o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z lives in Rome, though he is often in the USA. He is available for retreats and conferences. E-mail


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • MINI MOVIE REVIEW: Prince Caspain
  • Prayer request - ordination
  • Am I blue? You'd be too ... were you a Passerina cyanea
  • WDTPRS: Trinity Sunday
  • Octave of Pentecost PODCAzTs
  • PODCAzT 60: Pentecost customs; St. Ambrose on the dew of the Holy Spirit
  • Let's get the famous quote right, please?
  • New Sabine guest! Oooo ... look at the colors

  • Recent Comments:

    • porys: + (it means I join to the preyers)
    • elizabeth mckernan: Some of these comments remind me of the old joke:- = Where did you get the idea for your new...
    • Mark M: Gosh; doesn’t sound like the book! Father: if you want the definitive Chronicles of Narnia, then watch...
    • GOR: Great pictures Father! Yes, the Cowbirds are unfazed by any other visitors and if you get a few of them at once,...
    • boredoftheworld: Classically, I can handle my kids watching pg-13 violence, but not pg-13 sex; you liberals will have...

  • Visit the new WDTPRS Store!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Click below and vote !My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!


    Calendar

    September 2007
    S M T W T F S
    « Aug   Oct »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30  

    The Pilgrimage

    Subscribe to ...
    The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK






    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent


    Thanks for the support!


























    WINNER of...

    The 2007 Weblog Awards

















    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner

    28 September 2007

    Where are you?

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 8:27 am

    It has been a while since I’ve posted one of these "where are you" entries.  Here is a snapshot of the last few minutes.   These places are not precise.  Someone living in St. Ipsidipsy might actually be registered on the internet backbone through Black Duck, or Tall Tree, if you get what I mean.

    Here we go!

    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Binghamton, New York
    Woodstock, Georgia
    Vancouver, Washington
    Auburn University, Alabama
    Munro, Buenos Aires
    Tallahassee, Florida
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Canton, Ohio
    Staten Island, New York
    Nottingham
    Irving, Texas
    Nashville, Tennessee
    London, Lambeth
    Notre Dame, Indiana
    Saint Paul, Minnesota
    Jakarta, Jawa Barat
    Berkeley, California    
    Roma, Lazio  [PONTIFICIO COLLEGIO AMERICANO DEL NORD ter Network]
    Emmitsburg, Maryland  [Mount St. Mary Seminary?]
    La Storta, Lazio
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Plaistow, West Sussex
    Quezon City
    Gladwyne, Pennsylvania
    Holzgerlingen, Baden-Wu…
    Saint Peters, Missouri
    Grand Rapids, Michigan
    Los Angeles, California
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Paulo, Maranhao
    Leatherhead, Bromley
    Pharr, Texas
    Moorhead, Minnesota
    Colfax, Indiana
    Johnston, Iowa
    Geneva, Geneve
    Poughkeepsie, New York
    Saginaw, Michigan
    Detroit, Michigan
    Arlington, Virginia
    Saint Louis, Missouri [Kendrick-Glennon Seminary?]
    Saint Paul, Minnesota [Univ. of St. Thomas…. St. Paul Seminary?]
    Leeds
    Hyde Park, Massachusetts
    Philipsburg, La Massana
    Wisconsin Rapids, Wisco…
    Bend, Oregon
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Toronto, Ontario
    San Antonio, Texas
    Stamford, Connecticut
    Merrill, Wisconsin
    Stockholm, Stockholms Lan
    Midlothian, Virginia
    Gibson, Tennessee
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Anderson, South Carolina
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Madrid  
    Bloomfield Hills, Michi…
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    Blacklick, Ohio
    Groesbeek, Gelderland
    Iowa City, Iowa
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    South Hadley, Massachus…
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Palo Alto, California
    North Little Rock, Arka…
    Daytona Beach, Florida
    Mankato, Minnesota
    Leavenworth, Kansas
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Preston, Washington
    Columbus, Ohio [Josephinum?]
    Hyattsville, Maryland
    Philadelphia, Pennsylva… [St Charles Borromeo Seminary?]
    New Haven, Connecticut
    Tampa, Florida
    Bethlehem, Georgia
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    Newton Junction, New Ha…
    Winnipeg, Manitoba
    West Chester, Ohio
    Silver Spring, Maryland
    Philippine, Benguet
    Columbia, South Carolina
    Naples, Florida
    Seattle, Washington
    Dublin
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    San Jose, California
    Saint John, New Brunswick
    Washington, District of…
    Celina, Ohio
    Alexandria, Virginia
    Damascus, Maryland
    Fayetteville, Georgia
    Emmitsburg, Maryland
    Bethesda, Maryland
    Royal Oak, Michigan
    Richmond, Virginia
    Singapore, Dakar
    Indian Trail, North Car…
    Holzgerlingen, Baden-Wu…
    Des Plaines, Illinois
    Eccles, Trafford
    Richardson, Texas
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    Kista, Stockholms Lan
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida
    Emmitsburg, Maryland
    Ithaca, New York
    Front Royal, Virginia
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    [Mt. St. Mary of the West Seminary?]
    Chestnut Hill, Massachu…
    Johnstown, Pennsylvania
    My special greetings go out to seminarians reading the blog!
       
    • • • • • •

    German Bishops issue guidelines for Summorum Pontificum

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 7:25 am

    The Bishops of Germany have issued a statement about the implementation of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum.  It is available at kreuz.net.

    The following translation is from cathcon.

    My emphases and comments.

