Pope Francis recites the Rosary – POLL

POLL BELOW

The Holy Father is, as I type, at Santa Maria Maggiore for recitation of the Most Holy Rosary.

Do you say the Rosary?

Some shots from the live feed.

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

In Italy it is customary to end the Rosary with recitation of the Litany of Loreto.

Some will prefer that Francis use a stole or a cope.   But in the past Popes have some times used them, sometimes not.

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Pope Francis recites the Rosary - POLL

Now for the poll. Anyone can use the poll, but only those who have registered (and whom I have approved) can comment. I cannot tell who you are or how individuals “vote”.

I say part or all of the Rosary (privately or with others)

View Results

Loading ...
Posted in Francis, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
107 Comments

Mystic Monk Monthly Memo

The present Coffee of the Month offered by the Wyoming Carmelites is perfect for those of you who desire triumphalistic liturgy.

Mystic Monk Monthly Memo

Isn’t it time to refresh your coffee supply?

(That’s a trick question.  The answer is YES!)

And for you liberals out there… it’s organic and “fair trade” coffee!

They have TEA.  They have K-Cups, delightfully called Monk Shots.  You readers have given them good reviews.

You can subscribe to their coffee.

And just because this has to do with Mexico and things Catholic, have you seen…

Mystic Monk Monthly Memo

 

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
6 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can I hire a Mason to work on my house?

From a reader:

I need some repairs doing on my house. We found a man who seemed competent and honest, and his price is good. Unfortunately, I noticed he was wearing a masonic ring (a pentagram I think). Should I hire somebody who is almost certainly a Freemason to do work on my house?

The fact that he takes it seriously enough to wear a ring gives me pause; but on the other hand (pun not intended), I know Masons are not all wicked individuals.

Yes, it is okay to hire a mason to work on your house.  And I am not talking about your brickwork.

I can’t tell what continent you are on, but most masons in the USA are masons in the same way that some men are members of Rotary or subscribers to Sports Illustrated.

That said, when the work is done on the house, have your house blessed, room to room, thoroughly.  I suggest this not because of the mason in himself but because everyone should have their houses blessed.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
19 Comments

CNA: Theologian (a real one) dismisses call for women ‘deacons’

A while back some proponents of women’s ordination got all excited because a German archbishop said that, during a meeting of their conference, the topic of deaconesses came up.

Now a real theologian chimes in.

From CNA:

Theologian dismisses call for women ‘deacons’
By Estefania Aguirre and Carl Bunderson

Bern, Switzerland, May 3, 2013 / 02:02 am (CNA).- Theologian Father Manfred Hauke said recent comments from a German archbishop appearing to support a particular diaconate for women are confusing to Catholics and others.

“Allowing women to be deacons would create great confusion for the faithful,” Fr. Hauke, a professor of patristics and dogmatics at the Theological Faculty of Lugano, told CNA April 30.

“You would have to explain to them the difference between male and female deacons,” he pointed out.

Female “deacons” would not be ordained to the sacrament of Holy Orders, and calling them deacons would be “ambiguous,” Fr. Hauke said. Women could “receive a benediction for services of charity” but not ordination, he clarified. [As in ancient times.]

At the conclusion of a diocesan conference on possible Church reforms last week, Archbishop Robert Zollitsch of Freiburg im Breisgau discussed the possibility of “a specific office of deacon for women.”

This “specific,” or “particular” office of deacon for women was an example of how the Church might “promote the use of new Church ministries and positions, open also to women.”

Archbishop Zollitsch went on to speak of the importance of leadership roles for women, and had earlier talked of the importance of being a more strongly charismatic-oriented Church and the strengthening of the “common priesthood of all the baptized.”

He believes the Church needs to commit to reform in order to regain credibility and strength.

Fr. Hauke said that Archbishop Zollitsch, who was ordained a priest in 1965, has made some confusing remarks on previous occasions and that he probably “got his idea” to introduce a “specific office of deacon for women” from fellow German Cardinal Walter Kasper. [The gift that keeps on giving.]

However, Cardinal Kasper, president emeritus of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, had clearly distinguished between a service ministry for women and the sacramental ordination of men as deacons. [Even Kasper doesn’t get this one wrong.]

Fr. Hauke said that that most people who advocate for women deacons “ultimately want women in the priesthood.”

The Code of Canon Law makes clear that ordination, including to the diaconate, is validly received only by “a baptized male,” and John Paul II’s 1994 apostolic letter “Ordinatio sacerdotalis” teaches definitevly that only men may be ordained priests.

On May 29, 2008, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith decreed that whoever “shall have attempted to confer holy orders on a woman” – including necessarily the diaconate – “as well as the woman who may have attempted to receive holy orders, incurs a latae sententiae excommunication.”

