LCWR Assembly BEGINS! “Shifting from I to WE”

12_06_19_LCWR_largeThe annual conflab of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) starts today at a luxury location in Orlando.

I am still downcast about how they rejected my request for press credentials.  It was so traumatic.  I still choke up.

Perhaps some of you will get some updates!

Meanwhile, the participants were urged in the LCWR newletter to prepare for their assembly by reviewing some materials, including: HERE

Contemplative Dialogue: Unleashing the Transformative Power of Communal Wisdom is a video that demonstrates one method by which a group can engage in contemplative dialogue. Because we are paying attention to the field of relationship (the “WE space”) among us, this slow-moving manner of dialogue deepens our sense of union. Our intention is to move beyond the personal as we probe significant ideas together and listen deeply for truth in another’s point of view. Contemplative dialogue is a means of readying the ground for collective transformation, for helping shift from I to WE, from individualism to communion.

The one-hour video may be seen online and is provided by LCWR so that viewers may come to better understand this form of dialogue by watching an actual contemplative dialogue session. The video may be shared widely since many people today are searching for ways to converse with depth and openness about matters of significance. Contemplative dialogue fosters an exchange that allows for differences to be expressed, honored, and held with reverence. The video is also available with Spanish-language captions of the introduction and closing remarks.

Posted in Women Religious | Tagged
65 Comments

BRICK BY BRICK in Montana! Priests making the TLM HAPPEN!

This is for your Brick By Brick file.  Had I known about this, I might have attended!  I spent a lot of time during my young summers between Billings and Greybull in N. Wyoming.

From a reader…

Have you heard about this Third Annual Eucharistic Conference in Montana? It’s going on now.  HERE

I thought you would be interested because the group of priests (from various parts of the US, not just Montana) spend the week having Solemn Masses each evening. There are talks, processions, adoration and even their bishop makes an appearance! Besides introducing many people to the TLM the priests are able to enjoy fellowship with other like minded priests. I’m not certain but I think most or even all serve in NO parishes. At least one has had a denying-communion to “married” homosexuals occasion. I believe gatherings such as this strengthen the men in their priesthood.

I’ve wanting for a while now to visit the Carmelites in Powell and also perhaps the huge statue of Mary near Butte.  It has been many years since I’ve been in that part of the country.

Anyhoo…. Fr. Z kudos to these men for getting organized and making it happen.

If any of them are paying attention to this blog while they are meeting, I would love to have some PHOTOS to post here and updates.  

Also, to everyone there I send a solidarity enriched…

¡Hagan lío!

 

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z KUDOS, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool, Mail from priests | Tagged
10 Comments

Putin v. Francis – FAKE NEWS

Putin FrancisClaimed: Russian Prime Minister and former-KGB Lt Colonel Vladimir Putin has offered some rather negative comments about His Holiness Pope Francis.

QUAERITUR: Is this “fake news”?

Sure looks like it.

From Your News Wire (my emphases and comments):

Putin: ‘Pope Francis Is Not A Man Of God’

President Putin has slammed Pope Francis for “pushing a political ideology instead of running a church”, and warned that the leader of the Catholic Church “is not a man of God.” [I’ll take that as a “no” vote.]

“Pope Francis is using his platform to push a dangerous far-left political ideology on vulnerable people around the world, people who trust him because of his position,” Putin said.  [Do I correctly recall that Putin once remarked that Communism is a “blind alley”?]

“If you look at what he (the Pope) says it’s clear that he is not a man of God. At least not the Christian God. Not the God of the Bible,” Putin said at the Naval Cathedral of St. Nicholas in Kronstadt.  [Holy cow!  Look at this place!  HERE]

“He dreams of a world government and a global communist system of repression.

“As we have seen before in communist states, this system is not compatible with Christianity.”

The pope has become increasingly brazen this year in pushing the globalist agenda and far-left talking points upon the masses. Earlier this year he called for a global central bank and financial authority, and more recently he said “Americans need to be ruled by a world government as soon as possible for their own good.”  17_08_05_Spadaro_Thought[We can also call that Spadaro Thought, I think.]

