Doctors pronounced this baby dead, but after 2 hours of the mother holding him in her arms, he started breathing again.
Watch.
[wp_youtube]hMAzOjExKMw[/wp_youtube]
Doctors pronounced this baby dead, but after 2 hours of the mother holding him in her arms, he started breathing again.
Watch.
[wp_youtube]hMAzOjExKMw[/wp_youtube]
From a reader:
Due to your blog you singlehandedly managed to get me to my first confession ever (just before this lent, actually); my first, while I’m 30 years old and a cradle catholic. Obviously, that was quite a bit of a hurdle, which took me about a year (!) to overcome…
This sort of thing makes doing this worth it.
The writer made some other points the obstacles that remained to be overcome.
The writer made a decision to make a list, to let the priest sort out the doubtful points, and – because of nervousness about going to the local parish priest who didn’t seem very patient – to go to a different parish.
Sacramental preparation in some places was so bad, for so long, and the priests were lax in preaching about, preparing people for, and the actually getting to the confessional that many now adult catholics out there never made a 1st Confession as children before their 1st Holy Communion.
Here is a question from a reader I answered some time ago.
But it is now Saturday of Passiontide. Sure there are parishes this evening where you can find a priest hearing confessions.
Go. To. Confession.
From a reader:
I haven’t been to Confession in 10 years, and I’ve only gone three times back when I was still in grade school. It’s possible I wasn’t catechized in the sacrament properly because I don’t recall requiring the Act of Contrition, saying any lines for my first two Confessions, nor the proper format for confessing sins.
My last Confession was in a high school theatre and the priest kept tersely correcting me when I confessed my sins wrong, and seemed quite annoyed he had to walk me through it. Now the thought of going makes me anxious to the point I feel ill.
I’ve scoured the internet for guides to confession and examinations of conscience, as well as reviewed your 20 tips, but I’m still unsure about some things.
1. What EXACTLY is the proper way to confess sins, while still being brief at the same time? By Commandment (ie: “Took the Lord’s name in vain X amount of times)? Or by specifics (ie: received communion while not in a state of grace X amount of times)? Something Else?
2. What do you recommend I do if I can’t even hazard a reasonable estimate of how many times I did something?
3. If committing a mortal sin happens so often because it became a habit, is it still a mortal sin?
Before anything else, I am very glad that you are aware of your need to go to confession and you are striving to do it right.
Please know, friend, that going to confession is not supposed to be like being stretched on the rack. Yes, it is hard. Yes, you accuse yourself of sins. Yes, you should be thorough and that can be painful. But… think of the relief afterward.
Even if you don’t think you are wholly “knowledgeable” about what to do, go anyway. The priest can help if you get stuck. 99.9% of priests are going to be pretty careful with you. Just explain that it has been a long time and that you are nervous. He’ll hear that.
1) There is no specific method of confessing or of examining your conscience, which is more to the point. You can use the commandments. That is a standard way. You can go with virtues and vices. There is even an iPhone app to help you examine your conscience ahead of time! I think examens using the Decalogue, the Ten Commandments, are pretty complete. Perhaps that would be the easiest. You could simply say that you sinned against the, say, 4th Commandment X number of times. However, sometimes you may need to add details or circumstances that made it worse. For example, you can sin against the 7th Commandment by stealing a candy bar, stealing Bill Gate’s Porsche, or stealing a little old widow’s monthly pension. If you are starving, running from an Islamic terrorist hit squad, or… well… I can’t think of a good reason to steal a widow’s pension at the moment, unless it is to buy Mystic Monk Coffee … no… not that either… these are details that need to be included. Also, if you stole a candy bar once or 634 times, that is something you need to mention. Get the idea?
2) It is necessary to confess sins in kind and number, what the sin was and how many times you did it. The number does make a difference. That said, we have bad memories. Just do your best, friend and don’t torture yourself. Ten years is a long time. If you can’t think of numbers of times, go with something like an frequency, or an average per month, per year. Something like that. If you still can’t get at it, use something like “very rarely”, “really often”, “constantly”. That sort of thing. God knows that you are doing your best and, in examining your conscience, you are still giving yourself and the priest a sense of the problem you may or may not have with a particular sin.
