SYRIA: Bombs in confessionals

I am catching up on the news.  To my horror I saw a story at Vatican Insider, to my knowledge only in Italian at this point, wherein the the Syrian Melkite Greek Catholic Patrairch, Gregorios III, revealed during a visit to London that remote-controlled bombs had been planted in confessionals.

Christians are being murdered for refusing to convert to Islam.

Is there a lot of outrage in the main stream media?

Imagine what would happen in the press if some Christians killed a Muslim who refused t convert to Christianity.

Posted in Modern Martyrs, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
10 Comments

What did the Pope really say in his short, non-magisterial fervorino about “ideology”?

Some people are getting worked up – again – about something Pope Francis said during his morning sermonette yesterday.  His Holiness, in his non-magisterial fervorino, spoke about “ideology”.   A news report in the fervorinoHERE.

Here is something that the Pope said:

It is, he said, “the image of those Christians who have the key in their hand, but take it away, without opening the door,” and who “keep the door closed.”

Asking those present how a Christian is able to fall into this attitude, the Pope reflected that “The faith passes, so to speak, through a distiller and becomes ideology. And ideology does not beckon (people).”

Noting that it is a “lack of Christian witness does this,” he stressed that “when this Christian is a priest, a bishop or a Pope it is worse.”

“When a Christian becomes a disciple of ideology,” urged the Pope, “he has lost the faith: he is no longer a disciple of Jesus, he is a disciple of this attitude of thought,” and “the knowledge of Jesus is transformed into an ideological and also moralistic knowledge.

Ideology frightens, ideology chases away the people,” he stressed, stating that it is because of this that many are distanced from the Church.

“It is a serious illness, this Christian ideology. It is an illness, but it is not new,” he said, recalling how the Apostle John alludes to this mentality in his first letter.

Pope Francis then emphasized that the attitude of those who lose their faith in preference of personal ideologies is “rigid, moralistic, ethical, but without kindness.

“But why is it that a Christian can become like this? Just one thing: this Christian does not pray. And if there is no prayer, you always close the door.”

“The key that opens the door to the faith,” the Pope noted, “is prayer,” and “when a Christian does not pray, this happens. And his witness is an arrogant witness.”

The Christian who does not pray, urged the Pope, is “arrogant, is proud, is sure of himself. He is not humble. He seeks his own advancement…when a Christian prays, he is not far from the faith; he speaks with Jesus.”

When we pray, the Pope reflected, Jesus tells us to “go into your room and pray to the Father in secret, heart to heart,” because “It is one thing to pray, and another thing to say prayers.”

Those who do not pray abandon the faith, stressed the Pope, and allow it to become a “moralistic, casuistic ideology, without Jesus.”

[…]

The Holy Father’s passion is clear and strong, isn’t it?   It is a little stirring to read this.  I’ll bet it is even more so to hear it in person.   But …

The Pope’s language about ideology is so vague that I can’t for the life of me make out who or what he is talking about.  It could be that he has a first name and a last name in mind, but I have no idea who she might be.

Does anyone know what he is talking about?  Really?

Go back and read over the report again and ask yourself if you truly understand what he is talking about.

Does the spanish for “ideology”, which may be behind his thought, have some nuance of meaning that is different from English or Italian?

What did the Pope really say in this short, non-magisterial fervorino?

Anyone?

UPDATE:

I direct the readership’s attention to a post by His Hermeneuticalness on this topic.  He runs with it, brilliantly.

And, while were at it, let’s have a cheer for Millwall.

Soon we will need posts on Francisneutics.

Posted in Classic Posts, Francis, The Drill | Tagged , ,
130 Comments

Bank robber falsely accused priests

This is so disturbing. What a nightmare.

FOLLOW-UP: Convicted Bank Robber Found GUILTY of Falsely Accusing Four Different Catholic Priests of Abuse [w/ COURT DOCS]

Convicted bank robber Shamont Sapp has admitted in U.S. federal court that he falsely accused four different priests of sexually abusing him back in the 1970s.
Even though his crimes carry up to 25 years in prison, Sapp has negotiated a plea deal with prosecutors, and he will likely serve only 41 months, according to The Oregonian, one of only three media outlets to report this story.
Quite a character
We originally reported on the case of Sapp back in early February. While serving time in prison for ten bank robberies, Sapp not only drummed up four bogus abuse claims against Catholic priests, but he also filed a bizarre lawsuit alleging that Hollywood stars Jamie Foxx and Tyler Perry had stolen his idea for the lowbrow comedy film project Skank Robbers. (Thankfully, the movie never actually made it into production.)
Yet with regards to his attempted scam against the Catholic Church, Sapp found three of his targets by scouring old newspapers in search of priests who had already been publicly accused of abuse. He then filed lawsuits claiming that he too had been abused by those same priests.
Sadly, however, according to the Oregonian, one of the priests Sapp accused of abuse had never been accused before, and Sapp’s bogus 2006 lawsuit terribly damaged the reputation of the innocent priest.

