From a reader…
QUAERITUR:
As our diocese has cancelled all Masses until further notice which includes our TLM parish would it be disobedient and/or sinful to attend the local SSPX Mass which goes against both our local ordinary and our city which has forbidden all public gatherings?
Provided you follow local civil laws,… NO.
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
Loading ...
A Daily Prayer for Priests
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
on Online classes, courses opportunities: “FYI—Regarding the Latin classes, to receive the discount the linked page says one must have “established ties to England or…”
on Qui distinguit bene docet. Fr. Hunwicke opines.: “The incomparable Fr. Hunwicke is proof that God loves the Ordinariate and wants to provide a sure path for Anglicans…” on Qui distinguit bene docet. Fr. Hunwicke opines.: “The incomparable Fr. Hunwicke is proof that God loves the Ordinariate and wants to provide a sure path for Anglicans…”
on A bishop’s prayer petition for this Week of Christian Unity: for Catholics who want the Traditional Latin Mass: “God bless Bp. Thomas Tobin. mysticalrose: “Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the…” on A tale of two Archbishops: ““As it turned out, our own archbishop, Archbishop Bernard Hebda, decided to learn how to confer the sacrament in the…” on ASK FATHER: What to do about strange monthly intensions designated for gaining indulgences?: “WVC: Prayers and Peace to you and yours.”
on Cupich’s war on Catholics continues: a Chicago pastor speaks up – UPDATED with tweet from Bp. Strickland @Bishopoftyler: “I just saw a tweet quoted, from Bishop Strickland: I’ve re-read Fr Bus’s letter and I see nothing disrespectful in…”
on Your Good News: “A while back a friend went on pilgrimage to France. Apparently the country was requiring papers verifying compliance in order…”
on Daily Rome Shot 391: ““Another analogy about how some of clergy with power work is: high-school mean-girls in the bathroom.” Worse yet is they…” on Cupich’s war on Catholics continues: a Chicago pastor speaks up – UPDATED with tweet from Bp. Strickland @Bishopoftyler: “God bless Bp. Strickland and Fr. Bus.”
on A tale of two Archbishops: “I see from the article that the Confirmation apparently occurred on December 12, prior to the December 18 letter abrogating…”
on New Anthology of Fulton Sheen about “The Greatest Commandment”: “AND let’s get his Beatification moving forward again!! Time for the “bishop’s hold” to end.”
on A bishop’s prayer petition for this Week of Christian Unity: for Catholics who want the Traditional Latin Mass: “@moon1234 The rumor I heard is that Benedict did offer to give the FSSP a bishop, and they turned it…”
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful.
That way I have steady income I can plan on, and you wind up regularly on my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I periodically say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
My "challenge coin" for my 25th anniversary of ordination in 2016.
Want one? I do exchanges with military and LEOs, etc.
Loading ...If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
Loading ...
They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!
Help Monks in Wyoming (coffee – UPDATED LINK) and Norcia (beer) and the wonderful "Soap Sisters" of Summit, NJ!
Please follow me on Twitter!
Visits tracked by Statcounter
since Sat., 25 Nov. 2006:
I just got in my e-mail the letter from the SSPX district superior (as I’m on the mailing list) about the SSPX and the Coronavirus. In it he writes that the SSPX will follow all legitimate local laws about public gatherings. So, while the diocese might have forbidden public Mass, if the local government also forbid large public gatherings, the SSPX is supposed to be complying.
Maybe the chapel is not within the city? [There may be laws at the level of the county or state.] Maybe it’s not an SSPX chapel, but some offshoot? [Those chapels should be roundly and soundly ignored.] Maybe that decision was only recently communicated to the priests, and so you have a weekend of lag before all are on the same page?
My understanding is that it’s never a sin to go to any service of the SSPX. Unless of course one does it with schismatic intentions.
There are many, many good, holy SSPX priests and even more good, faithful who attend those chapels. I pray for regularization very soon.
The SSPX should certainly comply with the orders of civil authorities, like any other religious group.
And on this issue (in terms of offering public Mass), I would hope the SSPX would comply with the directives of the local bishop. This does not touch on any issue the SSPX has with Vatican II or the liturgy.