3) Sometimes when a sin is deeply ingrained or habitual there is a sense in which the guilt of that sin can be a bit less. That doesn’t mean that you are not committing a sin. Furthermore, when you know that you are sinning, you have the responsibility to do something about it. We can’t excuse ourselves saying, “I can’t help it!”, and then continue as if it suddenly is okay to do it because we struggled over it for a little bit. This is one of the hard parts of the spiritual life: we have to be willing to suffer, plain and simple. Saying “no” to ourselves can make us suffer. But knowing that we are going to suffer ahead of time could help us get our heads into the right place and make some plans before hand, so when the hard part starts, we are not just twisting in the wind. If you know that X is a big problem and that you had better stop X-ing, make a plan so that when you recognize you are on the verge of X-ing, your pre-arranged plan will kick in and you will Y instead. This can help.
Finally, it really does help to memorize a regular pattern or routine for what to say. That structure will make it easier!
Take it easy friend.
If you forget something, but you did your best during the confession itself, don’t fret. Mentioned it the next time you go. God knows you did your best and He doesn’t expect the impossible.
You’ll be okay. Just go. And if you think you may need a little time, make an appointment with the priest, even to meet at the confessional if you don’t want to face the face to face thing.
Give it a shot, please!
There is nothing that matches that sense of reconciliation and the relief of the forgiveness of your sins.
A note from Fulton J. Sheen to priests in difficult circumstances:
When nothing makes sense, when one is certain that “things can no longer go on like this,” one immediately is brought face to face with the most thwarted and disappointed man in the Gospel: John the Baptist…. His mission did not end as he thought it should. Like the earth shaking under his feet, there vomited up that awful sense of meaninglessness which seizes any man of God when he is seemingly not supported by God….
To whom shall we go in such black moments as we face the ugly mask of meaninglessness? John the Baptist went to Christ. Even though he did not understand the Master’s ways, he would bring his despair to Jesus. As Christ on the Cross would go to the Heavenly Father in the darkness of the Fourth Word, so the Baptist would go to Christ in the bleakness of his cell. In stark abandonment no theological discussion, no dialogue with a colleague will solace the heart, but only the experience of having an encounter with Christ. He could have said, “Oh! What’s the use? The hell with it. I’ll give up the priesthood. I made a mistake. This life demands more moral courage than I can summon. This is the end.”
On the contrary, John took all his doubts and despair to the Lamb…. But there are times when the strongest are weak; if he is pure, he feels weak when temptation attacks him; if he is hungering for righteousness, he feels weak in face of the apathy of his colleagues. When the remediless weaknesses of our humanity are upon us, then the strong search for the strongest. And this is what John did….
Somehow or other, Christ does not answer OK when we say, “Help me.” Priests may pledge their lives to Him at ordination, but there will be moments when they will think that He is not equal to their “unbearable situation”…. But in such moments, like John, they must bring their seeming defeat to the Lord, and never brood over it and assume that they know better than the Lord. Blessed is he who in spite of inner questionings and frustrations, still sees no hope for the future except in getting closer to Christ.Once we begin to separate in Christ His Priesthood and His Victimhood, the priestly life is full of wreckage. His Priesthood can account for our success; His Victimhood alone can explain our defects. When really are we more His? When we are offering, or when we are being offered? The Lord left His own cousin in jail when He could have smitten the bars like Samson. But the Lord Himself would spend Holy Thursday night in jail. Christ the High Priest was inseparably victim; hence He beats down no storms that rise against Him. He rides upon them. The aspiring boy, Joseph, is thrown into a well. Moses is left along the Nile. And John is beheaded….
Though the Lord does not rescue us from the unbearable, His Heart is so grateful for our acceptance of His Will…. The moment we condemn the Lord for forgetting us, is the time when the Lord most highly praises us. We have no idea how much we are loved in that hour when it seems we are most unloved. John thought himself as a broken and forgotten reed, but the Lord saw him as unshakeable as a rock…. In the Divine Order, the imprisoned souls fly. No priestly heart has freedom; it is mastered and victimized: it must be captured before it can fly. The hour of frustration is the day of emancipation. The apparent forgetfulness of Christ as we toil in oblivion is the time when we are most remembered, for it is possible to be “greater than John the Baptist”: and that is by being the “least.” The ark that the Spirit of Christ builds can float in all flood waters. We are winged by our wants. The hope of the future mansion is the house unfinished here. The priesthood learns victimhood in the unsatisfied soul.(from Chapter 17 of Those Mysterious Priests” by Fulton J. Sheen – Kindle version.)