[…]

Who knows how many men have been falsely accused?

Satan is at the bottom of this one. Those who falsely accuse will join him in the deepest cinders – or ice flows – of Hell.

Posted in Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , ,
11 Comments

QUAERITUR: Confession at regular parish but Sunday Mass at SSPX?

From a reader:

Howdy Fr. Z [Fine, thanks!]

I had a question about fulfilling my Sunday Obligation at an SSPX chapel. First let me say, I am 100% with the bishops and the pope. I prefer the Latin Mass. I am about 50-60 minutes away from the closest and only diocesan TLM in Dallas, and being a college student I cannot really afford to drive there every week. However, there is an SSPX chapel about 10 minutes from where I go to school. Since I have seen you write where SSPX confession are not valid, but their Eucharist is, could I go to confession at a diocesan parish and go to Mass at the SSPX chapel, would this fulfill my obligation? Please keep in mind this is strictly due to my preference of the TLM, not disobedience to the pope or bishops. Any help would be great.

In short order:

Yes and Yes.

You can go to confession at a regular parish (which is where you will find a confessor, that is, a priest with faculties and who absolves validly – unlike the SSPX priests except in danger of death when the law and situation give them faculties for that moment).

You can fulfill your Sunday obligation at a chapel of the SSPX. The Mass they say is valid (for valid celebration of Mass faculties are not needed – Mass is valid but illicit). The Mass is in a Catholic rite. That’s what canon law requires.

That said, some time ago there was a statement from the Holy See that attending Mass at chapels that were loosely associated with the SSPX did NOT fulfill the Sunday obligation. So, make sure it is truly an SSPX chapel.

Also, given the way the SSPX is going on these days, it may happen that the Holy See will adjust its approach.  I hope that will not be the case, but one of these days I suspect that Rome will confirm in an official way what the SSPX seems to want (for one reason or another): to be separate.

Finally, it grieves me that you don’t have better access to TLMs there.  How very sad that priests don’t care about the pastoral care of so many of the faithful, especially in a time when being “pastoral” (usually pronounced by liberals as “pastOral” or even – and I shudder – “pastO-ree-al”) is all the rage.  They are really only concerned with those who think like they do.

And since I haven’t said it for a while: Benedict XVI was the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Pope of Christian Unity, SSPX | Tagged , , , ,
30 Comments

18 Oct: Faint Lunar Eclipse

Just to remind us of who we are and who we are not, this is from SpaceWeather:

Space Weather News for Oct. 18, 2013
http://spaceweather.com

FAINT LUNAR ECLIPSE:  On the night of Oct. 18th, the full Hunter’s Moon will pass through the outskirts of Earth’s shadow, producing a faint “penumbral” lunar eclipse.  This is much less dramatic than a total lunar eclipse; nevertheless it should be easily visible to the naked eye as a dusky shading in the southern half of the Moon. The zone of visibility stretches from the eastern half of North America across Europe and Africa to western parts of Asia.  Check http://spaceweather.com for maps and details.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged
3 Comments

BE THE MAQUIS: Object lessons in how to obtain the TLM where you are.

Last night (here in Rome) I had an interesting supper with a Roman friend and a couple from the USA who are here on a visit.

They recounted the uphill battle they have had to obtain cooperation of their parish priest for Masses in the Extraordinary Form.

Their tale of patience and bureaucratic obfuscation was both maddening and inspiring. It was madden for the fact that their pastor (parish priest) and their (arch)diocese and even, to a certain extent perhaps also the PCED, are behaving as if Summorum Pontificum didn’t exist and we were still under the Motu Proprio Ecclesia Dei adflicta.

It is amazing how, now that Summorum Pontificum is in force, bishops want to implement Ecclesia Dei, isn’t it?

The basic outline of the story goes like this.

A stable group of the faithful, as I understand at least 100 people, formally petitioned their pastor for use of a small and beautiful chapel, the former parish church, which is on the parish property. It would be ideal for the TLM. The pastor effectively responded that, while he was pastor, they would never have one. Period. The assistant at the parish was willing and able, the people were surely a stable group, everything was in order. The pastor straight-armed them in a way that only be described as narrow, boorish and lacking any pastoral concern whatsoever. The main organizer of the petition is an attorney, and so she was careful to conserve a written record of everything that went on in their 2 year slog along with all the correspondence.

If you read my TIPS for writing to authorities, you will understand how the petitioners set about their work.

