Misogynist England now waging a war on women

England is clearly a misogynistic waging a war on women.  This must be true because the official state church of England has rejected women bishops.

From the site of The Church of England.

General Synod Rejects Draft Legislation on Women Bishops

20 November 2012

The General Synod of the Church of England has voted to reject the draft legislation to allow women to become bishops. [A move that would have made them them even more of a laughingstock for real Churches, with actual Apostolic Succession and valid Orders.]

Under the requirements of the Synod the legislation required a two-thirds majority in each of the three voting houses for final draft approval. Whilst more than two thirds voted for the legislation in both the House of Bishops (44-03) and the House of Clergy (148-45), the vote in favour of the legislation in the House of Laity was less than two-thirds (132-74). The vote in the House of Laity fell short of approval by six votes. [Would this have needed to go to the Queen for approval, as head of the Church of England?]

In total 324 members of the General Synod voted to approve the legislation and 122 voted to reject it.

The consequence of the “no” vote of terminating any further consideration of the draft legislation means that it will not be possible to introduce draft legislation in the same terms until a new General Synod comes into being in 2015, unless [Ooops! A loop-hole!] the ‘Group of Six‘ (the Archbishops, the Prolocutors [Would that be prolocútors or prolócutors?] and the Chair and Vice Chair of the House of Laity) give permission and report to the Synod why they have done so.

Speaking after the vote the Rt Revd Graham James, Bishop of Norwich, said:  “A clear majority of the General Synod today voted in favour of the legislation to consecrate women as Bishops. But the bar of approval is set very high in this Synod. [Unbelievable.] Two-thirds of each house has to approve the legislation for it to pass. This ensures the majority is overwhelming. The majority in the house of laity was not quite enough. This leaves us with a problem. 42 out of 44 dioceses approved the legislation and more than three quarters of members of diocesan synods voted in favour. There will be many who wonder why the General Synod expressed its mind so differently. [In every war there is the “fog of war”.]

“The House of Bishops recognises that the Church of England has expressed its mind that women should be consecrated as bishops. There is now an urgent task to find a fresh way forward to which so many of those who were opposed have pledged themselves.” [“It’s not our fault!  We tried!  We really did!”]

The House of Bishops of the Church of England will meet at 08.30am on Wednesday morning in emergency session [Ooooo!] to consider the consequences of the vote.

Exact voting figures will be found here.

They should in that emergency session immediately pass the provisions of Romanorum coetibus.

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in Liberals, Pope of Christian Unity, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged ,
44 Comments

Benedict’s little dig at liberals

In his new book the Holy Father has a dig at liberals.

I am sure this was directly at the Fishwrap. Aren’t you? o{];¬)

In some portrayals of the figure of Jesus, the emphasis is placed almost exclusively on the radical aspects, on Jesus’ challenge to false piety. Thus Jesus is presented as a liberal or a revolutionary. It is true that in his mission as Son, Jesus did introduce a new phase in man’s relationship to God, opening up a new dimension of human intimacy with God. But this was not an attack on Israel’s piety. Jesus’ freedom is not the freedom of the liberal. It is the freedom of the Son, and thus the freedom of the truly devout person. (p. 120-121)

Bottom line: Jesus was no liberal.

US hardcover HERE.  Kindle HERE. Unabridged audio HERE. Large print HERE.
UK hardcover HERE. Kindle HERE.  Large print HERE.

Posted in Benedict XVI, Liberals, Lighter fare | Tagged , , ,
29 Comments

Senate Bill gives govt. agencies WARRANTLESS access to everything you do on the internet

Please use the sharing buttons!  Thanks!

HOW TO FIND YOUR SENATORS’ PHONE NUMBERS: HERE

I think this is the ‘‘Electronic Communications Privacy Act Amendments Act of 2011’’ – or S. 1011.

______

The Obama Administration has been undermining the 1st and 2nd Amendments.

Here is an attack on the 4th.

I picked this up from CNET.

Senate bill rewrite lets feds read your e-mail without warrants

Proposed law scheduled for a vote next week originally increased Americans’ e-mail privacy. Then law enforcement complained. Now it increases government access to e-mail and other digital files.

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, [hissssssss] the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.  [Call your Senators.]

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

It’s an abrupt departure from Leahy’s earlier approach, which required police to obtain a search warrant backed by probable cause before they could read the contents of e-mail or other communications. The Vermont Democrat boasted last year that his bill “provides enhanced privacy protections for American consumers by… requiring that the government obtain a search warrant.”

Leahy had planned a vote on an earlier version of his bill, designed to update a pair of 1980s-vintage surveillance laws, in late September. But after law enforcement groups including the National District Attorneys’ Association and the National Sheriffs’ Association organizations objected to the legislation and asked him to “reconsider acting” on it, Leahy pushed back the vote and reworked the bill as a package of amendments to be offered next Thursday. The package (PDF) is a substitute for H.R. 2471, which the House of Representatives already has approved.

[…]

The list of agencies that would receive civil subpoena authority for the contents of electronic communications also includes the Federal Reserve, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Maritime Commission, the Postal Regulatory Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, and the Mine Enforcement Safety and Health Review Commission.

