PRAYERCAzT: The Lorica of St. Patrick

The Latin word loríca means “a leather cuirass; a defense of any kind; a breastwork, parapet”.  In effect, it means “armor”.  It has come to be associated with a prayer attributed to St. Patrick (+ 5th c.) .

“Loríca” is also association with an rhythmic invocation or prayer especially for protection as when going into battle.

The Lorica of St. Patrick is rooted in an unconfused belief in the supernatural dimension of our lives, that there is a spiritual battle being waged for our souls, and in our absolute dependence on the One Three-Personed God.

One could pray this prayer each and every morning.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, PODCAzT | Tagged
16 Comments

Bad groups within and without and knowing who our friends are

Remember distinctions of ad intra and ad extra when it comes to matters that concern the Church?

Remember my posts about the “Magisterium of Nuns”?

Remember how the “Catholic” Health Association gave cover against the local bishop to a “Catholic” hospital in Phoenix which performed a direct abortion?

The Cardinal Archbishop of Washington DC has some strong words about New Ways Ministry, founded by Sr. Jeannine Gramick, SSND, and Fr. Robert Nugent.

New Ways Ministry dissents from Catholic teaching, defends unnatural sex, objectively sinful behavior, between members of the same sex.

Card. Wuerl has made it clear that New Ways Ministries is not Catholic, the stuff they peddle isn’t Catholic, and that they shouldn’t use the word Catholic for what they do.

CNA has a write up about this.

US bishops emphasize booklet on ‘marriage equality’ is not Catholic

Washington D.C., Mar 16, 2011 / 02:46 am (CNA).- The U.S. bishops have said that a new booklet advocating “marriage equality” for same-sex couples by a self-identified Catholic group strongly contradicts Church teaching.

In “no manner is this organization authorized to speak on behalf of the Catholic Church,” Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C. said March 11, The cardinal was specifically referring to a new pamphlet released by the controversial New Ways Ministry – an organization that claims Catholic support for homosexual “marriage.”

The booklet titled “Marriage Equality: a positive Catholic approach” [Therein lies a problem: this approach is not Catholic.] was authored and released this month by New Ways Ministry’s executive director Francis DeBernardo.

DeBernardo argued that the “full” Catholic position on same-sex “marriage” is not represented solely by bishops within the Church. [Therein lies another problem.  I hope the US bishops are getting what is going on here, the bigger arc.]

“When dealing with lesbian and gay issues, a relatively new area of Church discussion on which there is so much debate,” DeBernardo wrote, “the bishops may not yet be able to discern what the Catholic community believes.” [And so they align themselves with the Magisterium of Nuns.  They are working not just to justify deviancy, but also to supplant the bishops as the Church’s teachers.]

The booklet also claimed that “Catholic tradition” allows for laity and theologians within the Church – some of whom support allowing marriage for same-sex couples – to have equal say and authority on the issue. [New Ways Ministry LIED.]

Cardinal Wuerl, who heads the Committee on Doctrine for the U.S bishops’ conference, reacted to the pamphlet by stating that New Ways Ministry is not “in conformity” with Catholic teaching and that the group should refrain from even identifying itself as Catholic.

Cardinal Wuerl also reiterated his support for the position of the previous U.S. bishops’ conference president Cardinal Francis George, who stated in February of 2010 that the organization is not Catholic and does not speak for the Church.

New Ways Ministry, based in Mount Rainier, Maryland, describes itself as a “gay-positive ministry of advocacy and justice.” Cardinal George noted in his Feb. 12 statement last year that since its founding in 1977, “serious questions” have been raised about the group’s adherence to Catholic teaching on homosexuality.

In 1984, New Way’s founders – Sr. Jeannine Gramick, SSND, and Fr. Robert Nugent – were barred from continuing their activities in the Archdiocese of Washington.  [There are a lot of problems these days in the Church.  There are groups such as New Ways Ministry trying to subvert the authority of the bishops on a lot of fronts.  I submit that the last thing prelates of Holy Catholic Church need to worry about are groups which desire to make use of the provisions of Summorum Pontificum.  As a matter of fact, these groups would go to the wall in support of, defense of Card. Wuerl and other residential bishops everywhere, were they embraced rather than shoved to the margins.]

That same year, their superiors ordered them to separate themselves from the organization. The two resigned from leadership posts but continued their involvement until 1999, when the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith said that because of “errors and ambiguities” in their approach, Sr. Gramick and Fr. Nugent are permanently prohibited from any pastoral work involving homosexual individuals. [But their legacy lives on.]

Cardinal George said New Ways Ministry’s “lack of adherence” to Church teaching on the morality of homosexual acts was the “central issue” in the censure of its founders and continues to be its “crucial defect.

