Washington DC Day 3 – The March for Life

Friday begins with Mass at Old St Mary’s in the Usus Antiquior in honor of Nellie Gray.

20130125-082328.jpg20130125-082345.jpg

Confessions are being heard during Mass, which is always nice to see.

It is also great to see young people with March for Life gear in the pews, the young ladies with chapel veils.

It is the Feast of the Conversion of St Paul.

Try to convert again today.

20130125-083725.jpg

UPDATE

With my friend Fr Pasley!

20130125-115710.jpg

20130125-120945.jpg

20130125-123225.jpg

Sen Rand Paul say our country needs spiritual cleansing.

20130125-123450.jpg

UPDATE

Benedict XVI sent a tweet

20130125-124038.jpg

20130125-130222.jpg
A parish with a TLM!

20130125-133401.jpg
With Tom Peters who is promoting March for Marriage!

20130125-140838.jpg

20130125-140849.jpg
With Archbp Nienstedt

20130125-141913.jpg

20130125-143333.jpg
I have been instructed to glare as we pass the Supreme Court!

20130125-145758.jpg

20130125-145925.jpg
UPDATE

PONTIFICAL MASS

I was stuck I traffic in a cab with the world’s least aggressive driver, so I didn’t make it to the choir in time.
But, hey!

20130125-181344.jpg

20130125-181353.jpg

20130125-181359.jpg

20130125-181405.jpg

20130125-181412.jpg

20130125-181427.jpg

20130125-181436.jpg
Chant is a little eccentric, but not bad.

20130125-181614.jpg

20130125-181647.jpg

20130125-181743.jpg

20130125-182642.jpg

20130125-184423.jpg

20130125-184436.jpg

20130125-190746.jpg

UPDATE:

The blognic is on. Alas people are scattered around the place and are almost constrained to sit, but there are about 40 people right now. Coming and going.

20130125-202353.jpg

20130125-202359.jpg

20130125-202405.jpg

20130125-202413.jpg

UPDATE:

I am finally back in my room after a loooong and rich day.

A great experience, wonderful people, the best cause.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
55 Comments

Bp. Finn calls out the National Catholic Reporter

The National Catholic Reporter (aka Fishwrap) conspired with others who are openly hostile to the Catholic Church to intimidate His Excellency Most Rev. Robert Finn into silence.

The fact is, the NCR is not a “Catholic” paper or news source. That was established years ago. But clearly NCR has worked incessantly to find every negative thing possible about Bp. Finn, and the tell it over and over again, in a way even Goebbels would admire, so that were Bp. Finn ever to exercise his office as bishop of the place where NCR is published, they could accuse him of retribution.

Talk about deflection of the most sinister kind.

In the newest edition of the diocesan paper of the Diocese of Kansas City – St. Joseph, Bp. Finn’s diocese, the bishop has an interesting column in which he calls out the NCR.

The paper has been released, though as I write this is not on the diocesan website yet.

Bishop Finn wrote a column entitled

The Bishop’s Role in Fostering the Mission of the Catholic Media.

He cites canon law and explains it and talks about the diocesan paper.

Then he writes:

[…]

In a different way, I am sorry to say, my attention has been drawn once again to the National Catholic Reporter, a newspaper with headquarters in this Diocese. I have received letters and other complaints about NCR from the beginning of my time here. In the last months I have been deluged with emails and other correspondence from Catholics concerned about the editorial stances of the Reporter officially condemning Church teaching on the ordination of women, insistent undermining of Church teaching on artificial contraception and sexual morality in general, lionizing dissident theologies while rejecting establised Magisterial teaching, and a litany of other issues.

My predecessor bishops have taken different approches to the challenge. Bishop Charles Helmsing in October of 1968 issued a condemnation of the National Catholic Reporter and asked the publishers to remove the name “Catholic” from their title – to no avail. From my perspective, NCR’s positions against authentic Church teaching and leadership have not changed trajectory in the intervening decades.