That said, I don’t look forward to banning any public Masses. But it may well come to that.
How about a Maronite service? [Catholics can freely attend all Catholic services, Easter or Western. Dioceses and Eparchies (Eastern “dioceses”) can overlap. However, they might have different policies about Masses in this time of increasing lockdown.]
They are just as Catholic as we are, so go ahead! [I’ll remind you that this is under ASK FATHER… right?]
Here’s the letter from the SSPX superior, for reference. It’s dated for this past Friday, but today’s the first I saw it on their website. (Granted I didn’t check much over the weekend.) https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/letter-fr-wegner-regarding-us-district-and-covid-19-coronavirus-56098
I would also recommend [I’ll remind you that this is filed under ASK FATHER….] people who can check with Eastern Catholic Eparchies. The Byzantine Catholic Eparchy hasn’t cancelled Liturgy, nor has the UGCC Eparchy of Chicago. Both are just saying to stay home if you’re sick, and consider yourself dispensed if you can’t go. (Again, local laws still apply.)
Father — could you clarify your answer? The question stated that the city has forbidden all public gatherings. Thus, that’s a local civil law (albeit temporary). But you wrote that it’s OK to go to an SSPX Mass, as long as one follows all local civic laws.
So putting the two together, I read that one shouldn’t attend an SSPX (in that city) since to do do would be to violate the local civic law.
[This is not hard. If the civil authorities have suspended public gatherings, obey the law. However, if there can be gatherings of, say, 50 or less, and there is an SSPX Mass available, whereas the local diocese has suspended all Masses, then one can go to the SSPX Mass. However, obey the civil laws about the numbers of people.]
Sorry if I seem to be too off topic, but isn’t it weird to say that local civil laws should be obeyed, when it’s clear that the SSPX is disobeying ecclesiastical law?
[Not if you think for a moment, no.]
Father, If the current Pope can abrogate centuries of Catholic teaching without an explanation, why should we be bound to obey any of his edicts. I am really frustrated by this ad hoc papacy, and I am just looking for a quiet place to contemplate my spiritual well being. If I were close to an SSPX chapel, or any order that says a dignified TLM, I would consider myself fortunate.
[I don’t know what the papacy has to do with this, when this is a matter of the legislation of your local bishop. If you don’t like Francis, fine. But he has little or nothing to do with your present situation. I suggest you ignore him for now.]
In countries like France and Ireland, the government has set a LIMIT on the amount of people permitted at public gatherings. The SSPX in these countries has responded by EXPANDING their mass schedules so fewer people go to each mass, thus complying with the law. At the same time they are ENCOURAGING distancing and hygienic practices at mass, REMINDING the faithful that their obligation has been lifted by the local bishop, and DISCOURAGING the old and vulnerable from attending the masses.
All very sensible and pastoral.
[This is precisely what I suggested in an earlier post! Good for them.]
The current crowd size limit here in Oregon is 25. A quick guestimate, based on the local website’s number of regular parishioners, is that the SSPX church would have to have at least 8 to 10 Masses on a Sunday in order to observe the letter of the current ’emergency’ regime. I don’t believe that will be happening but will keep my eyes open, chiefly to be able to attend at Holy Week and Easter. Spes contra spem.
Would you explain a little more Father? My understanding is that the SSPX recognizes the authority of the local Bishop and the Pope, though they are not under ordinary jurisdiction of the local Bishop. They are clear about their disagreements with some of the Vatican 2 directives, the Novus Ordo Mass, and anything else contrary to the Traditional practice of the Faith. However, if they recognize the authority of the local Bishop, it seems in a matter such as this which is reasonable, they would need to comply. If they agree to comply with the suppression of Masses (gatherings) by civil law, why not by ecclesial law? I do attend a SSPX chapel frequently and can ask the priests there, but would like a more neutral position. I would be very happy to hear it justified, but am having trouble doing so.
scholastica said: “My understanding is that the SSPX recognizes the authority of the local Bishop and the Pope, though they are not under ordinary jurisdiction of the local Bishop.”
Ha, if they recognized his authority they would probably wouldn’t be intruding in his diocese without invitation. Have any Ordinaries ever invited them?