Was there a good point in the sermon you heard for your Sunday Mass of obligation?
Let us know what it was.
Was there a good point in the sermon you heard for your Sunday Mass of obligation?
Let us know what it was.
Comments are closed.
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
St. John Eudes
- Prosper of Aquitaine (+c.455), De gratia Dei et libero arbitrio contra Collatorem 22.61
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
“He [Satan] will set up a counter-Church which will be the ape of the Church because, he the devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the anti-Christ that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. In desperate need for God, whom he nevertheless refuses to adore, modern man in his loneliness and frustration will hunger more and more for membership in a community that will give him enlargement of purpose, but at the cost of losing himself in some vague collectivity.”
“Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, and the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops act like bishops.”
- Fulton Sheen
Therefore, ACTIVATE YOUR CONFIRMATION and get to work!
- C.S. Lewis
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
"But if, in any layman who is indeed imbued with literature, ignorance of the Latin language, which we can truly call the 'catholic' language, indicates a certain sluggishness in his love toward the Church, how much more fitting it is that each and every cleric should be adequately practiced and skilled in that language!" - Pius XI
"Let us realize that this remark of Cicero (Brutus 37, 140) can be in a certain way referred to [young lay people]: 'It is not so much a matter of distinction to know Latin as it is disgraceful not to know it.'" - St. John Paul II
Grant unto thy Church, we beseech Thee, O merciful God, that She, being gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may be in no wise troubled by attack from her foes. O God, who by sin art offended and by penance pacified, mercifully regard the prayers of Thy people making supplication unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of Thine anger which we deserve for our sins. Almighty and Everlasting God, in whose Hand are the power and the government of every realm: look down upon and help the Christian people that the heathen nations who trust in the fierceness of their own might may be crushed by the power of thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. R. Amen.
Visits tracked by Statcounter
since Sat., 25 Nov. 2006:
Prayer Before Using The Internet HERE
Almighty and eternal God, who created us in Thine image and bade us to seek after all that is good, true and beautiful, especially in the divine person of Thine Only-begotten Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, grant, we beseech Thee, that, through the intercession of Saint Isidore, Bishop and Doctor, during our journeys through the internet we will direct our hands and eyes only to that which is pleasing to Thee and treat with charity and patience all those souls whom we encounter. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.
Father is having a penance service today with several priests to hear confessions during a holy hour so that we can all be prepared for the coming of Our Lord. He used his homily time to go through a very good Examination of Conscience used by the Omaha, NE Diocese.
The pastor said that Jesus’ life began in “scandal” (perhaps, prefiguring that it also would end in scandal–the cross) and that the religious law and tradition and custom dictated how that scandal should be handled but Joseph, even before his dream, decided that the prescribed response was wrong and had chosen, on his own, to quietly act “righteously.” The angel in his dream asked for more, even though his actions would be a second source of scandal, and Joseph took Mary and her Son as his own into his home. Joseph’s actions throughout exemplified the difference between a safe, legalistic, moralistic response and a daring, merciful, loving and pastoral response to human need.
At Holy Rosary Fr. Andersen used a substantial part of his homily to trace a history of the Septuagint, all by way of establishing that the word translated in this morning’s reading from Isaiah as “virgin’ was translated with that understanding of the Hebrew by the Hebrew scholars who translated the Hebrew scriptures into Greek. The post-70 A.D. Jews who insist that the word simply means maiden, or young woman, are faced with the problem that there is no way a young woman giving birth would have any sign value at all, since young women give birth all the time. The Lord through Isaiah had promised to give Ahaz a sign, the sign of a virgin giving birth.
He went on to say that we are given the infused virtue of faith at baptism, but if we have allowed doubts concerning the virgin birth or any truth of the faith to darken our intellects, then the remedy is to bring this to Confession, so that we may come to Christmas more readily believing.
Help Father Z , I am becoming more and more confused. Today’s sermon focused on the names Jesus and Emmanuel and their meanings. Focusing on Jesus meaning the great expanse of freedom and how Jesus told us he came to bring us an abundant life, not to focus on saying a certain number of prayers each day as that can become a burden to our abundant life that God wanted us to live. To declutter our lives and truly be in the presence of God(Emmanuel) . Also to be truly present to each other for world peace. I understand some but to say pray less and live abundantly within morality – and I thought Jesus meant he came to bring us life – the after life of this current exile from God- Father, I continue to pray for discernment but as a cradle Catholic, I am so confused. Shouldn’t I be trying to spend more time in prayer rather than enjoying this life, pleasures of the flesh, praying for souls here and in purgatory , praising our Lord ?
7am Traditional Latin Mass: did not occur due to deep snow preventing the priest, who lives across town, from safely and reasonably getting there. A few faithful were there.
