Card. Burke on “mutual enrichment”. Fr. Z rants.

When Benedict XVI promulgated his “emancipation proclamation” for the older form of the Roman Rite, his Motu Proprio  Summorum Pontificum, he wrote about a “mutual enrichment” between the Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms which could take place.  For that to happen, the Extraordinary Form must be established in many places.  The “mutual enrichment” is what I have called a “gravitational pull”.  This is a slow process which we may not see produce concrete fruits in our lifetimes.

The Church’s identity was dealt a massive blow with the sweeping changes to Holy Mass and other rites during and after the Second Vatican Council.  Paul VI permitted the Consilium, the committee set up to execute the changes mandated by the Council Fathers, to go way beyond the Council’s mandates and make a staggering number of changes not actually called for by the Council. The result was the artificially constructed “Novus Ordo”.   Making matters worse, the “spirit” of the times so deeply quaffed by liberals short-circuited even the faithful implementation of the artifically created Novus Ordo.  The results were wide-spread liturgical abuses and illicit experimentation, a  loss of continuity of worship from place to place and with our forebears, and a grave enervation of our Catholic identity.  With the weakening of our Catholic identity, we also became weaker in the eyes of the world at large and therefore easier to drive from the public square.

A “mutual enrichment” is desired by Pope Benedict so that our liturgical worship, a foundational element for any sort of renewal of any aspect of our Catholic lives, can slowly reacquire the process of development which is slow, natural and organic, overcoming the abrupt, artificial and sterile impositions of the 60’s.

With that, I turn your attention now to a piece in the National Catholic Register (the good one), in which His Eminence Raymond Card. Burke speaks about the “mutual enrichment” element of Pope Benedict’s vision.  His Eminence has been a cardinal now for one year.

He touches many topics of interest, but I restrict myself to this:

[…]

The tribunal prefect also exercises care for the Church’s liturgy as a member of the Vatican’s Congregation for Divine Worship.

He is grateful to Blessed John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI for giving the Church “a font of solid direction” regarding worship, based on the Second Vatican Council’s vision of a “God-centered liturgy and not a man-centered liturgy.”

That intention was not always realized, he said, since the Council’s call for liturgical reform coincided with a “cultural revolution.”

Many congregations lost their “fundamental sense that the liturgy is Jesus Christ himself acting, God himself acting in our midst to sanctify us.”

Cardinal Burke said greater access to the traditional Latin Mass, now known as the “extraordinary form” of the Roman rite, has helped to correct the problem.

“The celebration of the Mass in the extraordinary form is now less and less contested,” he noted, “and people are seeing the great beauty of the rite as it was celebrated practically since the time of Pope Gregory the Great” in the sixth century.

Many Catholics now see that the Church’s “ordinary form” of Mass, celebrated in modern languages, “could be enriched by elements of that long tradition.”

In time, Cardinal Burke expects the Western Church’s ancient and modern forms of Mass to be combined in one normative rite, a move he suggests the Pope also favors.

“It seems, to me, that what he has in mind is that this mutual enrichment would seem to naturally produce a new form of the Roman rite — the ‘reform of the reform,’ if we may — all of which I would welcome and look forward to its advent.”

[…]

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , ,
36 Comments

Interview with SSPX Bp. Fellay is worth your time

Bernard FellayOur friends at Rorate have posted something from DICI, an interview with SSPX Superior Bp. Bernard Fellay. In this interview Fellay speaks about the “doctrinal preamble” given to the SSPX by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Why is the Doctrinal Preamble that Cardinal Levada delivered to you on September 14 still surrounded by so much secrecy, both on the part of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and by the Society of St. Pius X? What is this silence hiding from the priests and faithful of Tradition?

This discretion is normal for any important proceeding; it ensures the seriousness of it. It so happens that the Doctrinal Preamble that was delivered to us is a document which can be clarified and modified, as the accompanying note points out. It is not a definitive text. In a little while we will draw up a response to this document, noting frankly the doctrinal positions that we regard as indispensable. Our constant concern since the start of our talks with the Holy See—as our interlocutors know very well—has been to present the traditional position with complete loyalty.

Discretion is required on Rome’s part also, because this document—even in its present state which needs many clarifications—runs a great risk of arousing opposition from the progressives, who do not accept the very idea of a discussion about the Council, because they consider that this pastoral council is indisputable or “non-negotiable”, as though it were a dogmatic council.

I think we can assume from this that the Doctrinal Preamble is being kicked back and forth.

I really like this quote:

In this context, can there by a solution to the crisis in the Church?

Short of a miracle, there can be no instantaneous solution. Wanting God to give the victory without asking armed men to engage in battle, to quote St. Joan of Arc, is a form of desertion. Wanting an end to the crisis without feeling concerned or involved is not really to love the Church. Providence does not dispense us from the duty of our state in life, wherever it has placed us, or from assuming our responsibilities and responding to the graces that it grants us.

The whole thing is worth reading.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
14 Comments

Dear Santa….

Remember when I was supposed to be given a Bugatti Veyron for … for… I can’t remember why. A reader sent me a note that Shelby made an even faster car. Piffle, quoth Bugatti. They turned around and topped Shelby.

Behold. Bugatti Veyron Super Sport. 431 kmph = 267.8 mph


Top Gear – New Bugatti Veyron Super Sport – Top Speed Test..mp4

If I can’t have one of these, can I have one of those obsolete Veyrons?

