What Does The Prayer Really Say?
W D T P R S

In The Criterion of the Archdiocese of Indianapolis we find a good response to the embarrassing letter from a priest columnist for the Catholic News Service, which the Catholic News Service – operated by the US Bishops, then distributed to publications far and wide, rather like the legendary feathers St. Philip Neri spoke about.

I treated the scandalous article here.  As I said before, it was "as mendacious as it is rude."

Folks, it is necessary to stand up to bullies.  Therefore enjoy the following, with my emphases and comments.

Be Our Guest / Msgr. Joseph F. Schaedel
Traditional Latin Mass has a devoted following in Archdiocese of Indianapolis

Controversy has been swirling like incense ever since Catholic News Service published a recent column about the pre-Vatican II Latin Mass by Father Peter J. Daly. The column also appeared in the Aug. 17 issue of The Criterion.

Internet weblogs (“blogs”) are full of criticism. [hmmm… who could he be talking about?] There are accusations that Father Daly’s account of a neighboring pastor who offers the traditional Latin Mass are inaccurate, and were mentioned without that pastor’s approval. Now the two pastors are in a snit; one wants to drag an auxiliary bishop into the fray. These blogs read like soap operas.

The Aug. 24 issue of The Criterion featured letters from readers critical of Father Daly’s column. Two writers mentioned the beautiful celebration of the traditional Latin Mass at Our Lady of the Most Holy Rosary Church in Indianapolis.

As pastor of Holy Rosary Parish, along with our associate pastor, Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter Father Michael Magiera, I can say that we are grateful and proud.  [Here we go!]

As vicar general of the archdiocese [This fellow is the VG!] and as pastor of a parish that has offered the traditional Latin Mass along with the Novus Ordo (post-Vatican II) Mass for nearly 10 years, I can only say that my observations and experiences are not the same as Father Daly’s.

We are one, unified parish. We are growing; we are getting “younger.” I would have to say that his statements about the “old Mass,” and how and why it is celebrated the way it is, are simply misleading.

Yet, there are more important points to be made from this controversy.

To begin with, Catholic News Service is operated by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. [This is the point I hit hard in my fisk of Fr. Daly’s article.] It is certainly inappropriate for any columnist—particularly a priest—to use CNS as a forum to vent about or to second-guess a recent decision made by the Holy Father.  [Right!]

Accompanying the pope’s moto proprio on the use of the Roman liturgy prior to the reform of 1970 is a letter addressed to the bishops. The second paragraph of his letter comments about the confusion created by “news reports and judgments made without sufficient information.”

Later on, in the same letter, Pope Benedict XVI comments on his personal experience with the hopes and confusion that often followed the reform of the liturgy. It is also clear that the pope only issued this directive after long, prayerful consideration and consultation. Before ending his letter, the Holy Father asks that three years into the moto proprio the bishops should “send to the Holy See an account of your experiences.”

The moto proprio takes effect on Sept. 14. No one is in a position to second-guess the decision before it even takes effect, much less to criticize it simply based on very limited (and evidently flawed) personal experience or personal preference.

I believe that the pope is genuinely interested in unity with those inside or outside the Church who have been alienated over authorized or unauthorized changes in the liturgy. To ram one’s opinions (liturgical or otherwise) down people’s throats as Father Daly did in his column hardly seems “in the Spirit of Vatican II.”  [Well put… and it was abetted by CNS.]

More importantly, take into account the Holy Father’s sense that people long for the “sacred” and transcendent in the liturgy.

More than 12 years ago, the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin spoke at the annual meeting of the National Federation of Priests’ Councils in San Diego. In soaring imagery, Cardinal Bernardin reminded priests that they are to be “bearers of the mystery of God.”

As the late prelate acknowledged a crisis of confidence and confusion among priests then (and today), he exhorted priests to embrace the role as “bearers of Sacred Symbols … who draw others to God’s love in Christ.”  [Are you enjoying this?  The author is using the late Card. Bernardin in defense of the older form of Mass.]

Particularly in today’s world, people long for that sense of mystery. The liturgy enables us to enter through Jesus Christ into the Mystery Who is God. Pope Benedict XVI must be keenly aware of this; he has a worldwide perspective on the life of the Church.

On the Feast of the Assumption, Aug. 15, Bishop Salvatore Matano of the Diocese of Burlington, Vt., offered the pre-Vatican II Latin Mass (“The Extraordinary Rite of the Eucharist”) in St. Joseph Co-Cathedral.

The church was packed with people of all ages. Bishop Matano commented, “And if this is what it takes to fill our churches, so be it!”

