The other day Jesuit golden boy and homosexualist activist James Martin tweeted…
It is stupefying to me that women cannot preach at Mass. The faithful during Mass, as well as the presiders, are missing out on the wisdom, experience and inspired reflections of half of its members. St. Mary Magdalene, pray for us.https://t.co/USedUvBxS1
— James Martin, SJ (@JamesMartinSJ) July 22, 2019
Virtually every major order or institute in the Church has a female parallel. Not the Jesuits, who have opposed women from the start. More HERE Martin should spend his considerable money and time in the awakening… the “woke”ing? of his own anti-woman Society.
Today at National Review Declan Leary has a piece with a seriously funny title: What America Magazine Gets Wrong about the Mass
Imagine! What Jesuits get wrong about liturgy! You know the old phrase about Holy Week and Jesuits.
Leary comments on Jasmine’s advocacy for women preaching at Mass, about which he had tweeted. Leary writes [NB – hyphen alert!]:
Throughout the piece Molesky-Poz writes positively of women turning away from the Church in protest of their inability to preach at Mass. She quotes, among others, one woman who alleges, “This church is not a healthy place for my soul.” What she means, of course, is that the Church is not a healthy place for her ego.
That’s it, isn’t it.
Catholics have to make a choice about how we approach the Mass. Is it the solemn observation instituted by Christ in which we as a Church constantly live the Passion and experience the real presence of our Lord? Or is it a do-it-yourself liturgy where we play out our fantasies and fulfill our wishes, where we make sure that everyone is included in any way they want, no matter how much attention is shifted away from Christ? One choice serves our egos, the other, our souls.
Reason #87850 for Summorum Pontificum.
The assault on the priesthood, indeed on the natural order, continues. Make it up at Mass. Make it up about male and female.
Another apple, please?