Pope Francis’s idea that Americans would be better off under a world government doesn’t stop there. The radical leftist pontiff also went on record stating that Europe should become one country under one government.

He is also on record calling for a China-style one child policy for Western nations, [Is that true?  I thought he criticized it.] as well as telling a congregation in Rome that having a personal relationship with Jesus is “dangerous and harmful.”

While Putin is a practicing Christian, he is not a Roman Catholic, and the pope is not his leader. According to his recent statements, President Putin does not even consider Pope Francis to be Christian.

The Russian president is rarely openly critical of foreign leaders, instead preferring to use diplomacy to win people over to his side. However notorious globalists including George Soros, Jacob Rothschild and Bill Gates have received tongue lashings before, and now Pope Francis has joined their company.  [Misdirection?]

Pope Francis is trying to lay the groundwork for a global communist government. President Putin is wise to his ruse and has called him out on it. It’s time for more world leaders to tell the pope to stay in his own lane.  [So the writer of the piece doesn’t like Francis.]

Okay… no love for Francis from “Russia” (=the writer).

The moderation queue is ON.

UPDATE

Another term for “fake news” could be “disinformation”.

Have any of you read the eye-opening book about “disinformation” by the Romanian General who was in charge of intelligence?

Disinformation: Former Spy Chief Reveals Secret Strategies for Undermining Freedom, Attacking Religion, and Promoting Terrorism by Ronald Rychlak and Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa.

Pacepa fled to the West when he was asked to start killing people. He is an expert on the Soviet techniques of framing, disinformation, creating false narratives and history. The book exposes the Communist background of seemingly-benign organizations and explains the treatment received by Cardinals Stepinak, Mindszenty and Wysznski and, of course, Pius XII.

It is riveting.

US HERE – UK HERE

Need a Kindle?

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in Francis | Tagged , ,
31 Comments

A new take on “lockstep sheep and papist throwbacks”

Some time ago, those who supported the new corrected ICEL translation (e.g. you regular readers) were accused by some angry liberal nutter as being “lockstep sheep and papist throwbacks”.  Of course that was in the days of Pope Benedict reign.   Today… I wonder if that can be said so glibly.

In any event, I found a video which embodies the phrase which libs would still hurl at my readers (hah! If they only knew).

Anyone who has done a little marching will get how amazing this is.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

SWAG HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
11 Comments

UPDATED WITH AUDIO: On hearing Sir James Macmillan’s “A European Requiem”

UPDATE 8 Aug 2017

MacMillan’s piece is first up.  Then at about 42:45 Beethoven’s 9th starts.

____

Originally Published on: Aug 7

Would that I were in London and able to attend the Proms.  I would have very much enjoyed hearing the premiere of Catholic composer Sir James Macmillan’s A European Requiem.  I’ve just finished watching the BBC archived broadcast.  Whew.

If you want more on Macmillan and this piece, may I direct you to Damien Thompson (a darn good music critic, if you ask me) who wrote about it at The Spectator?  I can quite easily believe that the nattering radio commentators didn’t have clue.  Damien called the new piece “gloriously subversive”.   Surely he is right.  This “Requiem” is for Europe, and Europe’s Western Civilization.

It even has a counter-tenor.

Damian found the right word: lament.  What it sings and sounds indeed brings on the pensivehead.  It seems to be too late for Europe.  Whatever else might be over there across the herring pond, in a few decades Europe, as described by, for example, Joseph Ratzinger, may be no more.

Damian points out the irony of the new composition’s juxtaposition with Beethoven’s 9th Symphony (think unofficially canonized EU anthem).

17_08_07_proms_01

Posted in Cri de Coeur, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
8 Comments

Thanks from seminarian: The BIRETTA PROJECT!

The other day, HERE, I mentioned that new seminarians of the diocese, gathered for their annual week with the Extraordinary Ordinary, have been measured for their birettas as part of the ongoing BIRETTAS FOR SEMINARIANS PROJECT.

