QUAERITUR: Epiclesis in the Roman Canon

From a priest reader:

In my Wilfrid Diamond dictionary of liturgical latin, the entry for “epiclesis”, is f., says, “an invocation. The “Supra quae” in the Mass. In the Greek Church a calling down of the Holy Spirit.”

Is the Supra quae an epiclesis (Upon which…)?; it seems to be addressed to the Godhead and not the Holy Spirit, per se.

However, I noticed right away that the “Veni, Sanctificator” just before the Washing of the Hands clearly addresses the Holy Spirit–could this be the epiclesis in the Low Mass. I understand this may be a common question, so forgive me.

My understanding is that, while there is no explicit epiclesis before the consecration, the Roman Canon has texts which are understood as such.

In the Extraordinary Form there was the Veni sanctificator prayer, of course.  This together with the Quam oblationem sufficiently express the intention.  After the consecration there is the Supplices te rogamus.  So, before the Canon begins and at the Canon’s end there are explicit invocations of the Holy Spirit.

So, the Quam oblationem is the main focus in your question.  The new translation renders it this way:

Be pleased, O God, we pray, to bless, acknowledge, and approve this offering in every respect;make it spiritual and acceptable,so that it may become for us the Body and Blood of your most beloved Son, our Lord Jesus Christ.

You can understand the thought behind moving the priest’s palms-down gesture over the bread and wine, from the Hanc igitur to the Quam oblationem in the Novus Ordo.  In the Extraordinary Form, that gesture (during the Hanc igitur) seems to be more a gesture denoting a transference.  It seems to be closer to the gesture of the ancient Jewish priests over the scapegoat, as described in Leviticus 16.  Moving it to the Quam oblationem makes it seem to be more of a calling-down gesture.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , , , , , ,
7 Comments

Sunday Supper: BACON – WDTPRS POLL

The apologetical Jimmy Akin has today without apology taught me that today is International Bacon Day.

Huzzay!  Huzzah!

Bacon!

I have the makings of something with bacon for this evening … or for tomorrow … or perhaps in the week that follows, since I believe there should be a Bacon Octave.  Probably tomorrow, my Sunday Supper.

Let’s have a poll.  Please choose your best answer and give your reasons in the combox.

I am using the term bacon to include what I have available, that is nearly unlimited good quality bacon and some little pancetta (I don’t have any guanciale and anyone becoming censorious about my lack of authentic guanciale will be instantly banned with extreme prejudice).

What bacony concoction should Fr. Z make?

  • Rigatoni (or spaghetti) alla carbonara (32%, 315 Votes)
  • Bacon, lettuce and tomato sandwiches (28%, 273 Votes)
  • Bacon and eggs (23%, 220 Votes)
  • Spaghetti all'amatriciana (14%, 135 Votes)
  • Spaghetti alla gricia (3%, 33 Votes)

Total Voters: 973

I would, if I could, invite to this Sunday Supper the Doctor Mirabilis Roger Bacon, Kevin Bacon, Sir Francis Bacon, but never never never the vile modern painter of that name who excreted hideous drek redolent of the the worst of the modern spirit, and the non-homonymous Fr. George Welzbacher, because he likes bacon and hates Francis Bacon, can read Roger Bacon and recount the life of Sir Francis, and has seen the thespian Bacon in the talkies.

UPDATE Sunday:

Having bent my will to the will of the readers, I made spaghetti alla carbonara for supper.

Who knows where this dish came from.  Some say GI’s brought it to Rome.  HAH, I laugh with scorn, patriotic as I am.  It was around before the war. Some say it came from the charcoal makers in the hills, who had the long-lasting ingredients on hand.   The ingredients, however, suggest penury.  Eggs… the rough cuts of pork cured… pasta.  This ain’t cucina sofisticata.

In any event, I found some pancetta in my freezer yesterday and let it thaw slowly during the day.  It was fine.

