Journey to the place of the Strong Shield

Sunday’s are, inter alia, good days for adventures.

Having left Gotham and the nearby Flatiron, I went in search of the Strong Shield.

I caught a redeye…Help. Fr. Z in England!

For some countryside.

A view from the train form King’s Cross Station to Letchworth.

This was Fr. Adrian Fortescu’s little church in Letchworth.

It is now the parish hall.

A tiny bit of the baldachino of the church survives in the Lady Chapel in the main church, itself built in 1962.

A window from the old church.

Some of you will enjoy some Latin.

As I said, the old church is now a hall for the parish.  It has just been tidied up with some work.   A false ceiling was recently taken out and displays on the life of Fr. Fortescu put up.

The parish priest was very kind.  He let us see Fr. Fortescu’s own chalice, which remained in the parish.

After lunch at a nearby carvery, back to town we went.

We caught Vespers at Brompton Oratory with Benediction.

Harrod’s is all lit up for you know what.

A momentary stop at my friend’s club for a rest of the feet and some tea.

Then to supper.  Steak, bacon and mushroom pie, with mashed potatoes.

All in all a good day.

Posted in On the road | Tagged
17 Comments

In Cordoba it a “cathedral”, not a “mosque”

Something that irks me is the penchant for mainstream media types to refer to this or that city where there is some important shrine for Islam as the “holy city of FILL IN THE BLANK”.  I suppose I could stomach that were they also to refer to the”holy city of Rome”, “the holy Vatican City”, etc.  They don’t.

I am therefore pleased to read this story from CNA:

Bishop requests historic cathedral no longer be referred to as mosque [Do I hear an “Amen!”?]

Cordoba, Spain, [Where Sts. Nunilo and Alodia were martyred.] Nov 5, 2010 / 09:58 pm (CNA).- Bishop Demetrio Fernandez of Cordoba, Spain has asked that the city’s historic cathedral be referred to as a Catholic church and not as a “mosque,” in reference to its past.

In an October column, Bishop Fernandez wrote, “Cathedral or mosque? Undoubtedly a cathedral.  It is the main church of the Diocese of Cordoba, where the chair of the bishop is located, thus the name ‘cathedral’.”

The bishop noted that the Cathedral of Cordoba has been a place of Catholic worship for eight centuries. [Long enough to qualify as a cathedral, I’d say. ] Saint King Ferdinand III took over the city without bloodshed on June 28, 1236, and ordered the temple, which had been built as a mosque, to be consecrated, Bishop Fernandez explained.

“It was saved from destruction because of the successful negotiations between Ferdinand and the Muslim occupiers of the city, who wanted to destroy it rather than turning it over.  When the Muslims invaded in 711, it was already a sacred place, as it was the location of the ancient Basilica of Saint Vincent the Martyr.”

The bishop noted that the Muslims destroyed the basilica “so a mosque could be built instead.”

Bishop Fernandez acknowledged the stir caused by his column, telling the Diario de Cordoba that he wrote it because “I knew it would be reported around the world, so that everybody would know that the ancient mosque in Cordoba is today a cathedral[OORAH!] The ones offended are those who think it’s wrong to call it a cathedral.”

“The cathedral has been a cathedral for eight centuries … I don’t mind if it is called a former mosque, but what I don’t want is it to be called just a mosque,” the bishop said, explaining that he does not want to confuse visitors to the city.

“The Catholic Church, and the Bishop of Cordoba, are the first to treat Muslims with respect and friendliness.  I am friends with many in the Muslim world,” he noted, adding he supports inter-religious dialogue in an atmosphere of mutual respect.

“People get upset, but this is for the good of Cordoba,” he stated.

WDTPRS KUDOS to the Bishop of Cordoba.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
17 Comments

QUAERITUR: getting around celibacy by leaving Church and coming back

From a reader:

For the sake of argument, couldn’t a married Catholic man, who wanted
to become a priest, simply get around the un-married rule by seeking
ordination in an Episcopalian/Anglican seminary and after ordination simply take advantage of John Paul II’s provision to Anglican clergy and be ordained as a Catholic priest?

