WDTPRS – 4th Ordinary Sunday: Billy loves bugs

bugsToday’s Collect prayer was not in the post-Tridentine editions of the Missale Romanum but it does have its origin in the ancient Veronese Sacramentary.

Were you to hear this prayer intoned in Latin, or at least in an accurate translation, you would be thereby transported back 1500 years to our most Roman of Catholic roots.

Concede nobis, Domine Deus noster,
[et (in Ver.)] te tota mente veneremur,
et omnes homines rationabili diligamus affectu

Lord our God,
help us to love you with all our hearts
and to love all men as you love them.

Is this what the Latin really says?

Grant us, Lord our God,
that we may honour you with all our mind,
and love everyone in truth of heart

Grant us, O Lord our God,
that we may venerate you with our whole mind,
and may love all men with rational good-will

“Affection” just doesn’t cut it for affectus and something more pointed than “love” is needed too.  I came up with “rational good-will”.  We mustn’t reduce all these complicated Latin words to “love”.  Why not?  Note in the prayer the contrast of the themes “reason” and “mood”, the rational with the affective dimension (concerning emotions) of man; in short, the head and the heart.   The fact is, a properly functioning person conducts his life according to both head and heart, feelings under the control of reason and the will.  The terrible wound to our human nature from original sin causes the difficulty we have in governing feelings and appetites by reason and will.

Today’s prayer aims at the totality of a human person: our wholeness is defined by our relationship with God.

We seek to know God so that we may the better love Him and His love drives us all the more to know Him.  Furthermore, possible theological and Scriptural underpinnings of this prayer are Deuteronomy 6 and Jesus’ two-fold command to love God and neighbor: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment.  And a second is like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets” (cf. Matthew 22:36-38; Mark 12:2-31; Luke 10:26-28).  In Deut 6:5-6 we have the great injunction called the Shema from the first Hebrew word, “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD; and you shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might….” Jesus teaches the meaning and expands the concrete application of this command in Deuteronomy 6.

There is no space here for the subtle relationships between the Latin words St. Jerome chose in his translations and the Greek or Hebrew originals of these verses.  Suffice it to say that in the Bible the language about mind, heart, and soul is terrifically complex. However, these words aim at the totality of the person precisely in that dimension which is characteristic of man as “image of God”.  Heart, mind and will distinguish us from brute animals.  We are made to act as God acts: to know, will and love.  Thus, “mind” and “heart” in man are closely related faculties and cannot be separated from each other.  Mind and heart are revealed in and expressed through our bodies and thus they point at the “real us”.

Love is at the heart of who we are and it the key to our prayer today.

We are commanded by God the Father and God Incarnate Jesus Christ to love both God and our fellow man and God the indwelling Holy Spirit makes this possible.

But the word and therefore concept of “love” is understood in many ways and today, especially, it is misunderstood.  “Love” frequently refers to people or stuff we like or enjoy using.  Bob can “love” his new SUV. Besty “loves” her new kitten.  We all certainly “love” baseball and spaghetti.  But “love” can refer to the emotions and affections people have when they are “in love” or, as I sometimes call it, “in luv”.

Luv is usually an ooey-gooey feeling, a romantic “love” sometimes growing out of lust.  This gooey romantic “love” now dominates Western culture, alas.   The result is that when “feelings” change or the object of “luv” is no longer enjoyable or usable, someone gets dumped, often for a newer, richer, or prettier model.

There some other flavors of “love” you can come up with, I’m sure.  But Christians, indeed every image of God in all times everywhere, are called to a higher love, the love in today’s prayer, which is charity: the grace-completed virtue enabling us to love God for His own sake and love all who are made in His image.  This is more than benevolence or tolerance or desire or enjoyment of use.

True love is not merely a response to an appetite, as when we might see a beautiful member of the opposite sex, a well-turned double-play, or a plate of spaghetti all’amatriciana.

True love, charity, isn’t the sloppy gazing of passion drunk sweethearts or the rubbish we see on TV and in movies (luv).  Charity is the grace filled adhesion of our will to an object (really a person) which has been grasped by our intellect to be good.

The love invoked in our prayer is an act of will based on reason. It is a choice – not a feeling.