I am not yet convinced that the recent moto proprio will be what it takes to fill our churches.

But my own experience makes me certain that Father Daly was wrong when he wrote: “But almost nobody will come.”

He and others who jump to the same conclusions need to “wake up and smell the incense.”

(Msgr. Joseph F. Schaedel is vicar general of the archdiocese and pastor of Our Lady of the Most Holy Rosary Parish in Indianapolis.) 

Good work, Monsignor.

Okay… is there a graphic artist out there who can help with a project?

I think we need an image of a smoking thurible, perhaps swung in the hand of a bishop with a big gaudy ring at a nice altar with altar cards, with the caption "Wake up and smell the incense!"

We can have T-shirts and coffee mugs sent to some select priests and prelates.

The Archbishop of Cincinnati, Most Reverend Daniel E. Pilarczyk, has issued his statement and his norms regarding the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum.

Here is the cover letter.

My emphases and comments.

September 5, 2007
 
Dear Father,
 
            I am certain that you have heard or read about the Motu Proprio, Summorum Pontificum, recently promulgated by the Holy Father, allowing for the more general celebration of Mass according to the 1962 Roman Missal.   Previously, permission was required by the diocesan bishop for the celebration of the preconciliar liturgy.  Now, priests, after meeting certain requirements and certain conditions, [Here is the open salvo.] may celebrate Mass according to the 1962 Missal without the permission of the local ordinary.  
 
            As the chief liturgist [A distinct element of The Party Line.] of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati, it is my responsibility to ensure that fidelity to the liturgical rites [Which also include making sure there are no abuses of rubics in the Novus Ordo, there are no improper uses of Form III for penance, etc.] of the Church is maintained.  Therefore, I am attaching norms for the celebration of Mass according to the 1962 Roman Missal.  It is imperative that priests understand that this form of celebration is the extraordinary form and should not be construed as an option equal [I think this is a misinterpretation.  There are two uses of the Roman Rite.  I don’t think "extraordinary" implies "inequality".] to the  ordinary form of Mass according to the Roman Missal in use since 1970 (current Missal).   After meeting the conditions outlined in the attached document, [We must look at these, below.] priests may privately celebrate the extraordinary form, and under certain pastoral situations, publicly celebrate it; however, the ordinary form of the Mass is the primary and normal way of celebrating Mass. 
 
            It is my expectation that the attached norms be diligently followed.  The Worship Office will assist priests in their understanding of the norms and provide further information as needed.  While the effective date for the Motu Proprio is Sept. 14, 2007, the conditions set by the Holy Father and by me, as Archbishop, are to be met prior to any celebration of the extraordinary form of Mass.   If you are already receiving requests for the preconciliar liturgy, know that there are two parishes, Sacred Heart, Cincinnati and Our Lady of the Rosary, Dayton, that already celebrate Mass according to the 1962 Roman Missal.  
 
            May God continue to bless you abundantly in your ministry.
 
Sincerely yours in Christ,
Most Reverend Daniel E. Pilarczyk,
Archbishop of Cincinnati

I find the tone of this statement to be very lofty indeed, even a little menancing. 

Let’s see the norms.

My emphases (some also in the original for headings) and comments.

Norms for the implementation of the
Apostolic Letter in the form of motu proprio –
Summorum Pontificum

Archdiocese of Cincinnati

    August, 2007

   
Introduction:   The Holy Father, in reaching out to Catholics who have “an attachment to the preconciliar liturgical forms” (BCL Newsletter, May/June 2007), expanded the use of these liturgical forms through his recent Motu Proprio, Summorum Pontificum.   Summorum Pontificum holds the weight of law and takes effect on September 14, 2007.  The most significant change outlined in this apostolic letter is that permission by the diocesan bishop [I find it interesting that this is the "most significant change".] is no longer needed in order for priests to celebrate Mass according to the 1962 Roman Missal (preconciliar liturgy).  However, the Holy Father laid down several conditions in his Motu Proprio which must be met in order for the celebration of Mass according to the 1962 Roman Missal to occur.  Additionally, as chief liturgist [The Party Line] of the diocese, it is the local ordinary’s responsibility to ensure that liturgical norms [whose?] are followed whether Mass is celebrated according to the ordinary form (current Roman Missal) or the extraordinary form (1962 Roman Missal).  If a priest desires to celebrate the extraordinary form of Mass in the Archdiocese of Cincinnati he must meet the following conditions:

     Conditions:

