Whooping Cough and You

Do you recall that a while ago I posted about Whooping Cough? People cough so violently and so long from this, called “Pertussis”, that they break ribs. Children can die.

Whooping cough is very infectious and it is coming back.  I wasn’t kidding about this, friends.

I saw today a story:

Whooping Cough Outbreak Spreads On Long Island; More Than 200 Cases Reported

Talk to your doctor. If necessary get a Tetanus and Pertussis booster.

“Whooping Cough” seems like something from the past. Like the Great Depression.

You don’t want to get this.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , ,
21 Comments

HuffPo: The REAL reason behind the new, corrected translation

Why, oh why, give time and attention to the loons of the Huffington Post?  One piece, sent by a reader who slogs through this rubbish so I don’t have to, merits a few minutes because it is emblematic of the dominant liberal navel-gazing when they write about matters concerning the Catholic Church in the MSM.

I present for your consideration Michelle Somerville, who twitted out some 2000 words.  I won’t inflict them all on you.

“The Truth Behind the Godawful New (Old) Roman Catholic Missal”. [Okay… she’s gonna give us the straight poop now.]

On the first Sunday in Advent, a new English translation of the Roman Catholic was implemented (by mandate) [how else?] in Catholic churches throughout United States. These changes of the are small, dramatic [small… yet dramatic… like Danny Devito, perhaps?] and disruptive — especially for the priests celebrating the masses.

Why have these changes been written into the mass?

The Vatican claims that a translation more faithful to the original Latin is needed. Is this the real reason for this disruption? I don’t think so.  [Ahhh!  Tell us, Michelle!  What’s the real reason?]

The nostalgia for the more Latin-faithful mass is an outgrowth of a desire for the church that used the Latin mass. This is nostalgia for the church in which less preaching took place, the priest presided with his back toward the congregation, only the hands of the priest touched the Eucharist, and wherein women — who were prohibited from setting foot on the altar — were required to cover their heads[So!  That’s the reason!]

The Second Vatican Council did not merely change the mass from Latin to vernacular in 1963; it rendered the Latin mass (depending upon whom one asks) improper or forbidden entirely. Between 1962 and 1988 Latin masses were often celebrated under the radar — somewhat in the “upper room” manner and spirit, ironically enough, of Dignity’s masses and those said by woman priests.

I happen to find the the Latin mass beautiful, and at first I seemed to object less to the new changes than most Catholics I know. I attend Spanish language mass in from time to time. In that liturgy, we already use phrasing similar to that the New Old Missal introduces. The Vatican is not nearly so interested, however, in the accuracy of the translation of the mass as it is in dragging today’s vernacular mass back in time. They want the 1962 mass with all the trimmings. This new translation business is a tasty treat for the lockstep sheep and papist throwbacks.

[…]

She burbles on for a long time, but that just about sums up her penetrating analysis of the real reason for the new translation.

Thanks, HuffPo!  We’ve got it now!

UPDATE:

Check the combox, below, for news about a new “Lockstep Sheep and Papist Throwbacks” coffee mug

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged ,
49 Comments

Atlantis rises: US seminaries are changing

It isn’t rocket science.

The theological and moral bizzaro-world into which US seminaries sank Atlantis-like over the decades of the 60s to the 80s is over.  They didn’t sink in a day, and they won’t be raised in a day either.

But they are rising.

The reason has been, in part, bishops who made changes, and in larger part students who would no long put up with the weirdness.  Men wanted Catholic formation and virile liturgy and they didn’t want to be… how to say it… hit on.  Seminarians themselves began to revolt against the faculty and tell their bishops what was going on and changes were implemented.  Once the shift in the episcopate Pope John Paul II worked patiently to achieve began to re-leaven the country, reform started gain momentum.

A reader sent a link to the following with the subject line: “Could it be…. Orrrthodoxy?”

From CNS with my cuts […], emphases and comments.

Catholic seminary enrollment up, but numbers seen as only part of story

By Nancy Frazier O’Brien
Catholic News Service

WASHINGTON (CNS) — In his first months as rector of Theological College in Washington, Father Phillip J. Brown has been confronting a problem that the national diocesan seminary for the U.S. Catholic Church “has not had for a long time” — it is bursting at the seams.

Enrollment is maxed out for the 2011-12 academic year at 90 seminarians. Five of those seminarians are back in their dioceses this year gaining pastoral experience, but a Sulpician seminarian and five priests from other countries also live there, bringing the total number of residents to 91 plus faculty members.

“If I had to start with a problem, that’s the problem I’d like to have,” Father Brown told Catholic News Service. “It’s a very healthy sign, a positive sign for Theological College and for the U.S. priesthood.”

The trend of rising seminary enrollment is being duplicated around the country:

— At the Pontifical College Josephinum in Columbus, Ohio, 40 new seminarians arrived this year, bringing total enrollment to 186, the highest level since the 1970s.

— St. Paul Seminary School of Divinity [SPS… the den-of-horrors I went to in the 80s.] at the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, Minn., welcomed 30 new graduate-level seminarians, making its class of 100 seminarians the largest since 1980. The influx forced 24 seminarians and two priests off campus into leased space at a former convent. [Anecdote: A couple years ago when I was visiting John H at Leaflet Missal (church goods) in St. Paul, he said he was super busy getting the clerical clothing in a sorted for the orders from all the seminarians at SPS.  I didn’t, at first, grasp what he was saying. Then he told me that the decision had been made that all the major seminarians were to wear clerical dress.  I, incredulous, nearly passed-out.]

[…]But Theological College’s Father Brown said a rise in enrollment is only part of the story.

“It’s not just the numbers but the quality and spirit of the men who are coming,” he told CNS.

“I’m tremendously impressed with the quality of the candidates, their zeal,” he added. “We’re seeing a real renewal of the priesthood.”

[…]

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
32 Comments

The Archbisop of Westminster on “civil unions”

From my friend Fr. Blake’s blog:

The Archbisop of Westminster said at a recent press following the Bishop bi-annual meeting:

We would want to emphasise that civil partnerships actually provide a structure in which people of the same sex who want a lifelong relationship [and] a lifelong partnership can find their place and protection and legal provision,

…………
As a Church we are very committed to the notion of equality so that people are treated the same across all the activities of life. The Church holds great store by the value of commitment in relationships and undertakings that people give. Stability in society depends upon the reliability of commitments that people give. That might be in offering to do a job but especially in their relationships with one another. Equality and commitment are both very important and we fully support them.
……….

He did go on to say, “equality and commitment do not amount to marriage”.

As is pointed out here, “The bishops conference position on civil partnerships appears to have shifted from 2003 when it told the Government that civil unions would not promote the common good and we therefore strongly oppose them”.

It appears that the 2003 CDF document Legal Recognition of Homosexual Unions only applies to Marriage, itself not “civil partnerships. I had obviously misunderstood as the bishops once did.

Posted in One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
Comments Off on The Archbisop of Westminster on “civil unions”

Anonymously help a university student receive the Youth Catechism of the Catholic Church

I was contacted by the Catholic Truth Society in England with a request to let you my readers know about a special appeal/collection they are taking up to defray the cost of distributing a large quantity of the Youth Catechism of the Catholic Church (“YouCat“) to university students in the UK.

Click HERE for more information.

The person who wrote included this comment:

If one person came back to Mass because they discovered what we really believe in it would be worth it.

They are asking for £5.00 per copy. That’s about US$7.80.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

Curious development with that WaPo POLL about altar girls!

Remember that recent Washington Post poll about altar girls? The poll shifted after I posted about it.

An reader alerted me to the fact that something rather odd has occurred.

You decide.

Here is how things stood and how they stand as I write.

The WaPo article and poll are HERE, FWIW.

UPDATE 23 Nov 2206 GMT:

UPDATE 30 Nov 0038 GMT:

Did they not like the results they originally obtained?

UPDATE 30 Nov 1545 GMT:

I’m sensing a trend.

UPDATE 1 Dec 0258 GMT:

Is this a surprise?