Tonight I used the pancetta, fresh eggs, grated pecorino and parmigiano cheeses, a tiny bit of olive oil, freshly ground pepper, cooking water.

Let the eggs be room temperature before you separate the yolks.

Use freshly cracked, ground peppercorns of a good quality.  I am using Penzy’s Black Tellicherry on a very course grind.  Pepper was the primary spice of the Roman’s in ancient time, along with garum.  I see no reason why we should change.  Also, and don’t tell anyone this, you intensify the pepper by grinding a little into your oil at some point so that it fries or toasts.  Don’t burn it.  Yes, it will burn, like everything else.  Pepper has stuff in it that revvs us the human system.  Did I mention that I like pepper?

Some people talk about using the cooking water from the pasta in the sauce.  I don’t generally do that.  However, with this sauce, which has to have a creamy texture, I do.  In this case I also use less water than I would normally heat to cook the pasta in order to concentrate starch in the water.

Timing is a key to this, but you don’t have to worry too much.  Cut your pancetta into small pieces and brown it.  I used just a tiny bit of olive oil, though I probably didn’t have to.  The fat will be a bit translucent.  You can cut the pork in matchsticks or small cubes.

Alla Carbonara is at the same time simple and tricky.  It is simple in its theory and ingredients, but you have to achieve a creamy texture without cooking the egg so that it coagulates, and yet have it hot enough so that it is warm when eaten.   If at a restaurant you get a bowl of curdled bacon and eggs, send it back to the kitchen with the harsh words of contempt, a deeply furrowed brown, expressions of vituperation and scorn, shouting, gesticulating, glaring. But the ingredients are truly merciful.

I haven’t made this stuff for a long time.  But the voting has required me to give it a try, lo, after all this time.

Boil water and get the pasta cooking.  This won’t take long.

Eggs in a bowl.  Nothing special there.  Four for about two large portions.  Obviously the size of the egg matters.

20110904-064006.jpg

I cut up my pancetta and began to brown it.

20110904-064026.jpg

20110904-064038.jpg

When browned, leave it in the pan with the heat off.  It’ll need to cool a bit so it won’t make the egg harden from the heat.

Fuzzy photo of my grated cheese going into the yolks.

20110904-064059.jpg

Think about using half pecorino and half parmigiano or Grana Padano.  Using only pecorino can get a little salty for some.

When the pasta is cooked, let it cool for a moment and add it into your yokes and cheese in the bowl along with the pancetta and mix gently with a spoon.

During the mixing/assembly process, add a bit of pasta water to the mix to achieve a creamy texture.

Don’t give into the dark side.

Don’t use cream.

Cream = Novus Ordo.

Egg alone = Extraordinary!

20110904-064107.jpg

Assembled and plated.

Sprinkle more cheese on top and grind on more pepper.

20110904-064133.jpg

20110904-064201.jpg

I used to make this stuff all the time in a restaurant I worked for.  I can relate an episode.  One night a woman wanted “carabinieri” not “carbonara”. The waitress asked if she meant carbonara or maybe calamari, pointing to the menu.  No, she wanted “carabinieri”.  The waitress told me.  I went out.  The customer insisted.  I explained that she wanted the “state police of Italy”.  She insisted.  I asked if it was pasta or something else.  Pasta.  I made the spaghetti and all was right with the world.  Thereafter at the place we called it “Spaghetti Cops”.

So… thus endeth my Sunday Supper of spaghetti alla carbonara.   Thanks to the readers for participating in the choice!

And remember, Sundays are good days for making something special and sharing it with others.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z's Kitchen | Tagged , , , ,
69 Comments

The future and our choices

Here is an interesting story from The Mail Online:

Christian nurse ‘ordered to remove crucifix… at hospital where Muslims were allowed to wear headscarves’

By Luke Salkeld

A Christian nurse was ‘forced to choose between her job and her faith’ after being ordered to remove her crucifix at a hospital where Muslim staff wore headscarves unchallenged, a tribunal heard yesterday.

