o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is also Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the (now dormant) ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z is available for retreats and conferences.

* E-MAIL
* TWITTER: @fatherz
LOGIN or REGISTER




VOTE!

My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • Off to another point on the list
  • Vote on Stupak Amendment
  • Show tonight!
  • Bp. Donald "Ineffable" Trautman's jihad against the new translation [Fr. Z POLL]
  • Seminary TLM training? A shout to seminarians!
  • Congressional Dems paying attention to Catholic Bishops
  • Bp. James D. Conley on Health Care Reform
  • "INEFFABLE" ALERT!

  • Recent Comments:

    • Vote on Stupak Amendment (15)
      • Francisco Cojuanco: Ladies and gentlemen, the Stupak Amendment has passed, 240 Yeas, 194 Nays, 1 (John Shadegg...
      • wanda: House approves Stupak Amendment. I take it as a good and I give thanks for our Bishop’s strong stand on...
      • GScheid: Like to see a list of so called Catholics who voted against the amendment tonight–Kennedy, Pelosi?...
      • Fr Martin Fox: If an amendment is offered to deal with the abortion-funding problem, then we must support it if it...
      • DisturbedMary: It’s 7:30. We are past the Stupack amendment. The so-called pro-life Democrats compromised. They...
    • Bp. Donald “Ineffable” Trautman’s jihad against the new translation [Fr. Z POLL] (42)
      • Andy F.: I don’t think His Excellency was being pastoral when he used the word “incomprehensible.” ;...
      • JosephMary: ‘Bishop Trautman says, “If the Roman Missal does not speak to our culture, the church in the...
    • Off to another point on the list (6)
      • Suburbanbanshee: Re: More portrait I didn’t know that, either! And even the little picture you’ve posted...
      • Fr. John Zuhlsdorf: Rachel: Yes it is here! It is one of the reasons why I went. You would not believe what it is...
      • GregH: St Vincent Ferrer is probably the best church in America. Just ask Matt of the Holy Whapping.

  • The Z-Cam in the Sabine Chapel is ON AIR!Z-Cam and Radio Sabina: LIVE

    Visit the WDTPRS Stores!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Calendar



    Subscribe to ... The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK





    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent

    Thanks for the support!

    2009 Catholic New Media Awards Winner

    * Best Blog by a Cleric
    * Best Written Blog
    * Most Informative Blog
    * People's Choice Blog
    * Best Podcast by a Cleric
    * Best Podcast by a Man
    * Best Podcast by a Religious
    * Best Produced Podcast
    * Best Video Podcast
    * Funniest Podcast
    * Most Entertaining Podcast
    * Most Informative Podcast
    * Most Spiritual Podcast
    * People's Choice Podcast
    * Best Overall Catholic Website


    2008 Weblog Awards Winner

    2007 Weblog Awards Winner



    * Best Apologetic Blog
    * Best blog by Clergy
    * Best Individual Blog
    * Most Informative Blog
    * Best Insider News Blog
    * Smartest Blog
    * Most Spiritual Blog
    * Best Written Blog




    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner

    Fr. Z's Facebook page



    TwitterCounter for

    Where Fr. Z will be:
  • Upcoming Events:
  • Events
  • Buy Fr. Z a cup of coffee!





    Your support makes it possible for me to continue with this blog.




    My November goal...

    free counters



    4 October 2008

    QUAERITUR: Rights of students on campus to TLM under Summorum Pontificum

    CATEGORY: ASK FATHER Question Box — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 7:17 am

    This is in my mailbox.

    Fr. Z,
     
    I am in the midst of a tense situation at a Catholic college, the identity of which I would prefer not to disclose.  The question facing us is: Granting that Summorum Pontificum acknowledges the rights of the faithful to request and to be given access to the usus antiquior, is there any way to derive, out of the document or any authoritative interpretations of it, that this access should primarily take the form of Masses offered on Sundays and possibly other Holy Days of obligation
     
    I ask because there are college chaplaincies that do have the old rite, yet offer it once a week on Tuesdays at 7:30 AM, or on the 3rd Saturday of the month at 1 PM, or other such odd times.  It seems to me that a "stable group of the faithful" who legitimately desire the Extraordinary Form are inherently requesting it for Sunday because that is the Dies Domini, the high point of the Christian week.  For a pastor or chaplain to allow or celebrate the old rite other times is good, certainly, but not really the central point.
     
    Would it depend on what the stable group itself explicitly requests?  I mean, if the group formally requests a Sunday Mass, is that understood to be the Mass that should be given to them in the older usage?  Or, if a pastor or chaplain responds by saying, "Well, I’m fine with a Saturday at 9:00 AM," would there be any grounds for complaint on the part of the group: "Thank you for that opportunity, but we were really looking for a way to fulfill our Sunday obligation with the old rite."?
     
