HuffPo: You can’t be a Republican (who hate and mock the poor) and a Christian

At HuffPo there is a stunningly dopey headline over a stunningly dopier opinion piece by someone named Larry Atkins, whom I don’t recall ever having heard of before.

Headline:

Why Would a Christian Want to Be a Republican, in Light of Pope Francis?

?!?

Here is the essential argument.

Pope Francis is for “the poor”.
President Obama is for “the poor”.
Republicans, I am not making this up, “frequently mock and hold in contempt the poor.”

Therefore,…

We should have even bigger government, which means that – in the name of Pope Francis himself! – you should be a Democrat or you are a bad Christian and, obviously, a bad person.

You have to read that piece.

This is another example of what I wrote about, HERE.

Never mind the official Democrat promotion of abortion (the writer claims the Bible is silent on that, btw)….

Some people think that free-markets and entrepreneurship will help “the poor” more efficiently, more quickly, and in a way that protects and fosters their human dignity. Others think that money should be redistributed, in “fairness”, through the agency of a vast government bureaucracy.

Posted in Liberals, Linking Back, The Drill, The future and our choices, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
36 Comments

QUAERITUR: Woman training altar servers stands in as priest. Sacrilege?

From a reader:

My parish priest recently asked an older (semi-retired) female altar server (former MC & Sacristan) from another parish to train our altar servers for enrolment into the Guild of St Stephen (http://www.guildofststephen.org/).

First of all she discourages genuflecting (as it looks uneven if those carrying things don’t genuflect – and being older she can’t do it as easily) – but when training for the lavabo  / consecration / ablutions she had another female server from her parish stand in as the priest, and used the real chalice (and drank the unconsecrated wine herself from the priest’s chalice). Is this sacrilege?

There are several points to consider.

First, I cannot tell if this involves the Novus Ordo or the Usus Antiquior.  If it involves the Usus Antiquior, then it is deeply wrong to discourage genuflecting, because it is required.  If it is the Novus Ordo, then… well… as deeply stupid as the rubric is not to genuflect when passing in front of the tabernacle, there is a rubric about that.  That rubric is so dumb that were someone to confess to me that he genuflected anyway, I would have a hard time getting worked up about it.

To have a female stand in as the priest during a practice…. sacrilege?  Welllll…. no, probably not.  It would be better were a male of any age to do that.  Far better.  But, so long as the female wasn’t dressing up, etc., I guess I could in a grouchy way live with that for the purpose of a practice.

Should women, for example, never be able to help an Extraordinary Form altar boy learn his Latin responses?  Learn to hold his hands properly when standing?  Genuflect properly?  If those things, then why not a little more?  If there are no men available to teach them, then who?

Now…using the real chalice?  I don’t like that at all.  That is unnecessary for the purpose of a practice.  They don’t need a real chalice, even though they might want to practice carrying the chalice from the credence table to the altar.   Using actual wine for the practice?  Drinking from the chalice.  This is starting to sound a lot like “simulation” of a sacrament, which would be a very serious matter indeed.

Anything that smacks of simulation – by adults in front of children – should be avoided.  Young children “playing Mass” is a different matter, though parents ought to watch that like the proverbial… NSA.  I was going to say proverbial hawk, but… you know.

This opens up another, deeper, issue.

Some things used during sacred liturgy are constituted as sacred things.  The chalice is one of these.  They are to be used in a sacred space, the church building, and then within the even more sacred space of the sanctuary, the proper place of those who are set aside as consecrated persons.  It does make a difference who enters the sanctuary and what he or she does there.  Also, the priest’s hands are consecrated so that he can handle sacred things.  I am always pleased to see altar boys or lay people working in sacristies who are trained to handle sacred vessels while wearing gloves or with some other cloth between their bare hands and the vessel itself.

It is important for our Catholic identity to revive a strong sense of the sacred: sacred times, places, persons and objects.

If you are really concerned that someone is going over the line in these practices, then it behooves you to bring your concerns to the attention of the parish priest.  I would’t go to him for something trivial, however.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
25 Comments

Dismissal of publicly immoral Church employees

This story caught my eye because of the name of the place involved.  When I see this name I always think of Daffy Duck.

From the San Bernardino Sun:

A Rancho Cucamonga man who taught 17 years at a Catholic high school was fired from his job days after he married his gay partner in a San Bernardino civil ceremony.

