I picked up this disturbing story from Damian Thompson. I don’t know all the details, but what I read was rather alarming.
My emphases and comments.
The suppression of a Latin-loving parish
Saturday, August 9, 2008, 12:45 PM GMT
I have been passed some correspondence which tells the shocking story of the apparent suppression of a traditionalist Catholic parish in the diocese of Leeds.
The New Mass being celebrated at St John the Evangelist
One hundred parishioners of St John the Evangelist, Allerton Bywater, have petitioned their bishop, the Rt Rev Arthur Roche, to allow the parish to celebrate Mass only in Latin, in both the old and new forms. [Priests don’t need permission to use the Latin books of the Latin Rite in either the post-Conciliar form of the Mass and sacraments or the pre-Conciliar.] Instead, he is closing the church this month and has told the parish priest, Fr Mark Lawler, that he will not be appointed to a new parish because his ministry is "divisive". [I must caution that we don’t know the whole story here. But it this is simply over the issue of language, this would be pretty shocking.]
Fr Lawler told me today: "This is a parish that does exactly what the Holy Father tells us to do, celebrating the Mass reverently in the old and new forms. The bishop is determined to squash it, and to destroy me because he doesn’t want me moving to another parish and doing the same thing."
The parish pastoral council has written to Bishop Roche asking why he has ignored its two formal petitions for the status of a "personal parish" celebrating Mass only in Latin, in accordance with Article 10 of Summorum Pontificum, Pope Benedict’s apostolic letter liberating the traditional Latin Mass.
It has now retained the services of a leading canon lawyer to challenge Bishop Roche’s decision to close the parish as part of a wider programme of closures. [So, apparently this is not only about the use of Latin.]
Relations between Bishop Roche and Fr Lawler have been strained for years. The bishop told Fr Lawler some time ago that he wanted him to say Mass facing the people, and that because he had told him what to do it was therefore the will of the Holy Spirit. [?]
Pope Benedict, in contrast, has written at length defending the ancient practice of celebrating the Eucharist facing east. He has also given priests the legal right to celebrate a public Mass in the traditional rite if they are approached by a stable group of the faithful, however small. [Even if they are not approached by a group.] At St John’s, the vast majority of regular worshippers have asked for the old rite to be made available. ["vast majority"? My!] On August 17, their church will be closed by the diocese.
Fr Lawler says he asked for a meeting with Bishop Roche, but to no avail. Instead, the Vicar General, one Mgr McQuinn, has written to him, telling him: "The Bishop … believes your ministry to be divisive, is uncertain that ordinary pastoral care of parishioners is taking place and does not have confidence that you will celebrate the Ordinary Form of the Mass with a generous heart for the vast majority of parishioners who expect Sunday and weekday Masses to be in English and at an altar facing the people." [And if people wanted him to wear clown makeup and say Mass on a unicycle would he have to do that? Saying Mass ad orientem is perfectly legitimate. And I note the phrase "generous heart".]
In an open letter to his parishioners, Fr Lawler describes this claim as "a slur on my character, an attack upon my priesthood and totally without foundation."
Clearly, this matter must now go to Rome. Perhaps the pontifical commission Ecclesia Dei might be persuaded to take a closer look at the scandal unfolding in Allerton Bywater.
I don’t know all the details, as I mentioned above, and these situations are usually rather complicated. However, this is an opportuity to remin everyone that according to Summorum Pontificum pastors are within their rights to celebrated the older form of Mass for their people. According to the 1983 Code of Canon Law they can celebrate Holy Mass in Latin to any degree they think proper. According to the rubrics in the Missale Romanum and the long tradition of the Church, not to mention sound theology and common sense, they can celebrate Mass ad orientem. Of course we wouldn’t want priests simply imposing things on groups of people who, over a long period of time, simply don’t want it and resist it, thus leading to divisions and problems. However, people who would resist such things are a) few and b) educable and c) … did I mention few?
However, at the same time as we all know about the Latin thing, the old Mass and ad orientem worship, we also know that priests can win this battle and that, and that bishops have a thousand ways to crucify a priest, for whatever reason it pleases them to do so.
And so, I repeat one of the most important things about Summorum Pontificum. It was one of the first documents we have seen in the modern era which stressed the rights of priests.
And that, friends, is one reason why some will resist it.