Tom Peters has a good write up on the situation entitled: “Who is funding the coordinated attempt to subvert the Church’s teaching on homosexuality and marriage?”  Be sure to check it out.  T. Peters points to the role of the anti-Catholic pro-homosexual Arcus Foundation:

New Ways Ministry received almost $100,000 from the Arcus Foundation in 2009. (Anyone who works for a small non-profit will appreciate how far $100k goes.) The Arcus foundation was founded by Jon Stryker, a friend of Tim Gill, a gay billionaire from Colorado who has promised to spend the entirety of his vast fortune on redefining marriage in the United States.

Arcus Foundation is funding anti-Catholic pro-homosexual groups within the sphere of the Church.  By the way, arcus in Latin for “rainbow”.

Consider the triangulation that is taking place.  There are dissident groups within the Church.  Some of them are puppets and ridiculous, though they muddy the waters.  Others are pernicious and they want to take power away from the Church’s true pastors.  There are bad groups outside the Church which desire to destroy the authority of the Church’s pastors.

I think that, as time passes, our bishops will figure out who their friends are.

Posted in New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
26 Comments

WDTPRS – Ember Wednesday of Lent (1962MR & 2002MR)

Remember today’s LENTCAzT.

COLLECT (1962RM):
Devotionem populi tui, quaesumus, Domine,
benignus intende:
ut, qui per abstinentiam macerantur in corpore,
per fructum boni operis reficiantur in mente.

In the Novus Ordo the prayer is somewhat softened.  Are you getting used to that now?

COLLECT (2002MR)
:
Devotionem populi tui, quaesumus, Domine,
benignus intende,
ut, qui per abstinentiam temperantur in corpore,
per fructum boni operis reficiantur in mente.

Our prayers this week are giving us different virtues to think about: devotio, moderatio, temperatio. There is a frequent juxtaposition of mens and corpus or caro, rationabilia and corporalia in Lenten prayers.  We are both.  Both must be subject to discipline during Lent.

Anyone who has been a cook recognizes the basic sense of macero. Macero is “to make soft or tender, to soften by steeping, to soak, steep, macerate”.   When applied to us it is, “to weaken in body or mind, to waste away, enervate”.

The Novus Ordo redactors sliced out macero and put in tempero, related to temperatio. Tempero is “to observe proper measure; to moderate or restrain one’s self; to forbear, abstain; to be moderate or temperate”. We can also use this word to indicate the mixing of liquids, such as when water is added to wine in a cup, according to ancient usage. Tempero also means, “to forbear, abstain, or refrain from; to spare, be indulgent to any thing”.  Think of the virtue temperance.  In our prayer it appears in a passive form.  Given the meaning of tempero I think the passive gives us something closer to a middle voice.

WORDY LITERAL RENDERING:
We beg You, O Lord, kindly look upon the
devotion of Your people,
with the result that they who by means of abstinence are being sparing in due measure in respect to the body
may by means of the fruit of good work be refreshed in respect to the mind.

Macero… soften.  You would think we want to toughen, not soften.  Right?  This is LENT!  This is BATTLE!  We are FASTING!  GET TOUGH!  Right?  Think of the cooking term maceration.  Soften?  Really?

We macerate things by immersing them in some substance in order to break them down.  This is done with meat, for example to tenderize it, to break down the fibers of muscle so that they will not contract under heat and make the meat tough.  We do the same thing by pounding flesh with a spikey hammer.  Maceratio means tenderize.  Think of softening up an entrenched position of the enemy by hammering it with artillery.

What we are driving at here is “mortification of the flesh”.

NEW, CORRECTED ICEL VERSION:
Look kindly, Lord, we pray,
on the devotion of your people,
that those who by self-denial are restrained in body
may by the fruit of good works be renewed in mind
.

LAME-DUCK ICEL:
Lord,
look upon us and hear our prayer.
By the good works you inspire,
help us to discipline our bodies
and to be renewed in spirit
.

Posted in WDTPRS | Tagged ,
11 Comments

Egyptian Army violently disperses protests by Coptic Christians

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us.

From ahramonline:

Army violently disperses new Copts’ protest

Thousand of Copts organised a protest calling for the punishment of all those who attacked and injured pro-Coptic sit-in demonstrators on Sunday night in front of the State TV building (Maspero). The protest began in Shubra after which the protesters mobilised and marched on Maspero.

When the protesters reached State TV, the army met them first by firing into the air and then chasing them off, beating them with electric batons and sticks.

The protesters began as Copts – Muslims also joined in unity – called for the prosecution of any parties involved in the church burning in Atfeeh at Soul Village two weeks ago.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
5 Comments

Michael Voris on Summorum Pontificum and the lay of the land

Michael Voris of Real Catholic TV, reporting from Rome these last days, has a 15 March video in which he uses a phrase found rather frequently in these electronic pages.

[wp_youtube]j-kRwoZKjPk[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices | Tagged
33 Comments

ATTENTION PRIESTS 26-29 July USA Confraternity of Catholic Clergy 2011 Convocation

This is something for all priests, especially in the USA.  Lay people should also take note of this.

Confraternity of Catholic Clergy 2011 Convocation – JULY 26 – 29

Adoremus in Aeternam

CARDINAL STRITCH RETREAT HOUSE
1300 Stritch Drive
Mundelein, IL 60060
(847) 566-6060   FAX (847) 566-6082

Fr. Thomas KocikReform of the Reform
New Liturgical Movement

Fr. Frank Phillips, CR
founder & superior of the Canons Regular of St John Cantius

Dr. Denis McNamara
The Liturgical Institute, University of Saint Mary of the Lake

COST:
$450 includes private room & board (accommodations & all meals) plus admission to all conference talks (BEST DEAL) or $300 for conference talks and meals only (FOR THOSE WHO WILL FIND THEIR OWN LODGING) or $150 for conference talks alone (FOR COMMUTERS & LOCALS)

email catholic-clergy@gmail.com to register

http://catholicclergy.net/

IS YOUR PASTOR OR PAROCHIAL VICAR CELEBRATING HIS ANNIVERSARY OF ORDINATION? YOUR PERMANENT DEACON? A NEW ORDINATION OF A FRIEND OR FAMILY MEMBER? HOW ABOUT GIVING THEM A GIFT THAT REALLY MATTERS? [I would be happy to attend, btw.]

Consider the gift of a Confraternity of Catholic Clergy annual convocation ($450) or provide him with transportation to the event. We can also use donations for scholarships to help those clergy (priests, deacons and seminarians) who cannot afford to come due to financial
difficulties.

ONGOING spiritual, theological and pastoral formation of the clergy is not an option nor luxury; it is a NECESSITY. The CCC provides this ongoing formation in a fraternal setting with our ordained brethren who unequivocally proclaim loyalty and obedience to the Magisterium and the Roman Pontiff. URGE your clergy to ‘come and see’ (membership not a requirement to attend convocation)

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
7 Comments

Fishwrap finally reports on courageous Norma Jean Coon

Remember Norma Jean Coon?  She is the courageous woman who repudiated her simulated “ordination” in the wymynpryst thingie and has cut all her ties with the wymin, as she works with the CDF for the lifting of the excommunication she incurred.  WDTPRS admires what Mrs. Coon is doing.  We wrote about her HERE.

We talked about this here about a month ago.  Now, however, National Catholic Fishwrap has set their cub-reporter Zoe Ryan in the Intern on this story.  Fishwrap reports that the wymymnenne say that … well… Mrs. Coon wasn’t really very involved very much anyway and suggest that perhaps she wasn’t very stable.

The Fishwrap, as you know, is a promoter of the ordination of wyymymnnm.

Here are some of the best lines from the Fishwrap damage-control piece.

“The Vatican labels the ordination of women in the Catholic church as a grave offense and participants are excommunicated latae sententiae, or automatically.”

Remember, it’s not nice to “label”!

Zoe the Fishwrap Intern paints the wimnym as understanding and cooperative.  The article suggests that Coon wasn’t all that stable because of other burdensome things going on in her life and they  just want to “help her follow her conscience”.

Riiiiight.

“The program is individualized for each person and includes an intake clinical interview and psychological screenings, among other things.”

I imagine the “other things” include walking with thoughtful expressions around on mazes.

“Because women’s ordination is not allowed in the Catholic church, those who participate in ceremonies confront conflict within the church.”

It is not allow because it is IMPOSSIBLE and it isn’t “within”.  That’s why doing it shows that you are “outside”.

For these wymmnmyn it’s all about individual conscience.  You choose what you want to do regardless of whether or not the Church has something to say about it.

“We remain ordained Roman Catholic Womenpriests who continue to follow our informed consciences and, simply put, obeying God trumps obeying the pope.”

No, dearie, you aren’t.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Linking Back, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , ,
33 Comments

One of the coolest things I have ever seen

No wizardry, no CGI… just photos from Cassini near Saturn.

This is as cool as cool gets.

I would add the video in a small box here, but… go NOW to Astronomy Pic of the Day.

Just go. Watch it full screen.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
20 Comments

QUAERITUR: Promoting use of the Communion rail

From a priest reader:

I am pastor of ___ in ___.  I have a weekly EF Mass that draws 50-100 people, a nice group of diocesan seminarian servers, and a good little schola.

