WINONA, MN: Annual SSPX seminarian/priest hockey game

hockeyThe SSPX seminary for the USA is found in the southern part of my native Minnesota, … hockey is just plain normal.

A thoughtful reader alerted me to this story from the Winona Daily News for your “Just Too Cool” files.

Priests, seminarians renew rivalry of ‘The Game’

By JAKE WANEK / jake.wanek@lee.net winonadailynews.com

When nearly 200 priests and seminarians get together, an ice rink isn’t the most logical meeting place. But once a year in Winona, that’s exactly what takes place. In what is simply known as “The Game,” seminarians from St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in Winona take on the priests from across the United States and Canada who studied at the very same institution[It would be far better where this to be extended to all priests and seminarians, if you know what I mean.  Still, it is great that they have this intra-squad game.]

It all happens at Bud King Ice Arena and is radically different from any high school, college or youth game that usually occupies the ice.

VOTE FOR WDTPRSSince 1988, “The Game” has been the biggest rivalry no one really knows about in Minnesota — yes, the State of Hockey.

Let me tell you, it is a hockey game unlike any other. I witnessed “The Game” on Wednesday at Bud King Ice Arena and it left me, well, smiling.

“The game is pretty well known throughout our society of priests,” said Father Arnaud Rostand, who is stationed in Kansas City.

Every February, priests are summoned to Winona for annual meetings.

Back in 1988, Father Charles Ward wanted to add something extra to the meetings and came up with an idea that has turned into a tradition.

Ward decided to start an annual hockey game between the priests and the seminarians.

After arranging it with the District Superior, his dream came to fruition.

“The seminary was originally based in Richfield, Conn., and a lot of the seminarians out there played hockey,” said Ward, who now is stationed in Los Angeles. “When we moved here we found a way to keep playing.”

hockeyWhile some priests — their team is known as the “Flyin’ Fathers” — wear traditional hockey equipment, many are on the ice in their robes. Yes, robes. Let your mind wander free for a moment and imagine that.  [Indeed.  I think that is entirely daft, but… I wasn’t invited.]

Robes are not likely going to turn into the latest hockey uniform craze, but hey, that’s not what this is all about.

It’s about fun, although both teams play to win. [To WIN.  None of your political correctness here.  Do keep in mind, however, that St. Thomas Aquinas explains how play is very like prayer and worship of God: they both are done for their own sake.]

[…]

That’s the essence.  You can read the rest over there.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
31 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can I go to another parish for a “big” confession?

From a reader:

I was recently listening to one of your podcaZts about St. Augustine, and became convinced of my need to make a good confession.

A quick questions: I would prefer not to confess at my own parish if possible (I have plenty of embarrassing sins and would probably lose my nerve). is it OK to call another parish and make an appt to go to confession there, eve though I am not a parishioner?

Yes, you are free to go to confession anywhere you find a confessor who is in good standing and has faculties to hear confessions.  That means, normally, any regular Catholic parish church.

You can call for an appointment, or you could simply go to that parish at the regularly scheduled time.

Many people like the opportunity of a visiting priest, or going to another parish for “big” confessions.  This is also why the use of the screen, or grate, is appropriate: it also helps to protect the anonymity of the penitent.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
23 Comments

Bp. Morlino’s (D. Madison) full statement available

As promised, the statement from the Bishop of Madison, WI,  H.E. Most Rev. Robert Morlino, is now available in toto on the website of the diocesan newspaper, the Catholic Herald (of Madison, of course).

I had a few previews of the Bishop of Madison’s statements yesterday.

Bp. Morlino is clear that he is addressing himself to the people only within the Diocese of Madison.  We can still listen in.

In view of the chaos in Madison right now, Morlino adds another dimension to the discourse of the collected bishops in the State of Wisconsin.

