Must read: Camille Paglia on feminist disrespect for men

I have enjoyed reading Camille Paglia for a long time.  I fervently oppose many of her positions, of course.  BUT… she is tough and honest and clear and, oh boy, can she write. Reading her scary-good prose is an unsettling pleasure.

In light of the catholic feminist uprising against Pope Francis that is building and dividing the catholic Left, and in light of Pope Francis’ firm slamming of the door on women’s ordination or female cardinals (which he called “un battuta… a joke, a wisecrack”), I found this piece by feminist Camille Paglia of great interest.

She is dead on in most of her assessment of most feminists.

Here is a sample, from TIME:

It’s a Man’s World, And It Always Will Be

The modern economy is a male epic, in which women have found a productive role—but women were not its author

By Camille Paglia

If men are obsolete, then women will soon be extinct—unless we rush down that ominous Brave New World path where females will clone themselves by parthenogenesis, as famously do Komodo dragons, hammerhead sharks, and pit vipers.

A peevish, grudging rancor against men has been one of the most unpalatable and unjust features of second- and third-wave feminism. Men’s faults, failings and foibles have been seized on and magnified into gruesome bills of indictment. Ideologue professors at our leading universities indoctrinate impressionable undergraduates with carelessly fact-free theories alleging that gender is an arbitrary, oppressive fiction with no basis in biology.

Is it any wonder that so many high-achieving young women, despite all the happy talk about their academic success, find themselves in the early stages of their careers in chronic uncertainty or anxiety about their prospects for an emotionally fulfilled private life? When an educated culture routinely denigrates masculinity and manhood, then women will be perpetually stuck with boys, who have no incentive to mature or to honor their commitments. And without strong men as models to either embrace or (for dissident lesbians) to resist, women will never attain a centered and profound sense of themselves as women. [Do I hear an “Amen!”?]

From my long observation, which predates the sexual revolution, this remains a serious problem afflicting Anglo-American society, with its Puritan residue. In France, Italy, Spain, Latin America, and Brazil, in contrast, many ambitious professional women seem to have found a formula for asserting power and authority in the workplace while still projecting sexual allure and even glamor. This is the true feminine mystique, [pace Betty Friedan] which cannot be taught but flows from an instinctive recognition of sexual differences. In today’s punitive atmosphere of sentimental propaganda about gender, the sexual imagination has understandably fled into the alternate world of online pornography, where the rude but exhilarating forces of primitive nature rollick unconstrained by religious or feminist moralism.

It was always the proper mission of feminism to attack and reconstruct the ossified social practices that had led to wide-ranging discrimination against women. But surely it was and is possible for a progressive reform movement to achieve that without stereotyping, belittling, or demonizing men. History must be seen clearly and fairly: obstructive traditions arose not from men’s hatred or enslavement of women but from the natural division of labor that had developed over thousands of years during the agrarian period and that once immensely benefited and protected women, permitting them to remain at the hearth to care for helpless infants and children. Over the past century, it was labor-saving appliances, invented by men and spread by capitalism, that liberated women from daily drudgery.

[…]

Read the rest there. I especially enjoyed her description of men, not women, doing the dangerous stuff after “the next inevitable apocalypse”.

Oh how I pray that Paglia will come over the right side of things. She has about 500 MHz more brainspeed than the entire corpus of catholic feminists combined.

Posted in TEOTWAWKI, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged , ,
22 Comments

NEW Z-SWAG: “I am a Self-Absorbed Promethean Neopelagian and proud of it.”

CLICK TO BUY

Are you a self-absorbed promethean neopelagian?*

I have just the thing for you!

I added a new section to my Z-Swag store at Cafepress.

There are bumper-stickers, car-magnets, coffee mugs, buttons and few other items.

Here is a view of the smaller coffee mug.  Picture yourself drinking your Mystic Monk Coffee or tea from this fine beverageware.

Don’t like coffee or tea… or Orange Fanta?  Get one anyway and put pencils in it.

You surely need a sticker or magnet for your car!  Imagine the puzzled looks you’ll get when you stop at a light, drive down the road, and then pull into your parish’s parking lot!

Having fun with impenetrably vague labels… and the liberals for whom they are intended.

Posted in In The Wild, Lighter fare, Self-absorbed Promethean Neopelagians, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
37 Comments

QUAERITUR: Ember Day coincides with feast day

From a reader:

On consulting my Ordo [for the Extraordinary Form] this coming Saturday is the feast of St. Thomas.

This supersedes the Ember Day which should be commemorated at the Mass of the day.

Should we still observe the Ember Day with respect to our diet for the day?

It is a penitential season: Advent.

It is a penitential day, and Ember Day, in the penitential season.  Don’t let anyone tell you that Advent isn’t a penitential season.

It is a feast!  Of an Apostle!

I respond saying:

Liturgically, do what the Ordo says!

However, you can still observe well the Ember Day by abstaining, if not fasting.  Feast, just a … little.