While school representatives declined comment on the matter, an attorney representing 45-year-old Ken Bencomo says he was fired because of the same-sex ceremony.

“The reason given was that the marriage occurred and the school’s position was that it violated church teachings,” said Chatsworth attorney Patrick McGarrigle.

Bencomo, 45, was head of the English department at St. Lucy’s Priory High School in Glendora, but also worked as a yearbook moderator and dance coach.

Students say they were aware of Bencomo’s sexual orientation.

“He never talked about his personal life to his students, but it’s something that students and faculty knew,” said former student, Abigail O’Brien, 19, of Upland.

McGarrigle also said the school was aware long before he got married.

[…]

This raises some interesting points.

At what point does immoral behavior have enough public notoriety that ecclesiastical authority must, or can prudently according also to civil law, dismiss employees?

During the canon law conference I just attended, these issues came up.

In this case, while the school probably could have moved earlier, when there is a public, civil act that would have been listed also in the newspaper (I believe in most places marriages are posted in the paper), then there is no question that you can act.

When hiring, ecclesiastical authorities can still include “morality clauses” in contracts.  They have to make it clear in the contract what is expected.  I heard about a case in which the school – I believe it was a school – handed the prospective employee a copy of the Catechism of the Catholic Church and had the person sign something to affirm that she had received it.  In that case, the employee would not easily be able to claim that she was unaware of what the Church teaches.

Isn’t this dreadful?

Also as part of the Canon Law Conference, we had a presentation from a civil lawyer who does a lot of work for church entities about the care which must be taken to protect assets as well as to protect the Catholic identity of those entities.  It was enlightening and, frankly, a little frightening.

My respect for the huge weight of responsibility diocesan bishops bear in these matters rose enormously.

In any event, this is the hand we have been dealt.  We have to play with the cards we have.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , ,
56 Comments

What’s red, flutters a little, and is carried in an entrance procession?

What’s red, flutters a little, and is carried in an entrance procession?

Yes, the elevated image of your patronal red fish god.

Someone sent me a link to a video of the entrance procession for the Mass at the Basilica Shrine in Washington, DC.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvbQUm8AVPg&feature=player_embedded

Just for a fun contrast.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

This is also a great opportunity to repost the video of the wonderful sermon Bp. Slattery (D. Tulsa) gave for that memorable event, the Pontifical Mass at the Throne to celebrate the anniversary of Benedict XVI’s election.

UPDATE:

I see that Jeffrey Tucker of NLM also wrote about this.  HERE

Posted in Lighter fare, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
63 Comments

Real Barber Shop!

It’s such a pleasure to be at a REAL barber shop.

Behold, my old shop in St Paul, Grandview Barber Shop. I’ve been coming here (when in St Paul) for over 30 years!

20130803-090129.jpg

20130803-090137.jpg

Many priests and seminarians come here.

Posted in On the road, SESSIUNCULA, The Campus Telephone Pole, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
21 Comments

A tactic

We are starting to see more often now the heterodox attack orthodox defenses of Catholic doctrine as “turning against the poor”.

In the combox here, under a post about Bp. Morlino, someone tried to slither in a snarky implication that Bp. Morlino stopped helping “the poor” when the Diocese of Madison rearranged funding for a multi-cultural center.  (To be clear: the notion that Morlino and/or the diocese stopped helping the poor is just plain weird.)

Now I see that His Eminence Francis Card. George of Chicago will no longer give money from the Campaign for Human Development to a group that also promotes “same-sex marriage” as part of their political agenda. Cardinal George explains HERE that we cannot give money to a group that promotes something that so egregiously goes against Catholic teaching. I would add: against nature, against the ecology of the human person, as it were.

I must note that there is not a direct parallel between the Madison and Chicago thing.  The point is that they are both accused of being somehow against “the poor”, as if by mentioning “the poor”, we know longer should consider anything else, such as the proper administration of the goods of the diocese and the best way to help the poor or, on the other hand, defense of and teaching of Catholic doctrine and the ecology of the human person in a clear way and to avoid scandal.