I am considering returning the distribution of Holy Communion at our 4 OF Masses to the altar rail, whether kneeling (what I would prefer) or standing (it’s an older parish, and I have several folks with bad knees!).

What are my canonical rights and choices?

I seem to recall a statement from USCCB that the norm for receiving Holy Communion at Mass in the US was standing. But if the Pope is doing it, can’t we? I’m not trying to be more Catholic than the Pope, but I do know it is more reverent to receive Christ in the Blessed Sacrament kneeling, and I already encourage people to receive on the tongue rather than on the hands (I don’t forbid them that option, though). Hope I’m not asking you something I’ve missed on posts already, but you’re a good man to ask!

I wanted to consult a canonist about this one.

The wording in the GIRM adaptations for the USA is odd.

Article 160 says:

“The norm for the reception of Holy Communion in the United States in standing.”

I am left scratching my head.

That is neither proscriptive nor prescriptive.  It is descriptive, a statement of fact.  It doesn’t sound at all like a law.

“The norm for the reception of Holy Communion in the United States in standing.”  Is that so?  Really?  I will stipulate that a lot of people stand.   It is the “norm” in that sense.  Is there some other “norm” out there?  An actual norm that is something more than a statement of fact?

If this said, “The norm for the reception of Holy Communion in the United States WILL BE standing,” then it would have some force.  Instead, it is a statement of fact that some people assume is a law.  Maybe there is a … what a “spirit” of a law hidden within the statement?

It is hard to forecast canonical repercussions for putting in an altar rail.  It is easy to forecast squeals of gloom from liberals of a certain age in the parish followed by pressure from the chancery.

I think that a steady process of catechesis, along with lots of talk about restoration of elements of the church that were lost, would be a good preliminary to putting in an altar rail.  Frequently explanations of what Pope Benedict has done would be good.  The priest’s own reverence for the Blessed Sacrament should be evident.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
58 Comments

QUAERITUR: EMHC told to put unconsumed, recognizable Host down the sacrarium/drain

From a reader:

I attended the class in our parish to become an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion. I do not want to distribute Communion at Mass because I think it is not needed, but I would like to bring Communion to the sick.

The pastor instructed us that if a host was spit out by a sick person, we should bring it back in a tissue and wash it down the sacrarium. When I asked if the host should be dissolved in water first, he said it wasn’t necessary. Is there documentation on exactly what to do the host in such a case?

This is wrong and I urge you never to do this.

You cannot “throw away” a Host.   Someone who “throws away” the Eucharist, either by, for example, simply tossing a consecrated Host in the garbage, or putting it down the sacrarium, or pouring the Precious Blood down a sink or sacrarium, knowing that it is wrong to do, runs the risk of incurring a latae sententiae excommunication, the lifting of which is reserved to the Holy See alone.

The practice is these cases has always been… always… to dissolve the Host in water first and only then to dispose of the mixture in the sacrarium.  If the Host is recognizable as such, it is correct to bring it back in a tissue.  I would not simply wash it down any drain.

You can argue that the Host dissolves in the drain… but… heavens… that gives me shivers.

Why am I so concerned?

In the Latin Code of Canon Law we find:

can. 1367: Qui species consecratas abicit aut in sacrilegum finem abducit vel retinet in excommunicationem latae sententiae Sedi Apostolicae reservatam incurrit; clericus praeterea alia poena, non exclusa dimissione e statu clericali, puniri potest … A person who throws away the consecrated species or takes or retains them for a sacrilegious purpose incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; moreover, a cleric can be punished with another penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state..

The word abicit, abicere, means here “throw away”, and this was clarified by the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts, at their plenary session on 4 June 1999, as not … not… being restricted to “throw away” in a spirit of contempt, or intent to do dishonor.  It really does mean “throw away”, which is what happens when you put a consecrated Host or the Precious Blood down a sacrarium without first making sure that the substance of the same is first broken down (by dissolving).  Precious Blood, of course, should be consumed.

In the case of any objectively sinful act which incurs an excommunication, there are always the circumstances to be considered (e.g., the person’s will and knowledge).  But you must not throw away the Blessed Sacrament in a recognizable form of a Host you know has been consecrated and whose substance you know has not been already broken.

Redemptionis Sacramentum distinguished different levels of liturgical abuses.  The worst are in the category graviora delicata (graver crimes).  Among the graviora delicta is throwing away the Eucharist (cf. RS 172).   This grave crime is reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Enough said.

I urge you warmly, if you have any doubts about my answer, to contact your local chancery to get a clarification about the precise thing you have been told to do: put a recognizable consecrated Host down the sacrarium without first dissolving it in water.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
14 Comments