May I recommend tempura?  That is a fine way to remember the universality of the Church.  HERE

Tempura reminds us also of the East, Japan.  Thomas went to the East, India.   Pray for those who are persecuted for their Christian Faith and the spread of the one true Faith in all those regions.

In honor of St. Thomas, reflect on what a gift it is to have your Catholic Faith as you have it.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , ,
12 Comments

Buy Soap from Dominicans… NOW. No. Really! TODAY!

I am informed that the “Soap Sisters”, the Dominicans in New Jersey who make the wonderful soaps, will shut down their store after 16 December.

If you want to order, order NOW.

Buy soap.  Help nuns.

Click NOW.

Help Dominicans. What’s hard about this?

Soaps… foofy stuff, tastefully wrapped. Small gifts.

They sent me their shaving cup, which I use every day.

(I wish they would bring back their smoky-smelling Savonarola line.  Get it?)

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

Kindle book by Pope Francis FREE today, Sunday [UPDATE: Still not too bad.]

At Amazon today, and today only, Sunday, a book by Pope Francis is being offered for free on KINDLE.  Open Mind, Faithful Heart.

Regularly… well… not free. [It is now $9.99]

Don’t have a Kindle yet?  Get a Paperwhite HERE.  One of you wonderful readers sent me one.  I have been using it in tandem with my older Kindle.  The Paperwhite is super slim and small, easy to slide into a pocket.  There is the Kindle Fire HERE.  I haven’t used one of those yet.

UK HERE.

Posted in Francis, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
13 Comments

Peter O’Toole: R.I.P. Fr. Z POLL

Actor Peter O’Toole has died at the age of 81.  He will forever be connected to one of the greatest films of its era (or any era), Lawrence of Arabia.  I suspect some of you young’uns haven’t seen it.

Lawrence of Arabia...

View Results

I digress.

The last few movie choices of his career are intriguing.

Click

For Greater Glory: The True Story of Cristiada (2012)
Katherine of Alexandria (2013 – not out yet)
Mary (announced…2014… made?)

And in between, it looks like a tiny cameo in some sort of Asian action film.

It is interesting to speculate about what might have been going on in O’Toole’s life toward the end. Surely, he felt his mortality. Of course, the cynic could suggest that he was simply taking jobs from those who would pay him.

Whatever.  Say a prayer for him.  He has passed from this life, as we all shall one day.

Once upon a time, these great films had musical overtures and intermissions with an entr’acte. Going to the movies was like going to the best of plays, a stage production on steroids. A Gesamtkunstwerk.?

I remember going to these big screen films, with the breaks… the patience. The quality.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , ,
55 Comments

Pope Francis’ new interview: damage control on “trickle down” economics?

Interviews.  Interviews. Interviews.

Pope Francis gave an interview to La Stampa.

In the newest interview, the Holy Father is asked about reactions to his odd economic observations in Evangelii gaudium.

My translation:

Some passages in Evangelii gaudium attracted accusations from American ultra-conservatives.  [For an Italian journalist, even for this publication, not being a socialist makes you an ultra-conservative.]  What effect does it have on a Pope to hear himself called a “Marxist”?

Marxist ideology is wrong.  In my life I have known many marxists who are good as people, and because of this I don’t take offense.

The words that struck the most were those about an economy that “kills”… [And the Pope pounces. He was waiting for this question.]

In the exhortation there is nothing that can’t be found in the social doctrine of the Church.  [This is called “damage control”. At least I think it is damage control.  Let’s find out…] I didn’t speak from a technical point of view, I sought to present a snapshot [una fotografia] of what is going on.  The only specific passage was on “trickle-down” theories, [le teorie della “ricaduta favorevole”] according to which every economic growth, favored by the free market, results in producing on its own  [di per sé] a greater equity and social inclusion in the world.  There was the promise that when the glass was full, it would be transferred over and the poor would benefit from it.  Instead what happens when it is full to the brim, the glass magically grows, and thus nothing comes forth for the poor.  [WHOA!  That doesn’t follow, does it.  What the Pope presents here is a picture of the pie growing, or here a glass, but as the glass grows it contains the water within, and never allows the water to spill over the edge.  It doesn’t follow that the growing glass automatically contains all the water.  Leaving aside the problem of the term “trickle down”, which is a disparaging political label, is there a good alternative to “trickle down”? A free market which grows the pie, grows the glass, is preferable to a model wherein when I get something, you are therefore deprived of having it as well.  While this is a brief comment on the Pope’s part, it conveys to me a mistaken notion.  What’s the alternative?  A glass that doesn’t grow?  Bad situation, that.  Zero sum.] This was the sole reference to a specific theory.  I repeat, I didn’t speak as an expert on economy [da technico], but according to the social doctrine of the Church.  And this doesn’t mean being a Marxist.  [True, none of what he says here is Marxist.]

In any event, the Pope seems to be doing some needed damage control.