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, POLLS | Tagged , , ,
35 Comments

QUAERITUR: Entrance Antiphon not used at Sunday Mass

From a reader:

Our Church never says the Entrance Antiphon for Sunday Mass. It seems such a beautiful prayer, we usually sing the Entrance Song. Any thoughts on this?

It seems to me that the Introit chant/text is actually part of Mass.  Hymns substitute for the Introit (Entrance Antiphon).

It seems to me that the whole of the Mass formulary ought to be used.  That includes the Introit.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
14 Comments

QUAERITUR: Bowing to the altar instead of genuflecting during Mass. Fr. Z rants.

From a reader:

Our new and much more traditional pastor joined us a few years ago, and within the first year he had the tabernacle moved behind the altar. (Which made me and many others very happy)I have observed the priests, deacons and various others as they walk through the space between the tabernacle and the altar. Most will turn and face the altar and bow, while just a couple actually turn to the tabernacle and genuflect. (a few just walk through like there is nothing special at all).

Why would anyone choose bowing to the altar over genuflecting toward the tabernacle? To me it appears like they are turning their back on Christ. Our pastor is one who does turn to the tabernacle and genuflect.

What are your feelings on this?

This is one of the things about the Novus Ordo/Ordinary Form that really burns me up. The General Instruction/Institution of the Roman Missal directs that once Mass begins, people passing across the sanctuary bow to the altar rather than genuflect to the Blessed Sacrament. The idea is that the altar should be the focus. This is probably associated with the preference for Communion to be distributed from Hosts consecrated during the same Mass.

I don’t want to advocate ignoring liturgical law – Say The Black and Do The Red, after all – but it find it very hard to ignore the Lord when it is obvious that the the Blessed Sacrament is reserved in a tabernacle which is clearly present and visible in the center of the sanctuary.

This winds up being a problem also when Holy Mass begins with an incensation of the altar, especially when Mass is ad orientem.  It just doesn’t make sense to me to pretend the Blessed Sacrament isn’t there when it so obviously is there!   I wonder if over time this doesn’t erode people’s reverence for the Blessed Sacrament.

The altar is surely an important symbol of Christ in our midst. However, the Blessed Sacrament actually is that which it signifies. The Blessed Sacrament is not a mere symbol of Christ’s presence, it is Christ, present.  The principle ubi maior minor cessat seems appropriate.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , ,
37 Comments

When stupidity and hate collide.

I picked this up from my friend Fr. Finigan, His Hermeneuticalness:

How’s this for stupid lawsuit of the year? Johannes Christian Sundermann, a lawyer from Unna in North Rhine Westphalia, representing a man from Dortmund, has filed a legal complaint against the pope for not wearing a seat belt on several occasions “for more than one hour at a time” during his visit to Freiburg at the end of September.

Apparently the lawyer (a member of the socialist Left party) took the case on after several other lawyers refused to do so. If he is doing the case pro bono, I hope it takes up a lot of his time. If he is not, then “man from Dortmund” may learn a salutary lesson.

The report in The Local (Germany’s News in English) tells us that “both Sundermann and his client are no longer members of the Catholic Church.” No surprise there, then. (Though of course they are still members of the Catholic Church whether they like it or not.)

Wow.  Just wow.

Posted in The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Throwing a Nutty |
15 Comments

Bp. Etienne: “Secularism is the moral grizzly bear of our day!”

The Bishop of Cheyenne, Wyoming (covering the whole state), His Excellency Most Reverend Paul Etienne, has a blog.  I have posted about his hunting with the Mystic Monk Coffee Carmelites in northern Wyoming.  Also in the Diocese of Cheyenne is Wyoming Catholic College.  I like bishops who blog intelligently.  I like bishops who have guns, too.  Put the two together and… well… I’m writing about Bp. Etienne, aren’t I?

A kind reader here alerted me to Bishop Etienne’s post about his sermon for the 1st Sunday of Advent.  The second part of the sermon caught my attention.