1)         A priest may celebrate the extraordinary form of Mass (according to the 1962 Roman Missal) privately if:
a)         He demonstrates a sufficient knowledge and facility of the Latin language.  (Summorum Pontificum, [SP], Art. 5.4)  [Much will depend on what "sufficient" means.  The outstanding canonist His Eminence Edward Card. Egan explained that the word idoenus indicates an ability to pronounce the words properly.  It does not mean expertise.  Note carefully that what His Excellency wrote here is NOT what Art. 5.4 really says.  5.4 actually says: "Sacerdotes Missali B. Ioannis XXIII utentes, idonei esse debent ac iure non impediti. ... Priests using the Missal of Bl. John XXIII, ought to be capable and not impeded by law."  No one disputes that it is best that a priest know Latin well, but this article should not be forced to say something it does not say.]

b)         He demonstrates a sufficient ability to observe the rubrics of the 1962 Roman Missal.  (SP, Art. 5.4) [See above.]
c)         He demonstrates such abilities before a committee established by the Archbishop. [Nobody expected the Cincinnati Inquisition!  Let the intimidation begin!]

NB:     While Summorum Pontificum allows the priest to celebrate the extraordinary form of Mass without the permission of the Ordinary, the Ordinary has the responsibility to see that all liturgy is celebrated in the proper manner and worthily;  this is why showing competency is required.  [Will there be such a committee to test priests who use the Novus Ordo?  If not, then this might constitute an unreasonable double-standard.]

NB:     Frs. Giles Pater, [who was at St. John Fischer in Newtown, OH, which does not have the older Mass] David Robisch,  [who at least was at St. Mary’s in Hyde Park, OH, which does not seem to have the older form of Mass on the schedule.] and Timothy Kallaher [who has an MA in Latin from Xavier Univ.] have agreed to serve on the committee to certify that a priest has demonstrated the ability to celebrate in the extraordinary form.  Priests interested in the extraordinary form should contact a member of the committee with any questions.  [NB: there are two parishes in this Archdiocese where the older Mass is celebrated.  It does not seem, from what I can dig up, that these three priests have anything to do with those celebrations or parishes.  I may be entirely wrong about this, of course.]       

NB:     A private Mass is one that is not publicized.  The faithful may attend this Mass if they, “of their own free will,” ask to do so.  (SP, Art. 4) Additionally, it is expected that at least one person is present as a server. The extraordinary form may be celebrated privately at anytime except during the Sacred Triduum.  (SP, Art. 2)

2)         A priest may celebrate the extraordinary form of Mass (according to the 1962 Roman Missal) publicly if:
     
a) “In parishes, where there is a stable group [here is the point of attack] of faithful who adhere to the earlier liturgical tradition” the members of this group request for him to do so. (SP, Art. 5.1)
     

NB:     A “stable group of faithful” means a significant number [No, it does not.  The word in the Latin is coetus.  There is NO implication in coetus that the number must be "significant", that is, "large".  A coetus can be very small.  The Motu Proprio does not require a minimum number.  To impose one would be outside the provisions of the Holy Father.] of the faithful who have been celebrating this form regularly, or who have been desirous of this form over the years, [Does this also improperly impose a length of time the coetus has been around?  It sure sounds like it.] and who of their own free will requested the extraordinary form of Mass.   Such a Mass may be publicized only if a “stable group” has requested that the extraordinary form be celebrated.  A priest, on his own, may not simply decide to publicly celebrate the extraordinary formwithout such a “stable group.”  [Remember that the priest himself can be part of the coetus and, truly, a coetus can be quite small.]

b)         He meets the qualifications laid out above (1a, 1b, 1c).

NB:     If a priest is unable to meet the request of the group because he does not meet the conditions required to celebrate the extraordinary form of the Mass, he should recommend them to a parish where it is already being celebrated.  (cf. SP, Art. 5.1) [This is NOT what Art. 5.1 says.  Go look.]  Currently, there are two parishes in the Archdiocese of Cincinnati that celebrate the extraordinary form of Mass:  Sacred Heart, Camp Washington, and Our Lady of the Rosary, Dayton.

NB:     In order to have an updated list of parishes where the extraordinary form of the Mass is being celebrated, pastors are asked to inform the Worship Office if they provide regular extraordinary form celebrations.  [That is entirely reasonable.]

