The improvement of ultrasound technology has probably contributed in many cases to the choice for life rather than death for unborn children.
Juxtapose that to the desire of some politicians and the self-interested in the abortion industry to make sure those abortions increase.
From CMR comes this:
Pro-aborts have decided on their main talking points against recent states’ requirements for ultrasounds to be shown to women before abortions. And it’s a doozy.
Pro-aborts are arguing that ultrasounds are invasive.
One Democrat running for a state seat even went so far as to call the state required ultrasound “rape by instrumentation.”
The media has picked up on this attack as they’ve clearly been ordered to. I’ve seen the term "invasive" used to describe the ultrasounds dozens of times in the past few days.
[Remember this name:] Rep. Betty Reed, a Democrat from Hillsborough County, [Oklahoma] said the ultrasound exam is an invasive procedure that should not be imposed on women.
AFP writes in a news headline:
Oklahoma lawmakers overrode their governor’s veto Tuesday to enact tough abortion laws that force women to undergo invasive ultrasounds and allow doctors to withhold test results showing fetal defects.
Do these people not realize how abortions are done? Suction tubes, forceps, curettes (sharp knives.) And it’s the ultrasound that’s invasive?
You know, I’m starting to think that pro-aborts will pretty much say or do anything to keep women in the dark.