So far, this project has met with real success.  We are furnishing future priests of your parishes with proper cover.

Today I received a nice note of thanks from a seminarian of the FSSP in Denton:

17_08_07_biretta_thanks

Want some lío?  We’ve got your requested lío right here, in lot’s of sizes including size 7½!

¡Hagan lío!

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, ACTION ITEM!, Seminarians and Seminaries | Tagged ,
Comments Off on Thanks from seminarian: The BIRETTA PROJECT!

Wherein homsexualist activist Jesuit Fr James Martin is schooled

Libs attempt to defend their dissent from doctrine – especially about morals (read: sex) – by claiming that the Church’s teachings have not be “received”.  That is, if a large number of people say they don’t agree with the Church on some point, therefore the Church can’t claim that people must accept it.  Moreover, because the teaching hasn’t been “received”, the Church ought to change it’s teaching.   That’s liberal dissent in a nutshell.  It’s pretty much an exercise in dishonesty.

I see today at First Things a piece by Gregory Brown of the Witherspoon Institute which vivisects Jesuit homosexualist activist Fr James Martin’s claim in his new (bad) book about building “bridges” between the Church (the institutional Church, of course) and homosexuals.   Martin claims – wait for it –

“Theologically speaking, you could say that these teachings have not been “received” by the L.G.B.T. community, to whom they were directed.”

Hence, the Church should change her teachings.

Martin, as the First Things article points out, makes an appeal to the sensus fidelium in his claims about the need for teachings to be “received”.  Martin:

To take a theological perspective, a teaching must be “received” by the faithful. It’s a complex topic (and I am no professional theologian) but, in general, for a teaching to be complete [?] it must be appreciated, accepted and understood by the faithful. The tradition is that the faithful possess their own inner sense of the authority of a teaching. That’s the sensus fidei or sensus fidelium. You can find out more about it in the Vatican document Sensus Fidei.

No.  That isn’t the sensus fidelium.

The sensus fidei fidelium is real and serious.  However, the problem with lib claims about the sensus fidei fidelium is that the sensus has to be that precisely of the fidelium… the FAITHFUL.  You have to be faithful to the Church and her teachings to have the “sense/grasp/perception” of the Faith.  To bring in Augustine: Nisi credideritis non intelligetis… Unless you will have first believed you will not understand.

At the end of the First Things piece, Brown writes:

As I read and reread Fr. Martin’s interviews, I am struck by a persistent ambiguity. Whether given a banal or radical sense, his remarks do not cohere very well with the Vatican document he cites. Why mention the theology of reception at all, if he just meant to make a tactical point about the scale of the Catholic-LGBT divide? Fr. Martin agrees that the rejected teachings are magisterial—so the rejection of them cannot spring from any intuition “infallible in itself with regard to its object,” the Catholic Faith.  [BINGO!]

The topic is one that requires clarification. Ever since the document’s release in 2014, progressive Catholics have treated the sensus fidei as a kind of magic bullet licensing dissent on, well, exactly those issues you would expect. The sensus fidei—the spontaneous intuition that the faithful have on account of their connaturality to God—sounds very exciting, because it is. But it is not quite as exciting as certain theologians want it to be.

Yes, indeed.  There is great need for a solid book which tackles a) the concept of sensus fidei fidelium and also the b) level or weight of magisterial teaching and documents which communicate those teachings.

The other day I posted about old categories of censures and warnings about teachings which strayed from Catholic doctrine to be avoided, or ways of speaking about teachings which were deficient enough to warrant a warning.  HERE

These old categories are useful… but they are not often used today.  Are the ever use today?  That is, by someone who isn’t an Unreconstructed Ossified Manualist like me?

To buy CLICK HERE.