        Guidelines of the German Bishops for the Traditional Latin Mass

        1. The possibility for the celebration of Mass in the extraordinary form must be carried forward under the leadership of the Bishop [I believe that in parishes it is the pastor, the parish priest, who makes the determination.  At least that is what SP 5.1 says.] by the principle of harmony between the interests and well-being of the Faithful making the request and the orderly care of souls. The permission of the extraordinary form may not reinforce existing tensions or cause new division (see Summorum Pontificum Article 5 § 1).  [Consider this: tensions and divisions are aggravated even more by not responding favorably to petitions from the faithful for the older form of Mass, to which it would now seem people have a right to enjoy as a legitimate and venerable use of the one Roman Rite.]

    2. The ordinary form of the celebration of Mass is using the Missale Romanum 1970 (in the version of the Editio typica tertia 2002 and – up to the appearance of the German issue of the 3rd Edition – `the Missal for the Dioceses of the German speaking areas’ 2. 1988 Edition). For the extraordinary form of the celebration of Mass, the Missale Romanum 1962 (e.g. Editio juxta typicam Regensburg 1962, with Diocesan propers ) is to be used (see Summorum Pontificum Article 1).

        3. The Parish Mass is to be celebrated in the ordinary form. On Sundays, one Mass in the extraordinary form, in addition can be celebrated, not however replacing the Mass in the ordinary form (see Summorum Pontificum Article 5 § 2).

        4. The request for permission [odd phrase: "Den Antrag auf Genehmigung"] (in accordance with Summorum Pontificum Article 5 § 1) by groups of laymen (see Summorum Pontificum Article 7) can be made to the Parish Priest within a Parish and/or within a Parish organisation or a pastoral unit, which is the responsibility of a Parish Priest. If groups, however, consist of members of different Parishes and/or a Parish organisations or pastoral units, the request is to be addressed to the Diocesan bishop. [I know I have used this phrase before, but it seems especially appropriate now: "AUSWEIS, BITTE!"  How is this going to be confirmed?  Will people need to produce identification?]

        5. About the kind and size of the groups making the request, nothing is laid down, in order to be able to respond to the local conditions appropriately.  [At last some common sense about this.]

        6. The necessary suitability of the priests [Here we go!] for the celebration in the extraordinary form of the rite (see SP Article 5 § 4) is covered by the following requirements:

        – General suitability, which each priest must possess;  [This means that he has faculties and he is not impeded by law from saying Mass, etc.]

        – Acceptance of the whole liturgy of the Church in their ordinary and extraordinary forms (see accompanying letters of Pope Benedict XVI.);  [Not sure how this will be determined.  Will priests be required to sign an adhaesio fidei?]

        – Familiarity with the extraordinary form of the Rite;

        – Understanding of Latin. [How much?]

        The Diocesan Bishops will make, as required, provision available for continuing and further training for the acquisition of the familiarity with the extraordinary form of the Rite and for the acquisition of the necessary understanding of the Latin language. [This is pretty good.]

        7. The Parish Priest and/or Rector of a Church is not obliged, even if he possesses the suitability, to celebrate the Missale Romanum 1962. If he believes because of official burdens or for personal reasons that he is unable to meet the wishes of the Faithful, he should turn to the Diocesan bishop. The right of the Faithful in this matter (Summorum Pontificum Article 7) remains unaffected.  [First, this mentions the "right" of the faithful.  That is interesting.  Second, I am not sure that the parish priest doesn’t have some sort of obligation to help people who make petitions.  He might not be able to respond personally, but should take steps to find a priest, time, resources, etc.  If he can’t, then the bishop is on the spot.  Let’s see what Art. 7 says: "Episcopus enixe rogatur ut eorum optatum exaudiat… The Bishop is strenuously asked that he graciously grant their desire." This looks like a pretty serious point.  It is even stronger language than that used for how the parish priest should react to petitions.  The point is that people have a right to the older form and clergy have some sort of obligation to respond.]

        8. The Calendar and order of readings of the Missale Romanum 1962 should be used for the celebration of Mass in the extraordinary form 1962. Attention should be given to the already announced extensions after a period of time of the Calender through the Ecclesia Dei Commission.  [This seems to be saying that while the old calendar is to be followed, there can be some room for adjustments.]

        For the reading of the readings in the vernacular (see Summorum Pontificum Article 6) the Perikopes are to be extracted from the recognised lectionary of the Missal for the Dioceses of the German speaking areas of 1988[!  A post-Conciliar book.  Apparently you look up the readings in the index.] Alternatively, the Schott of 1962 can be used.  [Surely that is what they will choose.]

        [CORRECTED TRANSLATION] 9. The German Diocesan Bishops will make no use of their right to erect personal parishes for the extraordinary form of the roman Rite for the time being. (Summorum Pontificum Article 10)  [THIS IS VERY BAD!]

        10. As the basis the report envisaged after three years over the experiences with the regulations of the Motu Proprio (see Accompanying Letter of Pope Benedict XVI.) the Parish Priest and/or the Rector, if he gives permission [Right… it is the pastor who does this.  Though this includes also rector.  That is interesting.] for the Mass celebration in the extraordinary form in his Parish and/or Church must make a report to the Diocesan Bishop. Parish Priests and Rectors, in whose Parishes and/or Churches Mass celebrations in the extraordinary form take place, must inform the Diocesan Bishops on a continuous basis about any development[I guess that is reasonable.]

    The only real problem here that I see is how they think they will control which parish people go to or participate in.

    I am also disappointed to see that they are not considering "personal parishes".  Let’s hope some of the German bishops won’t stick to this.

    • • • • • •
    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress