12-13 March USA: Spring Forward tonight! #dst change

Readers in these USA, remember to change your clocks tonight when you turn in.   Don’t be out of synch with Sunday Mass.

springforward2016

Posted in Events |
8 Comments

Archd. Omaha: Custodian destroys Mary Poppins mannequin, Buddha on display in Cathedral

In a way what follows echoes the post about concerts in churches.  HERE  What is appropriate in a church and what is not?

This remarkable bit of news is from Omaha.com:

Kelly: With a pair of bolt cutters and sense of indignation, custodian cuts down what flies in church

A Mary Poppins mannequin hung from the ceiling at St. Cecilia Cathedral [?!?  No, really.  There’s a photo.] for its 31st annual flower festival, but a custodian used bolt cutters to send it crashing to the floor on the first morning of the event. The custodian said he hopes the incident sparks “conversation” about what types of displays are appropriate in a church.

 

By Michael Kelly / World-Herald columnist

On the first morning of the 31st annual Cathedral Flower Festival, with its theme of “A Night at the Movies,” an agitated church custodian made a bold move.

Mark Kenney, 59, who grew up in the parish, had worked at St. Cecilia Cathedral for three years. Around 8 a.m. on Jan. 29, he went to a work shed, picked up a pair of heavy-duty bolt cutters and ascended to a catwalk high above the mostly empty nave, or main sanctuary.

He looked through a peephole, he said, to make sure he wouldn’t hurt any people. And then he cut a steel cable, which sent a suspended, umbrella-carrying, hat-wearing Mary Poppins figure crashing to the floor.

Kenney then went downstairs and removed a cardboard Buddha figure from the Nash Chapel, which also featured costumed mannequins from “The King and I.” [?!?] He threw the Buddha out one door and proceeded to toss costumed mannequins out two other doors.  [Good grief! Who thought these were good ideas?  Read on…]

Someone alerted the pastor, the Rev. Michael Gutgsell, who ran from the rectory next door to the church and saw Kenney.

“Mark,” he called out, “did you see who did this?”

“Father, it was me. You need to call the police.”

Gutgsell had known that his custodian had misgivings about secular displays in the church but says he was dumbfounded and didn’t understand why Kenney would take such drastic action. [It was indeed dramatic, if not drastic.] In a brief meeting that week, the pastor said, he had asked for Kenney’s promise not to be disruptive.

Now the priest was shocked, saying, “You promised!”

In response, Kenney said, he lashed out. “I started screaming, ‘Father, this is bullshit! We can’t have this in the church. This isn’t culture, it’s Disney crap!’?” [Oh my!]

Kenney — who has served three terms of up to six months in federal prisons for crossing security lines at military bases in protest of nuclear weapons — then knelt at the communion rail and prayed until officers arrived and handcuffed him.

He spent a night in jail before he was bailed out and pleaded no contest. He said he is scheduled for sentencing “on Holy Thursday,” March 24.

Damaging items at the flower festival was wrong, and Kenney said in an interview this week that he will make restitution. But he says secular items such as movie characters are inappropriate in the sacred space of the cathedral and amount to sacrilege and idolatry.  [Is he right? Buddha?]

Gutgsell, a former chancellor of the Omaha Archdiocese and a Catholic University-licensed “canon lawyer,” an expert in church laws and rules, disagrees.

“Obviously, context is everything,” the priest said, noting that the cathedral also is home to about six concerts a year. No sacrilege or disrespect is conveyed, he said, in the concerts or the dozens of exhibits at the flower festival.  [Mary Poppins and Buddha?  Here’s a question: Is it okay to play a non-sacred work on a pipe organ in a cathedral church?  Some compositions written for pipe organ are not explicitly sacred.]

“Cathedrals,” he said, “are kind of the epicenter for culture presentation and development.”

Eileen Burke-Sullivan, a theologian and vice provost for mission and ministry at Creighton University, said she sees no problem. The cathedral and the archdiocese, she said, have supported the arts in Omaha for many years.

“In mixing thematic popular culture with the beauty of God’s creation in flowers,” she said, “I don’t think there’s any inherent idolatry.”

 

[…]

Read the rest there.

So!

UPDATE:

Remember, read the whole article and think before posting.

That said, I received this from a reader:

I do no not like to comment online, but need to pass on some information.

Rev. Gutgsell at St. Cecilia’s Cathedral is actually a very devout conservative who regularly celebrates the TLM.

The Cathedral has one of the best choirs in the US and often chants in Latin.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
106 Comments

Obama: Worried more about climate change than ISIS – Admin may pursue “climate change deniers”

Of course he is.

Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch comments on the essay at The Atlantic on the “Obama Doctrine” by Jeffrey Goldberg.

Get this…

isis is not an existential threat to the United States,” he told me in one of these conversations. “Climate change is a potential existential threat to the entire world if we don’t do something about it.” Obama explained that climate change worries him in particular because “it is a political problem perfectly designed to repel government intervention. It involves every single country, and it is a comparatively slow-moving emergency, so there is always something seemingly more urgent on the agenda.”

Go to The Atlantic piece and read the whole thing.   Yes, I know that some of you leap in to comment without doing the reading.  DON’T.

Meanwhile, the Obama Administration is looking into prosecuting “climate change deniers”. HERE

AG Lynch: DOJ Has Discussed Whether to Pursue Civil Action Against Climate Change Deniers

Attorney General Loretta Lynch acknowledged Wednesday that there have been discussions within the Department of Justice about possibly pursuing civil action against so-called climate change deniers.

This matter has been discussed. We have received information about it and have referred it to the FBI to consider whether or not it meets the criteria for which we could take action on,” Lynch said at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Justice Department operations.

So-called climate change deniers.

Think about that language: “deniers”.  Whom else do we tar with the well-deserved brush of denial: Holocaust deniers.  If you deny that climate change is caused by man, then you are a “climate change denier”.  That’s like denying that the Holocaust took place.

I can hear you libs now, with your whiny, judging voices, “But Father, but Father! You are a very bad person.  You are evil.  You … you … like Latin!  You want the Holocaust to happen again!  You HATE VATICAN II!”

This is really creepy stuff coming from the Obama Administration.  This is creepy stuff coming from POTUS himself.  Climate change is a bigger threat than ISIS?

 

I’d be interested in hearing what you think about this, if you think about this.  Note the italics.

Do the reading.  Think.

Posted in The Drill, You must be joking! | Tagged , , ,
23 Comments

Dogs in packs. Chillingly amusing. Amusingly chilling.

There is a primeval, visceral connection between canidae and hominid.

This video is both amusing and also disturbing.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Funny, no?

Until the baying you hear is because the pack has picked up your scent.

Just to continue this downer… if there is a societal collapse, for whatever reason, domesticated dogs that are alone and starving will form packs. And they won’t be afraid of human beings.

You will want to be the alpha on that day, sheltered and well-armed.

I lived in an Italian town in which, because of ridiculous left-wing liberals, large packs of semi-feral dogs roamed the streets at night. They made a horrid ruckus and they were dangerous. They would collide in an intersection by the city gate visible from my window and, sometimes, have it out. It was … instructive.

Have a nice day!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
19 Comments

A story about the ’78 Conclaves that even Andrew Greeley failed to uncover!

As a follow up to what I wrote HERE about the dreadful piece attack piece on Church teaching through undermining infallibility by Hans Küng published by the even more dreadful National Schismatic Reporter (aka Fishwrap) I received the following from a priest friend.  It is amusing enough to deserve it’s own post. I’ve slightly anonymized it.

You might recall that, in my own post about the Küng piece, I added: “Francis is about as likely to renounce his infallibility as Küng is to renounce his own.”

Now, the fun anecdote:

I was in Rome in 1978 for the election of both JPI & JPII.

A year later Fr Angel Anton was lecturing to us on Ecclesiology at the [Gregorian University] in 2nd year Theology and had listed a couple of Kung’s books on the reading list.

When Kung’s license to teach as a Catholic Theologian was revoked, Fr Anton gave us a blow by blow account of the on-going saga between Kung and, first, the German Bishops and, then, the CDF.

Here’s THE big story about the Conclaves that even Andrew Greeley had failed to uncover.

During the summer of 1978 Cardinal Hume was also staying at the ___ and he heard that some of the other Cardinals wanted to propose Kung as a candidate for the Papacy. [My Jesus! Mercy!] So they sent Kung an urgent telegram to see if he would accept the nomination.