Here is what Card. George wrote:

ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO

AN OPEN RESPONSE TO AN OPEN LETTER
JULY 29. 2013

On Monday, July 29, in the Chicago Tribune, a group of Catholics published an open letter addressed to me and to the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD). They accused the Church of turning her back on the poor. This accusation follows a decision by the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR) to include support for “same-sex marriage” as part of their political agenda. The CCHD cannot fund groups that support this goal.

Donors to the CCHD give to this anti-poverty organization with the understanding that their money will be passed on to organizations that respect the teachings of the Catholic faith. Organizations that apply for funds do so agreeing to this condition.

On May 23, the ICIRR board broke faith with its member organizations when it publicly supported so called “same-sex marriage.” For its own political advantage, it introduced a matter extraneous to its own purpose and betrayed its own members, who were not consulted.

The CCHD had no choice but to respect the unilateral decision of the ICIRR board that effectively cut off funding from groups that remain affiliated with ICIRR. Without betraying its donors or the Catholic faith, the Catholic Church’s long-standing work for immigrant groups and for immigration reform remains intact. This record speaks for itself and is well known. It is carried locally by Priests for Justice for Immigrants and by Sisters and Brothers of Immigrants, along with very many lay Catholics, in collaboration with the Archdiocesan Office for Immigrant Affairs and Immigration Education, led by Elena Segura with my complete support.

It is intellectually and morally dishonest to use the witness of the Church’s concern for the poor as an excuse to attack the Church’s teaching on the nature of marriage.  Four weeks ago, Pope Francis wrote: “…marriage should be a stable union of man and woman…this union is born of their love, as a sign and presence of God’s own love, and of the acknowledgement and acceptance of the goodness of sexual differentiation, whereby spouses can become one flesh and are enabled to give birth to a new life.” In other words, when it comes to marriage and family life, men and women are not interchangeable. The whole civilized world knows that.

Those who signed the open letter in the Tribune proclaimed their adherence to the Catholic faith even as they cynically called upon others to reject the Church’s bishops. The Church is no one’s private club; she is the Body of Christ, who tells us he is “the Way, the Truth, and the Life.” Because the signers of the letters are Catholic, they know that in a few years, like each of us, they will stand before this same Christ to give an account of their stewardship. Jesus is merciful, but he is not stupid; he knows the difference between right and wrong. Manipulating both immigrants and the Church for political advantage is wrong.

Francis Cardinal George, OMI
Archbishop of Chicago

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , ,
22 Comments

Sister is upset that Archbp. Sartain will attend the LCWR meeting

The nuns aren’t happy.

That is to say the LCWR nuns aren’t happy.  All the traditional sisters are happy.

It seems that the LCWR’s Vatican Overlord is going to attend the whole of the LCWR meeting at the swanky Royale Caribe hotel in Orlando… near Disneyworld.

Archbp. Sartain of Seattle was appointed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to keep his eyes on the doings of the sisters.

You will recall that the CDF did a doctrinal investigation of the LCWR and found it lacking.  Thus, the Holy See’s “hostile takeover”.

Fishwrap (aka National Schismatic Reporter) is saying that a former LCWR co-mentor, Sr. Theresa Kane (about whom I wrote just the other day – HERE – because she was unhappy with Pope Francis) has unhappy things to say about Archbp. Sartain’s presence at their confab at the swanky Royale Caribe.

One former LCWR president said its members are preparing for this year’s assembly with an “ominous feeling.”

“We’re going into this assembly knowing that there’s a cloud over our head and that we are being investigated and they are going to be monitoring us,” said Mercy Sr. Theresa Kane, who served as LCWR president from 1979 to 1980.

Sartain, Kane said, is “showing up, and he’s staying for the entire assembly. It’s monitoring. There’s a cloud … and we’re living through it.”

Turn that frown upside down, Sister!  When heresy gives you Sartain, make lemonade!

I, on the other hand, am still darn sad.  The LCWR rejected me.  They rejected my entirely sincere and legitimate application for media credentials, which I submitted in all good will and honesty.  I would also have been able to visit my mother, who is in Florida. The nuns made my mother sad, too.

So, Sartain gets to go… lucky dog… and I can’t!

 

Posted in Liberals, Women Religious | Tagged , , , ,
22 Comments

Canon Law Conference at O.L. Guadalupe Shrine

Over the last couple days I attended a Canon Law and Civil Law Conference at the beautiful Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in the Diocese of LaCrosse. A great setting for a great conference.