11am Novus Ordo Mass with Bishop Morlino, with I think 16 seminarians and a transitional deacon: It is an early Christmas present to have not only half our seminarians who drove a long way from the pastoral center, but so many of you who made it here despite the snow, and you sing the Mass well even without the choir. In the readings, Saint Paul speaks of the obedience of faith, and in the Gospel Joseph the just man was obedient to the command of the angel that he should take Mary his wife into his home. The obedience of faith is not a servile obedience as if in bondage. There is a mysticism of obedience, of doing God’s will. There is the obedience within the family, there is the obedience of the priests among one another and to the bishop, and the bishops together obedient to the Holy Father. When seminarians arrive back at seminary after a long interval there is experience of not being able to do exactly as one pleases. We need to live the mysticism of obedience.
At the end of Mass the bishop commented (I paraphrase), some of you may have wondered if I would mention Phil Robertson, and I did not because I did not want to get upset at Mass.
Alas, I do not know. I’m in ice storm territory and missed an Advent Sunday mass for the first time in years. I’m aware that I probably could have made it if my faith were strong enough: but forty minutes on ice each way was just too scary a proposition. I don’t mend the way I used to. But thanks to the internet, innumerable homilies from Church Fathers et al. (I’m rather partial to Bede’s) are only a few clicks away. The power was on long enough to print up a couple on today’s readings for my wife and I to share.
Homily from visiting priest was similar to what Elizabeth related on holy obedience. Novus Ordo at regular parish, though they’ve been adding Chant from the loft for the Sanctus & Agnus Dei in addition to the normal music. Most surprising was one of our Deacons wore a violet dalmatic.
I attended Mass in St. Sylvester, Munich, celebrated by Father F., Jesuit Priest. I’ll try and translate some points of the German sermon:
Since childhood we may have been used to bringing together these two passages, the message of Isaiah 734 B.C., and the message of the angel in Joseph’s dream.
Father put Isaiah’s prophecy into the context of the Syria-Efraim-war. Ahaz wanted to make a pact with the mighty king of Assyria. For Isaiah, this strategy was betrayal of JHWH. So, he calls to Ahaz:
“im lo taaminu ki lo teamenu”: “If you are not firm in faith, you will not be firm at all.” Or, as Luther had it: “Gläubt ihr nicht, so bleibt ihr nicht.”
Father questioned the tradition to understand the message of the angel in Joseph’s dream as a “christologic relecture” of Isaiah 7. He rather pointed at the “strains”, the “tensions” in Isaiah’s text:
On one hand, the seemingly-pious words of the king: “I will not ask for a sign, and I will not put the Lord to the test.” On the other hand, the obvious anger of the prophet.
Why the first, and why the latter?
A “sign”, that means a connection between the reality of our lives (for Ahaz: the political conflict) and our faith. Ahaz rejects this, with a seemingly-pious explanation.
What is the Emmanuel-sign announced by the prophet?
It needn’t be the same Ahaz should have asked for. Neither need it have been the Messiah: His coming would have finished with the reigns of Ahaz, Tiglatpileser and whoever else.
But history continues. Probably the Emmanuel of Isaiah was a sign of bane. There is no sense in continuing as before, the history of salvation is no license for arbitrary political decisions. So, some verses later we read:
“I will not ask for a sign, and I will not put the Lord to the test.” This is sanctimonious reservation. But how is a prayer from faithful heart which really refrains from asking God for something?
Emmanuel(!) Levinas titles one of his late texts “Beten ohne zu bitten” (praying without asking for anything). He speaks of God, giving life to the worlds, receiving the prayers of people… Man has a responsibility for his fellow creatures, for the worlds he is living in. And, a paradox, not do we need something from God, but God needs the prayer of the just:
Looked at in that light, Ahaz is right: “I will not ask for a sign, and I will not put the Lord to the test.” But, and this provokes Isaiah’s anger, he doesn’t say it out of awe and faithfulness to the Thora, but for political calculus. He doesn’t mean it.
Praying without asking. How is this possible? For Levinas, God is suffering in human suffering. Our prayer rising to him identifies itself with this suffering of God.
God’s initiatives may be different: a child, the Emmanuel, who is at the side of the suffering people, paying for the responsibilities of the rulers.
Or the child announced by the angel in Joseph’s dream. Joseph, dreaming, is all open for the mysterious message, for the angel saying the message of Isaiah anew.
Praying without asking. Ahaz and Emmanuel Levinas are right in a way. Trusting in God’s initiative we are acting responsibly.
The signs God will give us needn’t be christmassy harmonious. They may disturb, irritate, put themselves in our ways, like Isaias did to Ahaz “at the end of the conduit of the upper pool on the highway to the Washer’s Field.” Then we may learn to pray without wanting to fulfill our wishes. Praying like in the Lord’s Prayer: “Thy will be done.”
One thing is for sure: The Immanuel is the God With Us. But sure is also: He doesn’t match our psychological projections. He is the sign God Himself gives to us.
EF 4th Sunday in Advent, Father talked about the importance of giving thanks after Communion, St. Alphonse Liguori recommended an hour but even if we spent 15 minutes that would be something. This is important because during that time we have Jesus body and blood present in us.