“Certainly not” came the reply “If I became Pope, I would no longer be infallible.”

And there it is.  Some might chalk this up as an urban legend, and I had heard something like it in the past, but we can all agree that…

Se non è vero è ben trovato!

Posted in Liberals, Lighter fare, Linking Back, Mail from priests | Tagged ,
6 Comments

Of Robert Card. Sarah

Everything that I know and am learning about Robert Card. Sarah suggests to me that he may be a Great Man. He is at least what Italians refer to as “un signore”.

First, read his exceptional book. A priest friend of mine recently gave a parish retreat in which he drew on the Cardinal’s book. Not only read this book, buy multiple copies and give them to every priest you can find. You might be interested to know that not long ago the Nuncio to these USA wrote to the bishops with his offer to send a copy of Sarah’s book to all their seminarians. Only one bishop declined. I’ll not publish his name. Let his name be forgotten to the ages. But I digress.

UK HERE USA HERE

Now that you have read his book.

Here is a piece in the UK’s best Catholic weekly (coincidentally I write a weekly column) The Catholic Herald.

It includes an important point… how properly to pronounce his name!

The unstoppable rise of Cardinal Sarah

The cardinal from a remote African village has become a standard bearer for Catholic orthodoxy in a Church where many things now seem uncertain

is often said that once a new pope has emerged on to the loggia of St Peter’s, the cardinals’ thoughts turn almost immediately to the question of his successor. Pope Francis, although about to turn 80 at the end of this year, does not seem ready to run out of steam. Despite having part of a lung missing, he seems undiminished by a daunting schedule, which in fact he seems to relish. This, along with his obvious pleasure in his role, means that it is difficult to take quite seriously his own speculation that his papacy will be a short one. Nonetheless, nobody should be surprised that there is already much speculation about the identity of his successor.

Among the names being talked about is that of one cardinal elevated to the Sacred College by Benedict XVI, who is increasingly admired by those who wish to consolidate the legacy of the Pope Emeritus.

Cardinal Robert Sarah, relatively little known before the election of Pope Francis, has shown himself since as a key player in Rome. His name – pronounced Sar-AH and not like the English given name – reveals the French linguistic and cultural heritage which this son of the West African savannah imbibed at an early age from the Holy Ghost missionaries. Cardinal Sarah, a second-generation Christian, is a man who combines an authentic claim to come from the ecclesiastical margins so beloved of Pope Francis with a deep grasp of the cultural and theological patrimony which the old continent disseminated along with its political and economic hegemony.

We get a fascinating insight into both of these strains in his personality through his book-length interview with French author Nicholas Diat, published last year in English translation as God or Nothing. After a biographical section, where the cardinal traces his career from the early years in a round, one-room brick hut in rural Guinea which was his family’s only possession to his present position as head of the Vatican’s liturgy dicastery, the book offers reflections on the theological issues which today affect the Church’s internal cohesion as well as the vitality of its missionary outreach.

Both sections are inspiring, revealing Cardinal Sarah as a man of profound and serene contemplative temperament along with dynamic capacities for action and an astonishing courage which tackles controversial questions head-on.

[…]

It is difficult to imagine that those who desire to reinvigorate the theological legacy of Benedict XVI could gain so significant a victory in a conclave held now. Every consistory held under Pope Francis – and one is expected later this year – dilutes their strength within the Sacred College.

Cardinal Sarah’s outspokenness on issues such as homosexuality, which has become a shibboleth for Western secular morality, would mean that electing him would be seen as a direct challenge to what appears to be the emerging world order. Not all cardinals are ready for this. [But such a timely testosterone booster is exactly what the College needs.] When he compared Western liberal ideas on sex and gender to Nazi propaganda and Islamist terror, he infuriated liberals, who see him as largely responsible for torpedoing efforts to get the synod to adopt “a more pastoral tone” on homosexuality. But he also probably scared off some conservatives who prefer a less confrontational approach.

One thing we have learnt in the last three years is that there are fewer certainties in the Church than we thought. I certainly won’t be putting money on having a pope from the West African savannah, but only a foolhardy pundit would rule it out. Cardinal Sarah is only nine years younger than Francis, so his eligibility will probably diminish if Francis remains as Pope beyond a few more years. That said, the prospect of a short reign can be seen as an advantage in a fraught situation – this was certainly the case for Cardinal Ratzinger in 2005. Still, whoever emerges as pope from the next conclave, one thing I think we can be sure of is that the voice of Robert Sarah will be listened to in its deliberations.