Holy Church has already thought of that eventuality.

A Catholic who apostacizes and becomes a minister of some other group, and comes back into communion of the Church is brought back by the Church “ut laicus“, as a layman.  He will not be permitted to exercise even valid orders.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
39 Comments

QUAERITUR: More than one intention with stipends for one Mass.

From a reader:

Over the years, parish practice has allowed that there be several
intentions listed at Mass. These collective intentions are a daily
occurrence with some Masses having four or five intentions. Our bishop
has recently begun to enforce the Canons concerning Mass intentions. I
was hoping that you could expand on the theological basis for having
only one intention be the norm. It seems that the priest could have as
many intentions as is possible as long as he personally does not
receive a stipend for them. If you could help or at least point me in
a good direction I will buy you a cup of Mystic Monk Coffee.

The Code of Canon Law says: Can. 948 – Separate Masses are to be applied for the intentions of those for whom a single offering, although small, has been given and accepted.”

This is the general norm.  However, the the Holy See authorized bishops to allow the celebration of Masses with several intentions at once.   My understanding is that these “cumulative” intentions should not be the usual practice.  Also, the local bishop determines how this is to be handled (i.e., who keeps the stipend, etc.).

There is a 1991 document of the Congregation for the Clergy which deals with this.

It is harder and harder for people in some places to have Masses said for their chosen intentions.  This is due, of course, to the dearth of priests and therefore daily Masses.

Pray for vocations!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
24 Comments

QUAERITUR: confession by phone, long-distance

ConfessionFrom a reader comes a question about long-distance confession, using telephone or other technology.

I am on the road at the moment and do not have good internet connection at the moment.  Same old story, I’m afraid: wifi settings are a mystery to those who use them and the person who set them up … just find him.   Anyway…

Absolution by long-distance technology is invalid.  Many years ago there was a response given to a question about absolution communicated via telegraph (which shows how long ago it was).  Such an absolution would be invalid.  Some time later, I don’t have the reference, there was a question about telephone.  The answer was the same.

If such a question were submitted today, the answer would be the same.   You cannot receive absolution via skype or internet chat or video phone calls, etc.  INVALID.

By the way, anyone can confess via phone or by megaphone or by microphone and amplifier with stratocaster accompaniment.

You can confess by long-distance technology, but you cannot receive absolution via long-distance technology.  Similarly, you can confess to anyone you desire, but only priests with faculties can forgive your sins through sacramental absolution.

There is a possibility of contracting marriage long distance, or even via proxy, but not any other sacrament.  And that is another and more complicated question which we will not delve into here.

There are practical reasons: certainty about the person of the confessor, the penitent, issues of faculties across even continents, security of not being overheard, etc.  There are theological reasons: the penitent must accuse himself of sins in the presence of the minister of the Church acting in the person of Christ who is judge, there is the personal nature of the encounter with the Lord who is Mercy itself, etc.

No confession by long-distance.  It must be a real, and personal meeting of penitent and confessor.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
14 Comments

QUAERITUR: bestowing “minor orders”

From a reader:

With the recent news of the upcoming ordination of several men to the Minor Orders, I was wondering — perhaps you’ve spoken on this — what is the canonical standing of these men?  I know several people, hostile and dismissive of the Extraordinary Form, who ridicule and passively insult men who are in FSSP, or some other likeminded communities, by denying them credence to their reception of the Minor Orders.  These hostile men might say to a man who has received porter, exorcist, or even the order of subdiaconate, that “it doesn’t even exist anymore” or “it is a fantasy”……

How would you respond, dear Father?

In olden days the clerical state began with tonsure.  Now, the clerical state begins with ordination to the diaconate.  Furthermore, the minor orders were, in the Latin Church, suppressed by Paul VI.