[…]

Howdy’a like them apples?

Revised bill highlights

  • Grants warrantless access to Americans’ electronic correspondence to over 22 federal agencies. Only a subpoena is required, not a search warrant signed by a judge based on probable cause.
  • Permits state and local law enforcement to warrantlessly access Americans’ correspondence stored on systems not offered “to the public,” including university networks.
  • Authorizes any law enforcement agency to access accounts without a warrant — or subsequent court review — if they claim “emergency” situations exist.
  • Says providers “shall notify” law enforcement in advance of any plans to tell their customers that they’ve been the target of a warrant, order, or subpoena.
  • Delays notification of customers whose accounts have been accessed from 3 days to “10 business days.” This notification can be postponed by up to 360 days.

 

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Liberals, TEOTWAWKI, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , ,
28 Comments

The Older Courtesies and the Gravitational Pull

A deeper sense of decorum is needed in our worship.

The older form of Holy Mass of the Roman Rite, the Usus Antiquior, must return – and will return – in strength.  Recovery of the older form will exert a “gravitational pull” on the way the Novus Ordo is celebrated.  As priests learn or relearn the older form, they change the way the say the newer form.  The deepening of their ars celebrandi will have a knock-on effect in their congregations.  Revitalized worship of God is a necessary element of a New Evangelization.

The Biological Solution continues is scything work.  New priests, free from the dominating hermeneutic of the 60’s-80’s, are rising up.  In the next few years, we should see a more rapid increase in the number and places where the older form is used.

With a tip of the biretta to Reluctant Sinner:

In his introduction to the extended version of A Bitter Trial: Evelyn Waugh and John Cardinal Heenan on the Liturgical Changes, Joseph Pearce begins by recalling how Sir Alec Guinness lamented the passing away of the “older courtesies” that our Catholic liturgy had preserved for centuries. Yet, being a man of God, Sir Alec also knew that it was only a matter of time before the Mass of Ages would once more be restored to its proper dignity and place within the Church’s worship. Here is how Pearce puts it: –

“Much water has flown under the Tiber’s bridges,” wrote Alec Guinness in his autobiography, “carrying away splendour and mystery from Rome, since the Pontificate of Pius XII.” Writing in the mid-eighties, Guinness lamented the “banality and vulgarity of the translations which have ousted the sonorous Latin and little Greek” from the liturgy and regretted that “[h]andshaking and embarrassed smiles or smirks have replaced the older courtesies.” Although dismayed by the nature of the liturgical changes, Guinness was sure that the Church would recover from such nonsense, “so long as the God who is worshipped is the God of all ages, past and to come, and not the Idol of Modernity, so venerated by some of our bishops, priests and mini-skirted nuns.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , , , ,
5 Comments

Benedict’s little dig at modernist theologians

In his new book in the infancy of the Lord, Pope Benedict as a little dig at modernist theologians – perhaps too wrapped up in the historical-critical method:

The answer given by the chief priests and scribes to the wise men’s question has a thoroughly practical geographical content, which helps the Magi on their way. Yet it is not only a geographical, but also a theological interpretation of the place and the event. That Herod would draw the obvious conclusion is understandable. Yet it is remarkable that his Scripture experts do not feel prompted to take any practical steps as a result. Does this, perhaps, furnish us with the image of a theology that exhausts itself in academic disputes?  (p. 105)

Here are some links you can use to purchase the Pope’s new book.

US hardcover HERE.  Kindle HERE. Unabridged audio HERE. Large print HERE.
UK hardcover HERE. Kindle HERE.  Large print HERE.

Buy a Kindle:

Posted in Benedict XVI, Liberals, Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
3 Comments

“No one likes us – we don’t care” – Fr. Finigan on the New Evangelization and men

My friend the mighty Dean of Bexley, His Hermeneuticalness, Fr. Tim Finigan has a great post at his place.

He places his observations in the context of men in his parish hall watching Millwal defeat Leeds.  I am mindful of the fact that when a couple years back gangs of yobs were busting up shops in streets of London, the young dopes didn’t get very far in the neighborhoods dominated by Millwall fans.  I think I shall have to start rooting for Millwall.  But I digress.

Thus, Fr. Finigan (read the whole thing there):

A useful point to make is that if people think that religion is not for men, why not take a walk in the vicinity of your local mosque after Friday prayers. A parishioner who did this by accident said that she thought that there must have been a football match nearby, and then realised that the young men were on their way home from the mosque.

[NB]If we don’t think in terms of these men, then the New Evangelisation will be nothing much more than a superficial makeover – the spiritual equivalent of a new kitchen and some expensive paint in tuscan truffle ochre or whatever from one of those posh shops. Christ did not hide from the hoi polloi, after all. [Nor from men.  Don’t let feminists divert attention to all the women the Lord spoke with in His earthly life.]

Perhaps “No one likes us – we don’t care” [The chant of Millwall fans.] would be a starting-point on the virtue of fortitude and dying to self in witness to the truth. (I also use this as an example when trying to convince boys that they are quite capable of chanting responses.)

Su. Perb.