Here is another taste (my emphases):

To the documents quoted by Archbishop Listecki I would also offer a quotation from the encyclical of Pope John Paul II, Laborem Exercens, which gives us even more “food for thought” on this matter:

“Just efforts to secure the rights of workers who are united by the same profession should always take into account the limitations imposed by the general economic situation of the country. Union demands cannot be turned into a kind of group or class ‘egoism,’ although they can and should also aim at correcting — with a view to the common good of the whole of society — everything defective in the system of ownership of the means of production or in the way these are managed. Social and socioeconomic life is certainly like a system of ‘connected vessels,’ and every social activity directed towards safeguarding the rights of particular groups should adapt itself to this system.

“In this sense, union activity undoubtedly enters the field of politics, understood as prudent concern for the common good. However, the role of unions is not to ‘play politics’ in the sense that the expression is commonly understood today. Unions do not have the character of political parties struggling for power; they should not be subjected to the decision of political parties or have too close links with them. In fact, in such a situation they easily lose contact with their specific role, which is to secure the just rights of workers within the framework of the common good of the whole of society; instead they become an instrument used for other purposes.”

Posted in Linking Back | Tagged , ,
11 Comments

A Mystic Monk shot… with a .308!

An alert reader let me know that H.E. Most Rev. Paul Etienne, Bishop of Cheyenne, WY, went to visit the Carmelite men near Cody, WY.  There are photos on His Excellency’s blog.

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you are surely saying.  “Aren’t those the guys who …”

…make the Mystic Monk Coffee!  Yes, indeed they are.

My favorite photo has to be this one.

Mystic Monk Coffee

Help these guys build their new monastery!

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged , ,
24 Comments

Obama Administration ceases defense of natural, true marriage

Under the cover of the chaos in Madison and the Middle-East, President Obama turns against natural marriage.

Didn’t they just – by fiat via pro-abortion Catholic Sec. Sebelius – eliminate some conscience protections for health-care workers?

Remember, the University of Notre Dame gave Pres. Obama an honorary doctorate in law.

Obama Administration Drops Defense of Anti-Gay Marriage Law

Published February 23, 2011

FoxNews.com

The Obama administration announced Wednesday that it will no longer defend the federal law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

The decision marks a significant about-face for the Obama Justice Department, which until now had defended the law in court despite President Obama’s misgivings with the policy. The administration’s attorneys as recently as last month had filed a court motion in support of the Defense of Marriage Act, which effectively bans recognition of same-sex marriage.

But after two new lawsuits were filed in New York and Connecticut, Obama ordered Attorney General Eric Holder not to defend the statute.

“I fully concur with the president’s determination,” Holder said in a statement, declaring the provision to be “unconstitutional.”

Holder said members of Congress may step up to defend the statute, but the Justice Department “will cease defense.”

Jan. 11:Attorney General Eric Holder delivers remarks at the Martin Luther King Jr. commemorative program, at the Justice Department in Washington.

Jan. 11:Attorney General Eric Holder delivers remarks at the Martin Luther King Jr. commemorative program, at the Justice Department in Washington.

He noted that the congressional debate during passage of the Defense of Marriage Act “contains numerous expressions reflecting moral disapproval of gays and lesbians and their intimate and family relationships — precisely the kind of stereotype-based thinking and animus the (Constitution’s) Equal Protection Clause is designed to guard against.”

Holder wrote to House Speaker John Boehner that Obama concluded the law fails to meet a rigorous standard under which courts view with suspicion any laws targeting minority groups who have suffered a history of discrimination.

Boehner’s office was taken aback by the move, suggesting it was a bit off-topic considering the high-profile battle lawmakers are waging on Capitol Hill over federal spending.  [Indeed.]

While Americans want Washington to focus on creating jobs and cutting spending, the president will have to explain why he thinks now is the appropriate time to stir up a controversial issue that sharply divides the nation,” Boehner spokesman Michael Steel told Fox News.

Maggie Gallagher, chairwoman of the National Organization for Marriage, said that if somebody from the House steps in to defend the law, it could actually be “good news” for Defense of Marriage Act supporters.

“This fight is not over yet. It’s really just begun,” she told Fox News.

Gay-rights groups applauded the administration. The Human Rights Campaign called the decision a “monumental” move against a law that “unfairly discriminates against Americans.”

“Congressional leaders must not waste another taxpayer dollar defending this patently unconstitutional law,” Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese said in a statement.