First, allow me to say that I was right: por si mismo is not “inevitably “.  Here we find Italian “di per se”.

The Pope isn’t endorsing any system.  He is speaking in generalities.   Greed and corruption can effect any economic system.  A free-market can, in fact, not result in a betterment of the lot of the poor on its own.  

And there is no such thing as an “unfettered” free market.  Nor should there be.  There must be rule of law.

People who are active in the free market must take responsibility to make sure that the benefits do trickle down.

I think Pope Francis is overly negative in his view that the glass will grow bigger so that nothing can get out of it.  Something is going to get out.  Again, I suspect that the Holy Father has a limited perspective: the disaster that is Argentina, indeed South America.

I call to mind what Andrew Napolitano said in his mostly negative reaction to Evangelii gaudium: the Pope is frustrated (and thus attacks capitalism) because the poor aren’t getting rich quickly enough.

I respond that, if people acting in the free market act with a view for the poor, the trickle can be far far greater, far far swifter.

I prefer to understand this to be the Pope’s main point when he comments on “trickle down” economics.

Bottom line: Francis is right! A free market will not on its own solve problems.  People have to take responsibility.

Still, the fact remains that a free market model is the worst model we could adopt to help the poor, except for all the rest.

I hope that when conservatives out there write about the Pope’s views they will weigh also the main point: por si’ mismo… di per se… by itself.

Posted in Francis, Linking Back, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
51 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point – or two – that you heard in sermon for your Sunday Mass of precept?

Let us know.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
28 Comments

WDTPRS POLL: Did you see Rose vestments on “Gaudete” Sunday?

Here is a little poll for your 3rd Sunday of Advent.

Please choose an answer and add a comment in the combox.

On this Gaudete Sunday 2013, what color vestments did you see at Mass (Latin Church)?

View Results

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, POLLS | Tagged , , , ,
65 Comments

Pope Francis: Women must not be clericalized!

In La Stampa we find a report on yet another interview Pope Francis has given, apparently to La Stampa.  I haven’t found the whole thing yet.  [UPDATE: Italian Original HERE.]

But in the summary we read:

Commenting on Curia reform, the Pope informs that in February his eight cardinal “advisors” will deliver their “first” concrete “suggestions”. Francis flatly denies allegations that he intends to nominate women cardinals, stating:  “I don’t know where any such an idea came from. Women in the Church must be valued not “clericalised”.”

In Italian, from the actual interview, with my translation:

Posso chiederle se avremo donne cardinale?
«È una battuta uscita non so da dove. Le donne nella Chiesa devono essere valorizzate, non “clericalizzate”. Chi pensa alle donne cardinale soffre un po’ di clericalismo».

May I ask you if we will have women cardinals?
“I don’t know where that crack came from. Women in the Church must be valued, not made into clerics. Whoever thinks about women cardinals suffers a bit from clericalism.

“Not clericalized.”  “Not turned into clerics.”  NB: People don’t speak with “quote marks”, unless they, perhaps, make them in the air while talking.  So, “clericalizzato”, can be “clericalized” (which isn’t really a word in Italian), or probably better, “made clerics”.  Either way, you can hear the Pontiff’s dismissive tone.

Women’s ordination?

Not. Going. To. Happen.

Not to the priesthood.  Not to the diaconate.

Had this come out a week or so ago, would Pope Francis be TIME’s POY?

It will be interesting to see how Francis reacts to Anglican hijinx regarding bishopettes.

For the catholic Left, the ordination of women is the flagship issue.  They don’t want to be “valued”.  They want ordination.  They think ordination is the path to power.

Francis has already caused a fissure among the liberal catholics by his comments about the ordination of women, which can reduced to: No… No… and, if you didn’t get it before, No.

Watch what will happen over time.  Wymyn will demand from their tame men on the catholic Left that they set aside their other reasons to support Francis.

They will be like Buridan’s Ass.

Let the dilemmas begin.

*What they really crave is the approval of men.

UPDATE:

A few people have asked me about my translation.

I translated this myself because a) the English version out there was mistranslated and b) I knew it would be spun by some to make it seem less dismissive.

The English version in La Stampa/Vatican Insider, reads:

“I don’t know where this idea sprang from. Women in the Church must be valued not “clericalised”. Whoever thinks of women as cardinals suffers a bit from clericalism.”

Note that “la battuta” is not there? Some might say that there is an element of “la battuta… wisecrack/joke” in that “sprang”.

“Una battuta” is a more of a wisecrack more than the longer joke one tells, that is “una barzelletta” in Italian, or even “uno scherzo”, depending on the context.

Also, Fishwrap‘s translation was:

“It’s a sound bite and I don’t know where it came from.

No, it isn’t a “sound bite”.  That’s a spin meant to diminish the impact.

In his commentary Fishwrap‘s John Allen, to his credit, caught the problem and said “joking sound bite”, which is at least not off the mark.

Posted in Francis, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Women Religious | Tagged , , , ,
29 Comments