Synod Nightmare Scenario: Card. Burke on devolution of doctrine to local bishops and conferences

12_04_11_burkeFrom Lifesite… read the whole thing, but this is probably the most important bit.

There has been talk of devolving some decision making about various issues to regional conferences of bishops or to local bishops. That would, of course, be total disaster.

From the interview… my patented emphases and comments:

LSN: What do you make of the idea of “regional diversity” in the Church? Should local bishops have the authority on a pastoral level to deal with questions pertaining to the “social acceptance of homosexuality” and with “divorced and remarried persons?”

Burke: This is simply contrary to Catholic Faith and life. The Church follows the teaching of our Lord Jesus Christ as it has first of all been taught to us by God in the creation — what we call the natural law, what every human heart understands because it has been created by God — but it’s also then been explained and illuminated by the teaching of Christ and in the tradition of the Church.

And this Church is one all over the world. There is no change in these truths, from one place to another or from one time to another. Certainly the teaching of these truths takes into account the particular needs in each area. But it doesn’t change the teaching. The teaching sometimes has to be even stronger in places where it is more compromised. [The Kasperites and those who talk about bending the Church’s teachings (and practices) to “reality”, would indeed say that truth can vary from place place.  If they say that what might have once been true doesn’t necessary need to be true now, then why not also posit fluid truth based on location?  The German/Kasperite/Rahnerian approach replaces the philosophical grounding of theology with politics (cf. Robert Stark).  Truth changes according to shifting mores, values, etc.  To hell with reason (e.g., syllogisms).]

So, this is unacceptable. I don’t know where this idea comes from. [I have a couple ideas.] What it actually means is that the Church is no longer Catholic [universal]. It means that it’s no longer one in its teaching throughout the whole world. We have one faith. We have one [collection of] sacraments. We have one governance throughout the whole world. That’s what it means to be ‘Catholic.’

[NB] I’d also like to comment on this idea of what is “pastoral.”

In much of the discussion which has taken place, beginning with the infamous presentation of Cardinal Walter Kasper in the Extraordinary Consistory on February 20 and 21 of 2014, centered around this idea that somehow doctrine and pastoral practice are in conflict with one another.

This is absurd. [Do I hear an “Amen!”?] The pastoral practice exists to help us to live the truths of the faith, to live the doctrine of the faith in our daily lives. You can’t have a conflict [between these]. You can’t have the Church teaching, for instance, that marriage is indissoluble and then someone claiming at the same time for ‘pastoral’ reasons that a person who is living in an irregular union is able to receive the sacraments, which would mean that marriage isn’t indissoluble. These are just false distinctions — false contrasts — that we really need to clear up because it’s causing an immense confusion among the faithful and, of course, ultimately can lead people into serious error with great harm to their spiritual life and their eternal salvation.

Blessings upon Card. Burke.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Synod | Tagged ,
23 Comments

Card. Arinze speaks on issues discussed at the Synod

The formerly nearly ubiquitous John L. Allen, Jr. has an outstanding interview with the great Francis Card. Arinze, 82 year old Cardinal Bishop of Velletri-Segni and quondam Prefect of Divine Worship.  Allen dubs His Eminence as Africa’s Lion in Winter.

HERE

You should read the whole thing, but here are a couple samples.  Note the Cardinal’s unhesitating clarity.

You are convinced it’s not possible to invite divorced and civilly remarried Catholics to Communion?

That is correct, in the sense that Christ has said, “What God has joined, let no man put asunder,” and the Catholic Church traditionally has interpreted it to mean that a consummated marriage sanctified by the sacrament cannot be broken by any authority.

Including the authority of the Church?

Yes, not even the authority of the Church can break it. That being so, if a man leaves a woman or asks her to go away, or she does the same, and they get a fresh partner, that can’t be approved. Christ has one word for a person who does that: “Adultery.” We cannot improve on what Christ has said. We cannot be wiser than him, or say that “there is a circumstance he did not foresee.” We cannot be more merciful than Christ.

We must look for a way to help the divorced who are remarried, [but] we don’t help them by saying, “Come and receive Holy Communion.”

The Eucharist is not something we possess, and we can give to our friends and those with whom we sympathize …. The idea of sin is not something new invented by modern conservative people in the Church. It is Christ himself who called it a sin, and he used that word “adultery.” He knows what he’s talking about. Without departing from Christ, how can we backpedal?

Remember, only God will conduct the last judgment, not us, not even half a dozen cardinals from the Vatican. God will judge each person’s circumstances, but objectively we cannot approve [divorce and remarriage].