“The Obama administration’s decision is a victory for civil rights, fairness, and equality for the LGBT community and all Americans,” House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said.  [Remember what the CDF document said? Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons.]

The administration previously has defended laws with which the president disagrees, notably the “don’t ask, don’t tell” provision banning gays from serving openly in the military — though that law was later repealed. Holder acknowledged this in his statement, but said there are exceptions.

“The department has a longstanding practice of defending the constitutionality of duly-enacted statutes if reasonable arguments can be made in their defense. At the same time, the department in the past has declined to defend statutes despite the availability of professionally responsible arguments, in part because — as here — the department does not consider every such argument to be a ‘reasonable’ one,” Holder said. “Moreover, the department has declined to defend a statute in cases, like this one, where the president has concluded that the statute is unconstitutional.”

Holder said the “legal landscape” has changed in the 15 years since the law was passed, citing the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” and lower-court rulings against the law.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney explained that the U.S. government will remain a party to Defense of Marriage Act cases so they can proceed in court. Though the administration says the key provision in the law is not constitutional, Carney said the administration will help others who want to defend it.

Obama, who supports the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, has said his views are “evolving” on same-sex marriage. Currently, he is only on record in support of civil unions.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Posted in One Man & One Woman, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
52 Comments

The Feeder Feed: predator edition

Follow Fr. Z on Twitter!It has been a  while since I have posted about the feeder.

During a recent cold snap, this Chickadee puffed up to keep in the heat.

Many thanks to readers who contributed with donations.  During a recent sale I was able to stock up on some high-nutrient food for the visitors.

This one took advantage of the webcam cable to pick open a sunflower seed.

VOTE FOR WDTPRS
A Nuthatch.

Not to be outdone….

Here is a more frequent visitor.  A different sort of feeder feeder.  The feeders at the feeder are fed upon.

Remember this one from the great Vincenzo?

Posted in The Feeder Feed | Tagged
21 Comments

Bishop of Madison, WI writes about conflict between Governor and unions

Badger Catholic shared this with me and I bring it to your attention.

H.E. Most Rev. Robert Morlino, Bishop of the DMZ … er um… Madison, Wisconsin (we have written of this fine bishop here and many other places on this blog) will have a piece in the Catholic Herald of the Diocese of Madison.  WDTPRS has written of Bp. Morlino many times.

The emphases were in what I was sent.  My comment.

Bp Morlino to clarify bishops position on unions in tomorrow Madison Catholic Herald

Clarifying the fairness issue

This column is the bishop’s communication with the faithful of the Diocese of Madison. Any wider circulation reaches beyond the intention of the bishop.  [I checked on this.  This does not mean that the column isn’t to be discussed elsewhere.  It means that the Bishop intends by this column to address people within the Diocese of Madison, not in other dioceses of his conference.  We can certainly listen in!]

And…

The Wisconsin Catholic Conference (WCC) has chosen a neutral stance because the present dilemma comes down to either a choice for the common good, of sacrifice on the part of all, at times that pose immense economic threats, both present and future on the one hand, and on the other hand, a choice for the rights of workers to a just compensation for services rendered, and to the upholding of contracts legally made. As Catholics, we see both of these horns of the dilemma as good, and yet the current situation calls many of us to choose between these two goods. Thus the WCC has taken a neutral stance, and this is the point of Archbishop Listecki’s recent statement, which I have echoed.

And…

I believe that the final question boils down to: is the sacrifice which teachers and other labor union members are called to make fair?

The problem with responding to that question, of course, is that there appears to be no common ground in terms of what the word “fair” actually means among various individuals. Some believe that “a fair solution” would require sacrifice from everyone but self. The relativism of our culture and society once again does us grave harm, because the cultural response to the question of the meaning of “fair” is, “well, what’s fair for you is fair for you and what’s fair for me is fair for me,” leaving us no common ground for reasonable and civil discourse. We are left with our emotions about the word “fair.” This, then, is a moment in our state and in our nation when the terrible effects of relativism on a culture are being blatantly displayed.