When early in my tenure I requested that the paper submit their bona fides as a Catholic media outlet in accord with the expectations of Church law, they declined to participate indicating that they considered themselves and “independent newspaper which commented on ‘things Catholic.'” At other times, correspondence has seemed to reach a dead end.

In light of the number of recent expressions of concern, I have a responsibility as the local bishop to instruct the Faithful about the problematic nature of this media source which bears the name “Catholic.” While I remain open to substantive and respectful discussion with the legitimate representatives of NCR, I find that my ability to influence the National Catholic Reporter toward fidelity to the Church seems limited to the supernatural level. For this we pray: St. Francis DeSales, intercede for us.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Biased Media Coverage, Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Year of Faith | Tagged , , ,
35 Comments

Washington DC Day 2

The day started with breakfast with a friend and then the National Gallery.

Here is a lovely Christological Goldfinch!

20130124-135601.jpg

20130124-135630.jpg

A closer look.

I then met a congressional staffer for lunch and a tour of the Capitol.

20130124-135722.jpg

Since a while back I had lunch with a staffer in the Houses of Parliament in London, the staff cafeteria seemed a good place to go rather than someplace off campus.

20130124-140051.jpg
UPDATE

The time at the Capitol was well spent. My friend really knew his stuff. Very grateful for the time. We went to the floor of the House and to the Senate and even had a chance to see the members’ chapel.

20130124-172855.jpg
UPDATE

R and R with priest friends.

20130124-192727.jpg

20130124-233928.jpg

Posted in Just Too Cool, On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
12 Comments

Hijacking the language of the pro-life movement

I have been saying for a while now that the liberal catholic left’s spittle-flecked interest in stricter control has little or nothing to do with a true pro-life agenda. Fishwrap (aka National catholic Reporter) and their ilk have hijacked the language of the actual pro-life movement. Thus, we find at the aforementioned Fishwrap today an article entitled

Catholics to Catholic politicians: Gun control is pro-life

The basic notion is that some liberals signed a letter against scary-looking guns.  Keep in mind always that these catholics could care less about the guns.  Their real target is the people who uphold the 2nd (and 22nd) Amendment and who also believe that the right to be born is the foundational pro-life issue.  If you go to the Fishwrap piece and follow the link you’ll find the letter and can read the oh-so-predictable names.

See my post:

What the National Catholic Reporter is really doing by calling for an “assault weapons” ban. (Hint: It ain’t about guns!)

and

NCR, hardly pro-life, hijacks pro-life language

For the Fishwrap, abortion and/or the right to be born are not really pro-life issues. They are women’s rights issues.

For the LCWR and the Nuns on the Bus types, high taxes and entitlements are the paramount pro-life issues. The unborn are sacrificed for their higher causes.

When you start hearing or reading about the “seamless garment”, friends, the old thing promoted by the late Cardinal Bernardin, alarm bells should go off in your heads.  Start reading carefully and between the lines.  It will usually happen that, at some point, the writers will mention how awful abortion is.  They will proclaim that we must work to reduce the number of abortions.  What they are really after, however, is a list of other “social justice” or even “green” goals.

The unborn are not even sent to the back of the bus… they aren’t permitted to board.

QUAERITUR: Will the Fishwrap be represented at the March for Life or its equivalent rally in Kansas City? Will they have banners proclaiming their desire to overturn Roe v Wade or to defend the lives of the unborn?

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
38 Comments

NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo – excommunication? Can. 915?

Prof. Ed Peters, canonist (whom I still think is wrong about a question concerning Mass obligations – but I digress), has posted something instructive about catholic politicians who truly need some medicinal help from Holy Mother Church.

We enter in medias res

[…]

Now, it’s Let’s excommunicate New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo for his latest push to expand abortion in what is perhaps the most pro-abortion state in the union. Sins, to be sure, these deeds, but canonical crimes? and ones punishable by excommunication at that? I suggest not, as many of us have discussed many times.

