Happy Columbus Day!

Christopher Columbus was an amazing, admirable man.   It is a serious injustice that some so malign him.

On this day I am reminded of when I was at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay and went to the place where Columbus landed on one of his voyages.

I didn’t have a real appreciation of Columbus until I met The Great Roman™ who had already forgotten more about Christopher Columbus than I, the American, had ever known.

No… he had NOT forgotten, because The Great Roman™ doesn’t forget.

About Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Fr. Z is the guy who runs this blog. o{]:¬)
This entry was posted in Linking Back and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Comments

  1. Legisperitus says:

    J. J. Barry’s “Life of Christopher Columbus” is an old but most enlightening biography, based on the research for Columbus’ cause for beatification. It’s been republished by Loreto Publications in both print and e-book form.

  2. Charivari Rob says:

    Amazing? Yes. He was brave, intrepid, good at promotion and selling an idea (also of promoting himself). So far as I know, he was also earnest and honest.
    He was, perhaps, a little deficient in Euclid, cartography, and navigation.

    I don’t favor tearing down “Columbus Day” (or statues) in favor of “indigenous peoples’ day”. I don’t begrudge folks some ethnic ancestry celebration, and mostly I just view it with the lens of celebrating the spirit of exploration and discovery (after all – Leif and Brendan had their voyages long before Chris).

    But…
    Admirable? Not so much.
    His voyages brought misery, ruin, and death to many.
    Disease. Transporting people as curiosities and slaves. Certainly not the biggest or worst (or even close) in any of that, but he did have his place in beginning it there.

    [So, you have imbibed the kool-aid.]

  3. Macarius says:

    Columbus was a brilliant navigator, intrepid explorer, and admirable person. His story is amazing and inspiring.

  4. TheCavalierHatherly says:

    @Charivari Rob

    “He was, perhaps, a little deficient in Euclid, cartography, and navigation.”

    Actually not true. Columbus did a lot of research for his voyage. However, instead of Eratosthenes’ circumference calculations, he chose to follow those of another (I believe Arabic) geographer which were smaller. He landed in the new world exactly were he would have landed in India had the estimate he chose been the correct one.

    Defective by modern standards, yes. But we hardly run around accusing Hippocrates of being a bad doctor.

  5. TonyO says:

    I have read a claim that Columbus repeatedly raped female slaves; even, that it is recorded in (his?) journals. From the first I have doubted these claims as malicious libel, but I don’t know what the truth of the matter is. Can someone point me to what are likely to be the source(s) of these claims, and how we know whether they are groundless or have some merit? Is there anything in his own journals or those of his shipmates / colleagues that suggests this? Is it wholly a fabrication made up later?

Comments are closed.