The article in full will appear in tomorrows Madison Catholic Herald

The whole article should go up on the site at around midnight, I assume CST.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , , ,
27 Comments

An act of defiance by a priest

From the Minneapolis STrib comes this.

The featured cleric, Fr. Michael Tegeder, pastor of St. Edward’s in Bloomington, MN, has been a source of dissent in the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis for years.  We have seen him here (Tegeder asked people not to fight FOCA, contrary to the message of Archbp. Nienstedt), here (Tegeder criticized the Archbishop’s comments in USAToday), and here (Tegeder, with the help of NCR, defends of homosexual marriage and attacks Archbishop Nienstedt’s defense of the sanctity of marriage).

Here is a preamble to this story.  Redemptionis Sacramentum from the CDWDS says:

[64.] The homily, which is given in the course of the celebration of Holy Mass and is a part of the Liturgy itself, “should ordinarily be given by the Priest celebrant himself. He may entrust it to a concelebrating Priest or occasionally, according to circumstances, to a Deacon, but never to a layperson. In particular cases and for a just cause, the homily may even be given by a Bishop or a Priest who is present at the celebration but cannot concelebrate”.

So, now in the STrib we read (my emphases and comments):

Twin Cities archdiocese critical of lay preaching at Bloomington church

Posted by Rose French

At a recent Sunday Mass at St. Edward Catholic church in Bloomington, a woman stepped up to the podium on the altar — and started to preach. [Lay people, male or female, cannot preach at Mass.]

For at least one parishioner, the act of a female lay person (albeit with a master’s degree in theology from St. Paul seminary) [Well… that would be a treat.] addressing the congregation during the homily portion of the worship service was too out of bounds.

So the parishioner contacted the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis after the Jan. 23 service. And not long after, the Rev. Peter Laird, the archdiocese vicar general, spoke to St. Edward’s pastor, the Rev. Mike Tegeder, about the situation.

According to Tegeder, Laird said it was not appropriate for a lay person to preach during the homily, the part of the Mass when priests or deacons usually reflect on the Gospel and scripture. Tegeder said Laird indicated it was only OK for lay people to preach or make comments after Holy Communion, near the end of Mass. [I would say comments, but not preaching.]

[And now…] Tegeder, however, stands by his move to allow the woman to address the congregation about the issue of adult faith formation at St. Edward, an area she’s in charge of leading at the church — one of the largest in the Twin Cities with nearly 6,400 members. [Perhaps they need some new leadership.]

Tegeder maintains lay parishioners have many skills and gifts to offer churches and their talents should not be wasted. [Who will disagree with that.  But there are appropriate ways and inappropriate ways.]

“She probably is more competent than most priests when it comes to putting together a good message,” said Tegeder, a frequent critic of Twin Cities Archbishop John Nienstedt. “She has basically the same training as a priest.” [No, she doesn’t.  But note how the writer of the article states that Fr. Tegeder is a “frequent critic” of his Archbishop.  That means that Tegeder’s actions in the past have lead to public scandal.]

As many parishes across the country (including those in the Twin Cities) struggle with a growing shortage of priests, lay participation in church ministry (or lack thereof) can have very real impact on a church’s existence, proponents of lay preachers say. Also, they maintain that lay preachers allow for a diversity of voices and views to be heard within the church. [I direct your attention to Ecclesiae de mysterio.]

For decades, the Catholic Church did allow for lay followers to preach during Mass — a practice approved of in the 1960s at the Vatican II council. [Would any of the documents of the Second Vatican Council said that a priest can determine on his own when lay preaching was appropriate, and in direct contradiction to the Church’s present legislation and the desire of the local bishop?] The idea behind lay preaching was to encourage greater participation by non-clergy members in the Mass and other church activities. [Note the odd understanding of “participation”.   This is the worst sort of clericalism.  Effectively, Fr. Tegeder is reinforcing the condescending view that if lay people are not doing what priests do, they aren’t participating.  In other words, lay people aren’t good enough on their own.  They need priests to bestow their dignity on them.]

In 2004, however, the Vatican amended the practice to say lay people could only preach or make comments following Holy Communion, near the end of Mass.