Posted in Liberals, Sin That Cries To Heaven | Tagged , , ,
10 Comments

URGENT: for priests

Molteni Giuseppe La confessioneToday at Crisis Fr. George Rutler is the purveyor of salutary advice to young priests.  HERE

Of particular interest to me, since I harp on the need for frequent confession:

The Holy Mass is the heart of the Christian life, but to be that, it must proceed from the Sacrament of Confession. With exquisite subtlety the Risen Christ prompted Peter to confess before he sent him out to offer the Eucharist to the heart of the empire. The parish priest should not let a day pass without some time in the confessional, and if no one shows up, that time can be one of prayer, and eventually the people will come. Weekly confession should be the goal for the priest himself. Often the Anti-Christ will tempt the priest to absent the confessional for one reason or another just before a seriously burdened penitent is about to ask to be heard. Humble confessions heard in the sacred tribunal often inspire the priest beyond anything the penitent could understand. Humility is never discouraged by a good examination of conscience, for the Good Physician always has a cure for sickness of soul, be it a defect of the intellect or a weakness of will.

Fathers… GO TO CONFESSION!

Fathers… HEAR CONFESSIONS!

If you don’t, you are running the risk of eternal perdition.  No, really!  We still believe that stuff!

Remember also:

Of course an examination of conscience goes hand in glove with the need for confession and absolution.

Again, for priests, I share now something that a priest friend in my native place, Fr TD, sent me recently.   This is posted at the site of God’s Plan For Life.

UPDATE NB: There is a serious hole in this examen, however, as pointed out in a comment below.  There is nothing about liturgical worship.  One the first things mentioned in the Code of Canon Law is the duty of the pastor to see to the Eucharist, which is not only the Blessed Sacrament, but also its celebration.  It is a constant disappointment to me that, when I read offerings from certain bishops and muckity-mucks about “what the Church needs”, they almost never bring in liturgy.   However, we are our rites.  No initiative we will undertake with all good will can succeed if it is not rooted in and returning to proper sacred liturgical worship of God.

That said…

Examination of conscience for pastors

Introduction

This examination of conscience is designed for all pastors as they eagerly strive to meet the challenges of our time. It assumes that the pastor who is exploring its contents has already achieved self mastery of the emotions and therefore it omits the many questions that are typically included in a general examination of conscience written for all members of the Church. It focuses on the fundamental mission of the Church which is to proclaim the Good News, to combat sin and save souls for everlasting life. These weighty core values should form the epicenter of every pastor’s mission directed toward a culture that in large part does not “repent of their murders, their magic potions, their unchastity, or their robberies.” Rev. 9:20. The examination of conscience may seem very challenging. Indeed, that is what an examination of conscience is supposed to do! A zealous pastor will quickly see that this examination has the potential to greatly assist in propelling the entire Church forward toward its glorious destination.

Preaching

“When Jesus finished these words, the crowds were astonished at his teaching, for he taught them as one having authority, and not as their scribes.” Mt 7:28

  1. Do I preach with authority?
  2. Do I claim the authority given to me by Christ and his Church?
  3. Is my tone emboldened by truth, faith, righteous authority to rebuke sinners, as well as meekness and humility, with each tone appropriate for the time, place and audience?
  4. Do I present the Gospel as a choice with serious consequences for acceptance or rejection? Or do I dilute the message, presenting the Gospel as a proposal, that is, something which can be implicitly rejected without consequences.
  5. Do I avoid difficult parts of the Gospel under the guise of being more loving and gentle?
  6. Do I proclaim the problem of sin and the call to repentance?
  7. Do I mention specific sins that are rampant in our culture in our time?
  8. Do I proclaim the Particular and General Judgments of Jesus?
  9. Do I proclaim the Particular and General Judgments of Jesus while at the same time acknowledging that they apply to me?
  10. Do I imitate as closely as possible the powerful teaching ministry of Jesus Christ?
  11. Do I humble myself in the presence of righteous believers?