Read the whole thing there.

Posted in The future and our choices | Tagged
19 Comments

Fishwrap hypes Küng (still alive, still banned from teaching)

fishwrapHans Küng is deeply impressed with Pope Francis.

He has issued a plea to Francis to open a discussion about the dogma of infallibility with a view of overturning it. Küng, by the way, thinks that Vatican II didn’t go nearly far enough in digging at the foundations of faith and morals. He would bring pretty much everything down and, essentially, let majority rule in particular communities on every point.

The Fishwrap (aka National Schismatic Reporter aka National Sodomitic Reporter) has published an attack on Church teaching by Hans Küng, still alive. Küng is going after infallibility, again. He wants the doctrine of infallibility dogma overturned so that all sorts of other teachings can be abandoned, especially Humanae vitae.

“These questions are as relevant today as they were then. The decisive reason for this incapacity for reform at all levels is still the doctrine of infallibility of church teaching, which has bequeathed a long winter on our Catholic church. Like John XXIII, Francis is doing his utmost to blow fresh wind into the church today and is meeting with massive opposition as at the last episcopal synod in October 2015. But, make no mistake, without a constructive “re-vision” of the infallibility dogma, real renewal will hardly be possible.”

There was a point that I found ironic.

Küng:

“1965: Chapter III of the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church is devoted to the hierarchy but, oddly enough, Paragraph 25, which is on infallibility, in no way actually goes into it. What is all the more surprising is that in actual fact the Second Vatican Council took a fatal step. …”

The irony is rich.

Fishwrap admires Küng, who criticizes elements of a Dogmatic Constitution of Vatican II, but is against Archbp. Lefebvre and the SSPX, who criticize far less weighty elements of the Council’s lesser documents.

Hypocrites.

Francis is about as likely to renounce his infallibility as Küng is to renounce his own.

And Greg Reynolds is still excommunicated.

Posted in Liberals, Pò sì jiù, The Drill | Tagged ,
19 Comments

ASK FATHER: Deacon wore the priest’s stole

From a reader…

I am a sacristan at my parish. This past Friday we had Stations of the Cross and Benediction led by our Permanent Deacon. The strange thing was that the deacon wore the priest’s stole with the cope and not the deacon’s stole. I showed him that there were purple deacon’s stoles in the draw, but the deacon told me that it was no big deal and that he wears the priest’s stole every time he does benediction at the parish.
I did all I could to convince the deacon to wear the proper stole, but he refused. Is this a liturgical abuse or any violation of liturgical norms in the GIRM?

A couple things must be clarified.

How the Roman priest traditionally wears the stole under the chasuble for Holy Mass.

First, the priest wears the stole “straight”, around the back of the neck, over each shoulder and either down straight in front or, as when celebrating Mass, crossed over his breast.  If he is vested in the surplice as, for example, during a baptism, he the stole hangs straight down on either side in front.  The stole is more properly worn upon the shoulders, rather than hanging from up against the neck.  Thus, it hangs down a bit in back.

Bishops wear the stole straight, not crossed, under the chasuble.

The deacon, on the other hand, wears a stole upon the left shoulder and then draws it across both back and breast like a sash so that it joins at the right side, usually near the hip.  It goes diagonally across front and back.

Deacons must NOT wear a stole in the manner of a priest.  PERIOD.  To do so would look like he is impersonating a priest, which is a serious problem.  At one time, it would be considered a wrongful usurpation of a higher order and it would have made the deacon irregular for ordination to the priesthood.  So… yes… it is a big deal.

If the deacon persists in doing this, inform the pastor.  If nothing comes of this, inform the local bishop.  If nothing comes from that, send copies of your correspondence to the Congregation for Clergy.

The Directory for Deacons says:

30. […] The deacon is to observe faithfully the rubrics of the liturgical books without adding, omitting or changing of his own volition what they require. Manipulation of the liturgy is tantamount to depriving it of the riches of the mystery of Christ, whom it contains, and may well signify presumption toward what has been established by the Church’s wisdom. Deacons, therefore, should confine themselves to those things, and only to those things, in which they are properly competent.  For the Sacred Liturgy they should vest worthily and with dignity, in accordance with the prescribed liturgical norms.  The dalmatic, in its appropriate liturgical colours, together with the alb, cincture and stole, “constitutes the liturgical dress proper to deacons”.