Twin Cities archdiocese spokesman Dennis McGrath said the archdiocese is following the policies of the Vatican.

“The purpose of the homily at the Mass is to interpret the Gospel,” McGrath said. “Normally a priest is far more qualified to deliver that message. [Always more qualified.  Not because he is smarter or more educated, but because he is ordained for that role.] Also there’s an opportunity there for wrong teaching or misinterpretation (with lay preachers).” [One wonders about what else is heard from that pulpit in Bloomington.]

Tegeder said the woman parishioner is scheduled to preach at an April 11 Lenten penance service at St. Edward’s, which is not a Mass. He’d also like her to preach at a Mass celebrating Mother’s Day in May. He said he’s not sure yet if he’ll ask her to preach during the homily or after communion.

Reason #179650 for Summorum Pontificum.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , ,
Comments Off on An act of defiance by a priest

WDTPRS HIGHEST KUDOS to Norma Jean Coon!

Norma Jean Coon, A woman who did the “woman priest” thingie and simulated ordination to the diaconate has had a change of mind and heart.  She has a webpage where she explains herself.

My emphases and comments.  This starts off a bit odd, but keep reading.  This is not the usual stuff about women being ordained.  She becomes clearer and clearer until, at the end, she makes a deeply impressive conclusion!

I admire her courage.

Document of Renunciation of Ordination to Diaconate

On July 22, 2007, I was ordained to the diaconate [No, Ms. Coon, you weren’t.] by [pretend] Bishop Patricia Fresen, of Germany and South Africa who was [not] ordained by three male bishops in Germany for the group called Roman Catholic Women Priests. The [fake] ordination took place at the Santa Barbara Immaculate Heart Spiritual Center. Because neither Patricia Fresen nor myself were given permission for the ordination by Pope Benedict XVI, the ordinations were illegitimate and not recognized by the Roman Catholic Church. Thus an excommunication process called Latae Sententiae occurred, excommunicating oneself by failure to observe the Canon Laws of the Church. [There is a bit more to it than that.  NO Church authority gave permission or even could give permission because you are a woman and cannot be ordained to anything.  The statement Coon makes above buries the lead: “I am a woman and I cannot be ordained.” But read on!  What follows is amazing…]

I wish to renounce the alleged ordination [Here she says “alleged”.  This is a shift in language.  If it were a simple matter of lack of permission (and it involved a baptized man) the ordination would have been valid but illicit, much in the same way that SSPX ordinations are valid but illicit .  But in this case it was obviously invalid and it was also one of the graviora delicta.] and publicly state that I did not act as a deacon as a part of this group except on two occasions, when I read the gospel once at mass and distributed communion once at this same mass. I withdrew from the program within two weeks of the ceremony because I realized that I had made a mistake in studying for the priesthood. [AND HERE IT IS…] I confess to the truth of Pope John Paul II’s Apostolic Letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis . I confess the authority of the Holy Father on these issues of ordination and recognize that Christ founded the ordination only for men. [BRAVA!  Quite simply BRAVA!]

Formally, I relinquish all connection to the program of Roman Catholic Women Priests and I disclaim the alleged ordination publicly with apologies to those whose lives I have offended or scandalized by my actions. I ask God’s blessings upon each of these folks and their families.

Norma Jean Coon, RN, MFCC, PhD
San Diego, California
Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Going on she says…

Holy God, I ask your blessings on my Bishop and my pastor and priests in Rome who have assisted me in the process of being re-instated into the Roman Catholic Church and I forsake all connection with the Roman Catholic Women Priests program via Internet or otherwise.

I thank you for the efforts of my family in my behalf and ask for Jesus’ Light and Love to pour over my husband of 47 years and my five children.

Forgive me my Beloved Jesus and Mother Mary for pursuing my own will in this matter of ordination and as I consecrate myself to your Divine Will through the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I ask you to pour out Light and Love upon any who have placed themselves outside of your Love and Light Bless us, O Lord, for these thy gifts and place us in the Heart of the Father, as we pray for more priests to serve in our church and for vocations to enrich our Church in the United States.