[…]

There has been conversation in the synod about a finding a “new language,” especially on homosexuality, meaning something that’s more inclusive and welcoming. How does that look from the African perspective?

I would be suspicious, because I would wonder what type of new language you want. Shouldn’t we call things by their name, calling good “good” and evil “evil”? We don’t condemn the person, but we don’t approve the action.

One of the duties of bishops is to teach, and it is very important that the Gospel be undiluted, without adding salt or pepper, but without subtracting them, either. The message is not ours. Christ’s message must shine clearly on what marriage is. If two men come together for business purposes, we’re not worried about that. But if they begin to call it marriage, don’t you see that it’s not all right anymore?

[NB: And now what I think is out Nightmare Scenario, one of the worst of possible products of this Synod…] Some at the synod have talked about allowing decisions on the divorced and remarried or on homosexuality to be decentralized, made at the level of regional or national bishops’ conferences or by individual bishops. How do you feel about that?

Are you going to tell me that we can have a national bishops’ conference in one country that would approve something which, in another conference, would be seen as sin? Is sin going to change according to national borders? We’d become national churches. Have there not been other religious affiliations in the world that came dangerously near to that?

National bishops’ conferences are important and should have a clear role, [a very limited role, perhaps] but I don’t think it should include these areas. It looks dangerously like nationalizing right and wrong.

[…]

There’s quite a bit more.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA, Synod | Tagged , , ,
17 Comments

SSPX priest allowed to say Mass regularly by Italian Archbishop

From Eponymous Flower:

SSPX Clergy Invited to Help in Ravenna Archdiocese by Archbishop

(Rome) As auxiliary bishop of  Reggio Emilia-Guastalla (2006-2012)  Msgr. Lorenzo Ghizzoni was a bitter opponent of those faithful who sought to celebrate the Holy Mass in the Immemorial Rite of All Ages.   It was an opposition which undermined the Motu Proprio  Summorum Pontificum.

As Archbishop of Ravenna-Cervia,  Msgr. Ghizzoni is allowing, on the first and second Sundays in October, a priest of the Society of Saint Pius X (FSSPX) to celebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. 

The celebration will take place in the parish of Saint Maria del Torrione and follows from the formation of a stable group of  the faithful desiring the Traditional Rite, who’ve asked the Archbishop for it.

The celebrant was Father  Enrico Doria of the priory of  “Madonna di Loreto” in Rimini.

The online edition of the paper „Prima Pagina Reggio“ described it: “It seems that Pope Francis’ recognition of the legitimacy of the sacrament of reconciliation given by lefebvrian priests has also quickly led to a new course in the Italian Episcopate.  This, what was unthinkable yesterday, (the opening of parish property to Lefevrians, who had previously been regarded as lepers), are today not only tolerated but welcome.  Those of the faithful community close to Econe will celebrate, but also all other faithful of the Catholic Church, we are convinced, will make use of this.”

Msgr. Lorenzo Ghizzoni was named in Dezember 2012 by Pope Benedict  XVI. as Archbishop of Ravenna and enthroned in January 2013.

That’s interesting.  I know of at least one case like this from way before Summorum Pontificum.  But this is interesting.

It is unusual for a priest who has been irregularly ordained to be given permission to offer (technically, an illicit) Mass. There’s no indication in the article whether the archbishop has given him faculties, or is merely permitting him (looking the other way?) to offer Mass and permitting the faithful to attend.

This smacks of that gray chaotic area Pope Francis seems so fond of.

If it were to come out that the archbishop gave him faculties, then we’d be in a very interesting canonical ballpark.  It would likely have to be cleared through the Holy See and whatever irregularities that exist would need to be lifted (perhaps by the Pont. Comm. “Ecclesia Dei“).

Since he would have been ordained without proper dimissorial letters, he would have been ipso facto suspended from the exercise of Holy Orders (can. 1383). This suspension is a censure which presumably prohibits the licit celebration of the sacraments (can. 1333) and prohibits the reception of stipends and demands the return of those stipends even if they had been given and received in good faith (can. 1333, 4). This suspension would need to be lifted. It does not appear that this censure is reserved to the Holy See.  Therefore a bishop could probably lift it for one of his subjects, but only if that subject has purged his contempt (can. 1347, 2 and can. 1358, 1). This also might possibly require adjuration of the impaired communion the SSPX is currently in, as well some indication of a desire to return to the full, unimpaired communion enjoyed by other priests.