[The notes specify a stola diaconalis.]

The GIRM says:

340. The stole is worn by the Priest around his neck and hanging down in front of his chest, while it is worn by the Deacon over his left shoulder and drawn diagonally across the chest to the right side, where it is fastened.

Pretty clear.

However, it may be that what is meant in the question, above, is that there are some stoles set apart for priests and that the deacon, taking one, then arranges it in the manner of a deacon.  Liturgically that’s okay.  Whether or not that’s okay as far as the arrangement of who uses which stoles at that parish is concerned… that’s an internal matter amongst the clergy.  That’s more of a “don’t use my stuff” issue.

By the way, the vesting prayer said by the deacon and the priest when vesting with the stole is the same:

Redde mihi, Domine, stolam immortalitatis, quam perdidi in praevaricatione primi parentis: et, quamvis indignus accedo ad tuum sacrum mysterium, merear tamen gaudium sempiternum.

Lord, restore the stole of immortality, which I lost through the collusion of our first parents, and, unworthy as I am to approach Thy sacred mysteries, may I yet gain eternal joy.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged ,
9 Comments

ASK FATHER: CDW doc says don’t charge for concerts in church. German bishops charge.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Dear Fr., in “Concerti nelle chiese” (1987) from the CDW, it says “si attenga, in ordine all’autorizzazione dei concerti, alle seguenti condizioni, che l’Ordinario del luogo potrà precisare: […] c) L’entrata nella chiesa dovrà essere libera e gratuita.”

The German Conference of Bishops has published the following document in 2005: HERE

In nr. 4.9 on page 43, they cite the direction from the CDW, but say that it only forbids entrance fees which aim at making a profit, thereby leaving room for fees which just cover the costs.

Can the Conference of Bishops decide that? Is it a legitimate form of “precisare” the condition from the CDW? Or are they not bound to “Concerti nelle chiese” at all, because it is just a Declaratio which is neither from the Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts nor has been approved in forma specifica by the Holy Father?

The document says don’t charge.  The German bishop charge anyway?  Imagine my shock!

If the obligatory pay-to-pray Kirchensteuer is in force, then why not pay-to-hear in church, too?  In 2012 the Church in Germany only gained some $7 billion.

The CDW  decree was not signed in forma specifica, so it remains a document of the CDW merely.  However, it deals with something that pertains to the competence of the CDW, and so has that authority. For the bishops conference to prescind from it, they would need permission from the Congregation or the Holy Father.

It seem that the German bishops are not specifically prescinding from the law, but rather interpreting it imaginatively to allow a fee to cover expenses. They may have a case. I think it’s tenuous.  That said, the reality on the ground is that, during this pontificate, it’s unlikely that the German bishops will be corrected in any way.

Unless … perchance, the matter is presented to the German press in such a way that it sits up and pays attention.  For example,

HEADLINE:

“German bishops prevent poor from attending concerts”

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
24 Comments

QUAERITUR: How early can the Easter Vigil 2016 begin?

We are getting to that time of Lent when we should be thinking about the schedule for the Vigil of Easter.

Here is an oldie but goodie. Updated for 2016.

From a reader:

There is a parish in our diocese that is advertising (in the bulletin and even in the diocesan paper) a 4:00 p.m. Easter Vigil. Are there ANY circumstances which allow for such an exception to the rule that the Easter Vigil may not begin until after sundown?

I seem to remember a clarification from Rome which stipulated that beginning an Easter Vigil at the same time as anticipated Masses is “reprehensible.”

I cannot think of any exceptions.

Given the time of year and daylight savings time, 4:00 pm is simply too early. It is still too light out.  I am leaving aside the dilemma of people in, say, northern Alaska, where length of day and night and day at different times of the year can be pretty dramatic.

But, ad rem

Since this night is the most important of the year, you want to get it right. Right?

That includes the time when the rite is to begin.

The symbolism of the light in darkness is important to the meaning of the rite. And the purpose of our liturgical rites is to have an encounter with mystery. The signs and symbols are important.