And yet here we are talking about them, aren’t we?

I am not sure what happens when men are given minor orders in traditional groups today.  I know they don’t become clerics until diaconate, but what they are before that is a bit unclear.

It seems unlikely that the Holy See would be satisfied with the answer that they are just playing make-believe, or “simulating” something when minor orders ceremonies are conducted.  So, the minor orders appear to do something.  It isn’t a fantasy.  The Holy See wouldn’t want them playing make-believe.

Are the men who receive the order of Porter, Porters?   I suppose they are unless the Holy See issues a clarification that they are not.

It isn’t absolutely that someone who is made a porter be also a cleric.

I suspect in the present environment of talks with the SSPX were someone to ask the PCED for a response on such a question, they would probably get a very traditionally-minded response, if they go a response at all.

Meanwhile…

[CUE MUSIC]

After a hard day of sorting out the sticky question of whether of not men can still be ordained as exorcists, why not also stick your teeth together with some caramels… from Carmelites.  Get it?  Carmel?… ehem

Yes, not only to the Wyoming Carmelites roast coffee they also have caramels.

Enjoy them along with a piping hot WDTPRS mug of their fine coffee as you contemplate exorcists and porters.

Just like that old tonsure, Mystic Monk coffee is a cut above.  Heheh… get it?  A cut ab  … right.  Okay.

And, it’s still swell!

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
35 Comments

The Feeder Feed

TwitterIt has been a while since I have posted feeder photos.   And these are a few days old, since I am in NYC at the moment.

I post these just to remind everyone that feeders are still there and also for the special delight of a certain priest whom I hear made a less than enthusiastic comment about the bird photos.

Just for him, this nuthatch.

Some Goldfinches.

I believe the Chickadees are scrounging up stuff to line their holes against the cold.

I have a couple roosting boxes on the wishlist.  Apparently they stack themselves inside and help retain warmth when it is a a gazillion below zero.

LOTS of Goldfinches.

I have always wondered how they get these little black sunflower seeds open so fast.

This Goldfinch spent some time looking in my window… or at its own reflection.

Help feed the birds!   They eat only from your donations.

Posted in The Feeder Feed |
1 Comment

Roman Vespers

Here is a little continuity for you.

Vespers at the EF parish in Rome, staffed by the FSSP.   This is the beautiful SS. Trinita dei Pelegrini.

Brick by brick, folks.

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged ,
3 Comments

Need another reason for Anglicanorum coetibus?

If you were looking for another reason why the Pope Benedict, the Pope of Christian Unity, issued the provisions of Anglicanorum coetibus, take a look at the liturgy recently perpetrated at an Episcopalian church in Pittsburgh.

The whole this is based on the style of Dr. Seuss.

Yes, this seems to have been intended for children and I don’t think it really was intended to be for their Episcopalian eucharist.

What a way to teach children how important worship is, right?

Remember, this is an Episcopalian thing and not a lame-duck ICEL translation.

Celebrant: God be with you.
People: And with you too.
Celebrant: Let us pray.
Celebrant: Almighty God, who gave us fun all this week,
So that we could be at our best, and at our peak;
Give us grace, as we leave this place,
Let the lessons that we have learned not go to waste
All this we ask through your loving name –
Father, Son and Holy Ghost, one in the same.

First Reading Yertle the Turtle [I am pretty sure this is a reading from Yertle’s inspired book rather than by Yertle himself.]

Gospel Matthew 5:1-12

Prayers of the People

Let us bow our heads and fold our hands
To pray for all across the spans

Silence

We pray for people everywhere
For those who want or need your care
We pray for people everywhere

There is a lot more. There are a few photos.

Pope Benedict is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged , , ,
35 Comments

A random act of culture

Remember the flash mob choir brindisi thing?

Get a load of this, which I picked up from CMR.

600 choristers break out in song with the largest organ in the world, in Macy’s in Philadelphia.

It’s a random act of culture.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged
22 Comments