Posted in Priests and Priesthood, SSPX | Tagged , , , , ,
19 Comments

Card. Burke: “Yes, I’m a fundamentalist”

Click to buy in English

In Italian bookstores a new book by Card. Burke has appeared in Italian: Divino Amore incarnato – La santa Eucaristia sacramento di Carità (Cantagalli). This is the Italian translation of His Eminence’s Divine Love Made Flesh.

For the occasion, the Italian Il Foglio interviewed Card. Burke.  A few snips with my translation:

Card. Burke: “Yes, I’m a fundamentalist”

“I’m open to the world, but I insist on the fundamental things.  Like the Eucharist.”  Thus says Raymond Card. Burke.

“The Church must be clear on her identity.  If, for ‘fundamentalist’ one means someone who insists on the fundamentals, I’m a fundamentalist.  As a priest, I don’t teach for myself and I don’t act for myself.  I belong to Christ.  I act in his person.  I teach only what He teaches in His Church, because this teaching will save souls.”

[…] Burke says quit labeling, which “is a way to discount a person and to not consider the truth which he teaches or what he does.  I am a Roman Catholic, I hope to be so always, and, at the end of my earthly life, to die in the arms of the Church.”

[…]

The position of Card. Kasper is not reconcilable with the teaching of the Church on Holy Communion and the indissolubility of matrimony.  Certainly, the Most Holy Sacrament is for sinners – which we all are – but for repented sinners.  A person who lives in an irregular union is bound to another in marriage, and therefore lives publicly in the state of adultery, according to the clear teaching of the Lord in the Gospel.  So long as the person in the irregular union, that is in the context contrary to the truth of Christ in matrimony, does not correct his particular situation, he can’t draw near to receive the sacraments because he has not manifested the repentance necessary for reconciliation with God.

[…]

If the Church were to permit the reception of the sacraments (even in a single case) by a person who is in an irregular union, that would mean that either matrimony is not indissoluble and this the person is not living in a state of adultery , or that Holy Communion is not communion in the Body and Blood of Christ, which instead requires the proper disposition of the person, that is, repentance about grave sin and the firm resolution to sin no more.

[…]

Many priests and bishops tell me that many people who are living in irregular unions are convinced that the Church has changed her teaching and, therefore, they can receive the sacraments.  In a large city that I visited last May, at the main door of a parish church there was an poster that said that in that church the divorced and remarried had access to the sacraments.  In certain countries, it seems that various bishops have simply decided to admit to the sacraments whoever is in an irregular union.

[…]

There is no doubt that the confusion in the Church is great, and that Church, for the good of souls and for her faithful testimony to Christ in the world, must affirm clearly her perennial teaching on the indissolubility of marriage and on Holy Communion.

[… I’m cutting a lot…]

He went on to explain that the way of saying Mass that is centered on the priest and congregation rather than the real presence of Christ has added to the difficulty we face.

He speaks of the contribution of the African Church right now.

Then… smiling…

I am entirely open to the world and I am full of compassion for the situation of our world, which is confused and in error about the most fundamental truths: the inviolability of human life, the integrity of matrimony and its incomparable fruit, the family, religious liberty which is the expression of the irreplaceable relationship of man with God.  For this motive, I embrace the world with true compassion which offers to the world the truth in charity.  I’ve discovered, during the 40 years of my priesthood, that what man (even secular man) awaits from the priest is Christ,

There’s more.  I suppose the whole thing will be converted into English one of these days.

Fr. Z kudos to Card. Burke!

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
17 Comments

The Left seems to win constantly. What would happen if…

At Radical Catholic there is a post about Newark’s Archbp. Myers’ recent letter to his priests about the fact that people in mortal sin shouldn’t receive Communion.

To what point have we finally arrived when a bishop has to send such a memo to his parish priests?  O tempora….

If you go over there, take note of the unhinged goofy musings of Prof. Reid at the Univ. of St. Thomas in my native place, the Twin Cities.  But I digress. Canonist Ed Peters takes Reid apart HERE.

Radical Catholic made a point worthy of discussion:

Perhaps one reason why the progressives always seem to have the upper hand is that the Hegelian dialectic is set up to grind conservative resistance into dust. If the only directional force being exerted is leftward, why be surprised at the continual leftward drift? So, what would happen if we changed things up by proposing something radically conservative – restorationist, even? For example, what would happen if a Cardinal or Bishop at the Synod started proposing that we require penitents to declare their mortal sins publicly before the entire congregation, kneel in the back during the Mass of the Catechumens, and then leave the Church before the start of the Mass of the Faithful? This was a common practice during the early medieval period, after all. If it was good enough for St. Theophilus, it’s good enough for us, right? Maybe then the Church’s present practice would reveal it’s true character: as merciful as possible without overtly condoning sin. Or, conversely, maybe the cilice would make a comeback….