Say a prayer today for His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI, whose birthday it is today.
The Holy Father is 84 years old.
A partial indulgence is granted to the Christian faithful who, in a spirit of filial devotion, devoutly recite any duly approved prayer for the Supreme Pontiff (e.g., the Oremus pro Pontifice):
V. Let us pray for our Pontiff, Pope Benedict.
R. May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and bless him upon earth, and deliver him not to the will of his enemies.
Our Father. Hail Mary.
Let us pray.
O God, Shepherd and Ruler of all Thy faithful people, look mercifully upon Thy servant Benedict, whom Thou hast chosen as shepherd to preside over Thy Church. Grant him, we beseech Thee, that by his word and example, he may edify those over whom he hath charge, so that together with the flock committed to him, may he attain everlasting life. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.
I am getting lots of questions and I just don’t have time or the energy, or often the expertise to answer them.
I am considering reviving the old ASK FATHER Question Box site. When it wound down, due to a technical problem, it had well over 6000 questions and answers in different categories.
If I would consider doing such a thing again, I would need the help of priests (or bishops). I would need a priests with training in scripture, canon law and moral theology in particular, as well as a sound grounding in dogma. And did I mention liturgy? We would need men who know both Forms and I would be pleased to have a priest of an Eastern Catholic Church involved, for the sake of the Eastern Code and liturgy and traditions. The Church has Eastern and Western lungs.
Should any priests (of bishops) be interested in participating in such a project, please let me know by email.
NB: Absolutely fidelity to the Church’s teachings is a must, along with a willingness to do a little work.
Have some Mystic Monk Coffee, Fathers, and think about it.
COLLECT (2002MR)
Deus, qui omnes in Christo renatos
genus electum et regale sacerdotium fecisti,
da nobis et velle et posse quod praecipis,
ut populo ad aeternitatem vocato
una sit fides cordium et pietas actionum.
In the Tridentinum there is a prayer from Holy Saturday after the 10th prophecy: Deus, qui diversitatem gentium in confessione tui nominis adunasti: da nobis, et velle, et posse quae praecipis; ut populo ad aeternitatem vocato, una sit fides mentium, et pietas actionum. In the Gregorian Sacramentary in the Hadrianum manuscript this results on the Thursday in the Octave of Easter, when the Station is at XII Apostoli.
SLAVISHLY LITERAL TRANSLATION
O God, who made all those reborn in Christ
to be a chosen race and a royal priesthood,
grant us both to desire and to be able to do what you command,
so that within the people called unto eternity
there may be one faith of hearts and one compassionate duty of actions.
The really hard phrase in this is pietas actionum. We have on many occasions in the daily Lent series talked about pietas, and how hard it is to get into English, since “piety” just doesn’t sound right to our modern ears.
In a nutshell, when we talk about pietas as applied to us humans, we generally are referring to our duty, what we owe. When pietas is used to describe God, we are usually speaking of His mercy towards us. But, here we seems to have a confluence, whereby our duty is that of mercy to our neighbor as God is dutifully merciful to us His children.
If you are steeped in medieval things, or at least archaic usage of English, and know something of heraldry, you might remember the symbol of the pelican “in her piety”. There is a symbol of Christ and His Church as a pelican who, in time of famine and drought, pierces her own breast with her bill to feed her chicks from her own blood.
Perhaps you have sung the hymn by St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274) called Adoro Te devote, in which we find the words, “Pie pelicane, Iesu Domine, / me immundum munda tuo sanguine. … O compassionate pelican, Lord Jesus, cleanse me, unclean, in your blood.”
This sort of pietas harks to the sense of “duty” and mercy. This is what she must do for her young out of mercy.
So, in the phrase una sit fides cordium et pietas actionum we have an expression of Christian wholeness.
Just interior faith alone does not suffice for the Christian life, nor do mere outward actions of charity and mercy.