Some bloggers really should google a bit before they post. If they did so in the Cuomo case, they’d find out, among other things, that politicians are not subject to excommunication for abortion under Canon 1398 (the only canon remotely relevant to their situation), that Canon 915 is a much more appropriate response to the scandal of the prominent pro-abortion Catholic politico, and that Cuomo has already been the subject of an extensive discussion in regard to his eligibility for Communion; indeed, they’d probably find out that Cuomo is apparently refraining from approaching for holy Communion on his own.

Can the canonical ante be upped further? Sure, but not by blog-driven public pressure on Catholic bishops for politico-excommunications under a Code that at present does not punish activities such as Cuomo’s or Quinn’s with a penalty such as excommunication. So, those distressed, and rightly so, by Cuomo’s or Quinn’s politics and specifically desirous of seeing them excommunicated, have, as I see it, two options: either (a) petition the pope to rewrite one or more canons of Book VI of the Code to excommunicate them; or (b) petition the bishops of New York and Illinois to enact particular legislation leading to their governors’ excommunications. I think both ideas are, for several reasons, problematic, but they seem within the bounds of what a Catholic could suggest. As for exploring the mechanics of such papal or episcopal canonical drafting, that’s beyond the scope of this blog. For now I simply note the idea. Again.

In the meantime, may I suggest prayers and fasting for Gov. Cuomo’s and Quinn’s repentance? They stand in great need of turning from the evils they support, and such acts on our part would improve the state of our souls, as well.

I have additional comment.

We get the priests and bishops we deserve.

Therefore, pray for and work to foster vocations to the priesthood.  Encourage sound young men to become enter seminary.  Future priests are out future bishops.

The Biological Solution is working on all of us.  Over time the character of the episcopate in these USA will change over (if we still have a country and a Church here, that is).  In what direction will the changes take us?

If you think that the present generation of leaders in the Church is less than optimal, think about the next generation and work with prayer and elbow-grease to make it happen.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
55 Comments

Concerning the National Anthem and its public singing

I thought about this during the National Anthem the other day, while sung at the sad inauguration and tweeted that often find these pop singers deeply annoying.  A Twitter respondent opined that these poptarts and others place their style before patriotism.

Someone sent me a page of the score for the National Anthem as sung by one of these poptarts.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged ,
63 Comments

WASHINGTON DC BLOGNIC Friday Evening, 25 January – after the Pontifical Mass (Usus Antiquior)

[Watch this for updates.  Apparently there is something after the Pontifical Mass that may conflict for some people.]

Since there is going to be a Pontifical Mass (Usus Antiquior) at Old St. Mary’s in Washington DC. (5th and H Sts. NW), this might be a good opportunity for a blognic.

The Pontifical Mass starts at 6 pm.  I suppose it will end around 7:30.  People could coagulate at the Irish Channel right away or go over after the Mass.  Perhaps a few people might stake out a zone.

The location for the blognic will be at the Irish Channel (500 H St. NW (202-216-0046)), just across from Old St. Mary’s.

The celebrant for the Pontifical Mass on Friday evening is Bp. Perry, Auxiliary Bishop in Chicago. Juventutem Michigan is sponsoring the Mass.

For your opportune knowledge, on Friday morning there will be a Missa Cantata at 8 a.m at Old St. Mary’s commemorating Nellie Gray. This will be in the morning of the March for Life.  This is sponsored by the Paulus Institute, who organized the great Pontifical Mass at the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington a few years ago.  What an event that was.

Here is a quick poll to see who might be able to come to the blognic on Friday after the Pontifical Mass.

25 Jan '13 Washington DC BLOGNIC

View Results

PS: I’ll be getting into DC on Wednesday.  I should spend some time in the National Gallery in the afternoon, but it closes at 5.  After that, supper will have to be found.  Dunno… Chinese perhaps?  If someone has an idea, drop me a line.