Forgive us for failing in obedience and enrich us in your Holy Love, I pray through Jesus and Mary. Fiat+

Okay.  I am impressed.

WDTPRS HIGHEST KUDOS to Norma Jean Coon.

I will say Holy Mass for her and her family later this week.  I ask you readers to stop and say a pray for them as well.

Biretta tip   o{]:¬)   to Rorate.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS | Tagged
46 Comments

Mix up in reporting about ordaination of a married Lutheran minister

VOTE FOR WDTPRSLiberals are having palpitations over the story that a "German man married to nun ordained as priest with pope's approval".  That is how AP put it. 

Here is what happened. Permission was given by Pope Beneditct XVI that a married Lutheran minister, Harm Kleuting, 61, be ordained a Catholic priest.  Now Fr. Klueting has been married for some time to Edeltraut (great name!)!  The accomplished Edeltraut, a medievalist – of course, has a webpage on which she identifies herself as a T.OCarm.  She is a tertiary.  She is a third order Carmelite.  She is not a fully professed Carmelite nun.  The now-Fr. Klueting had to have permission to be ordained because he was married, but he wasn't married to a nun.

Carmelites far and wide will correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think that tertiaries have to be dispensed to marry.  Am I wrong?

Anyway, AP seems to have adjusted its headline.   Let's see what the story looks like from the AP via NPR.

Married German Ordained As Catholic Priest

by The Associated Press

BERLIN February 22, 2011, 10:45 am ET

In a rare move that needed the pope's approval, a Lutheran convert was ordained Tuesday as a Catholic priest in Germany and is being allowed to remain married to his wife — who has already become a nun. [Again, Edeltraut seems to be a T.OCarm, a tertiary and not a fully professed Carmelite nun.  Third Order Carlmelites live in the world, rather than in community (usually) according to Carmelite spirituality.]

Harm Klueting, 61, was ordained by Archbishop Joachim Cardinal Meisner in a private ceremony at the city's seminary, the Cologne archdiocese said.

Pope Benedict XVI gave Klueting a special permission to remain married to his wife Edeltraut Klueting, who became a Catholic Carmelite nun [tertiary] in 2004.

The Rev. Federico Lombardi, the Vatican's chief spokesman, said the exception is rare but there have been similar cases.

"It doesn't happen every day," he said.

Klueting and his wife were Lutherans when they married in 1977 and both served as Lutheran clerics before converting to Catholicism several years ago. They have two grown children.

The Cologne archdiocese said in a statement that [How many things are wrong with this next statement] the couple would not have to take the traditional vow of celibacy as long as they remain married — a highly unusual move since celibacy is normally a key requirement for Catholic priests.

Klueting and his family could not be reached for comment, and it was not clear whether they still lived together as a couple. [Perhaps becaaaaaaause… they are married and she is not, in fact, a Carmelite nun?]

Lombardi said he didn't have any specific information about the Kluetings, including what the pope said about the case.

Klueting is a professor for historical theology at the University of Cologne and teaches Catholic theology at Fribourg University in Switzerland. From now on, he also will provide services as a spiritual counselor for university students.

Cardinals HatThe archdiocese published pictures of the ordination ceremony showing Klueting with short gray hair and a beard, wearing a simple white priest vestment as he received his blessings from Meisner, who was wearing [Get this!] a festive yellow embroidered robe and a golden cardinal's hat.

In 1950, Pope Pius XII first allowed clergymen who had converted to Catholicism to remain married, the Cologne diocese said in its statement. However, each case has to be approved by the pope himself, the statement said, adding that in the past married priests also had been ordained in the German cities of Hamburg and Regensburg.

Last month, three former Anglican bishops were ordained as Catholic priests in London, becoming the first ex-bishops to take advantage of a new Vatican system designed to make it easier for Anglicans to embrace Roman Catholicism.

———

Frances D'Emilio contributed to this report from Rome.

 

Meanwhile, all this talk of Carmelites reminds me to remind you to refresh your coffee supply!  Help some professed Carmelites in Wyoming build their monastery and put groceries on the table!


Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Lighter fare, The Drill |
40 Comments