Alas, the Shrine is in a rather remote area, and there was neither phone coverage nor internet. I was pretty much off the grid for a couple days.

Here, however, are a few pics.

The attendees formed a group of goodly size this year.  I attended 3 years ago and it was smaller.  There were quite a few civil lawyers and non-priests at the meeting.

20130802-195722.jpg

Archbp. Sample giving his address.  Sorry… my iPhone isn’t good at low light and distance.

20130802-195741.jpg

Here is a shot of the interior of the church.  This proves that we don’t have to build ugly churches if we don’t want to.

20130802-195758.jpg

20130802-195816.jpg

The Shrine is staffed by the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, about whom we have thought a great deal of late.

20130802-195827.jpg

Last night there was a nice supper and, afterward, Q&A with the speakers.  The food at the cafe is surprisingly good.

20130802-195847.jpg

Cardinal Burke asking Bishop Gainer (D. Lexington) a question.

20130802-195903.jpg

Card. Burke preached at the noon Mass today.

20130802-195920.jpg

Fr. Z and friend doing a little writing after the conference.

20130802-200002.jpg

I was deeply edified by the talks and gained a lot of insight into the work of diocesan tribunals.  It was a valuable two days in a beautiful, prayerful setting.

The Shrine is worth the effort to visit.  Make the effort and take the time.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , , , ,
17 Comments

HEY! YOU! Who do you think you are?!?

There is an AP story floating around, in which the undersigned is quoted, “Analysis: Pope’s revolution; not all are pleased” by Nicole Winfield of AP.

As usual, Nicole gets some things wrong and some right. My focus at this moment is this part, wherein I – and you – are mentioned.

Here is the section:

His recent decision to forbid priests of a religious order from celebrating the old Latin Mass without explicit authorization seemed to be abrogating one of the big initiatives of Benedict’s papacy, a 2007 decree allowing broader use of the pre-Vatican II Latin liturgy for all who want it. The Vatican denied he was contradicting Benedict, but these traditional Catholics see in Francis’ words and deeds a threat. They are in something of a retreat.
“Be smart. There will be time in the future for people to sort what Vatican II means and what it doesn’t mean,” the Rev. John Zuhlsdorf warned his traditionalist readers in a recent blog post. “But mark my words: If you gripe about Vatican II right now, in this present environment, you could lose what you have attained.”
Even more mainstream conservative Catholics aren’t thrilled with Francis.

It seems that I am a traditionalist.. and so are you.

That would be a surprise to a lot of traditionalists. But then again, the neo-con no-risk conservatives are squinting at us too. And liberals can’t stand us.

It sounds like, though the wording is ambiguous, that you are not “mainstream”.  Fair?

We just can’t win, can we?

I see this sort of thing all the time when I and this blog are mentioned.

Delightful!

Question for the readers, and this might lead to a poll.

How do you identify yourselves?

Are you “traditionalists”? Conservatives? Mainstream? Lefties? Just Catholics? Tradition-friendly?

I am looking for pithy, one or two word, descriptors which I could use in a poll, if I want to put one together.

HAVE AT!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Our Catholic Identity |
354 Comments

Bp. Morlino … ad multos annos

On 1 August 2003, His Excellency Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino was installed as Bishop of Madison.  Madison, one of the great liberal bastions of these USA, has been described by some as “47 square miles surrounded by reality”.

Happy 10th anniversary of ministry in MadCity.

With his clear eye fixed on the Church’s mission and doctrine, and his sense of humor, and his willingness to be attacked in the liberal press (and in Madison that’s just about the only kind) Bp. Morlino has been a source of encouragement for many in these cultural wars we are experiencing.

You could in a small way express your congratulations to Bp. Morlino for this milestone by sending online a donation to the Diocese.  In the last 10 years the number of seminarians has quintupled, nearly sextupled, from 6 to about 35.  To this this strains the budget – but in a good way – doesn’t quite capture the need.   Click HERE.

Last year I heard with my own ear him tell the seminarians that he wanted them to know the Extraordinary Form before he ordained them.

I have met a lot of the seminarians and they are outstanding young men.

Tonight His Excellency will be on EWTN with Raymond Arroyo, 8 EDT, 7 CDT.

Say a prayer for the bishop in his heavy pastoral mandate.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
17 Comments