Fr. Hauke noted that in 2003, the International Theological Commission “published a document with evidence that we have no historical basis for the sacramental diaconate being bestowed on women.”  [Pay attention to that little word “no”, as in “NO”.]

And in September 2001, the prefects of the Congregations for the Doctrine of the Faith (Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope emeritus Benedict), of Divine Worship, and of Clerics prepared a document, which was approved by John Paul II. It affirmed that “it is not licit to put in place initiatives which in some way aim to prepare female candidates for diaconal ordination,” according to the Italian paper La Stampa.

Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer of Regensburg has said he can appreciate Archbishop Zollitsch’s call for a greater role for women in the Church, but that the sacramental diaconate cannot be received by females.

He was quick to distance himself from Archbishop Zollitsch’s remarks, and said that a non-sacramental female diaconate would not satisfy the desire for a greater leadership role by women in the Church. [That is because most of those who push for female deacons won’t be satisfied until the Pope marries her lesbian partner.]

Bishop Voderholzer pointed out that abbesses, general superiors, and school principals all generally have more influence than deacons.

“The sacramental diaconate – like the priesthood and episcopacy – is inextricably a sacrament, which according to the bible-based Tradition of the Church – even the Eastern Churches – is reserved to men,” he stated April 28.

Some have called for the ordination of women deacons by noting ancient documents referring to “deaconesses,” including a letter of Saint Paul.

Fr. Hauke [a real theologian] responded that in such instances, the “deaconesses” “cannot be identified as really deacons.”

The word ‘deacon’ comes from a Greek word which simply meant ‘servant,’ and so early references to “deaconesses” signify women in roles of service in the Church.

In the early Church, which more frequently practiced baptism by immersion, such “deaconesses” assisted in the baptism of females for the sake of modesty.

These deaconesses were servants of the Church but were not sacramental deacons, as there is no mention of a bishop laying hands on them in an act of ordination.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
24 Comments

QUAERITUR: “The Gospel, the good news, of the Lord.”

QUAERITUR: "The Gospel, the good news, of the Lord."

Click!

From a reader:

After the Gospel, one of our priests pronounces the acclamation by saying “The Gospel, the good news, of the Lord.” It has been quite distracting for me personally when he does this because it is not the norm. I have spoken to others and they have expressed the same sort of distraction. The insertion appears redundant. I am going through qualms about addressing this directly to the priest. Is it appropriate to add the insertion? Perhaps I am over reacting?

Perhaps he thinks you are not very smart?  Does he think he has the authority to change the texts of Mass?

Sometimes clerics slip and do something odd.  But if he is doing it week in and week out, then it is a choice.

After the Gospel the deacon or priest or bishop is to say, in English, “The Gospel of the Lord.”  There is no indication in the rubrics that the cleric may say anything else.

Why is that hard?

That would, over time, be annoying.

Are you over-reacting?  I have no idea.

I would like to assume that everything else that is done is according to the book, that it is this priest alone and in this moment only that the texts are fudged.  If that is the case, then perhaps you can let it slide as you prepare to listen to Father’s no doubt edifying sermon.

QUAERITUR: "The Gospel, the good news, of the Lord."

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged ,
18 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can a regular Latin priest say Mass in the Anglican form?

From a reader:

With all the hullabaloo in the past with bishops not allowing priests to offer the EF Mass, I’m wondering if Latin Rite priests are allowed to celebrate the Anglican Rite in an Anglican Use Ordinary?

I consulted with a priest of the Ordinariate in England.  Hey responded that, yes, a garden-variety priest of the Latin Rite could use the Anglican form.

I posed in the question in the context of substituting for an Ordinariate priest, rather than the garden-variety guy wanting to use the Anglican form at his garden-variety parish.

So, yes.

However, if Father would not be able to do a proper job of it, perhaps the people would be patient were he to use the Missale Romanum.

Benedict XVI was the Pope of Christian Unity.

IMPORTANT UPDATE:

A priest from the US Ordinariate wrote (edited):

Can a regular Latin Rite priest use the Anglican Use? At least here in the US, the answer is: not without permission of the priest’s Ordinary. Just as I would not presume to celebrate the Dominican Mass without permission, a diocesan priest really should not be using the Anglican Use. Should a priest be asked to fill in at a local Anglican Use parish, and if he has not received permission to use the Anglican Use, then he should use the Roman Missal, which is in fact a liturgical use also proper to the Ordinariate.