    Finally this comes down to a question: When, or with what circumstances, can the stable group be considered to have been granted that to which its members have a right?  I know some will say this is just a matter of prudence and practicality, but it seems to me that there has got to be some way of getting closer to an essential answer.  Otherwise, it seems either that the stable group could keep demanding all the way to asking for seven days a week, which is quite beyond what is feasible in many contexts right now, OR that the stable group could be denied even a Sunday Mass, as long as a "bone" had been tossed to them on some other day of the week or month.
     
    God Bless,
     
    [please withhold name]

     

    These are questions for the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei and possibly the Council for Legislative Texts.

    First, remember that Summorum Pontificum speaks of stable groups in the context of parishes ... parish priests, pastors, are to respond to stable groups.  Of course it makes sense that if the church isn’t a parish and there is someone other than a pastor, this should apply also.  But that is not what the document says.  Also, while it is pretty clear that a group can be very small, you have to argue that a body of students is "stable".  I think the law would provide that they have some sort of domicile, if they live there.  But I don’t quite understand the status of students at a school.  It might be that "stable" doesn’t apply.

    Second, I think rather than the legal/juridical argument approach, it would be best to try to arrange this through persuasion and relentless charity.  You will probably get farther that way and quicker.  The student who want this should cheerfully wear down those in charge by a kind and good-natured constant "rapping on the judge’s door" as it were, until they relent.  

    Also, it may be that the priests involved don’t know how to say the older form of Mass, or they have too much to do now.  In that case, you need to be creative and get the necessary resources for the priests, including, perhaps a priest from outside willing to come in for a while.  That may involve the bishop’s permission: keep that in mind. 

    Finally, it might be a good idea to contact students and prof at other schools where this cause has already been taken up and worked through.

    Clearly, the spirit of the document aims at helping many groups of people, not just those who are registered parishioners.  Hopefully a sense of charity and goodwill will prevail in your case. 

    Do not neglect getting the students to pray to the guardian angels of those involved, to move them to a better position, including some fasting for their petitions.  You can also pray to St. Joseph, who is a powerful intercessor.

    • • • • • •

    5 Comments »

    1. The issue is being nicely dealt with in Cambridge, UK. Today, Fisher House will start a regular Extraordinary Form Mass: Saturdays, 17:30!

      Details on my blog. Pray for the Chaplain and the students!

      Comment by Levavi — 4 October 2008 @ 9:43 am
    2. There is a Catholic college near my parish about which similar allegations have been made. Though I don’t know the current status of the EF Mass on campus, and while I hope for the best, especially for those students who desire it, in the meantime, I would like to make it known to all students at Benedictine College (you know where you are) that you are most welcome to attend Mass in the EF at St. James Parish in St. Joseph, MO, every Sunday at 1230. It is about a twenty minute drive from your school.

      Comment by Father Totton — 4 October 2008 @ 9:53 am
    3. The practical issue for parish Sunday schedules that are already full and for which scheduling an additional Sunday mass would be a problem for logistical or canonical (trination – why that issue wasn’t address in SP is beyond me, but it would have been helpful for Rome to make a clear universal exception for ritual pastoral purposes) reasons is that in the eyes of many pastors and parishioners, you’d need that stable group to be of a sufficient size to be nearly a majority of the regular attendance of the least-attended mass in order for the substitution of the EF to be as welcomed as those who desire it would probably want it to be. (This appears to be one of the reasons Rome rejected the approach of stipulating the minimum size of a group).

      Comment by Liam — 4 October 2008 @ 10:22 am
    4. This is an interesting question because a group of us in an English university are considering how best to approach our chaplain, whom we are fairly sure is quite anti-SP, about provision of the EF. We’re not quite sure what to do because our chaplaincy is run by one of the mendicant orders so do we approach our local ordinary or the prior provincial in the event that our request is turned down? Moreover, it’s hard to argue that a stable group exists because, of course, students are only ever at the university for about three years. With all these obstacles, and the current state of the Church in England, we are actually quite pessimistic about our chances regardless of how humbly we make our approach. It’s easier to retreat to a twice-monthly EF in the city but that is quite depressing because then we’re back to that old “outside” mentality where we don’t interact with the “parish” on our campus. I will continue to attend the chaplaincy NO (celebrated rubric-lessly), which causes great pain, as well as the local EF because it’s important not to become an EF ghetto.

      Comment by Andrew — 4 October 2008 @ 10:51 am
    5. Father, because most students either intend or in fact reside at their schools for at least three months (September – December & mid January – mid May), they would have at least established a canonical quasi-domicile, meaning that their proper parish priest would be the parish priest of where they live while studying. See CIC canon 107 § 1 (quasi-domicile establishes one’s parish priest along with domicile); id. canon 102 § 2 (intention to reside or in-fact residence for 3 months establishes quasi-domicile).

      Comment by Paul Madrid — 4 October 2008 @ 5:16 pm

    Comments RSS

    Leave a comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress