Daily Archives: 17 September 2006

Prof. Adel Theodor Khoury & Pope Benedict

I have read in the ENGLISH language converage that the German expert on Islam mentioned by the Pope during his Regensburg Address, Prof. Adel Theodor Khoury, distanced himself from the Pope’s remarks.  However, if you read the story, he didn’t … Continue reading

FacebookEmailPinterestGoogle GmailShare/Bookmark
Posted in SESSIUNCULA | 3 Comments

Civilized dialogue: The Regensburg Address

In the older, traditional calendar of the Roman Church, used usually with celebrations of Holy Mass with the 1962 Missale Romanum today is also the feast of the Impression of the Stigmata on St. Francis. The feast has brought … Continue reading

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | 4 Comments

The Holy See’s first encounter with Islamic terror

The first modern experience the Holy See had with Islamic terror was in St. Peter’s square on 13 May 1981. 
The Soviets wanted JP2 dead.  They asked the Bulgarians to help and they found someone predisposed to shoot a Pope: … Continue reading

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Comments Off

Benedict did not grovel during his Angelus address

The Holy Father gave his Angelus address today at Castlegandolfo. At the beginning he departed from his text many times to console those present who were being treated to heavy rain. The press reacted instantly, stating that the Pope apologized. … Continue reading

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | 12 Comments

24th Sunday of Ordinary Time: POST COMMUNION (1)

EXCERPT:
The vocabulary of our prayer today is very dense, and so our English translation will suffer if we try to come up with one-to-one equivalents for the Latin elements. For example, the word sensus has great weight. It means more than simply “sense”. Even in a non-theological source such as the preferred Latin Dictionary of fame we find that sensus carries meaning beyond what we might perceive by the five physical senses of the body or by the perceiving powers of the mind. It points to that which is common to all human beings, “common sense”. This not the “common sense” which we might have (or lack) in, for example, not standing too close with our back to the lions’ cage when posing for a photo. This is also not the Kantian a priori principle of every judgment of taste, the Kantian term for the so-called subjective principle which determines only by feeling rather than concepts, though nonetheless with universal validity, what is liked or disliked by all people. It is not quite the ancient Greek idea of koine aisthesis according to the Aristotle (De anima – II,6, 418a17-20) which applies to our capacities of perceiving objects through more than one sense. Aristotle suggests a “common sense” power by which we perceive things. Medieval Aristotelians suggest that sensus communis is the root and origin of all sensing. Thus we are able to hear the roar, feel the bite and then see the shaggy mane and realize that it is the one and the same lion gnawing us as he drags our leg into the cage … when we lack the other sort of common sense. So, we might say that this is the power of uniting mentally the impressions conveyed by the five physical senses which constitutes ordinary understanding, without which one is foolish or insane and thus prone to lack common sense.
Continue reading

Posted in SESSIUNCULA, WDTPRS | Comments Off