Shirley Chaplin, 54, said she had been wearing the religious symbol around her neck without complaint for 31 years before she was ordered to hide it away.

But the grandmother claims that after refusing to comply and then pointing out that two women doctors were allowed to wear headscarves, she was moved to a desk job.

Her case has caused uproar among Christian support groups,  who feel their beliefs are not being given the same respect as other faiths. At the weekend her case against the NHS was backed by seven senior Anglican bishops who issued a national letter of support.

Yesterday, on the first day of an employment tribunal, Mrs Chaplin, from Kenn, near Exeter, Devon, told of her fight to be allowed to carry on wearing the crucifix.

She is claiming religious discrimination in a case backed by the Christian Legal Centre, which says her treatment is a symptom of increasing discrimination against Christians.

Mrs Chaplin is due to retire later this year but hopes the case will force the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital to change its policy so staff can openly wear crucifixes.

The hospital says she was asked to remove the necklace after a risk assessment showed it could be pulled by one of the patients in her care. They insist it is a health and safety issue and that the problem is not with the crucifix but the necklace it is attached to[No one could ever pull a… say… lab coat… hair… hospital scrub top… head scarf.]

Mrs Chaplin told the tribunal in Exeter she was given the crucifix as a confirmation present and had worn it without complaint throughout her 31-year career.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, TEOTWAWKI, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged ,
30 Comments

Soon we will hear reviews of the new, corrected translation from England

Soon we will hear reviews of the new, corrected translation from England.

The new, corrected version is now in use in England for the Order of Mass.  The Proper will be implemented at the end of November.

Fr. Finigan, His Hermeneuticalness, has a post about using the new version.

I hope people in the UK will send in their feedback.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
21 Comments

Diocese of Great Falls-Billings issues amazing document about Benedict XVI’s Summorum Pontificum

UPDATE:

There has been a change to the document. Read THIS.
_____

ORIGINAL POST:

I thought this sort of thing over, and long in the past.

A reader sent me a copy of and link to a document issued by His Excellency Most Rev. Michael Warfel, Bishop of the Diocese of Great Falls-Billings concerning the use of the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.

Here,  below, is the text of the cover letter of the total of 9 pages of the pdf.  There are attachments.

The date of issue/signing is 9 August 2011.  Thus, this is not an old document.  This is a current document, not something from 2007.

Even though Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei“‘s instruction Universae Ecclesiae is attached, it is as if Universae Ecclesiae didn’t exist.  Indeed, it is as if Summorum Pontificum didn’t exist and these matters were still governed under the now superseded provisions of Ecclesia Dei adflicta.

I took this directly from the pdf on the diocesan website.  My emphases and comment:

GUIDELINES REGARDING CELEBRATION
OF THE EXTRAORDINARY FORM OF MASS
Diocese of Great Falls-Billings

Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, (MPSP) article 5.2 notwithstanding, celebrating the Extraordinary Form on Sundays and Holy Days of Obligation in parishes of the Diocese of Great Falls-Billings as a regular Mass of obligation is not allowed at this time. [Parishioners in these instances may be drawn away from celebrating at the regular Mass for Sunday or Holy Day].

Indiscriminate mixing of elements of the Novus Ordo and elements of the Extraordinary Form is now [sic] allowed. Norms for each form are to be observed correctly [N.B. Instruction on the Application of the Apostolic Letter Summorum Pontificum, #24].

MPSP, article 5.3 notwithstanding, celebration of ritual Masses (funerals, weddings, etc.) in the Extraordinary Form is not allowed at this time in the Diocese of Great Falls-Billings. A priest must contact the Bishop in advance to ask for any exception to this policy and demonstrate pastoral consideration by not imposing the Extraordinary Form on a parish in these instances.

Altar Servers for the Extraordinary Form must be properly trained.