“But we will more fully understand this power of discernment if we study the example of the first shepherd. For Peter, who by God’s authorization held the position of leadership in the holy Church, refused immoderate veneration from Cornelius (though the latter had acted well by humbly prostrating himself before Peter), but Peter recognized him as an equal saying: “Arise, do not do this, for I am also a man.” But when he discovered the sin of Ananias and Sapphira, he immediately showed the extent of power he had over others. For by his word, he ended their lives when he overtook them with his penetrating spirit. He had a self-awareness that he was the head of the Church in the battle against sin, but he did not acknowledge this honor when he was in the presence of upright brethren. In one case, holy conduct merited the communion of equality; in the other, avenging zeal revealed the just use of authority.”[1]

Teaching while preaching

“About this we have much to say, and it is difficult to explain, for you have become sluggish in hearing. Although you should be teachers by this time, you need to have someone teach you again the basic elements of the utterances of God. You need milk, (and) not solid food.
Everyone who lives on milk lacks experience of the word of righteousness, for he is a child. But solid food is for the mature, for those whose faculties are trained by practice to discern good and evil.” Hb 5:11-14

  1. Do I study and teach the meaning of Scripture, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Papal Encyclicals and Church documents?
  2. Do I expound on the finer points of these invaluable sources?
  3. Do I teach the Ten Commandmentsand explain how they must be fulfilled in Spirit and Truth?
  4. Do I teach the seven capital sins – pride, greed, jealousy, anger, lust, gluttony and sloth? [3]
  5. Do I teach virtues and vices and how vices may be disguised as virtues? [2]
  6. Do I make any of the following excuses[5] when it comes to the more difficult moral teachings?

o    Talking about serious moral issues would scandalize the children.

o    It’s okay to talk about these matters in RCIA, marriage preparation classes and to provide pamphlets on these issues in the vestibule, but not at the pulpit.

o    These issues are contentious. They will produce strife and discord.

o    Collections will go down.

o    People will go to another church because they don’t want to hear this.

o    When the bishop talks about it, I’ll begin to talk about it.

o    I’m not prepared to speak about these issues because I wasn’t trained in the seminary for this.

o    The recent clergy sex scandals make it impossible for me to talk about sex today. I have no credibility.

  1. Am I mindful that if I do not warn a sinner and rebuke his sin, the Lord will hold me responsible for the sinner’s death? Ez 3:18-20
  2. Do I teach the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit – wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety and fear of the Lord?
  3. Do I teach and foster the charismatic gifts of the Holy Spirit – expression of wisdom, expression of knowledge, faith, healing, mighty deeds, prophecy, discernment and tongues?
  4. Do I teach the five precepts of the Church?[4]
  5. Do I teach on issues of social justice and urge the laity to participate in the building of a just society by establishing a hierarchy of values with prominence given to the right to life?
  6. Do I strive to protect the souls entrusted to my care by warning them about heresies?

Prayer

  1. Am I faithful and regular in daily prayer, including the Divine Office?
  2. Do I pray the Rosary as earnestly requested by Our Lady of Fatima?
  3. Do I implore those encharged to my pastoral care to fervent daily prayer, including the Rosary?
  4. Do I invite those encharged to my pastoral care to frequent the Sacrament of Reconciliation?
  5. Do I offer up all sufferings, annoyances and inconveniences to Christ for atonement of sins?
  6. Do I foster prayer meetings?

Obedience

“Priests must be pure, very pure. They should not busy themselves with anything except what concerns the Church and souls. The disobedience of priests to their superiors and to the Holy Father is very displeasing to Our Lord.” Words of Our Lady of Fatima spoken to little Jacinta.

  1. Do I place obedience to God as my number one priority?
  2. Do I implement the requests of my religious superiors?
  3. Do I obey my religious superiors in their requests that I live very modestly so as to imitate Christ and not bring scandal?
  4. Am I faithful to my religious or priestly vows?

References

  1. The Book of Pastoral Rule by St. Gregory the Great. Translated by George E. Demacopoulos; St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press. Crestwood, New York, 2007, section 6, p. 64.
  2. ibid, section 9, page 76.
  3. Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition, Part Three, Section One, Chapter One, Article 8, Section V, Paragraph 1866, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Citta del Vaticano, 1997.
  4. ibid Part 3, Section One, Chapter Three, Article 3, Section II, Paragraph 2041-2043.
  5. Getting Beyond “I Can’t” By Fr. Daniel McCaffrey, STD  and Fr. Matthew Habiger, OSB, PhD.