Nemini iuvamus – Non curamus!

What would Millwall’s Latin name be?  F.C. Pistrimurensis? Molamurensis?

I know an anecdote about Cardinal Heenan, late of Westminster, at the time of the post-Conciliar liturgical changes.

It is said -and I beg you readers, if you know, to send me a reference from any article or book wherein this anecdote might be more firmly substantiated – that when Card. Heenan saw the Novus Ordo for the first time he quipped to the effect that “No man will go to this.”

No effort for a New Evangelization will be effective without we also revitalize our liturgical worship of God.

Fr. Finigan mentioned the virtue of Fortitude.  I will mention the virtue of Religion.

The virtue of Religion obliges us to give God what is His due.  This consists, first, in worshiping Him properly as individuals and as a Church.  The essence of worship of God is focus on God, not on ourselves.  The Extraordinary Form will help renew our focus on God also in the Ordinary Form.  I think also that the Extraordinary Form draws men more powerfully than Ordinary Form.

Meanwhile, in honor of Fr. Finigan, I am thinking about making a car magnet for his parishioners and neighbors… er um neighbours, more than likely Lions fans to the man.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
23 Comments

Christ is born, astrology dies – a comment on the Pope’s new book about Jesus

First, if you plan to buy the Holy Father’s new book online, will you please my links?  You’ll get your book quickly and at a good price and I will also benefit.  Thanks!

US hardcover HERE.  Kindle HERE. Unabridged audio HERE. Large print HERE.
UK hardcover HERE. Kindle HERE.  Large print HERE.

Also, amazon has lots of discounts right now.  If you enter amazon using one of my links, I’ll benefit from everything you buy, from new tires to shredded suet for your Christmas puddings.

This would be a nice gift for your parish priest or a seminarian.

Andrea Tornielli at Sacri Palazzi wrote about the Holy Father’s new book, which was presented today.

He mentioned this, in my translation:

When the star that guided the Magi in the account by Matthew, Benedict XVI recalled that “on the cusp of the years 7 and 6 BC – which today is considered the probable year of the birth of Jesus – there was a conjunction of the planets Jupiter, Saturn and Mars”. To this, according to the astronomer Johannes Kepler, there was added a supernova, of which there seem to be mentions “in Chinese chronological tables” relative to the year 4 BC.

Citing Gregory Nazianzus, the Pope writes that “in the very moment in which the Magi were prostrating themselves before Jesus, the end of astrology took place, because in that moment the stars would have spun in the orbit established by Christ”. A demythologization, “a anthropological turning point”, because, Ratzinger explains, “man assumed by God – as is seen in the Only-begotten Son – is greater than all the material forces of the world and is of greater worth than the whole of the universe.”

Classic Ratzinger.

Posted in Benedict XVI, Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , , ,
14 Comments

The dangers of liturgical dance

From the always amusing Eye Of The Tiber:

Liturgical Dancer Tests Positive For Performing-Enhancing Drugs

It is being reported this morning that world-renowned liturgical dancer Doris Griffin has tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs. A USCCB spokesman said that trace amounts of an illegal substance were found in Griffin’s blood early Monday morning. This comes just days after reports that Griffin’s trainer, Jake Stately, admitted that he had not only injected Griffin before “numerous Masses,” but that he also had one of the syringes used on the 56-year-old dancer.

Griffin, who is best known for her treatise on liturgical dancing, The Art Of Body Worship, And So Can You, told Eye of the Tiber that the drug found in her system may have been the result of an over-the-counter weight loss medicine that she had recently started taking. Meanwhile, friends of Griffin have come to her defense saying that, though she had recently been under a grueling schedule, that the liturgical dancing phenomena would never resort to injecting. “The Lord has just blessed her body with such a rhythm…such an ability to properly express the proper flow of worship as to ever need any drugs,” a friend of Griffin said.

The USCCB Commission for Mass Doping, meanwhile, say that they will be suspending Griffin from participating in all Masses where dancing is involved until they have concluded their investigation. “For the time being, Ms. Griffin will only have access to the Tridentine Low Mass.”

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
15 Comments

Blog move accomplished

The blog move was accomplished last night.  It is now on a different server.

I still have some kinks to work out but it went fairly smoothly.

As I had warned beforehand, some readers’ comments, posted during a short interval, were lost. There is nothing I can do about that.

We shall soldier on.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
Comments Off on Blog move accomplished

Oh PLEEEEZZE let this be true! Mexican company Bimbo may save Twinkies

I am not making this up.  This is not a fluff piece.

From HuffPo (if they can be believed about anything):

Bimbo & Twinkies: Mexican Mega Bakery May Save Brands From Hostess Liquidation

Grupo Bimbo, a Mexican company that is the world’s largest bread baker, might hold the key to saving the Twinkie from extinction in a Hostess liquidation.

Though other companies have shown interest in buying some of Hostess’ iconic brands, Bimbo might have the inside track, according to the Christian Science Monitor.

[…]

PPPPLEEEEEZZZZ! Let this the true!

Hostess by Bimbo!

Cupcakes by Bimbo!

Ding Dongs by Bimbo!

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
16 Comments