My emphases:

[…]

This past week I had the opportunity to hike and hunt up on the South Fork of the Shoshoni. By midweek, the temperatures approached the mid 50’s, warm enough to bring the bears out of hibernation. Sure enough, as we walked along, we saw fresh grizzly tracks in the snow. I need not tell you, a grizzly is a frightening and fierce creature to encounter in any circumstance, and is always an imminent threat to life and limb, whether one is carrying a high powered rifle and wearing a side-arm or not! Thankfully, no such encounter ensued, but it put me on high alert!

It is precisely to such an “alert way of life” Christ is calling us this Advent season. We hear much in our day about “secularism” and the “New Evangelization.” But what exactly do these mean? First of all, secularism is a philosophy of life which rejects God, and rejects any attempts on the part of believers to insert their faith and morals into public discourse, politics or legislation. Webster’s Dictionary defines secularism thus: “a view of life or of any particular matter based on the premise that religion and religious considerations should be ignored or purposely excluded : a system of social ethics based upon a doctrine that ethical standards and conduct should be determined exclusively with reference to the present life and social well-being without reference to religion.”

My dear friends, secularism is the moral grizzly bear of our day! The New Evangelization is our response. The New Evangelization is our opportunity, our mandate, to re-proclaim Christ to a culture and world that formerly considered itself Christian. The New Evangelization is our effort to “Go out to all the world and proclaim the Good News,” to bring Christ to our people, and to bring our people to Christ. This is the “good work” the Opening Prayer of Mass exhorts of us: Grant your faithful, we pray, almighty God, the resolve to run forth to meet your Christ with righteous deeds at his coming.

We must pray for the Wisdom of Solomon, and the patience of an oyster, as we face this present culture, and address its many, subtle efforts to lower our moral standards and discredit any belief in the Divine Revelation that is ours in Sacred Scripture. Advent calls us to be honest about the values and beliefs that we hold because of cultural convenience, rather than the values and beliefs dear to our faith. We must be alert to the many cultural messages that reinforce a relative view of Truth. Let me be very clear: We as Catholic Christians believe in an absolute Truth, and that Absolute Truth is found in and preached by Jesus Christ. It is this Truth that underlies our Christian values and beliefs. This is the Truth we are called to live and bring to the public forum. The death many people face today is a moral death, and the only remedy is Christ and the life which only He brings.

Secularism is real, and recent surveys tell us it is having more of an effect on the values and morals of our people today than is our faith. Advent is our claxon call to “Wake up!” It is time to not only draw a line in the sand, but to reclaim lost ground in the culture war for moral values and Truth. We belong to Christ. He has claimed us for Himself and His Kingdom through his life, death and resurrection. He and His Kingdom are all that really matter. He and His Church, His Catholic Church, are to be our passion and our life.

My dear people, Advent calls us to be alert for the presence of Christ in our daily lives. Advent calls us to renew again our commitment to acknowledge Christ as the source of our life and to make Him once again our center. He is our origin and our destiny. This admonition is captured well in our closing prayer for Mass:

…even now, as we walk amid passing things, you teach us by them, O Lord, to love the things of heaven and hold fast to what endures, Through Christ our Lord.

My dear friends, let us live accordingly! Let us live according to Christ our Lord!

Well done.  WDTPRS kudos to Bp. Etienne.

I must, however, make an observation about his use of the Post communion prayer.

I think the “them” in the phrase “as we walk amid passing things, you teach us by them, O Lord, to love the things of heaven and hold fast to what endures”, refers back to “mysteries” in the first part of the Collect, which he did not quote.

POST COMMUNIONEM (2002MR):
Prosint nobis, quaesumus, Domine, frequentata mysteria,
quibus nos, inter praetereuntia ambulantes,
iam nunc instituis amare caelestia et inhaerere mansuris
.

NEW CORRECTED ICEL (2011):
May these mysteries, O Lord,
in which we have participated,
profit us, we pray,
for even now, as we walk amid passing things,
you teach us by them to love the things of heaven
and hold fast to what endures
.

You decide.

In any event, I like the use of the grizzly.  I am reminded of the roving lion of 1 Peter 5:8.

Posted in Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
12 Comments