Christ humbled himself to come to earth to show how much God loves us. We have trouble humbling ourselves, wanting to take revenge at every slight. Father meditated on three points of St. Ignatius’ Spiritual Exercises:
What have I done for Christ?
What am I doing for Christ?
What will I do for Christ?
God’s love for us requires a response. In the last days before Christmas, it is important to prepare well. We should make these resolutions for these last days before Christmas:
1. Avoid dissipation of mind–With modern distractions it is difficult to dwell on the mysteries of faith. This is why we maintain silence in the chapel. It takes time for the soul to absorb mysteries such as the Nativity. Christ was born in the stillness of the night–God speaks in the silence.
2. Avoid indifference–Fervor is very important. Christ said in Revelation that He will spit the lukewarm out of His mouth. Many Christians are indifferent to the spiritual realities behind Christmas. They do not derive spiritual benefits from it because they do not prepare and have no zeal.
Fr. Flood, FSSP, NA District Superior, is here visiting our apostolate and preached his sermon on Mass, comparing and contrasting it to the Last Supper in the Upper Room and a regular fancy dinner one would serve in their dining room. He spoke the need for fancy vestments and really nice sacred vessels, proper preparation before and after receiving communion, etc.
My homily was entitled, “It easily might have been different.” I went back and forth between the ways the story of salvation unfolded, with twists and turns, including hugely consequential decisions not only by our Lady, but by Joseph, as seen in today’s Gospel–and the way our own lives unfold similarly. How our lives might easily have been different; how decisions we make may be vastly more consequential than we ever can imagine.
I talked about how Joseph could only respond as he did because of the character and spiritual depth that came from choices made leading up to that moment. This is one reason why Mass, confession, prayer, self-denial, etc., matter in our lives.
And I talked about how, in our twists and turns, we have sins and regrets, yet God works with us, and we find ourselves–due to God’s hand–in a good place nonetheless. And I closed by saying that, if we make it to heaven, when we look back at the path we took, we’ll say “wow!”
If only I could recall all that was said. All I remember is that it was very good.
During the homily at our 9:30 AM TLM, we did hear discussion of the 4th Sunday of Advent, with a call to draw nearer to Christ. But it was Father’s words about Pope Francis that I found most moving. He commented on how, in past ages, so many things a pope said and did would never have seen the light of day, unlike today with social media. With that, he spent some time talking about some of the good things he saw in what the Holy Father is sparking, in terms of getting people to live the Gospel more fully. He went into some specific areas, but I’m terrible at recall. I was really kicking myself for not recording that homily, even if only for my own reference.
The homily had me pondering how many times we look at the defects, faults, and imperfections of people in general (even perceived), without emphasizing within ourselves, their good qualities, strengths, and purity in other areas.
A very condensed recap–
We are all preparing for Christmas–shopping, cooking, decorating. Time to prepare our souls for the great gift we are about to receive. So–Go. To. Confession!
Each of the three churches in our parish will have confession available tomorrow afternoon/evening.
(This priest often mentions confession and has gone out of his way to be at one of the outlying churches regularly to hear confessions.)
Excellent sermon by the Vocations Director of the Davenport Diocese, who is a Latin Mass priest.
Father Hennen spoke of trying to avoid sin in this season of excess. He also spoke of the readings from the Bible being hyper-specific about the time Christ was born, the genealogy of Christ, and Christ beginning His apostolic work to remind us that the Incarnation is real.
Nice sermon.
gertrude, sounds like too many points in one sermon-do not be confused. Jesus brings life, and we meet Him in prayer and the sacraments, in order to go out into the world and evangelize, taking that abundant life of grace with us. Maybe that is what the priest meant?
I went to the local parish, staffed with Trinitarian priests. Today we had their regional/provincial vocation director celebrating the Mass, with three young men that are in the earliest stage of vocational discernment.
So… part of the homily was about vocations, and part was discernment and how sometimes in dreams the seeds of a vocation are sown, or a direction in life we are to take; the emphasis on the dreams of St. Joseph in the Gospel reading.
Note: we still were in ADVENT, no trees, no lights, no garlands, no creche. This afternoon the Parish Center and offices were decorated, TOMORROW AFTER MASS, our pastor will allow the Church to be decorated. There was some grumbling about it this afternoon.
Very like the excerpt from Dogma und Verkundigung in today’s ADVENTCAzT, about the surprise and humility and vulnerability of the “Child” in Isaiah’s prophecy (in the context of Ahaz’s circumstances) and in the Angel’s quoting it in enlightening St. Joseph about the Incarnation having taken place.
I attend an Novus Ordo mass, the priest spoke today about being open to life, perhaps not purchasing a new boat and having another baby. I was pleasantly surprised to hear that up here by the lake. It is the first time in my life I’ve heard a priest mentioning being “open to life” in a homily. I’m 33 years old.
What mountains do we put between ourselves and the love of God or of our neighbor?
What self-pitying “low places” do we refuse to leave?