The questions above cannot possibly explore every aspect of the pastoral spiritual life. For example, missing are questions involving the diligent performance of the Sacraments. While important, these are well governed by ritual rules of discipline and generally do not present difficult challenges. The questions above are tuned and focused on the difficult challenges of our time, a time when authoritative preaching has faded while the world labels evil good and good evil. This examination was composed by Brian Murphy and first posted September 15, 2016.

Endorsed by:

Very Rev. Charles Wright, OSB, Oceanside, CA
Rev. Matthew Habiger, OSB, Atchison, KS
Most Reverend Timothy Freyer, Orange, CA
Rev. Frederick Parke, Jacksonville, FL
Rev. John Putnam, Huntersville, NC
Rev. John Paul Hopping, Maplewood, MO
Rev. Shenan J. Boquet, President, Human Life International, Front Royal, VA
Fr. Tom Cusack, St. Columbans, NE
Most Reverend James D. Conley, Lincoln, NE

The moderation queue is ON.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Mail from priests, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged ,
9 Comments

Wherein a popular beer is renamed to honor priests

Remember the recent story about the priests who denied entry to a pub in Wales because the bouncer didn’t know what they were wearing… who they were?   They were eventually admitted with apologies and applause and it all worked out.

As a follow up, I read now that the same priest-excluding Welsh pub has renamed one of their offerings in honor of the priests.

From Wales Online:

[…]

After spotting one of the priests called Reverend James drinking a popular beer – The Rev James – the company who own the chain, Brains, are renaming the ale to “The Thirsty Priests”.

The beer, described as a “rich, warming ale with a clean, rewarding finish” will be on sale soon in the capital’s pub.

It also has a witty slogan, which reads “saving souls and satisfying thirsts”.

Tim Lewis, PR Manager for Brains, said: “We wanted to do something as a ‘thank you’ to the priests for taking the misunderstanding in such good spirits.

“We thought what could be better than renaming The Rev James, their favourite ale, in their honour.

“It had to be something that captured the light-hearted nature of the story and we think the ‘Thirsty Priests’ is perfect.

[…]

Fun.

Remember also to support the wonderful Benedictines of Norcia who make spectacular beer!

 

Posted in Lighter fare, Mail from priests, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged ,
6 Comments

Your Transfiguration Sunday Sermon Notes – PHOTOS and AUDIO

UPDATE:

One of you readers sent…

Hey Fr. Z !

Our priest loved your post and so we had the blessing of the grapes today along with a beautiful homily he prepared ! Thank you !

____ Originally Published on: Aug 6

Was there a good point made in the sermon you heard during the Holy Mass in fulfillment your of Sunday Obligation? Let us know.  Good points, please.

For my part, I explained that today’s Feast, Eastern in spirit, was made universal in the West by Pope Callixtus III in honor of the defeat of the Islamic invaders at the Siege of Belgrade in 1456.  Sultan Mehmet was trying to get his toes into Europe.  God threw them back.  Huzzah!

Also, I spoke about the blessing of grapes…. and I blessed grapes.

Moreover, I spoke about how our rites transform us and that we are our rites.

A taste of Sunday where I was…

Asperges – the Deacon is transitional and is studying in Rome, the Subdeacon is the Vocation Director for the Diocese… how fortunate are we here?!?

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_01

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_02

All we have to do now is say, “Solemn Mass today”, and everyone knows what to do without rehearsals.

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_03

These are vestments from the Pontifical Set, which is now complete.  Gammarelli sent the final pieces last week (e.g., extra large dalmatics, additional copes, etc.).  Not bad, huh?  PLEASE DONATE!   HERE

Action shot.

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_04

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_05

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_06

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_07

A couple of the seminarians joined us.

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_08

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_09

17_08_06_SMPB_Transfiguration_10

This what we do.  How about you?

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
30 Comments