Posted in Blognics, Events, On the road | Tagged , , , , ,
31 Comments

Fishwrap gins up the Catholic gun control debate – POLL

Over at Fishwrap I was amused to see Michael Sean Winters go after Nicholas Hahn of the far more serious Crisis Magazine who opined that the US bishops and papal spokesman Fr. Lombardi ought to butt out of the gun-control debate.  Winters chastises Hahn for disagreeing with the bishops (as Winters reads them, at least).  Pretty rich.

Fishwrap defending Catholic teaching as presented by the bishops and a spokesman for the Holy See?

This when the ultra-dissenting Fishwrap thumbs their collective noses at the Church’s definitive teaching on women’s ordination, etc.

But there is a fun line in Winters piece.

More Conservative Claptrap
Michael Sean Winters | Jan. 22, 2013

Over at Crisis magazine, there is an article by Nicholas Hahn in which he chastizes the bishops and Father Lombardi at the Vatican press office for daring to support common sense gun control measures. It is clear that Mr. Hahn cares more about the Second Amendment than he does about the Second Vatican Council. He cherry picks a few quotes from pope John Paul II, which were not on point to begin with, and fashions them into a core argument: Bishops, mind your own business and gins are not your business.

[…]

I beg to differ!  No right-thinking Catholic would ever suggest that gins are not the bishops’ business!

This is a great opportunity to revive an old poll.

What is the plural of the adult beverage made from gin mixed with tonic water?

View Results

 

Posted in Lighter fare, POLLS |
34 Comments

Lutheran Ordinariate coming?

Vatican Insider has something today about some Lutherans who are getting nervous about the Holy Father establishing an Ordinariate for Lutherans, along the lines of that which he established for Anglicans.

“A Lutheran ordinariate? That’s a bad sign”

An ordinariate for Lutherans who wish to re-enter into communion with the Vatican, whilst preserving their traditions at least partially? [As a former Lutheran, I am wondering what those would be.  Perhaps strong congregational singing of hymns?] The idea of extending the solution offered by Pope Benedict XVI to groups of traditionalist Anglicans [I don’t think that is a good description, but… let that pass…] to followers of Martin Luther was suggested for the first time by the President of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, Cardinal Kurt Koch.

But just as the proposal is being put forward again by the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Mgr. Gerhard Ludwig Müller, it is beginning to trigger heated protests and concerns among the Catholic Church’s ecumenical partners –as happened with the Anglican Church. [It’s time not to care.]

The creation of an ordinariate – intended for those groups of Anglicans that wish to join the Catholic Church but also maintain their own identity – was “not Rome’s idea; it originates in the Anglican Church,” Koch said last 30 October. “The Holy Father looked for a solution and found a wide-reaching one which took into account the Anglican Church’s ecclesial and liturgical traditions. If the Lutherans made a similar request – he went on to say – we will have to consider their situation carefully. But the initiative remains in the hands of the Lutherans.” [And there are going to be not a few, I think.  In the last decades I think there has been a steady shift to a more sacramental approach to worship.  Some ministers have sought ordination from the Orthodox.  They are reading the Fathers.  Get the idea?]

The issue was recently addressed by Mgr. Müller. The German theologian chosen by Pope Benedict XVI to lead the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, recognised that the “Lutheran world is different to the Anglican one because Anglicanism has always had an element that is closer to Catholicism.” But this would not stop the Church from allowing Lutheran groups to convert to Catholicism, preserving “legitimate traditions developed” over the centuries. [see above]

According to Mgr. Müller, there are Lutherans in his homeland, Germany, who hope to enter once again into communion with the Roman Catholic Church and who believe that the changes introduced by the Second Vatican Council were an adequate response to Luther’s request for reforms five centuries ago. [The SSPXer’s will love that line!  But they are marginalizing themselves.]  “Protestants – he added – do not oppose Catholicism because they have hung onto many Catholic traditions.”

However, the idea of establishing a Lutheran ordinariate was turned down by the Secretary General of the International Lutheran Federation which has approximately 70 million Christian Lutheran members. [None of which, I believe, are actually governed by this Federation.  Am I wrong?] The Rev. Martin Junge said individual believers naturally still have every right to convert, but the establishment of an ordinariate would not only pose “theological problems[? Oh? Such as a challenge to the Lutheran rejection of the Petrine Ministry?  The Mass?] it would also have “serious ecumenical repercussions.” [Good.]