N.B.: It is important to remember that the Extraordinary Form generally does not enable full, active participation by the assembly which was called for by Vatican II. While the Extraordinary Form holds a definite place in the liturgical tradition of the Church, it does not meet the spiritual needs of the large portion of Church membership today.

Attachment – Instruction on the Application of the
Apostolic Letter Summorum Pontificum of His Holiness
Benedict XVI Given Motu Proprio

Promulgated by Bishop Michael Warfel
August 9, 2011

You may read the rest of the document at that website.

The weird thing is there have been very few EF Masses in that diocese.   Has anyone heard reports of some priest implementing Summorum Pontificum in too zealous a manner?

Here is my guess.  Someone close to the bishop, perhaps someone in the liturgy office, wrote this and unbelievably got the bishop to issue it.  His Excellency was ill-served in the person who wrote this.

I cite a paragraph from Universae Ecclesiae, which is attached to the document from the Diocese of Great Falls-Billings. My emphases:

The Competence of Diocesan Bishops

13. Diocesan Bishops, according to Canon Law, are to monitor liturgical matters in order to guarantee the common good and to ensure that everything is proceeding in peace and serenity in their Dioceses, always in agreement with the mens of the Holy Father clearly expressed by the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum. In cases of controversy or well-founded doubt about the celebration in the forma extraordinaria, the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei will adjudicate.

14. It is the task of the Diocesan Bishop to undertake all necessary measures to ensure respect for the forma extraordinaria.

There probably won’t be any huge fallout from this.  Neither should we want any.  The PCED will surely be involved with quiet correspondence and no one needs to know any more.

This was simply a mistake.  It can go away.

I have no other particular comments, other than to ask this question.

Are there other norms of universal law His Excellency does not want applied in that diocese?

UPDATE:

A priest reader sent a note with a link to a story on Life Site about Bp. Warfel’s sharp criticism of Notre Dame University’s shameful choice to honor the aggressively pro-abortion President Obama with an honorary Law degree.  Read that HERE.

Also, on Life Site was story about how Bp. Warfel “asked a local support group for homosexuals to move its meetings out of a local parish hall to avoid confusion over the Catholic Church’s teaching on homosexuality.”  Read that HERE.

Stories such as these leave me even more convinced that Bp. Warfel was ill-served by the person who wrote that document.  The buck stops on his desk, of course.

UPDATE:

There has been a change to the document.  Read THIS.

Posted in SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, Universae Ecclesiae | Tagged , , , ,
Comments Off on Diocese of Great Falls-Billings issues amazing document about Benedict XVI’s Summorum Pontificum

Random Thoughts

It has been a while but here are some random thoughts:

  • Were I in the Navy I would wear my hat athwartships.
  • Oil and gas are cheaper than a car payment.
  • Ad astra per aspera.
  • French cooking is great.  Then go back to Italian.
  • I hate lightning.
  • If your quarry goes to ground, leave no ground to go to.
  • Hear that NCR?  Phyllis?
  • I am forgetting my Russian.
  • The Chinese cannot buy The Dodgers. Think about it.
  • Cheese.
  • I like drawing to inside straights. No, really.
  • I want to live in New York.
  • Archaisms are your friends.
  • I have a rare blood type.
  • The Cold Steel Recon is good.  I want the Trail Master.
  • Caro Kann.
  • I buy ramen and soup by the case.
  • I can still use a bottleneck on my 12 string.  Amazed.
  • Commuting once almost killed me. No, twice. No, thrice.
  • It’s fun to click between 3 movies you know.
  • Sts. Nunilo and Alodia.
  • I am more interesting than the Dos Equis guy.  Isn’t everyone?
  • The Star Wars scripts are the worst scripts ever written.
  • Amor meus pondus meum.
  • I can’t answer all my email, and that makes me sad.  Well.. not really.
  • “My little green friend.”  Best line.
  • My little knives are keys to my day.
  • Shot gun
Posted in Random Thoughts |
56 Comments

Help a convent in trouble

As I understand things, this convent in England is in trouble and needs help.

Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate in Cornwall.

A reader writes:

This convent once belonged to the Earl of Arundel. St. Cuthbert Mayne, one of the first martyr priests during the Reformation, used to celebrate Mass there, and his skull is kept there. It is a grade 1 (one) listed building, and the fear is that if it is sold, it will be converted to secular use.

[wp_youtube]8P-_25Y5Rjc[/wp_youtube]

As fare as I can tell, friends, these poor sisters haven’t set up a website or a way to take contributions online.   It’s the snail mail for them, it seems, though there is some email address at the end of the video.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, The Campus Telephone Pole |
14 Comments

The CDF/SSPX talks and a provocative observation

My friend over at The Sensible Bond has a very interesting observation about the continuing doctrinal talks between the Holy See’s CDF and the SSPX.   As you know, there will be a meeting of the SSPX superiors with Roman officials of the CDF, including Card. Levada the Prefect, this month.

The Sensible Bond has good analysis.  There is quite a bit, all worthy of your time, but he concludes with this:

BY WAY OF A PS

I have just read another Dinoscopus letter from Bishop Williamson talking about the Vatican Insider’s view [of Andrea Tornielli] of the outcome of the doctrinal talks. Therein he [Williamson] again repeats his view that the issue is one of Catholic Truth. According to his rather threadbare metaphor, the SSPX believes 2+2=4; the Vatican believes it equals 5. [Not terribly original either.  In Orwell’s 1984 this is what torturers want their victims to admit.  That scenario was brutally ripped off for a Star Trek episode.  2+2=4 was, I believe, a slogan of Solidarity against the Communists in Poland.] Bishop Williamson repeats this ad nauseam and never seems to show the least sign of realising that he is turning the theological differences between Rome and the SSPX into a blackbox the inside of which we cannot examine.

So let us take just one example and try to explain the complexity of the issues to the good bishop and those who agree with him:

1. There is no definitive Magisterial teaching which condemns the New Mass. Fact.

2. Everyone who finds fault with the New Mass must therefore make a theological argument based on other teachings about the Mass and apply those teachings to the New Mass.

3. Where there is a theological argument, there is room for individual error and there is the potential for theological disagreement.

4. When there is theological disagreement in the Church, and this disagreement reaches critical proportions, it is the Holy See which has the final say.

5. The final say on the Catholic character of the New Mass rests with the Holy See.

THEREFORE

It is entirely a misrepresentation of the problem to reduce it to some simple mathematical equation.

I continue to pray for the successful outcome of the dialogue and swift reconciliation of the SSPX.

Pray for Benedict XVI, Pope of Christian Unity, that when the time comes, he will not weaken under the onslaught sure to come from his enemies.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
29 Comments

Gregory the Great, in words and in music

Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite observes today the feast of St. Gregory I, “the Great” (+604).  Here is his entry in the Ordinary Form Roman Martyrology:

There is an oddity in the Latin text. What is it?

Memoria sancti Gregorii Magni, papae et Ecclesiae doctoris, qui, vita monastica inita, munere legati Constantinopoli functus est et, ad Sedem Romanam hac die tandem electus, et terrena composuit et sacra servus servorum curavit. Verum se exhibuit pastorem in rebus regendis, in egenis omnimodo subveniendo, in vita monastica fovenda, necnon in fide ubique firmanda vel propaganda, quapropter multa etiam de re morali ac pastorali egregie scripsit. Obiit vero die duodecima martii.

I have a few PODCAzTs on St. Gregory

There are pieces of music which refer to St. Gregory.

Here is a piece called Gregory’s Prayer for Organ or Strings and Trumpet by Allan Hovhaness (+2000)

[wp_youtube]aT3x74nTNRQ[/wp_youtube]

There is also a piece by the Italian Ottorino Respighi as part of his Vetrate di Chiesa.

