More work on an airplane. Reading about the battle of the “ressourcement” theologians with “neo-Thomists”.
I find Chinese music goes well with this sort of thing, don’t you?
More work on an airplane. Reading about the battle of the “ressourcement” theologians with “neo-Thomists”.
I find Chinese music goes well with this sort of thing, don’t you?
Comments are closed.
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
St. John Eudes
- Prosper of Aquitaine (+c.455), De gratia Dei et libero arbitrio contra Collatorem 22.61
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
“He [Satan] will set up a counter-Church which will be the ape of the Church because, he the devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the anti-Christ that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. In desperate need for God, whom he nevertheless refuses to adore, modern man in his loneliness and frustration will hunger more and more for membership in a community that will give him enlargement of purpose, but at the cost of losing himself in some vague collectivity.”
“Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, and the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops act like bishops.”
- Fulton Sheen
Therefore, ACTIVATE YOUR CONFIRMATION and get to work!
- C.S. Lewis
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
"But if, in any layman who is indeed imbued with literature, ignorance of the Latin language, which we can truly call the 'catholic' language, indicates a certain sluggishness in his love toward the Church, how much more fitting it is that each and every cleric should be adequately practiced and skilled in that language!" - Pius XI
"Let us realize that this remark of Cicero (Brutus 37, 140) can be in a certain way referred to [young lay people]: 'It is not so much a matter of distinction to know Latin as it is disgraceful not to know it.'" - St. John Paul II
Grant unto thy Church, we beseech Thee, O merciful God, that She, being gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may be in no wise troubled by attack from her foes. O God, who by sin art offended and by penance pacified, mercifully regard the prayers of Thy people making supplication unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of Thine anger which we deserve for our sins. Almighty and Everlasting God, in whose Hand are the power and the government of every realm: look down upon and help the Christian people that the heathen nations who trust in the fierceness of their own might may be crushed by the power of thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. R. Amen.
If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
Visits tracked by Statcounter since Sat., 25 Nov. 2006:
You are too much, Fr. Z.! I don’t know what any of that means, but, I have prayed for you & your fellow travelers safe flight.
Irony of the day: St. Thomas himself was a “ressourcement” theologian.
Is this the same Chinese music we hear on some z-chat sessions?
What was the name of the article/book?
Irony of the day: St. Thomas himself was a “ressourcement” theologian.
Comment by arotron theou
Every Thomist has to be ressourcement theologian.
Of course, as JRatzinger pointed out, the problem with the ressourcement theologians is that they conveniently forgot to consider the theology of the Middle Ages.
jbalza007: Not quite the same. This stuff was a little more … challenging.
should read: some of them conveniently forgot to consider the theology of the Middle Ages.
Looks like you’re reading Tracey Rowland’s “Ratzinger’s Faith.”
Sounds like it calls for the soundtrack from a good kung-fu movie!
Father, when will you be doing that long awaited (at least by me and you) only Chinese Opera Z-Chat? I am looking forward to something like that!
A good Thomist will discriminate between what is good and what is not so good in any source of any age for the service of the unchanging yet inexhaustible Truth.
That said, the only good thing about some texts is the very fine printsetting.
Fr. I certainly hope you’re using earphones. I’d hate to hear that they threw you out of the exit doors over what we all know is your “wonderful, ahem” chinese music.
Fr Z, I am starting my dissertation on this topic. Can you tell us what you are reading?
Fr Smith
I would love to know what book you are reading. I am very interested in this topic.
robtbrown and RandomFriar, I agree with you both. The best theologians, regardless of camp or training, love the Truth, always and everywhere. Good Thomists and solid Patristic thinkers both reach the same conclusions about dogmata. Just as neo-Thomism errs if it neglects the Fathers, so Patristic ressourcement fails if it neglects Scholasticism.
In other words, we all need to be good Boethians…
I do think St Thomas is a genius, as regards the Chinese music I may have to listen to some as I may be teaching in a Catholic school in Hong Kong next accademic year.
Fr.
Did you every study Chinese at the U of M? That was where I got my degree in the same lo many years ago.
Two points about St Thomas:
1. What distinguishes the theology of St Thomas, making it unique, is that theology is always primarily speculative, that it is always done primarily to know Truth, not as a plan of action. All theology, even moral theology, is primarily about God (theocentric).