This Vigil (which is by definition a nighttime action) is not like the normal “vigil” celebrated in anticipation of a all other Sundays or Holy Day. It has a unique character in the whole liturgical year.

The rubrics for this rite, as found in the 2002MR says this is nox, night.

3. Tota celebratio Vigliae paschalis peragi debet noctu, ita ut vel non incipiatur ante initium noctis, vel finiatur ante diluculum diei dominicae.

The whole celebration of the Paschal Vigil ought to be completed at night, both so that it does not begin before the beginning of night, and that it finishes before dawn of Sunday.

sunset twilightAs your Lewis & Short Dictionary will indicate perago is “to complete”, in other words, “to get through it”. Vel…vel… is the equivalent of et… et.

To repeat: the Vigil is to

a) be gotten through entirely during nighttime
b) begin after nightfall
c) be completed before dawn

Also,

4. Missa Vigiliae, etsi ante mediam noctem celebratur, est Missa pachalis dominicae Resurrectionis.

The Mass of the Vigil, even celebrated before midnight, is the Easter Mass of the Lord’s Resurrection.

In most cases you don’t have to say that a vigil Mass is for the following Sunday. But the unique character of the Rite, different from the Sunday morning Mass, needs to be clarified. Also, the time midnight is explicitly mentioned.

Midnight is the traditional time to begin the Vigil Mass rites!

Also, the 1988 Circular of the CDW, called Paschale solemnitatis  (Notitiae 24 [1988] pp. 81-107) dealt with the time of the beginning of the Vigil,

78. This rule is to be taken according to its strictest sense. Reprehensible [!] are those abuses and practices which have crept in many places in violation of this ruling, whereby the Easter Vigil is celebrated at the time of day that it is customary to celebrate anticipated Masses.

“Reprehensible”… get that? And that from a year long before this Pope.

We must drill into initium noctis.

sunset twilightThis is the time when daylight is no longer visible. It is after nightfall.

The Jews made all sorts of distinctions about sundown and twilight and night. So do we when considering liturgical times.

The earliest time we can start the Vigil is initium noctis. What does this mean?

Nightfall is when sunlight is no longer part of the illumination of the sky.

Sunset is when the upper edge of the sun finally sinks the horizon. This is what the Jews called sunset. For Jews the evening twilight lasted until a few stars appeared. Then it was night. They had to figure these things out so that they knew, for example, how far they could walk to get to places, etc., before the sabbath fell.

There is “civil” twilight, that is, when the sun’s center is 6 degrees below the horizon. Of course there is still a lot of light from the sun in the sky at that time.

More helpful and accurate in this day of astronomical precision and electric lights is to go by astronomical twilight.

Astronomical twilight is, technically, when sunlight no longer illuminates the sky.  That’s the time we are looking for.

That is a fancy way of saying, “it’s night”.

16_03_01_Vigil_Mass_start_2016

CLICK FOR LARGER

Astronomical twilight is helpful because we can use the calculations of the Naval Observatory to figure out when astronomical twilight takes place.

Exempli gratia let’s say you are in the Diocesis Extraordinarii Ordinarii Madisonensis, where I am now.

Summon a chart for Astronomical Twilight from the Naval Observatory for your place and find the beginning of astronomical twilight for 26 March (yes 26, because the Sunday is 27 March)  My results were 1955 + 0100 hour for daylight savings – begins 13 March in these USA), which means that the starting time can be 2055.  Let’s call it 9:00 pm, to start the procession to go to the place for the flinty sparking of the fire.

Your nightfall (your exact astronomical twilight) will be a little different depending on your location (latitude and longitude, elevation, etc).

Clearly it is the Church’s intention that the rites begin when it is dark. There can be a little flexibility. There might still be traces of twilight but it would be black in church with the lights out, outside trees, mountains, and buildings might be in the way, etc.

The point is: let there be darkness!

So… if by 4:00 pm where you are night has fallen, fine! Start the Vigil Mass.

If not, and I will bet it hasn’t in most places people inhabit, then 4:00 pm is too early.

And, given how important the Vigil is, it is a grave liturgical abuse to begin Mass at 4:00 pm.

Didn’t that document say “reprehensible”?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , ,
15 Comments