A couple videos:
[wp_youtube]UD4VlsLIZfI[/wp_youtube]
How many times have I dealt with this?
And this…
[wp_youtube]z2-GEIWIurA[/wp_youtube]
A couple videos:
[wp_youtube]UD4VlsLIZfI[/wp_youtube]
How many times have I dealt with this?
And this…
[wp_youtube]z2-GEIWIurA[/wp_youtube]
I had to read the headline of the story twice, and let it sink in.

From LifeSite comes this … what is the word… puzzling? bit of news.
Houston Democrats Throw Christmas Party at Planned Parenthood
by Steven Ertelt | Houston, TX | LifeNews.comDemocrats in Houston have decided on a location for their annual Christmas party and have decided to hold it at a local Houston Planned Parenthood facility.The women’s auxiliary of the Harris County Democratic Party will hold their politically correct-named “Holiday Party” on December 8 at the late-term abortion business Planned Parenthood runs in the southeast party of Houston that has gained national attention and controversy.
The location is no surprise given the close relationship the Democratic Party has with abortion advocates, especially in Houston. Houston Mayor Annise Parker spoke at the opening of the massive new Planned Parenthood abortion business (the location of the party) in June 2010, saying, “It’s not about the building; it’s about people’s lives; it is not about women, it is about families; [That’s right!] and it’s not about what we do here today, it’s about our future.”
Parker lives with her life partner Kathy Hubbard, campaign treasurer for Planned Parenthood and Parker’s bid for re-election as Houston Mayor was endorsed by Planned Parenthood.
The gigantic abortion facility planned Parenthood now runs in Houston is a seven story, 78,000 square foot center that will eventually do abortions later in pregnancy.
Jim Sedlak of STOPP International condemned Parker at the time.
“No matter where you live, it would be entirely appropriate to write, phone or email the mayor and ask her just how brutally killing children up to 20 weeks gestation helps the families and the future of Houston.”“And remember, this facility is located in the midst of four huge minority neighborhoods,” he said.
He noted that Parker serves on the board of directors of Girls, Inc., among other community organizations, and it has partnered up with Planned Parenthood in the past.
ACTION: Complain to the Harris County Democratic Party at bluegals.harris@gmail.com and Mayor Parker at Mayor Annise D. Parker, City of Houston, P.O. Box 1562, Houston, TX 77251; phone 713-837-0311; email: mayor@cityofhouston.net
One of the worst piece of anti-Catholic bigotry I have ever seen in the legal profession.
From TwinCities.com:
Religious slurs in lawyer’s memo have court up in arms
By David Hanners
dhanners@pioneerpress.com
Updated: 11/30/2011 10:37:03 PM CSTIn the sedate and sober world of bankruptcy law, one lawyer’s memorandum sticks out like a sore loser.”Across the country the court systems and particularly the Bankruptcy Court in Minnesota, are composed of a bunch of ignoramus, bigoted Catholic beasts that carry the sword of the church,” the Nov. 25 filing said.
It went on to call one bankruptcy judge “a Catholic Knight Witch Hunter,” said one trustee was “a priest’s boy” and claimed another trustee is a “Jesuitess.”
It got worse from there.
Hastings lawyer Rebekah Nett also called U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Nancy Dreher and other court personnel “dirty Catholics.” Then she expressed concerns over what might transpire at a hearing docketed for next week, writing, “Catholic deeds throughout the history have been bloody and murderous.”
People who spend their time writing and reading legal documents were stunned.
“I’ve never seen anything in 30 years of practicing law like this,” said Brian Leonard, a bankruptcy trustee. “This is so far over the line, it’s in another world.”
[…]
There is a lot more.
From a reader:
If I had to guess, there are probably many priests throughout the US who are refusing to celebrate the Mass according to the new translation.
My question is, “Is the Mass invalid if a priest uses the old words of consecration?” I am sure we can all agree that it would be illicit, but is it invalid? I am asking this because I am wondering what I should do if I encounter a Mass where the priest uses the old translation.
The consecration is NOT invalid if the priest uses the obsolete, incorrect words for the consecration as they were in the obsolete, incorrect and now illicit-to-use old ICEL version. If the priest says, for example the incorrect and now illicit, “for all”, purposely, he is probably committing a sin if he is doing so out of contempt for authority and because he thinks he knows better. It would, nevertheless, be a valid consecration.
What should you do?
If you are just dropping by that parish and you don’t have regular ties there, think twice before doing something. You are not there often enough to know if the priest is simply making a mistake because of an old habit – it happens! – or whether he is defying the Church’s authority and causing scandal at the most solemn moment of Holy Mass.
