulterated voice of Joseph Ratzinger? And published by the same outlets that gave us Vigano’s “testimony”. https://t.co/Oic6OA0tmn
— Pope news (@Pope_news) April 11, 2019
Here’s Beans!
Can we have Mueller looking into Benedict XVI's essay?
Robert Mueller, not cardinal Mueller.— Massimo Faggioli (@MassimoFaggioli) April 11, 2019
Other loons.
So here we are.
A fmr pope encourages Jacobite resistance to the actual @pontifex by circulating a letter (it is thus ?????????, an encyclical) blaming a far-reaching complex phenomenon on 1968 w/o benefit of any real history or social science. Scandal.https://t.co/iodZAKWVYH
— ????? ??????? (@stevenpmillies) April 10, 2019




From a reader…
