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
15 Comments

CL: The Obama Administration v. The Catholic Church

From The Catholic League:

CATHOLIC CHURCH VS. OBAMA SHOWDOWN

November 28, 2011

Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on the upcoming showdown between the Obama administration’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Catholic Church:

On December 1, the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform will hold a hearing titled, “HHS and the Catholic Church: Examining the Politicization of Grants.” At issue is the decision by the Obama administration to deny a grant that the Catholic Church routinely receives providing for relief to the victims of human trafficking; the ruling was made despite an independent review board’s finding that gave high scores to the Church’s program.

The Church was denied the grant because it refuses to offer abortion referrals. Many Catholics, including the Catholic League, believe that the politicized nature of the decision to defund the program demands a hearing, and on Thursday we will get it. Since 2006, the Church has helped more than 2,700 trafficking victims, most of whom are women and children.

Although the issue of abortion referral is on the table, the real issue is something more sinister: the pro-abortion community, which is supporting the Obama administration’s push to mandate that private healthcare plans provide coverage for sterilization and contraceptive services, has its real sights set on mandated abortion coverage. That’s why there has been an editorial and op-ed explosion in recent weeks calling for Obama to stand up to the bishops. Everyone knows that even minimum-wage earners can afford contraceptives, so this issue hardly explains the heated rhetoric. What mandated contraceptive services accomplishes is that it greases the slide towards abortion coverage.

Those who do not ascribe to the vision of sexuality entertained by “progressives,” but are nonetheless not terribly bothered by the push for contraceptive services in healthcare plans, need to wake up and smell the odor before the “progressives” start racing for home. We’re at the top of the stretch right now, which is why this hearing is critical.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , ,
5 Comments

Brick by Brick: Altar boy scores WDTPRS kudos

For your “Brick by Brick” file, from a reader:

I thought you might be interested to know about something that one of the altar boys did after Mass today – I know I was impressed!

We had a visiting priest at our parish celebrate the Ordinary Form today, and, during Communion, he dropped a consecrated host on the floor. The priest immediately picked up the host and gave it right back to the person who was receiving, and made no effort to not step in the area where the Sacred Host was dropped.

After Mass, I saw a server walk out of the sacristy with a purificator. He walked over to the spot where the Sacred Host was dropped and put the purificator over it. He then went and got another priest to purify the area.

I was overjoyed when I saw this! This server also knelt for communion!

WDTPRS kudos to the kid.  Not so much for the first priest.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
17 Comments

SERIOUS Occupy Wall Street commentary. No, really.

You all know by know how much I admire the Occupy Wall Street movement.  A comedian I never watch seems to esteem them about as much as I do.

This is brought to WDTPRSers at the urging of the great Fabrizio the Roman, WDTPRS’s go-to-guy for insight into American politics and culture.

This soooo very much reminds me of my US seminary back in the 80’s and.. well… a certain catholic publication.

I think the connection rests in their self-absorbed gravity and lack of humor.

Part Two is over there, if you want it.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

Fortune Cookie Alert!

Hmmm…

20111126-165047.jpg

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
8 Comments

The new translation and “twice a year catholics”

From a reader about “C & E catholics”… those who darken the church’s door at Christmas and Easter.

Four Sundays from now, on Christmas, the “Twicers” will attend without the benefit of the explanations.

The following are for your consideration, totally as you see fit.  I do not expect you to respond, but feel free to do so if you want.

1.) Are any priests planning a “mini” explanation immediately preceding the Christmas masses?  Or at least a large sign outside each of the entrances letting them know to use the cards in the pews.

2.) I’m guessing that four weeks will not be long enough for regular attendees to “unlearn” the old responses.  One benefit is that the Twicers probably will not stand out if they respond “and also with you” the first time at the beginning of mass.

3.) I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts that there will be more negative comments/ complaints about the new translation from the Twicers than from regular mass attendees.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
47 Comments

One thing NOT to do with the obsolete “Sacramentary”. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

At CNA there is an article picking up on earlier commentary on the USCCB about what to do with the now happily obsolete – that feels so good to write –  copies of the book called the Sacramentary, which has to old, now obsolete ICEL translation.   The bottom line is that, while some could be archived, they may be buried with or without being burned (I opt for the burning).

However, the piece includes this snippet:

“Some have even suggested following a custom used in various Eastern churches,” they noted, “whereby liturgical books or Bibles are placed in the coffin of the deceased as a sign of devotion and love for the liturgy.”

Let this word of warning go forth…

If anyone…anyone… puts a copy of the obsolete ICEL Sacramentary in my coffin, I will haunt that person until the end of his subsequently miserable days.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Lighter fare, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged ,
39 Comments

Refusing to “learn the damn prayers”.

Ultra-liberal Huffington Post has an article on the implementation of the new, corrected translation.

Here is one of the dumbest things I have read to date about this new, translation, even from some the professional whiners.

[…]

Maribeth Lynch, 51, a publisher from the Milwaukee suburb of Elm Grove, said she was “distraught” over the changes and would refuse to “learn the damn prayers.

“It’s ridiculous. I’ve been a Catholic for 50 years, and why would they make such stupid changes? They’re word changes. They’re semantics,” she said.

“It’s confusion. All it’s doing is causing confusion,” she said. “You want to go to church and be confused?”
[…]

I think someone brought her confusion with her to church this morning.

What a nice way to talk about something so sacred as the prayers of our central form of worship of Almighty God.

I am reminded of the person who is tearing along in the car, shouting at other motorists, “Get the HELL out of my way! I’m late for Mass!”

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Throwing a Nutty |
36 Comments