If are at your regular parish, then I suggest you consult my tips for writing to bishops or offices of the Holy See.
I suggest, first, a conversation with the priest if possible. Then follow up that conversation with a writing letter about what was said. If that doesn’t bear fruit, then send copies to the local bishop. If that doesn’t bear fruit, send copies to the Congregation for Divine Worship in Rome. I think it is always best to work on these things at the lowest possible level of authority, (parish – diocese – congregation). The same applies if the priest is a member of a religious order in one of their chapels or churches or institutions.
At the end of Redemptionis Sacramentum we read:
6. Complaints Regarding Abuses in Liturgical Matters
[183.] In an altogether particular manner, let everyone do all that is in their power to ensure that the Most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist will be protected from any and every irreverence or distortion and that all abuses be thoroughly corrected. This is a most serious duty incumbent upon each and every one, and all are bound to carry it out without any favouritism.[184.] Any Catholic, whether Priest or Deacon or lay member of Christ’s faithful, has the right to lodge a complaint regarding a liturgical abuse to the diocesan Bishop or the competent Ordinary equivalent to him in law, or to the Apostolic See on account of the primacy of the Roman Pontiff. It is fitting, however, insofar as possible, that the report or complaint be submitted first to the diocesan Bishop. This is naturally to be done in truth and charity.
Again, priests can slip up out of habit. I knew an priest who once in a while used to say “Paul, our Pope” during the Canon. Words repeated every day of a priest’s life can become engrained and pop out unexpectedly.
I was sent a code for an iPhone/iPad app for Advent developed by the folks who put out the Magnificat liturgical aid. Click HERE for a link to the app. $0.99 in iTunes.
Advent Companion App is a fusion of the Magnificat App (with Prayers and Mass from Magnificat) and the Advent Companion (the daily meditations + some Advent features).
It has a day-by-day format, and offers: morning, evening, and night prayers “inspired by” the Liturgy of the Hours (not, however, suitable for fulfilling the Office), Scripture readings and prayers for daily Mass (more on that, below), original meditations on the Gospel by thirty-four authors. (I was not asked to write for them! A flaw in the app, IMO. o{];¬) It seems a little Dominican top-heavy.) Other features include: essays, blessings, an Advent Penance Service, poetry, reproductions of sacred art masterpieces, (Didn’t see too much of that) and Advent Stations (whatever that is).
A SERIOUS gap in the app is that is does NOT include the material for the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite. It should, if this app is limited to the Roman Rite. There is abundant material out there.
Here are a few screenshots:
The entrance page
The first meditation I looked at was by the distinguished Anthony Esolen. Good choice.
Advent Stations… I guess Advent really is a little Lent. Again, note the Dominican authors.
I have a problem with lay people falling into the mistake of thinking they are blessing in the manner of a priest. So… iuxta modum on this.
Again, there is NOTHING for those who prefer the Extraordinary Form, even though the texts are readily available and they are less extensive than for the Ordinary Form. This is a problem, perhaps of… I don’t know… perspective? If they are going to stick to the Roman Rite (and not also include anything for Catholics of Eastern Churches) they should at least remember that the Roman Rite has two forms.
The app is pretty and fairly easy to navigate. You sometimes have to tap the screen a couple times, and firmly, to get out of a page, but all in all it worked well.
It is not free, but it is hard to go wrong for $0.99, right? The meditation feature could be worth the cost of the app by itself, if the quality is at the level of Anthony Esolen’s piece.
Have any of you iPhone 4 users noticed any problems with your OS after updating to 5.0?
When the 4.0 update came out, the 3GS became very sluggish.
Observations?

Here is a glimpse into the Collect for this upcoming Sunday.
Last week in the Collect we were rushing to meet the Lord who is coming. We merited our reward due to good works because they are made meritorious by Christ. During Advent, as the Baptist warns us, we are to make smooth the path for the coming of the Lord, especially the Second Coming. This week we are again rushing.
Perhaps we are wiser this week.
After the first rush of excitement we are now also wary of obstacles on that path which could impede us, snare our feet. These would be our merely human, simply worldly, works.
Lest any “über-trad” think today’s Collect is insufficiently Catholic because it isn’t old enough, or wasn’t in the 1570 Missale Romanum, it is from 8th century the Gelasian Sacramentary.
COLLECT (2002MR):
Omnipotens et misericors Deus,
in tui occursum Filii festinantes
nulla opera terreni actus impediant,
sed sapientiae caelestis eruditio
nos faciat eius esse consortes.