On the other hand, it is never purely speculative–it always has a practical aspect. hat is why implicit in St Thomas’ method is human experience. In fact, a common complaint against the pre Vat II neo-Scholastic theology is that it .
Acc to St Thomas, theology is not primarily about salvation, either of the individual or the community. And so the concepts of dogmatic theology (what someone must believe) and moral theology (what someone must do and avoid) are not adequate as a foundation for theology. Further, Counter Reformation Theology, Liberation Theology, Ecumenical Theology, etc., can never be adequate expressions of theology, only of some aspect of it.
2. In so far as it deals with Relevation, theology must always be grounded in Christ (Christocentric) not on the Church (Ecclesiocentric). I have mentioned before that St Thomas’ Sacramental Theology is a division of his Christology. The Sacraments flow directly from Christ, not from some legislative authority that Christ gave to the Church.
The efforts to reestablish the notion of the Church as Mystical Body began before Vat II (cf Pius XII) and extended into the Council. Unfortunately, certain theologians simply went from a legalistic Ecclesiocentric theology to a sociological one, e.g., the Schillebeeckx disconnection of the priesthood from Apostolic succession.
To paraphrase Forrest Gump, that’s all I’ll say about that.
Contra Forrest, let me add that St Thomas’ concept of theology as primarily speculative, but never purely so means that his method is going to both ascend from the particulars of human experience and descend from universal principles.
For those interested, I highly recommend Garrigou LaGrange’s The One God, especially the introduction where he explains St Thomas’ method and the commentary on Question I of the Summa.
D’oh — when I viewed the display on your iPhone/pod/pad, I thought I saw “Wang Chung.” Now [i]that’s[/i] ressourcement!
… and so much for the BBcode …
Regarding Ressourcement Theology and Thomism, I read Ressourcement Theology, Aggiornamento,and the Hermeneutics of Tradition by Dr. D’Ambrosio at http://www.crossroadsinitiative.com and while this was my first foray into the realm of “Ressourcement Theology” I found it, on it’s face at least, to be a reasonable concept, if not abused. In the article, it is explained that some of the Jesuit theologians from Fourvière were in fact themselves Thomists. What they found, according to the article, is that Aquinas is really more traditional in the mold of the Early Fathers than is neo-Thomism/neo-Scholasticism, once you dig into his writings first-hand. That was just what I gathered from a reading of the article.
I do not agree that there were Thomists in La Fourvière. De Lubac opposed certain Counter Reformation tendencies, but from what I have read, he seems more like a neo-Augustinian than a Thomist.
Father Z is reading Tracey Rowland’s, Ratzinger’s Faith: The Theology of Pope Benedict XVI. He has shown us a glimpse of page 21.
Robtbrown, aside from method, in what do you see the differences between St. Thomas and St. Augustine? Or am I reading too much into your comment about De Lubac, in which I seem (perhaps quite wrongly) to see a disparagement of “neo-Augustinian” ressourcement?
Some of you might also be interested in the Fergus Kerr book called “Twentieth-Century Catholic Theologians,” which does a good job explaining the transition we have seen from Neo-Thomism to Ressourcement theology. I personally think the Church should enthusiastically embrace both Neo-Thomism AND Ressourcement theology. In the end, how can any one theology whether it be Neo-Thomism or Ressourcement theology explain the full Mysteries of God and His relationship with us? Being able to understand the metaphysical proofs for God’s existence (Neo-Thomism) and returing to the study of Scriptures and realizing that God calls us to deep personal communion with Him and all other people (Ressourcement theology) are both equally important and valid approaches to theology.
The SSPX crowd will sometimes say that Neo-Thomism is the only good theology and that new theology is all modernist rubbish. Baloney! On the other hand, the New Theologians will sometimes say that Neo-Thomism is dry and irrelevant. Baloney! The Church needs both Neo-Thomism AND Ressourcement theology. Just as there is legitimate diversity between the expressions of worship in the Western and Eastern Catholic autonomous ritual Churches, so should there also be a healthy legitimate diversity of theologies in the Catholic Church, with each theology helping us to understand better some aspect of the Mysteries of God that another theology might not shed as much light upon.