"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
Loading ...
Pingback: “I am a devout Catholic, but….” – Via Nova Media
Or, the different reactions of the Pevensie children on hearing that ‘Aslan is on the move.’
My elderly mother answered,”We just accepted it”.
Thankfully, this is not my parents 1970 church. I will not backflip into the NO. I’ll embrace the struggle and trust Our Lady to open a door.
Herod, the king,
in his raging,
Charged he hath this day
His men of might,
in his own sight,
All children young to slay.
For of all those souls who fell by Herod’s sword since 1970 , I WILL NOT receive this teaching.
“Take not away my soul, O God, with the wicked; nor my life with men of blood. In whose hands are iniquities: their right hand is filled with gifts.”
Traditional Catholics need to prepare for possible canonical penalties including Excommunication or the formation of a new Church like the Orientals that is no longer Roman Catholic but carries the Ancient Liturgy.
j stark, I hope you weren’t serious:
“…the formation of a new Church… that is no longer Roman Catholic.”
No matter how bad things get, don’t leave the barque of Peter for a “new Church.” Doing so didn’t help in the 16h century, and it’s not going to help in the 21st.
One can be a new Church in the barque of Peter; the Oriental Churches are all in the barque.
So… there is one barque, but many Churches? You should realize that that’s not what Catholics believe. (Christ is the head of the Church. Not Churches.)
Perhaps you meant different rites; then your Oriental analogy might make sense.
Language changes overtime; Rite and Church are used interchangeably; the Maronites refer to themselves as a Church; the Byzantine as a Church. Not sure of your issue. We are on the same boat but the Oriental Churches; and yes I used that term with knowledge they are Rites, have their own liturgy and laws
surriter, while we believe in one Church, you should be aware that She is made up of 24 particular churches (the largest being the Latin Church). The use of church rather than rite in the context was perfectly correct.
surritter (two Ts – apologies), here are the relevant canons: https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib2-cann368-430_en.html
Traditional Catholics need to prepare for possible canonical penalties including Excommunication or the formation of a new Church like the Orientals that is no longer Roman Catholic but carries the Ancient Liturgy.
The problem lies rather in the phrase “formation of a new Church”. The recognition of the Orientals having their own rite in their churches was a recognition of a reality that had ALREADY existed as an immemorial custom, and that this custom had had that stable presence in a fixed, stable church (i.e. diocese) presided over by metropolitan archbishops (or patriarchs of patriarchal churches, and the local dioceses that look to that patriarch), not a “new church”.
Now, it may indeed be possible to assert that the Vetus Ordo represents a different rite than the Novus Ordo. The difficulty is whether it is and has been the stable, unchanging rite of a stable diocese in the same sense. It may, possibly, in Campos, Brazil, but nearly nowhere else.
I have already proposed that the next pope may, if he chooses, ERECT a patriarchate to preside over the Vetus Ordo as a separate rite from the Novus Ordo. This would give the Vetus Ordo certain (very useful) protections that are not available now. But it is undoubtedly the case that the mere creation of such a partriarchate would not, by itself, solve the issues of all these local parishes that want to either say the old mass all the time, or some of the time.