"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
I think that even drunk, concussed, and just plain stupid, I’d expect an ultra-liberal nominee.
Some share (small, I hope) of these people are probably so far to the left that they think that the current president is a moderate or a mild conservative. Seriously, I’ve met such people; it’s one of the joys of teaching at an American university.
I agree with Hans. I’ve noticed that liberals have a pathological inability to see themselves as liberal. Most consider themselves moderate and anything to the right of them as fascist. The 39% would see Castro as a moderate.
Maybe it’s the same 39% that didn’t vote for John McCain because he wasn’t pro-life “enough.”
OK, well, how about this… When you think about it, the ends of the spectrum aren’t liberal and conservative, but liberal and authoritarian or perhaps totalitarian (although totalitarian liberalism is becoming a reality now, too). What I mean is, “conservative” is really the middle position in the true spectrum, although it’s considered the right end of the spectrum. So, everything else to the left of conservative is liberal. So, 90% of people think Obama will appoint someone who is liberal.
Look at it another way: The categories “somewhat liberal” and “somewhat conservative” and “moderate” all mean the same thing. Seriously, a liberal who is not “very liberal” is somewhat conservative, and a poll respondant could be thinking of such a person as “not very liberal.” I would say that “somewhat conservative” actually refers more to someone who is basically liberal, and not to someone who is basically conservative.
To say that coffee is “somewhat cool” means it’s not as hot as it should be. To say that it is “somewhat hot” means it’s not as cool as it should be (as in coffee that’s too hot to drink). (Again, the spectrum is not between scalding and ice where leukwarm is the actual center [which by analogy makes conservative the moderate position], but between scalding and leukwarm, where the middle is still hot [which means moderate is still liberal].)
Therefore, it is not unreasonable that every response except “very conservative” and “no opinion” should count as liberal. So, again, 90% think he’ll appoint a liberal of some sort.
The people who are drunk are the 7% who said he’d appoint someone who is “very conservative” and the 3% who don’t know. In fact, I’d say that 7% are delusional or they don’t know what is meant by “very conservative.”
So the basic problem is that the poll is poorly designed. It should have had choices of “Very liberal,” “mostly liberal,” “neither liberal or conservative,” “mostly conservative,” and “very conservative.”
Doc Angelicus, thanks! I like your thinking, but it is getting easier for me to just pray and leave it all to God. Yet I appreciate the ‘sorting and separating’.
Liberalism is not only a sin, but a mental disorder.
Not True. I only had one beer :-)