When Vortices meet Hermeneutics – great video too

Over at the blog The Hermeneutic of Continuity there is a great shot of my friends Fr. Finigan, His Hermeueticalness himself, and Michael Voris of Church Militant.   Voris has Father – the Dean of Bexley! – doing the pencil thing.

When Vortices meet Hermeneutics - great video too

Not to be outdone, I have photos of myself and Voris dining, but we don’t have Dr. Pepper on the table.

The best line from Fr. Finigan’s post (and be sure to go there for the rest of the story) is:

I just enjoyed watching one of the latest of Michael’s short programmes. It is the “Boretex” in which he extols the Church of Nice and the importance of not being divisive or offending anyone.

Play video

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged ,
6 Comments

New CD from Benedictines of Mary is getting air time!

New CD from Benedictines of Mary is getting air time!

Click to buy!

As you may recall, the wonderful Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles (real  women religious in the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph) have another music CD.

Angels and Saints at Ephesus

The disk is out and around and people are taking notice.

A reader alerted me that he heard tracks from the sisters album on their local NPR radio station.  He sent a link to story about them on the site of WQRX.  There is a great little twist in this.. see if you can spot it…:

Benedictine Nuns from Missouri Keep Ancient Hymns and Chants Alive

Nuns and monks are one together of the sure cyclical forces in the classical recording business. Every few years, the quiet, otherworldly sounds of their centuries-old chants and hymns are seemingly rediscovered and marketed as a soothing balm for harried, stressed-out urbanites. While some listeners may find spiritual enlightenment in the chants’ religious texts, many others are drawn to their aesthetic or New Age qualities. [New Age qualities? Blech!  What would those be?  There is nothing stupid or syncretistic about this album.  But let’s move on.]

The latest chant boomlet comes via the Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles, a monastic order in rural Gower, Missouri. The Benedictines drew national attention last year with “Advent at Ephesus,” a Decca recording of Gregorian chants and hymns that topped the Billboard classical charts for over a month (unseating a companion CD to the novel Fifty Shades of Grey). The sisters’ follow up release, “Angels and Saints at Ephesus,” features 17 selections in English and Latin associated with the feasts of holy saints and angels.

[…]

Buy some CDs!

If you are in Canada or the UK, copy and paste the CD title (above) into my amazon searchboxes at the bottom of the page.  Easy.  Otherwise, the UK link is HERE and Canada HERE.

To motivate you, here is  short collage of excerpts.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, Linking Back, The Campus Telephone Pole, Women Religious | Tagged ,
4 Comments

You Scream, I Scream, we all Scream for more Scream

From History comes an interesting story: today in history, in 1994 the painting by Edvard Munch “The Scream” was recovered, three months after it was boosted from a museum.

Here is the story from History… watch for the interesting bit…

On May 7, 1994, Norway’s most famous painting, “The Scream” by Edvard Munch, was recovered almost three months after it was stolen from a museum in Oslo. The fragile painting was recovered undamaged at a hotel in Asgardstrand, about 40 miles south of Oslo, police said.

The iconic 1893 painting of a waiflike figure on a bridge was stolen in only 50 seconds during a break-in on February 12, the opening day of the 1994 Winter Olympics in Lillehammer. Two thieves broke through a window of the National Gallery, cut a wire holding the painting to the wall and left a note reading “Thousand thanks for the bad security!”

A few days after the theft, a Norwegian anti-abortion group said it could have the painting returned if Norwegian television showed an anti-abortion film. The claim turned out to be false. […]

Okay… you got me. That was the interesting part.

Every time some loon shoots up a town or office building, I brace myself for the liberal MSM (redundant, actually) to rush to opine – with no evidence – that it was a white male conservative belonging to an organization suspected of domestic terrorist ties (read: the Catholic Church).

Posted in Liberals | Tagged , ,
1 Comment

The LCWR goat rodeo continues

The LCWR goat rodeo continuesThe Leadership Conference of Women Religious has been in a demonstrable doctrinal tailspin for years.  The LCWR has been strange enough that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith got involved.  The LCWR has its charter from the Holy See.  If the Holy See says “jump”, the sisters ought to get out their jump ropes.

The Holy See, especially the CDF, has plenty to do.  They don’t get involved unless they have to.  As a matter of fact, they often operate on the principle cunctando regitur mundus.  When they act, it is for good reason.

Of course the LCWR sisters, not wanting to give their odd notions, fought back.  They twisted the story into a issue of “power” and played on the wonderful things people know many sisters have done in the past.  They also conflated, through a willing press, the visitation of all US religious communities of women through the Congregation for Religious.

