This was from CMR about POTUS and SCOTUS:
CNN Poll: 39% of Americans Drunk Right Now
Shock poll. A CNN poll released Wednesday indicates that 61 percent of the public expect the president to nominate a liberal to replace John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court.
That clearly means that 39% of Americans right now are drunk, concussed, or just plain stupid.
Seriously, who’s answering these questions?
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
Loading ...
A Daily Prayer for Priests
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
on ACTION ITEM! Fascinating VIDEO about a common phone scam and big time payback with glitterbomb traps, stink bombs, and law enforcement – UPDATED: “About languages: I live in Texas and I have several friends who are Hispanic. Seriously, there are scammers, salespeople, telemarketers,…” on ACTION ITEM! Fascinating VIDEO about a common phone scam and big time payback with glitterbomb traps, stink bombs, and law enforcement – UPDATED: “If a telemarketer calls and wants you to buy something, just say “I need to check with my bankruptcy attorney…”
on Daily Rome Shot 313 (video): “Woah. This is excellent, and I wish the recording was longer. Might someone be able to ID the piece being…”
on 25 Oct – “This day is called the Feast of Crispian…”: “Because I could not pass the opportunity to show this clip. It’s also the only western to have (some) dialogue…”
on Connect the dots. The attack on the Vetus Ordo is also an attack on John Paul II, not just on Benedict.: “Geoffrey, I hear you. The attitude of some who seem to think they know better than the Magisterium who is…”
on Connect the dots. The attack on the Vetus Ordo is also an attack on John Paul II, not just on Benedict.: “I think it is time to dust your copy of Monsignor Robert Hugh Benson’s, Lord of the World (1907). As…”
on Connect the dots. The attack on the Vetus Ordo is also an attack on John Paul II, not just on Benedict.: “From the Wisdom of the Interwebs this AM: “Keep adjusting your world view until you no longer are surprised. If…”
on Meanwhile, back in Middle Earth: “There’s a helpful Atlas of Middle-Earth by Karen Wynn Fonstad. The recent discovery of the aquatic Crusader sword mentioned above…”
on Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 22nd Sunday after Pentecost (30th Ordinary – N.O.): “The homily was so-so at my parish so I came home and looked for a homily online. I found this…”
on Connect the dots. The attack on the Vetus Ordo is also an attack on John Paul II, not just on Benedict.: “I’m in a regular, diocesan, JPII kind of parish in a region dripping with really great, orthodox priests. Reform of…”
on Connect the dots. The attack on the Vetus Ordo is also an attack on John Paul II, not just on Benedict.: “To anyone who has read Windswept House, this shouldn’t come as any surprise.” on A dying Catholic school reborn and flourishing: “A buddy raises an interesting point: Edmund Burke and “little platoons.” Edmund Burke wrote skeptically in 1790 about the bloody…”
on Connect the dots. The attack on the Vetus Ordo is also an attack on John Paul II, not just on Benedict.: “True, but this is nothing new. As early as a few weeks into this pontificate it was impossible to find…”
on Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 22nd Sunday after Pentecost (30th Ordinary – N.O.): “A very chilling sermon about particular and general judgement. Attendance at my TLM parish is way up. The numbers at…”
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful.
That way I have steady income I can plan on, and you wind up regularly on my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I periodically say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
My "challenge coin" for my 25th anniversary of ordination in 2016.
Want one? I do exchanges with military and LEOs, etc.
Loading ...If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
Loading ...
They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!
Help Monks in Wyoming (coffee – UPDATED LINK) and Norcia (beer) and the wonderful "Soap Sisters" of Summit, NJ!
Please follow me on Twitter!
Visits tracked by Statcounter
since Sat., 25 Nov. 2006:
I think that even drunk, concussed, and just plain stupid, I’d expect an ultra-liberal nominee.
Some share (small, I hope) of these people are probably so far to the left that they think that the current president is a moderate or a mild conservative. Seriously, I’ve met such people; it’s one of the joys of teaching at an American university.
I agree with Hans. I’ve noticed that liberals have a pathological inability to see themselves as liberal. Most consider themselves moderate and anything to the right of them as fascist. The 39% would see Castro as a moderate.
Maybe it’s the same 39% that didn’t vote for John McCain because he wasn’t pro-life “enough.”
OK, well, how about this… When you think about it, the ends of the spectrum aren’t liberal and conservative, but liberal and authoritarian or perhaps totalitarian (although totalitarian liberalism is becoming a reality now, too). What I mean is, “conservative” is really the middle position in the true spectrum, although it’s considered the right end of the spectrum. So, everything else to the left of conservative is liberal. So, 90% of people think Obama will appoint someone who is liberal.
Look at it another way: The categories “somewhat liberal” and “somewhat conservative” and “moderate” all mean the same thing. Seriously, a liberal who is not “very liberal” is somewhat conservative, and a poll respondant could be thinking of such a person as “not very liberal.” I would say that “somewhat conservative” actually refers more to someone who is basically liberal, and not to someone who is basically conservative.
To say that coffee is “somewhat cool” means it’s not as hot as it should be. To say that it is “somewhat hot” means it’s not as cool as it should be (as in coffee that’s too hot to drink). (Again, the spectrum is not between scalding and ice where leukwarm is the actual center [which by analogy makes conservative the moderate position], but between scalding and leukwarm, where the middle is still hot [which means moderate is still liberal].)
Therefore, it is not unreasonable that every response except “very conservative” and “no opinion” should count as liberal. So, again, 90% think he’ll appoint a liberal of some sort.
The people who are drunk are the 7% who said he’d appoint someone who is “very conservative” and the 3% who don’t know. In fact, I’d say that 7% are delusional or they don’t know what is meant by “very conservative.”
So the basic problem is that the poll is poorly designed. It should have had choices of “Very liberal,” “mostly liberal,” “neither liberal or conservative,” “mostly conservative,” and “very conservative.”
Doc Angelicus, thanks! I like your thinking, but it is getting easier for me to just pray and leave it all to God. Yet I appreciate the ‘sorting and separating’.
Liberalism is not only a sin, but a mental disorder.
Not True. I only had one beer :-)