Actus means, “an act or action” but also, “the moving or driving of an object, impulse.” Impedio (built from the word pes, pedis, “foot”) is “to snare or tangle the feet”. Sapientia means “wisdom”. In Christian contexts, especially of the Early Church, Wisdom is simply loaded with different overtones from theology and philosophy (philosophia, “love of wisdom”). The Bible has a group of writings called “Wisdom literature” which were, according to the Fathers of the Church, filled with foreshadows of Christ who is identified with Wisdom. The phrase faciat eius esse consortes calls to mind both the Collect prayer in Mass for Christmas Day and also the priest’s prayer when preparing the chalice at the offertory. A consors is someone with (cvm) whom you share your lot (sors). This is at the heart of today’s Collect prayer. Remember: Deus, “God”, is declined irregularly and in solemn discourse the nominative is used as the vocative form (e.g. cf. Livy 1, 24, 7). Do not, as the OBSOLETE ICEL translators did, fall into the trap of thinking that Deus is the subject of the verbs. The subjects are plural opera and singular eruditio.
LITERAL TRANSLATION:
Almighty and merciful God,
let no works of worldly impulse impede
those hurrying to the meeting of Your Son,
but rather let the learning of heavenly wisdom
make us to be His partakers.
OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):
God of power and mercy,
open our hearts in welcome.
Remove the things that hinder us
from receiving Christ with joy,
so that we may share his wisdom
and become one with him
when he comes in glory.
NEW CORRECTED ICEL (2011):
Almighty and merciful God,
may no earthly undertaking hinder those
who set out in haste to meet your Son,
but may our learning of heavenly wisdom
gain us admittance to his company.
Works not performed in Christ are “works of worldly impulse”. They are not meritorious for heaven.
There is a sharp contrast between heavenly Wisdom which liberates and worldly “wisdom” which entangles. The Apostle St. Paul contrasts the wisdom of this world with the Wisdom of God (cf. 1 Cor 1:20; 3:19; 2 Cor 3:19). In Romans 12:2 Paul says, “Do not be conformed to this world but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you may prove what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”
This is not just a Pauline concept. Compare our Collect also with 2 Peter 1:3-4 (RSV):
“His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge (cognitio: cf. eruditio) of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, that through these you may escape from the corruption that is in the world because of passion, and become partakers of the divine nature (efficiamini divinae consortes).”
St. Augustine of Hippo (+430) dismantled a Donatist heresy that priests ordained by a sinful bishop would be automatically stained in the same guilt. He used imagery like that of our prayer today (Ad Donatistas post collationem in CSEL 53:19.25, p. 123 my translation):
“The sludge (lutum) their feet are stuck in is so thick and dense that, trying in vain to tear themselves out of it, they get their hands and head stuck in it too, and lingering in that sticky mess they get more tightly enveloped.”
The Donatist argument was based in worldly, not heavenly, wisdom.
Sticky lutum is a metaphor of worldly life.
Neglecting God, who speaks in the Church and our conscience, we weak sinners can convince ourselves of anything, over time: down becomes up, back is made front, black turns into white, and wrong is really right. We justify what we know, or knew, to be sinful. Once this becomes a habit, it is a vice in more than one sense of that word.
Occasionally our consciences will struggle against the grip of self-deception, but quite often the proverbial “Struggle”, Novocain for the conscience, supplies permission: “I really ‘struggled’ with this, … before I did it!”
If we go off the true path into the murky twisted woods, thoroughly mired in sticky error we will not escape the Enemy, the roaring lion seeking whom he might devour (1 Peter 5:8).
Nor will we elude Christ the Judge, who will come through dark woods by straight paths.
Advent reminds us to prepare for the coming of both the Enemy lion and the Lion of Judah who will open the seals and read forth the Book of Life (Rev 5:5).
There can be no renewal of any aspect of our Catholic lives and identity without first a revitalization of our liturgical worship.
A reader sent me a link to a letter of 18 November 2011 and accompanying decrees concerning the sacred liturgy issued by His Excellency Most Rev. Roger J. Foys, Bishop of Covington. You can find it HERE.
In the letter and in the decrees, Bp. Foys stresses in particular Sacrosanctum Concilium 22 which states that no on even if he be a priest, may add, remove, or change anything in the liturgy on his own authority.
Among the decrees we find this interesting point:
1. The text of the Roman Missal be used exactly as it is written. As stated in the citation from the Second Vatican Council none of us has the authority to change the text for any reason.
[…]
4. The gestures for the priests, deacons, religious and lay faithful be strictly carried out in accord with the rubrics of the Roman Missal, for “the gestures and bodily posture of both the Priest, the Deacon, and the ministers, and also of the people, must be conducive to making the entire celebration resplendent with beauty and noble simplicity, to making clear the true and full meaning of its different parts, and to fostering the participation of all.