Now, at a international meeting of women religious in Rome, the Prefect of the Congregation for Religious made strange statements which have all the liberals quivering with excitement.  In nutshell João Card. Braz de Aviz said he wasn’t in the loop about the CDF’s mandate for the LCWR, and when he heard about it he had “much pain”.  He said that this isn’t the way it is supposed to work, and we have to change the way we do things.  Frankly, it sounded like he was playing to his audience.

On the other hand, today the Vatican press office released this statement (I’ll edit out the blah blah at the top…:

[…]

The initiatives of the Holy See in this area are concerned primarily with the faith of the Church and its expression in Religious Life. The Church’s faith—in the loving plan of the Father who sent his Son to be our Savior, in the inspiration of Sacred Scripture, in the gift of grace through the Sacraments, in the nature of the Church guided by the Holy Spirit—this faith is at the heart of the Evangelical Counsels. It motivates the passion for justice shared by so many Religious women and men, and it seeks ever to be expressed in active charity towards those most in need.

Recent media commentary on remarks made on Sunday May the 5th during the General Assembly of the International Union of Superiors General by Cardinal João Braz de Aviz, Prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life, has suggested a divergence between the CDF and the Congregation for Religious in their approach to the renewal of Religious Life. Such an interpretation of the Cardinal’s remarks is not justified. The Prefects of these two Congregations work closely together according to their specific responsibilities and have collaborated throughout the process of the Doctrinal Assessment of the LCWR. Archbishop Gerhard Müller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and Cardinal Braz de Aviz met yesterday and reaffirmed their common commitment to the renewal of Religious Life, and particularly to the Doctrinal Assessment of the LCWR and the program of reform it requires, in accordance with the wishes of the Holy Father.

This statement is trying close the gap that, in the press at least, opened between Religious and the CDF.

Also, on CNA (I’ll cut out some of the blah blah at the top):

Vatican doctrine office confused by cardinal’s LCWR comments
By Estefania Aguirre

[…]

Commenting on [Cardinal Braz de Aviz’s] statements about the doctrine congregation, the inside source said, “One does not do this. [EXACTLY.] I don’t know how his comments benefit him or the Church, and he makes it seem that injustice is being done.”

“This was a very slow and objective process and our members are extremely professional theologians and philosophers who consult weekly with the Pope,” he explained.

But according to the source, “there is a lot of pride and one always wants to believe they are right.”

“People are very misinformed theologically, philosophically and academically” about the positions taken by the LCWR, he added. [Misinformed by the quisling catholic press.]

The doctrine official believes that “the most important part has already happened, which is that Catholics have been informed that these women are wrong.”  [Repetita iuvant. On the other hand, some of these women, with obvious bad intent, will take that statement and say “See!  This is about women.” It is not.]

He explained that the LCWR follow the “gender ideology” and “have developed an exacerbated ultra feminism which makes them reject all type of male authority.”

“They have been fired in many parishes because they teach things that provoke great discomfort within communities,” he said.

Referring to the April 15, 2013 statement from the doctrine office in which Pope Francis confirmed the finding that the sisters’ conference must be reformed, the source underscored that “this is not an issue about a Pope being spoiled.”

Attempts by CNA to obtain comment from the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life were referred to Cardinal Braz de Aviz who was unavailable.

It sounds like the CDF official was given leave to talk to the press, but the official’s name was to be kept out of it.

What we have here, friends, is a full-blown goat rodeo.

But the fact remains that the LCWR has bizarre stuff going on.  They are strange enough that even Michael Sean Winters of the Fishwrap thinks that there enough for the CDF to get involved!  So, the fact remains that the Holy See underwrites their charter and the CDF is looking at the LCWR’s doctrinal problems.  The fact remains that Pope Francis signed off on the CDF’s process, and backed the CDF in this matter.

All this other stuff going on is a goat rodeo.

And for

Posted in Liberals, Linking Back, Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, Women Religious | Tagged , , , , ,
10 Comments

Ugh

I have had some sort of crud with a fever for a couple a days.  Prayers would be appreciated.

UPDATE:

Fever 101º F (38.3° C).  Pretty weak.  I have been alternating between getting up for a while and then crawling back into bed with my clothes on.  Doctor tomorrow.

UPDATE:

Last night was pretty rough.  I sweated through several changes of clothes.  The fever finally broke at about 3:30 am.  I went to the doctor today, who pronounced my lungs to be clear.  Therefore I think I am on the mend.  Prayers would still be appreciated.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
36 Comments

Weightless Water Wringing

This is very cool.

Play video

I may have to get out my Yaesu radio later on and see if I can pick up the ISS during a fly over.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , ,
21 Comments

QUAERITUR: Sister starts Mass and Father shows up around the Offertory

I generally like one question at a time, but this was so… bizzareQUAERITUR: Sister starts Mass and Father shows up around the Offertory that it needs more attention.

From a reader:

This weekend, Father was having a series of talks during his Masses which spanned about fifteen minutes, and so he was late for one at another Church.