Charity delights in and longs for the good of the other more than one’s own.  The theological virtue charity involves grace.  It enables sacrifices, any kind of sacrifice for the authentic good of another discerned with reason (not a false good and not “use” of the other).  We can choose even to love an enemy. This love resembles the sacrificial love of Christ on His Cross who offered Himself up for the good of His spouse, the Church.  St. Augustine, as a matter of fact, taught that “enemy love” is the perfection of the kind of love we can have in this earthly life.  Rationabilis affectus reflects what it is to be truly human, made in God’s image and likeness, with faculties of willing and knowing and, therefore, loving.

Knowledge and love are interconnected.

The more you get to know a person, the more reason you have to love him (remember… love seeks the other person’s good in charity even if a person is unlikable).  Reciprocally, the more you love someone or (in the generic sense of love) something, the more you want to know about him and spend time getting to know him.

For example, Billy is fascinated by bugs.  From this “love” for bugs Billy wants to know everything there is to know about them.  He works hard to learn and thus launches a brilliant career in entomology.  Given Our Creator’s priority in all things, how much more ought we seek to know and love God first and foremost of all and then, in proper order, know and love God’s images, our neighbors?  He is far more important that the bugs He created.  Even spouses must love God more than they love each other.  Only then can they love each other properly according to God’s plan.

We also have a relationship with the objects of both love and knowledge.  What sort of relationship?  With bugs or spaghetti it is one thing, but with God and neighbor it is entirely another.

In seeking to understand and love God more and more we come to understand things about God and ourselves as his images that, without love, we could never learn by simple study.  The relationship with God through love and knowledge changes us.  St. Bonaventure (+1274) the “Seraphic” doctor wrote about “ecstatic knowledge”. This kind of knowledge is not merely the product of abstract investigation or analytical study (like Billy with his bugs).  Rather, it comes first from learning and then contemplating. According to Bonaventure, by contemplation the knower becomes engaged with the object. Fascinated by it, he seeks to know it with a longing that draws him into the object.

Consider: we can study about God and our faith, but really the object of study is not just things to learn or formulas to memorize: the object of our study and faith is a divine Person in whose image and likeness we ourselves are made.  To be who we are by our nature we personally need the sort of knowledge of God that draws us into Him.  Knowledge of God (not just things learned about God) reaches into us, seizes us, transforms us.  To experience God’s love is to have certain knowledge of God, more certain than any knowledge which can be arrived at by means of mere rational examination.

Bring this all with you back to the last line of our prayer and the command to love our neighbor, all of them made in God’s image and all individually intriguing – fascinating, in a way that resembles the way we love God and ourselves.  This we are to do with our minds, hearts, and all our strength.

Please share!

About Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Fr. Z is the guy who runs this blog. o{]:¬)
This entry was posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to WDTPRS – 4th Ordinary Sunday: Billy loves bugs

  1. Maltese says:

    In Deus caritas est, Pope Benedict XVI left us with a beautiful understanding of the word “love.” There is love for our family, our friends, our spouses, etc. But, really, who understands what love really is? We say we are in “love” with this or that, but oftentimes it is sentimental love, or not true love. Often it is wasted, unfruitful, or unfulfilling “love.” I think we have Christ as an example of what is true caritas: to lay down your life for your friends. To do that, is love. Recently a school principal pushed kids out of the way of an oncoming bus, and was run over. She expressed love in that act. For God, the martyrs gave their lives for Christ; that is love.

    Love can’t be expressed in words, but only shown.

  2. MrsMacD says:

    Father, if agape is what love of God is all about then what does St. Therese mean when she says,” Do little things with great love?”

  3. robtbrown says:

    Omnes homines rationabili diligamus affectu reminds of the phrase from Romans 12:1 that was noted by JRatzinger in A New Song for the Lord: ??????? ???????? ?

  4. robtbrown says:

    Interesting that Greek letters show up in the preview but not in the post

    [Use Unicode – HERE]

  5. robtbrown says:

    logiken latreian.

    Both phrases, one referring to love of man, the other to love of God in worship, indicate that the affections should never act independently of the intellect.

  6. Imrahil says:

    Oh and if you put it that way, it also makes you think of that rather rationalistic ;-) phrase of the Roman canon:

    Quam oblationem … benedictam, adscriptam, ratam, rationabilem, acceptabilemque facere digneris.

  7. teomatteo says:

    I have come to wonder about the passage of the greatest commandment. Regarding the word ‘love’. What word was used in the hebrew scripture that our Lord used and how did the jewsish people of his day understand that word. The latin scripture I dont think used charitas but dilegentis.