Can you say “Say The Black – Do The Red”?
That last point included this:
b. Special note should be made concerning the proper posture during the Eucharistic Prayer. In the United States the lay faithful are instructed to kneel from the end of the Sanctus through the end of the Great Amen (see GIRM 43). Deacons kneel from the epiclesis through the showing of the chalice. Priests remain standing. In addition, “the faithful kneel after the Agnus Dei unless the diocesan Bishop determines otherwise” (GIRM 43).
i. Please note: Within the Diocese of Covington the Bishop has not determined otherwise so as to remain in accord with the norms set by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
c. Special note should also be made concerning the gesture for the Our Father. Only the priest is given the instruction to “extend” his hands. Neither the deacon nor the lay faithful are instructed to do this. No gesture is prescribed for the lay faithful in the Roman Missal; nor the General Instruction of the Roman Missal, therefore the extending or holding of hands by the faithful should not be performed.
Interesting, no? People are not to raise the arms, extend their hands or hold hands during the Our Father. And if that is the case, they should never be directed or encouraged to do so. In fact, if they are doing so, they must be instructed and encouraged about the proper posture and improper posture.
Am I reading that right?
I also like this:
5. That choirs and other musicians use choir lofts in churches that are structured as such. While this is not mandated, we strongly recommend it.
[…]
b. The sanctuary is reserved for the Priest Celebrant, concelebrants, the Deacon and the other ministers who serve at the Altar. (see GIRM 294)
And this is very good:
6. Sacred Silence be observed in our churches prior to the celebration of the Sacred Liturgy to allow the clergy and the faithful to properly prepare and dispose themselves for the Sacred Mysteries to which they are about to participate. The General Instruction of the Roman Missal reminds us: “Sacred silence also, as part of the celebration, is to be observed at the designated times…. Even before the celebration itself, it is commendable that silence is observed in the church, in the sacristy, in the vesting room, and in adjacent areas, so that all may dispose themselves to carry out the sacred action in a devout and fitting manner.” (GIRM 45) Silence following the Mass is also encouraged for those who might want to remain in the church to pray.
WDTPRS kudos to the Bishop of Covington, to whom I shall send a New Translation SUPER Special ELITE Edition “Say The Black – Do The Red” coffee mug.
There can be no renewal of any aspect of our Catholic lives and identity without first a revitalization of our liturgical worship.
For your “Brick by Brick” file, comes this from Trenton, NJ. Several people wrote to me about about this.
There is a newly-established Latin Mass at St. Anthony’s in Trenton at 12:15 pm every Sunday. St. Anthony’s is located in Hamilton, NJ.
A Schola Cantorum is also in the works, with hopes to begin weekly sung Masses after Christmas.
Writers gave high praise to Bishop David O’Connell.
Fr. Brian Woodrow is the “Diocesan Liason to the Extraordinary Form” (not sure what that means). The first Low Mass was well attended, and was followed by a catered “convivium“.
There was an article about the new apostolate in the diocesan paper HERE.
I believe this project is connected to a good initiative I wrote about some time ago, HERE.
From a reader:
‘Should Catholic priests be reported to the local Bishop if they go up and receive the Episcopal ‘communion’ at a funeral for one of their clergymen?
When their ‘communion’ time came around, I saw the Catholic priests go up to receive. Now that didn’t look right. I, of course, remained in my seat (I attended as an act of Christian charity towards the family) and didn’t go up.
Should the Catholic priests be reported to the Bishop for receiving the Episcopal ‘communion’?
Yes. Sadly, I think so. If it happened, he caused scandal. He probably did it from ignorance and not from malice towards Catholic teaching. However, he and the his bishop should have a chat to clarify some ecumenical parameters.
The only thing I would caution about in the future, however, is to make sure the funeral is not at an Anglican Use of the Catholic Church church. But, I am sure people will be smart about that, if they are paying attention to what is going on.
Priests and lay people may attend funerals of non Catholics. We can pray with non-Catholics to a certain extent, but not with the intention of praying as if we were also non-Catholics. We cannot do anything or pray anything which is contrary to the Catholic Faith. We can pray for a return of unity with non-Catholic Christians, but that cannot include receiving their “communion”.
Under limited circumstances and in emergencies it is permissible to receive the Eucharist of true Churches with valid Orders. The Episcopalian Church is not one of those Churches. Catholics may not receive their “communion”. Some will argue that some Episcopalians may have valid orders. I respond: It is all too iffy: we can’t do it.