NB:     The names of the priests who have been certified by the committee mentioned above will be made public so that these priests will be available to celebrate in this extraordinary form if local priests are not available.  [Hmmm[]... und if your name iz not on zee list, und you are caught saying zat Mass?? ] 3) The extraordinary form of Mass may be celebrated on Sundays only if the following conditions are met:

a)         A stable group of faithful have made such a request.

b)         Only one such Mass is celebrated.   It is not the intention of Summorum Pontificum to arbitrarily [?] take one of the current Sunday Masses and substitute Mass in the extraordinary form merely for the sake of variety.  [What a strange thing to say.]                       

c)         The priest celebrant meets all of the qualifications laid out above (1a, 1b, 1c).

4)         If the extraordinary form of Mass is celebrated, the liturgy is celebrated according to the calendar and Lectionary of the 1962 Roman Missal. However, “in Masses celebrated in the presence of the people in accordance with the Missal of Bl. John XXIII (1962 Roman Missal), the readings may be given in the vernacular using approved texts.”  (SP, Art. 6)

5)         The celebration of the sacraments in the extraordinary form may take place if:

a)         The celebrant has demonstrated the ability to do so.  He must meet the same qualifications as laid out in 1a, 1b, 1c.

b)         The faithful request such sacramental celebrations (i.e. Baptism, Marriage, Penance, and Anointing of the Sick) to be celebrated in the extraordinary form of the sacraments. (SP, Art. 5.3)

c)         The pastor has granted permission after attentively examining the various ramifications [?] of such celebrations.  (SP, Art. 9.1)
For further study and information, a [flawed] translation of the text of the Motu Proprio, along with the accompanying letter of the Holy Father can be found at the Bishops’ Committee on the Liturgy (BCL) website: www.usccb.org/liturgy.  Additionally, the May/June 2007 BCL Newsletter was dedicated to providing information regarding the interpretation and implementation of the Motu Proprio.  This newsletter can also be found on the same website.

Time and more information will allow us to see if these norms simply step on the toes of the provisions in Summorum Pontificum or if they actually grind a heal into the whole foot.

Much will depend on the men chosen as Archdiocesan Inquisitors who will sit on judgment of priests who show any interest in the older Mass.  If this isn’t an tactic of sheer intimidation, and I really hope it is not intended that way, will those priests be in a position by background or inclination to render a reasonable judgment?

I don’t want to prejudge the men selected for the committee.  I am sure they are sound and dedicated priests with great love of the older form of liturgy and who will be friendly toward all those who need to be examined.  This committee has no track record yet.

The question remains of the double-standard: Will all priests be subjected to inquisitions to see if they are following the rubrics or are sufficiently capable with the English language?  How about foreign priests working in the area?  When certified will they be given an Ausweis?

Also, if there is such strict liturgical oversight now, are there now or will there persist, say, improper celebrations of the sacrament of penance with Form III (so-called "general absolution")?  

I am just musing about the wider implications.

Here is a very interesting story from The Times of India.  The article is very poorly written, but it is interesting.

My emphases and comments. 

Gibson constructing $37m church
5 Sep 2007

 The Roman Catholic Church does not recognise Gibson’s secretive sect because it does not acknowledge the authority of the Pope or the Vatican, and rejects the universally accepted [?] teachings of the Second Vatican Council.


Beleaguered actor-director Mel Gibson has reportedly donated 10 million dollars for the construction of a controversial private church in the Malibu hills, in order to promote his contentious sect.

A federal tax filing reveals that Gibson has donated a huge amount of money to his Holy Family Catholic Church, situated in the secluded Agoura Hills. The church now has 37 million dollars in its coffers, up from 27 million dollars last year, shows the document.

[I guess there was no editor working at the paper today.  Does the following sound familiar?] The Roman Catholic Church does not recognise Gibson’s secretive sect because it does not acknowledge the authority of the Pope or the Vatican, and rejects the universally accepted teachings of the Second Vatican Council.

Gibson’s church follows an antiquated ideology of Catholicism dating back to the 16th century. Its female followers have to abide by a strict dress code, needing them to wear veils over their hair and long skirts. Women are banned from wearing pants.  [Like the Taliban, right?]

Currently, the existing chapel has a seating capacity for only 100 people.

The new church located at a place 400 metres higher from the current building will be able to accommodate about 400 people, when it is completed in the next 12 months, reports the website news.co.au. [More great reporting.]

A construction company owned by Gibson is constructing the high-ceilinged church in the architectural style of an old-fashioned Spanish mission.

Federal tax records enlist Gibson and his wife Robyn as directors of the church, reveal the planning documents obtained by The Daily Telegraph.

Gibson’s Icon Production company offices in the beachside suburb of Santa Monica run the church.

The church has an unlisted phone number, keeps its address a secret, and has asked members of the congregation not to release the information.