Pope Benedict spoke to this in his first encyclical letter Deus caritas est. All good outward actions are good not just because they are performed, but because they are performed from love, a deep sacrificial love which is charity and which imitates the Lord on the Cross.
But wait, there’s more!
Double checking led to the discovery that there was a change of Collect in the 2002MR. Here is the Collect used in the Novus Ordo this day until the 2002 editio tertia.
COLLECT (1975MR)
Deus, qui, licet salutem hominum semper operaris,
nunc tamen populum tuum gratia abundantiore laetificas,
respice propitius ad electionem tuam,
ut piae protectionis auxilium
et regenerandos muniat et renatos.
The prayer in the edito typica altera of 1975 was not in a previous edition of the Missale Romanum. It had precedent, however, in the Gelasian Sacramentary.
LAME-DUCK ICEL:
God our Father,
you always work to save us,
and now we rejoice in the great love
you give to your chosen people.
No, folks. That’s really it. Let’s keep moving along with a chuckle.
NEW CORRECTED ICEL:
O God, who have made all those reborn in Christ
a chosen race and a royal priesthood,
grant us, we pray, the grace to will and to do what you command,
that the people called to eternal life
may be one in the faith of their hearts
and the homage of their deeds.
See what the new, corrected version does with that pietas actionum? “Homage of their deeds”.
You decide.
As of tomorrow, we enter into the Passion with Palm Sunday. Sweet Hosannas will ring, before we, as a Church, plunge into darkness.
The always useful C-FAM site – may they thrive – has this.
Volume 14, Number 18
April 14, 2011US Castigates Holy See over Family Planning
By Lauren Funk
NEW YORK, April 14 (C-FAM) The contrast between the priorities of the developed and developing world was as clear as night and day.
“It is detrimental to not have adequate family planning resources,” a visibly US delegate told the room. “Why is there a resistance to acknowledging access to family planning as a necessity?”
The soft-spoken delegate from the small island nation of St. Lucia replied, “How do we get our fertility rate to rise? We were told we needed to reduce our fertility rate –now we have an aging population.”
Both voices spoke out during a UN panel hosted last week by the Holy See, Honduras, and Malta called “Secure Human Development: Marriage, Family, Community.” Laurie Shestack-Phipps, a US representative to the UN, castigated the Holy See and other organizers for not being “comprehensive” in their approach to the panel, specifically mentioning family planning and abortion. She [There’s a surprise.] complained further about high fertility rates in the poor countries of Africa.
Shestack-Phipps said, “How can you say that you value family, community, and marriage, but not bring into the picture that both men and women have a right to a healthy life, to be able to avoid unsafe abortion, and have access to the highest attainable standard of reproductive health, and to decide how many children they should have?” [Get that? Note the language about “rights”. The “right” to “avoid unsafe abortion”. The assumption is that abortion is a right.]
The exchange between Shestack and Sarah Flood-Beaubrun of St. Lucia points up an irony at the UN. On the one side are rich countries demanding poor countries reduce their fertility rates, and on the other, the poor countries saying they need higher fertility rates for not just development, but survival. Almost half the countries in the world are facing what has come to be known as demographic winter, where fertility rates have fallen so dramatically that populations are rapidly aging.
The US delegate’s castigation on family planning, which ignored the demographic realities and actual desires of developing countries, is a microcosm of the current UN debates on population and development. The documents that guide this year’s Commission on Population and Development admit that most nations have achieved low fertility, yet the UN continues to ask donor nations for more and more money for family planning services [US taxpayer money at work around the world!] and for what the UN euphemistically calls commodities: condoms, pills, and injectibles that prevent pregnancy. [“commodities”…. Orwellian.]
Wendy Wright, President of Concerned Women for America, further underscored the incongruity. She has visited many medical clinics in Africa and the doctors there told her of medicine cabinets that are empty of essentials like penicillin but overflowing with condoms [Get that?] – so many that children have taken to blowing them up like balloons and playing with them as toys. “So much attention is given to family planning that it drains resources away from what the desperate needs are,” she explained.