Protestant Churches are preparing to celebrate the 500th anniversary of the 2017 Reform and have invited the Catholic Church to take part in the celebrations. But – Junge said – the creation of an ordinariate “would send out the wrong signal to Lutheran Churches which are preparing to celebrate the anniversary of the Reform in a spirit of understanding and ecumenical cooperation.” [Good.] This is why Müller’s message to the “small number” of Lutherans who wish to convert to Catholicism has triggered “a great deal of concern.” [We’ll see how small it is.  Isn’t that what the Anglicans were saying too?  “Oh, Rome might set something up, but only a handful of people will actually join.”]

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

It is he who determines the parameters of dialogue… not liberals and the squishy, who croon about dialogue… dialogue which becomes endless dialogue.

Another benefit of the Lutheran Ordinariate could be the welcome that Lutherans would give to readers of the National Catholic Reporter who don’t become Anglicans under Romanorum coetibus.

Posted in Benedict XVI, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, The future and our choices, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
75 Comments

Dissident Irish priest about to get hammered into the ground by the CDF.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s process is slow and patient and respectful, to a fault, when certain people and their odd theological notions come under study.  It takes a lot to get scrutinized by the CDF in the first place, but once you are in their system, they go over and over what you write and give you chances to explain and correct.  If it gets to a point where someone refuses to be corrected, unpleasant things result.

From CWN:

A prominent Irish priest has announced that he will reject a directive from the Vatican and refuse to sign a statement affirming Church teachings on the nature of priestly ordination.

Father Tony Flannery had been silenced by the Vatican last year because of his statements supporting the ordination of women and questioning Church teachings on contraception and on homosexuality. At a January 20 press conference in Dublin he said that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) had ordered him to sign a statement of support for Church teaching, and threatened further disciplinary action if he refused.

“Either I sign a statement, for publication, stating that I accepted teachings that I could not accept, or I would remain permanently banned from priestly ministry, and maybe face more serious sanctions,” Father Flannery said. He claimed that his disagreements with the Vatican involved “not matters of fundamental teaching, but rather of Church governance.” Actually his published writings have questioned fundamental Catholic doctrines; he has not only opposed the ban on ordination of women but also said that he does not believe that “the priesthood as we currently have it in the Church originated with Jesus.”

[…]

The Association of Catholic Priests, a dissident group that Father Flannery had helped to found, issued a strong statement of support for the embattled priest, denouncing the Vatican for “a callousness and even brutality” in its handling of his case.

[…]

BOO HOO!  sniffle…

Read the rest of the article about this whinging heretic over there.  Hell’s Bible has something on him HERE.

Every once in a while I foster the desire that guys like this not sign, not conform… and good riddance!  Yes, it would be better were he to convert to Catholicism, especially given that he is ordained. But if is isn’t going to, and if he is going to persist in error after being corrected by Congregation…. hasta la vista.  And take the Ass. of Catholic Priests with you.

Quislings.

UPDATE 22 Jan 14:47 GMT:

From a priest in Ireland:

I’m not very tech savvy so i don’t know how to post a comment on your blog.
I just wanted to add that Fr. Flannery called his press conference the day after the massive prolife rally in Dublin which we Catholics wanted to be big news. 30,000 people turned up, but by Sunday Fr. Flannery’s difficulties became the hot topic for an Irish Media that was only too delighted to get the chance to move on from a positive prolife story. Even if I agreed with Fr. Flannery’s position (I certainly do not) I think it was lousy of him to call a press conference on the weekend when the Church was getting people in this country to focus their attention on keeping abortion out of Ireland.
From a prolife point of view he couldn’t have picked a worse weekend to vent his anger at the Vatican.

And you can bet he did it on purpose, to cause a problem.

Posted in Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill | Tagged , ,
43 Comments