Discuss.

One possible point of consideration is the fact that conservatives and trads seems constantly to be bickering among themselves, fighting over their tiny little wrinkle of ground.  Thus, divided we don’t band together to get done what needs doing.  Divided, we fall.  Instead, what would happen were we to put aside our small differences and work more collaboratively?

A storm is on the horizon and our efforts are not well focused.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, Cri de Coeur, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Semper Paratus, The Campus Telephone Pole, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
53 Comments

Movie Recommendation and Books Received

I don’t like to expose much about plots of movies I see because I detest spoilers.

Yesterday (being Tuesday, my movie day, $5 all day and free popcorn), I saw The Martian (from the book HERE).  Gorgeous martian landscapes, apparently filmed in part in Jordan.  These sci-fi movies, with the special effects, are getting to be amazingly real.

The plot had a lot of points for reflection on a) will to survive, b) solving problems c) being prepared for anything.

It was a movie presentation on Zuhlsdorf’s Law:

Since the legendary Murphy was an optimist, therefore…

  • When you need your technology to work, that is when it will fail.

  • The extent of the failure is proportioned to the urgency of the need.

  • When you want to show someone the great gizmo or program you have, that is when it won’t work.

You may bite your nails a couple times during the movie despite a suspicion (which I won’t confirm or deny) that the protagonist might make it (but at what cost?).

Books pour in from publishers faster than I can read them.

I received Inventing Socrates by Miles Hollingworth.  This is the fellow who wrote the book on St. Augustine that was so impressive HERE.

Behold the Man: A Catholic Vision of Male Spirituality by Harold Burke-Sivers

No link for this yet. Maybe they’ll decide they want to sell some of them.  I’ll let you know. It has Card. Burke’s address at Steubenville.  Impressive.

Sins of the Press: The Untold Story of The Boston Globe’s Reporting on Sex Abuse in the Catholic Church by David F. Pierre Jr

The Coup at Catholic University: The 1968 Revolution in American Catholic Education by Fr. Peter Mitchell

Posted in REVIEWS, SESSIUNCULA, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
14 Comments

The Coming Storm – Argentina: topless pro-abort feminists assault men, try to burn Cathedral

UPDATE 15 Oct:

I received this from a trustworthy priest:

I saw your post on the Mar del Plata cathedral assault. Quite frightening demonstration and disappointing response from the rector.

However, the whole event may be more complicated than it seems from the Life Site News report. See:  HERE and HERE

Interesting to note the presence of far right counter-protestors who may have been using the Church and the Cathedral for their own political goals.

Argentinian politics is very complex and I’m no expert, but the whole thing looks much more complex than “pro-abort feminists try to burn down the Cathedral”. Therefore, perhaps Fr. Mestre’s response was one of tact rather than cowardice. I noticed that “marcelus” recommends in a comment that you nuance your post. Might be worthwhile, especially considering that some readers associate Fr. Mestre’s “cowardice” with Bergoglio on account of this being in Buenos Aires, but Mar del Plata is a separate diocese in the Province of Buenos Aires. I’m not sure how Card. Bergoglio could have appointed Fr. Mestre….

_____ ORIGINAL Published on: Oct 14, 2015 @ 13:33

This is what modern feminists and their big-business abortion sugar-daddies have in store where you are.

Each of you should think about what you will do when this sort of thing arrives where you are.

From LifeSite. Warning. The photos and video are dreadful and not a little gross in many respects.

Shock video: Violent mob of topless pro-abort feminists assaults praying men, tries to burn Cathedral

WARNING: The video footage included below is shocking, graphic and contains nudity and violence. Viewer discretion is strongly advised. LifeSite is working on creating a censored version of the video which will be available shortly.

Mar de Plata, October 13, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – A horrific and surreal scene unfolded Monday night outside the Cathedral of Mar de Plata in Argentina as hordes of women, many of them masked and half naked, violently assaulted a group of young men who stood outside the Cathedral of Mar de Plata praying and standing watch.

Such violence is becoming the norm for the annual March for Women in the Pope’s native land of Argentina, although this year’s violence seemed to be the most extreme yet, with the women turning their violence against the police, and even attempting to set the Cathedral on fire.

The women tore down the outer gate of the cathedral and hurled glass bottles and feces at the young men standing guard. When they attempted to burn down the Cathedral the police began taking measures to disperse the hordes.