I was both shocked and simultaneously unsurprised at the blocks placed in their path, the delays in even responding to these petitioners. Sometimes months passed without substantive responses. Requests were responses were sent repeatedly, with dogged persistence. Notes were sent back from the chancery with vague explanations about “organizing” responses and getting canonists involved and various difficulties.

The only explanation I could see by the time I had heard it all is sheer liberal ideological disdain not just for the Extraordinary Form, but for the people who want the Extraordinary Form. I was told that the pastor said, openly, not only that he didn’t like the older forms, but that he didn’t want the sort of people who like it around his parish. I’ll grant you that trads can be pretty hard to deal with in some cases… but that’s no different from any other group of people in the Church.

The long and short is that the local Archbishop eventually appointed a “chaplain” to their group, who will know be their point man in the the matter of their legitimate aspirations. They managed to squeeze ONE Mass out of the pastor of the parish in that perfectly suited chapel.

That’s a start.

A few of the lessons to be taken from the story were these.

1. You must be ready to fight with dogged perseverance for months or even years in the face of infuriating clerical condescension and run-arounds.

2. You must be prepared to continue your fight with diplomacy and a smile. Expressing rage on paper or in person is counter-productive. By doing so, in a parish or to the bishop, you simply undermine your own cause. Your anger becomes the issue. Keep it diplomatic and personable, but persistent and document EVERYTHING.

3. Never never never let up. Keep pressing forward, cordially but relentlessly. Be the woman nagging the judge.

4. You must know well both Summorum Pontificum and also the Instruction Universae Ecclesiae.  Read them carefully and understand the proper roles of all the players, pastor, bishop, Pontifical Commission.

Shifting gears slightly, I will remind the readers about a couple things I have been saying since the day after Pope Francis was elected.

Firstly, we have the provisions of Summorum Pontificum.  We have the vision laid out by Pope Benedict, which is as valid and appropriate now as when he laid it out back when.  You have the resources (if something is lacking, SOLVE THE PROBLEM).  As I have said before, it is time to take the training wheels off and ride the damn bike!   If you want the TLM, work for it.  If it is hard, keep working.  This is NOT the time to ease up.  This is exactly the time to keep pressing onward, petitioning for more and more and more, not just for little crumbs off the liberal cool-kids’ table.  Young priests will be with you.  Support them 250%.

Secondly, don’t whine about how hard it is.  Don’t gripe, bitch, moan, lament, complain and don’t don’t don’t let your frustration with uncooperative obfuscating narrow-minded bigoted pastors and bishops come out sideways in anger or accusations or any other thing that can be turned, by them, into the issue.  Once you lose your cool, that will become the only issue.  It will be their excuse for slowing down even more, blocking, ignoring, and even flat out insulting you.  That’s what they do.  When you are on thin ice, it is smart to tread a bit lightly.

As I have said on many occasions, we can lose what we have built already.  We won’t lose the provisions of Summorum Pontificum.  Those are here to stay.  But, mark my words, in this present environment, liberals have the big mo. They are emboldened. You have to be prudent and smart.  Provisions on paper are one thing, but their observance by liberals who hate what you want (and hate you too) is a whole other pot of stew. As the Fat Man said in his legendary Laws of the House of God: #8 – They can always hurt you more.

You think not?  Just ignore this advice, friends.  And they will hurt you more, if you take a tack that ends in anger, etc.  They will cancel your Masses, block your petitions, put more and more restrictions on what you have until it collapses.

Be smart.  Be the Maquis.  Press on.

Now, as a complete aside, I have learned that there is going to be a beautiful All Souls Day Solemn Requiem Mass celebrated in a small chapel north of Detroit on 2 November. Anyone in the area might want to support the event and show up with big smiles and lots of prayers of thanksgiving along with suffrages for the Poor Souls. The Solemn Mass will be at St. Hugo’s Stone Chapel at 5:00 PM. There will be low Masses before that. Of course priests say more than one Mass on 2 November. The Windsor St. Benedict Tridentine Community Choir will sing. The celebrant will be Msgr. Ronald Browne.

For more information check out their facebook page. HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Be The Maquis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Universae Ecclesiae | Tagged , ,
42 Comments

My view for a while

Farewell to Venice.

The pilgrimage is officially over and I am off to Rome.  But… sigh… what a sight to have to leave.   And from the relative quiet and clean air to … well… you know.

20131017-133034.jpg

I made it by vaporetto with 10 minutes to spare.

I will now fight with the onboard wifi for a while and, once I have given up, I will read from my Kindle a book sent by a reader.  (I am into the Kydd series).

20131017-133150.jpg

UPDATE:

This was about what we did for most of the trip.

20131017-162327.jpg

UPDATE:

Back in Rome.  I just made it in before rush hour.

20131017-190007.jpg

UPDATE:

I am in my apartment, I did my grocery shopping, I put laundry in (really needed) and I have the computer online.  Soon I must get a cab and race to P.za Barbarini to meet someone for supper.