Archbishop Francis Chullikatt of the Holy See Mission also strongly warned against such warped priorities. “International programs of economic assistance aimed at financing campaigns of sterilization and contraception, as well as the subordination of economic assistance to such campaigns, are affronts to the dignity of the person, the family, and the human community,” he said.
The panel was organized and hosted by C-FAM (publisher of the Friday Fax, Focus on the Family, and Concerned Women for America). The UN Commission on Population and Development ends this Friday.
Did L’Osservatore Romano cover this?
I wonder if they still think Pres. Obama really wants to to find common ground, really wants to dialogue.
Watch the main stream media for an uptick in stories, articles, and programs which aim at making the Catholic Church look bad.
Easter is coming and then the Beatification of John Paul II. We will see…
I suspect that editors have been sitting on stories, waiting to publish them at this time of the year.
Watch for the uptick.
COLLECT
Absolve, quaesumus,
Domine, tuorum delicta populorum,
ut a peccatorum nexibus,
quae pro nostra fragilitate contraximus,
tua benignitate liberemur.
In the pre-Conciliar Missale Romanum this prayer was the Collect of the 23rd Sunday after Pentecost. In the ancient Veronese Sacramentary it was found in the month of September, a fast time, but it was a bit different: Absolue, domine, quaesumus, tuorum delicta populorum, et quod mortalitatis contrahit fragilitate purifica; ut cuncta pericula mentis et corporis te propellente declinans, tua consolatione subsistat, tua graita promissae redemptionis perficiatur hereditas.
A nexus, from necto (“to bind, tie, fasten; to join, bind, or fasten together, connect”), is “a tying or binding together, a fastening, joining, an interlacing, entwining, clasping” and thence, “a personal obligation, an addiction or voluntary assignment of the person for debt, slavery for debt”. Nexus is used to indicate also “a legal obligation of any kind”. It is not uncommon to find somewhere near nexus the word absolvo, which is “to loosen from, to make loose, set free, detach, untie”. In juridical language it means “to absolve from a charge, to acquit, declare innocent”. Here is a truly fascinating piece from the mighty Lewis & Short Dictionary: “to bring a work to a close, to complete, finish (without denoting intrinsic excellence, like perficere; the fig. is prob. derived from detaching a finished web from the loom”
Contraho in this context is “to bring about, carry into effect, accomplish, execute, get, contract, occasion, cause, produce, make”. Blaise/Dumas indicates that contraho means “to commit sin”.
LITERAL TRANSLATION
Unloose, O Lord, we implore,
the transgressions of Your peoples,
so that in Your kindness we may be freed
from the bonds of the sins
which we committed on account of our weakness.
Think of sin as a web which we both weave and then get caught it. As Hamlet says the engineer is “hoist with his own petard”. When our First Parents committed the Original Sin, they contracted (contraho) the guilt and effects for the whole human race. At that point our race was bound by justice. To be “justified” again, and to be unbound from our guilt and set to right with God, reparation had to be made. Thus, the New Adam allowed Himself to be bound by His tormentors, and be bound to the Cross, and then unbind His soul from His Body and die.
The Sacrifice of the Lord was aimed not just at a few chosen or privileged people. It was for all peoples. The Sacrifice was “for all”, though “all” will not accept its effects. Some will refuse what Christ did to free us from our sins and the punishments of eternal hell they deserve. “Many” will be saved as a result of Christ’s Passion and Death. Which side of the reckoning will you be on.
Returning to the image of the loom, which is woven into today’s vocabulary, I have in mind the incredible phrase from the Book of Job: “My days are swifter than a weaver’s shuttle, and come to their end without hope. Remember that my life is a breath; my eye will never again see good.”
Our days are indeed like a shuttle. Some years ago I met a women who woven cloth with a large loom. She showed me how it worked. In her practiced hands, the shuttle lashed swiftly back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, while the loom packed the threads together. The cloth “grew” as it was woven, slowly, but surely. But the shuttle snapped back and forth with increasing speed as she found her rhythm and settled into it.
LAME-DUCK ICEL:
Lord,
grant us your forgiveness
and set us free from our enslavement to sin.
You decide.
NEW CORRECTED ICEL VERSION:
Pardon the offenses of your peoples, we pray, O Lord,
and in your goodness set us free
from the bonds of the sins
we have committed in our weakness.