[wp_youtube]cqOnC8mp17Q[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Just Too Cool, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged , , ,
9 Comments

QUAERITUR: Reading at Mass and “eye contact”

From a seminarian:

I wanted to know if the lector should keep eye contact while
proclaiming the word of God at Holy Mass? Many parish guidelines say that it’s important to keep eye contact.

Keep eye contact… presumably with the “audience” to which the lectoress is “playing”?

Here’s my view.  There is a thin line between reading the Word of God in an articulate, intelligible, thoughtful way, and a performance.  While Holy Mass is the greatest drama even in earthly terms, our roles are not dramatic roles.

I was an actor in a former life.  I know the temptation to “play” the crowd.  Keeping eye-contact, for most people, will lead them into problems, in my opinion.  Unless they are quite disciplined, they will lend to their reading the overtone that that reading is about the reader and not the Word.   In all our reading in Scripture, the Word is both speaking and being spoken, raised to the Father.

“Keeping eye-contact” is not something that I would push.  I would push proper pronunciation of the words, the phrasing, the meaning.

Perhaps we can, under the gravitational pull of the Extraordinary Form, take a cue from how the priest was trained to say Holy Mass.  Even though the priest knows most of the texts by heart, he is to keep his eye in contact with the texts printed on the pages of the Missale Romanum or on the altar cards.   A priest does well, for the sake of prudence, to follow the printed texts even when they are something he has said everyday of his life for decades.  The texts are important.  They are Christ speaking.  The priest ought not stumble over them, scramble them, lose his place.

I think all of us have had the experience of poor readings by poorly prepared or simply untalented readers.  We have also have the experience of readers who read as if for a Victorian melodrama.  They soon become ridiculous and, sadly, don’t realize it.

Women religious of a certain age, I have noted, easily fall prey to this.  Could they be channeling their years of teaching elementary school?  They sometimes are involved in the training of readers in parishes and they pass along all their skill in “reading with meaning“.

Okay, that last part was a digression, a shot leveled from my battle-scarred personal experience.  I’ve had to watch, listen to, suffer from ghastly, overblown, prating proclamations from women religious, with their Sears’ pants suits and lapel pins and hairdos, usually named Sr. Randi, now grinning, now frowning, sawing the air, thus, vivisecting the texts with pregnant pauses, pivoting their aggressive eye-contact from side to side with the intensity of a coastline lighthouse in a fog, who clearly wanted to be at the altar, not the ambo.

I’ll drop it now.  And yes, I have heard some men do the same.  But not, by far, in the same numbers.  Nowhere like.  And I have heard many women, even religious, read well.

Moreover, no matter how well some people may read, there are some men who are officially installed as Lectors.  They read with a difference.

On an additional point, I will also give a little advice to readers.

LISTEN TO YOURSELF when reading.  Tune your ear to listen to the sound of your voice for a few seconds when you start to read.  Listen for whether or not your voice, by itself or amplified, is filling the space.  Are you to soft?  Too loud?  Therefore, mind your use of the microphone.  Some mics require that you be positioned immediately in front of them.  Some need you to be very close.  Some are more sensitive.  Mind the sound of your voice coming back to you.   Once you have the right balance, and this should take no more than two or three syllables, not words, then pay attention to your text again.

Finally… unless the book, the Lectionary, is set to the wrong page and you can’t find the text, use the Lectionary and not the missalette.

Bottom line: Focus primarily on proper diction, phrasing, comprehension, not the congregation – they aren’t in a theater – and not, with the exception of checking your sound, on yourself.  And remember the old actor’s adage: less is more.

And when Mass is over….

[CUE MUSIC]

… why not enjoy some Mystic Monk Coffee?

Many parishes have coffee and doughnuts after Mass.  Wouldn’t some Mystic Monk Coffee be a nice way to follow Mass?  Click HERE and order coffee for your parish after Mass gathering now.

And, while you are at it, how is your coffee supply?

Mystic Monk Coffee… and Tea!

It’s swell!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
40 Comments