  8. Greek of Matthew 22:37

    22:37 ὁ δὲ ἔφη αὐτῷ ἀγαπήσεις κύριον τὸν θεόν σου ἐν ὅλῃ τῇ καρδίᾳ σου καὶ ἐν ὅλῃ τῇ ψυχῇ σου καὶ ἐν ὅλῃ τῇ διανοίᾳ σου

    A Hebrew version of Matthew 22:37

    וַיּׂאמֶר יֵשׁוּעַ אֵלָיו וְאָהַבְתָּ אֵת יְהוָֹה אֱלׂהֶיךָ בְּכָל־לְבָבְךָ וּבְכָל־נַפְשְׁךָ וּבְכָל־מַדָּעֶךָ׃

    Deut 6:5

    וְאָהַבְתָּ אֵת יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ בְּכָל־לְבָבְךָ וּבְכָל־נַפְשְׁךָ וּבְכָל־מְאֹדֶֽךָ׃

    The word in question:

    אָהַב ‘ahab

  9. Fr AJ says:

    Thank you, Father, for the reflection. I’m speaking on eros v. philia v. agape love at Masses this weekend.

  10. robtbrown says:

    λογικὴν λατρείαν

  11. Gerhard says:

    MrsMacD: “if agape is what love of God is all about then what does St. Therese mean when she says,” Do little things with great love?”
    The Little Flower offered her little acts to Jesus imagining she was giving Him flowers, as one would to a beloved. The power in this is awesome.
    This is a true story: as a junior lawyer (and keen client of St Therese) I had to produce draft documents for a boss who was feared, loathed and reviled by every one else in the firm. As I entered his office clutching my written effort, I would ask Our Lord to treat my draft, and my boss’s inevitable blistering criticism, as a rose, for the salvation of my boss’s soul. One day, after my boss had been particularly nasty, and none of us junior associates dared to approach him, I took a draft to his room to make this a really big penance for his sake. In God’s infinite mercy towards me, my boss had stepped out, so I left the paper on his chair, and bolted from his room. But, as God knows, it is the thought that counts. At my leaving party from that firm some years later, my boss asked me why I was different from the others – why did I not react badly towards him. I told him I was no different from the others, but that I offered up the sufferings he inflicted upon me for his own salvation. He was touched speechless, looked at me silently for an instant, and then muttered “we need more like you”.

  12. Gerhard says:

    Imrahil: “Quam oblationem … benedictam, adscriptam, ratam, rationabilem, acceptabilemque facere digneris.”
    Each word beautifully balanced with a different meaning and implication, and sealed with the sign of the Cross.

  13. Gerhard says:

    “The fact is, a properly functioning person conducts his life according to both head and heart, feelings under the control of reason and the will.”

    Beautiful. Thank you Fr Z.

  14. robtbrown says:

    MrsMacD says:

    Father, if agape is what love of God is all about then what does St. Therese mean when she says,” Do little things with great love?”

    It is of course what dedicated wives and mothers do all the time. In fact, it can be said to define that vocation.

  15. PostCatholic says:

    This was interesting, even to a non-Christian.

    I agree that the culture places a lot of emphasis on what you are terming “luv”; however, I think you’ve undervalued [I haven’t “undervalued” anything. You can’t include every possible thing in every post or article.] an important and perhaps essential part of human courtship. You might want to look into (gaze, if you will) the biology of human attraction and of forming a pair bond. And while our culture does over-emphasise courtship in our entertainment media, to be fair let’s acknowledge there is much more inherent drama on which to hang a story in a boy-meets-girl scenario than there is in my wife and I reading the newspaper this morning in companionable silence. [Drama… so? No, don’t answer that.]

  16. robtbrown says:

    Post Catholic,

    I don’t think Fr Z is denying it’s an important element of courtship. Rather, IMHO, he’s saying that Love cannot be reduced to it. Love in all its form is union and, despite various pleasant experiences, it also always involves a purgation.

  17. sperisho says:

    I kept “affection” but used “ordinate” for “rationabili” (“tota” vs. “rationabili”): http://liberlocorumcommunium.blogspot.com/2016/01/total-vs-ordinate-love.html. In the Veronese sacramentary, there is an “et” before “te”, and thus a “both . . . and” that is missing in the current missal.

  18. sperisho says:

    Unusually for entries in Corpus orationum, it occurs in the early 7th-century Veronese sacramentary only, i.e. in no subsequent manuscripts. Apparently it was still-born there until recovered by the new Missal.

    [Yes, as I mentioned in top entry, it is in the Veronese in the month of July. It had an “et” which I added to the Latin text, above.]