[…]

While the police and faithful came out bravely to defend the church form the aggressors, putting their bodies in the way of the hordes, it appears that the local Church hierarchy is not willing to do the same.

Father Gabriel Mestre, the Vicar of the Cathedral, stated that “one has to accept the dynamic and the dissent , and in fact in the Church we have to accept it because I think that more than half is in favor of legal abortion, and for that there are proper avenues, within a pluralistic and democratic society to generate policies which each from his ideological frame of reference considers as an appropriate way to progress, just like happened with ‘marriage’ equality or with divorce.” [traidor cobarde]

Read the rest there.

 

Posted in Liberals, Si vis pacem para bellum!, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
39 Comments

Rads on a Plane! Holes in the Sun! Flares!

Not for Rad Trads, unless you are also frequent flyers…

From Spaceweather

RADS ON A PLANE: Regular readers know that Spaceweather.com and the students of Earth to Sky Calculus regularly fly balloons to the stratosphere to measure cosmic rays. For the past six months, May through Oct. 2015, they have been taking their radiation sensors onboard commercial airplanes, too. The chart below summarizes their measurements on 18 different airplanes flying back and forth across the continental United States.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Meanwhile…

CHANCE OF FLARES: NOAA forecasters have boosted the odds of an M-classsolar flare today to 30%. They are responding to the emergence of sunspot AR2434 near the sun’s southeastern limb. Earlier this week while AR2434 was on the farside of the sun, it hurled several clouds of plasma over the limb: movie. This suggests it is capable of significant explosions. Solar flare alerts: text or voice

Significant explosions.  That’s what we want to hear.

Then…

ENORMOUS CORONAL HOLE: A gigantic hole in the sun’s atmosphere has opened up and a broad stream of solar wind is flowing out of it. This is called a “coronal hole.” It is the deep blue-colored region in this extreme UV image from NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory:

Coronal holes are places in the sun’s atmosphere where the magnetic field unfurls and allows solar wind to escape. In the image above, the sun’s magnetic field is traced by white curving lines. Outside the coronal hole, those magnetic fields curve back on themselves, trapping solar wind inside their loops. Inside the coronal hole, no such trapping occurs. Solar wind plasma is free to fly away as indicated by the white arrows.

For much of the next week, Earth’s environment in space will be dominated by winds flowing from this broad hole. This should activate some beautiful Arctic auroras. NOAA forecasters estimate a 65% of polar geomagnetic storms today as Earth moves deeper into the solar wind stream. Aurora alerts: text or voice

I think this means that the ham radio bands may stink for the time being.

Play
Posted in Ham Radio, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , ,
7 Comments

Ite Catuli!

How about those Cubs?

They beat the Cardinals to advance another step toward the World Series.

That said, today is the anniversary of the infamous Bartman incident, when a fan interfered with an out, thus extended the enemy’s inning and leading to the Cubs getting knocked off.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Meanwhile…

IMG_2626

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged , , ,
10 Comments

ASK FATHER: TLM cancelled, pastor and bishop won’t respond. What to do?

I have received sundry questions about situations in which Traditional Latin Masses (Extraordinary Form), have been suddenly cancelled, without reasons, without dialogue, without recourse… no doubt in the name of the Mercy Pope Francis speaks of.

As you know, the law laid down by Benedict XVI in Summorum Pontificum protects lay people and priests in these situations and requires that pastors engage with them to come up with a satisfactory solution for their legitimate aspirations.

So… what to do when the local bishops is openly hostile or unresponsive?  What do to when the local priest turns on you (in Mercy)?  What to do when your correspondence to the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei disappears into the black hole… in Mercy?

Here’s an idea.  Be the maquis!

You don’t have to lie down and let your shepherds alternately ignore you and kick you.

Continue to build your coalition, your group, your coetus.

Expand your numbers and, therefore, economic clout.

Take the money you could then have been contributing to the parish (where the TLM was/should be) and buy a comfortable bus to provide transportation to the nearest parish/town with the TLM.   Be sure to paint

Trads on the Bus

on the side of the bus, along with Exiled Latin Mass Society of [fill in blank].

You might also modify the bus as did Aid to the Church in Need in some Eastern European places so that the side of the bus opens up with a beautifully appointed traditional altar where your “flying” priest might say Mass for you.

You might on certain feast days park the bus in front of the chancery.  If it should have external speakers, it could be a good idea to play Gregorian chant and Marian hymns.

¡Hagan lío!

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Be The Maquis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged
3 Comments