The parish sister started the Mass with the full (including greeting) introductory rites and Liturgy of the Word.

Father arrived at the offertory and then Mass continued as normal.

This is a common, though not weekly, practice. [?!?]

1) Is it still Mass?

2) Does it satisfy the obligation of the faithful (and myself) to attend Sunday Mass?

3) Is Our Lord still rendered present in the Blessed Sacrament?

4) If so, does this mean priests can just walk around saying the words of consecration with the right intention and confect the Sacrament?

Just when you think it can’t get stranger.  If this happens often, I would inform the diocesan bishop and/or the Congregation for Divine Worship in Rome.

1.  It does not seem to be a Mass. Mass is the entirety of the ceremony.

Could we hack away and say, “If the priest simply forgot the sign of the cross at the beginning would it still be a Mass? If he forgot the sign of the cross AND the penitential rite, would it still be a Mass?”  Sure, it would be. In the case above, however, it’s clear that what happened was not a Mass.

2. It would not fulfill anyone’s obligation (including the priest’s obligation to offer Mass – if there was a stipend accepted, or if this was a pro populo Mass). The faithful who attended this inadvertently would not be culpable for not fulfilling their obligation. Objectively however, this did not fulfill their obligation.

3. Yes, Our Lord is present in the Sacrament confected.

However.. and this is a big however….

The priest, however, is guilty of a major crime, a crime so bad that canon law uses the Latin word “nefas“, rarely encountered in the law (canon 927).

It is absolutely forbidden to consecrate one matter without the other or even both outside the Eucharistic celebration.

4. Possibly, though to do so would be an abuse so great that one one could call into question either Father’s sanity (were he totally insane, the sacrament would probably not be confected) or his real intention to do what the Church intends.

Reason #675663 for Summorum Pontificum.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged ,
88 Comments

QUAERITUR: I’ve tried to get an imprimatur for my book several times

From a reader:

I’ve tried to get an imprimatur from my Bishop several times but I haven’t received a response. I am publishing a devotional with reflections on the Old Testament. Is it sinful for me to publish it without an imprimatur?

Canon 826, §3 says pretty clearly that books of prayer “for the public or private use of the faithful are not to be published without permission of the local ordinary.” It does not introduce the concept of sin in doing so, but the prohibition is strong.

The lack of a response from the bishop may be disappointing, but there may be good reasons for it. In a larger diocese, the bishop may have delegated the task of reviewing books and other items to a priest or a theologian. The task of granting permission may have been given to the Vicar General or an Episcopal Vicar (who are also local ordinaries).

I suggest submitting the book again, but to the Vicar General.  Otherwise, call the chancery office and ask who who reviews religious books for publication.

Another approach would be to entrust the publication of the book to a Catholic publishing company. Ask them to work through their normal channels for ecclesiastical approval.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , ,
22 Comments

QUAERITUR: Could a Catholic terrorist be denied funeral and burial?

QUAERITUR: Could a Catholic terrorist be denied funeral and burial?From a reader:

Father if the Boston bomber was catholic could the church refuse to give him a funeral or burial in catholic cemetary under cannon law?

To the first question: Yes, the Church could refuse him a funeral.

We read in the Latin Code:

canon 1184: §1 “Unless they gave some signs of repentance before death, the following must be deprived of ecclesiastical funerals:
1° notorious apostates, heretics, and schismatics;
2° those who chose the cremation of their bodies for reasons contrary to Christian faith;
3° other manifest sinners who cannot be granted ecclesiastical funerals without public scandal of the faithful.
§2 If any doubt occurs, the local ordinary is to be consulted, and his judgment must be followed.

As far as denying them burial in a Catholic cemetery, there is no provision for this in universal law.

There may be particular law of a diocese that governs the discipline to be observed in cemeteries (canon 1243). The reason for this is that the Church recognizes that there may be civil laws which need to be respected (c. 22).

For example, civil laws may state that if a person (your theoretical Catholic terrorist) had purchased a cemetery plot in advance, his body may not be prevented from occupying it after his demise, regardless the circumstances.

In such a case, it should be buried without Catholic ceremony.

We should, of course, pray for God’s mercy for such people, as well as for His justice.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , , ,
55 Comments

Some are reporting registration, access trouble

Some readers are sending email saying that they are having a hard time with this blog’s registration form.

I had to turn up the security option to “paranoid” mode to keep out spammers.

Also, it may be that your browser may have an ad block plugin that doesn’t like the registration form.  I suggest you set your ad block plugin to accept the whole wdtprs.com domain.

Sorry about the trouble you are having.   I am still getting successful registrations, so I know the form is working.

If there are problems with registration or with accessing the blog, send me your IP address so that I can “whitelist” it in my anti-spammer software.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
6 Comments