So far so good.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to |
3 Comments

Symptoms of The Francis Effect™

We didn’t think this was going to happen?

Six months into this pontificate, and people are starting to go a little crazy.

For example, the Archbishop of Birmingham is talking about intercommunion with Anglicans, based on a document which dates back to 1993 and concerns the conditions necessary for intercommunion with the Eastern Orthodox.   (In other words, that document doesn’t apply.  One is an actual Church with valid sacraments and the other is neither.)

For example, in the Archdiocese of Freiburg, Germany, some minor chancery official usurped authority which was not his in order to outline a “policy” that would allow the divorced and remarried in the diocese to receive Communion.  (In other words, it remains entirely against the law and, whether he did it on his own or with the wink and nod of the diocese’s administrator, someone oughta get their backside paddled, and hard.)

Not helpful.

In some places, the Church’s teaching on doctrine and morals are out the window.

Real colors are being revealed.

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you will be saying by now… ohhhh…. I know you too well…. “You are turning on Pope Francis!   We can tell.   NotonlydoyouhateVatican II, but all this fulsome support of Francis you gave over the last few months….”

No, dear readers.

If in some diocese in Germany or some diocese in England a minor official or a bishop does something that is … well… pretty weird or against the Church’s law, that in itself is not Francis’ fault.  I remind the readers that those bishops or officials were not appointed by Francis.  They weren’t told to do those things by Francis.

We will have to wait and see, with patience, what the CDF might do in response to crazy things that will be popping up from time to time.

Here’s the deal.

The new style of this Pope – which I admit I am not comfortable with when it comes to liturgical praxis – is going to tend to bring people’s true colors out.

Doesn’t it seem that way to you?

The SSPX is having a spittle-flecked nutty over in the selva oscura where they wander.  Liberals are dancing around like Gollum on the edge of the Crack of Doom.

SNAFU

Something about Pope Francis is disorienting.  In the disorientation, people are showing sides that they have otherwise been able more easily to keep under wraps.

I recommend the brewing of strong Mystic Monk Coffee as an antidote to both the nutty in the dark woods and the temptation of the “precious”.

Mystic Monk Coffee!

It’s swell.

 

Posted in Francis, The Drill, The future and our choices, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , , ,
56 Comments

QUAERITUR: I am not sure if I confessed this sin or not.

From a reader:

I know you have a lot on confession here, but I can’t find an answer for my question. Several months ago I went back to the Church after 30 some years, and gave what I thought a good and thorough confession. Later I thought of sins that I wasn’t sure I confessed, and confessed them at my next confession. Since then, I keep thinking of sins, committed over decades, that I’m honestly not sure if I confessed or not. I think I did, but not 100% sure. This is really starting to get to me. Is there a place I can just start fresh, with a clean slate, without the constant worrying about whether it was confessed or not. This isn’t about remembering unconfessed sin, but about thinking I confessed, but not 100% sure, and this happening over and over again with each confession.

First, laudetur Iesus Christus!  Second, good for you!  30 years.  I really admire people who come back to confession after a long time.  It takes some guts and trust.

If you make a sincere confession, as complete as you can at the moment – even though you suspect you have forgotten things – with true sorrow for sins and a desire to amend your life, then when you receive absolution all your sins are forgiven.  It isn’t that the ones you confessed at forgiven and the ones you forgot are not.  ALL of them are forgiven.

If you remember things along the way, by all means confess them the next time you go to confession.

The confessional may a tribunal in which you are both the prosecuting attorney and simultaneously the accused, but it is not a torture chamber.  I am not saying that you should be easy on yourself.  Examine your conscience and be tough and exacting.  When making your confession, do your best, be clear, precise and hide nothing.   But don’t torment yourself in doubts about vague memories.  If you are not sure about whether you have confessed something in the past or not, something that comes to your memory and you are just not sure about, then tell the priest exactly that: you remembered something and you aren’t sure that you confessed it and then just say what it is.  You don’t have to go into long detailed explanations.  Just say it and move on.

And everyone out there reading this…

GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

An encouraging website

I saw at Rorate a great post about the beautiful page of the FSSP’s seminary in Wigratzbad. It is in French, but you will

Great new blog: Wigratzbad seminary

The European seminary of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP), the Seminary of Saint Peter in Wigratzbad, in the Bavarian Swabia, has a new page in French, a blog on the daily activities of the formation house.

We heartily recommend visiting it for frequent updates, and we also recommend it to those thinking about a vocation in this great Fraternity.

While I think that the real reforms will come when more diocesan priests are shouldering the load, I am all for – even more than ever – the good work of the FSSP.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, SSPX | Tagged , ,
2 Comments