Very helpful.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pope of Christian Unity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged ,
16 Comments

Hacker group with a spotty record threatens Diocese of Columbus

At the onset I direct the readers attention to Fr. Z’s Litany for the Conversion of Internet Thugs (2.0)

There is a hacking group called Anonymous – made up of people… or maybe use a person … not brave enough to furnish names and probably pretty young – are threatening the Diocese of Columbus in a gesture of pro-homosexual anti-Catholic bullying.

First, they issued a video about a week ago, which is on the site of the ABC TV affiliate in Columbus:

Play video

Then there is this:

Play video

Ah… anti-Catholic tolerance!

This looks like the work of a confused 15 year old.

You may recall that the Diocese fired a teacher at a diocesan school because the teacher publicly revealed that she is not only homosexual but in a homosexual relationship. The diocesan contracts have morality clauses. There is now a push on the part of anti-Catholic, pro-homosexual activists to force the Catholic Diocese to violate the moral tenets of Church and rehire the teacher. More HERE

You might say a prayer for and send an encouraging note to Bp. Campbell:

His Excellency
Most Rev. Frederick Campbell
Bishop of Columbus
198 East Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215

E-Mail

 

Posted in Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , ,
32 Comments

“The lukewarm, lukewarm Christians, without courage … That hurts the Church so much”

From Pope Francis’ fervorino at his daily Mass:

“When the Church loses courage, the Church enters into a ‘lukewarm’ atmosphere. The lukewarm, lukewarm Christians, without courage … That hurts the Church so much, because this tepid atmosphere draws you inside, and problems arise among us; we no longer have the horizon, or courage to pray towards heaven, or the courage to proclaim the Gospel. We are lukewarm … We have the courage to get involved in our small things in our jealousies, our envy, our careerism, in selfishly going forward … In all these things, but this is not good for the Church: the Church must be courageous! We all have to be courageous in prayer, in challenging Jesus!”.

In the first part of the Divine Comedy, Dante describes what his poetic-self sees as he and Virgil pass through Fore-Hell in Canto III:

“These people have no hope of again dying,
And so deformed has their blind life become
That they must envy every other fate.

50 “The world will not allow a word about them;
Mercy and justice hold them in disdain.
Let us not discuss them. Look and pass on.”

And I, looking again, observed a banner
Which, as it circled, raced on with such speed
It did not seem ever to want to stop.

55 And there, behind it, marched so long a file
Of people, I would never have believed
That death could have undone so many souls.

Posted in Francis, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
16 Comments

Gonzaga University and the Knights of Columbus – UPDATE

A while back I posted about Gonzaga University’s rejection of the Knights of Columbus.  HERE

There has been some movement on that front.

Sponsorship Granted to Knights of Columbus

April 30, 2013

Statement from the Office of President, Gonzaga University

University President Thayne McCulloh has completed his review of a decision issued last month regarding the “club status” of a Knights of Columbus Council at Gonzaga.

Dr. McCulloh communicated to the student leader of the organization that the Knights of Columbus St. Aloysius Gonzaga Council #12583 is approved as a sponsored organization at Gonzaga. This sponsorship is granted under the University’s “Standards for On-Campus Religious Activities Policy.” The Council has been granted permission to: utilize the University’s name in its title; fundraise on campus for the purpose of advancing the Council’s mission and activities; meet in and utilize campus facilities, including for the purposes of hosting events; and to recruit members and participants in membership activities such as the semi-annual Club Fair. As with other student organizations, it is obligated to follow University policies and procedures.

Also as a result of his review, Dr. McCulloh has directed the Student Activities department to review and update the “Clubs and Organizations Recognition Policy,” with the goal of more clearly and explicitly identifying benefits of recognition and criteria for club eligibility. The revisions are expected to be in place in time for the coming academic year.

Dr. McCulloh once again affirmed the University’s value, respect and support for the purpose and good works of the Knights of Columbus, with which the University has enjoyed a long and mutually collaborative relationship at the local level.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Linking Back, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
10 Comments

Sr. Roccasalvo on Gregorian Chant – Out of the park!

I have in the past – and with sincere approval – posted items about liturgy and music written by Sr. Joan L. Roccasalvo, C.S.J. Don’t let that CSJ scare you! Sister’s got game when it comes to liturgy.

An alert reader send a link to this piece at CNA. Read the whole thing there, but here as a few excerpts to prompt and to whet your appetites…

How the Church built western sacred music: part three
By Sr. Joan L. Roccasalvo, C.S.J.

[…]

With the renewed ecclesiology of Vatican II, full, active, and conscious participation of the Assembly was pursued as the expected outcome in liturgical worship. Vatican II’s “Sacrosanctum Concilium” did not banish the chant from the Eucharistic liturgy (#115 ff). Other suitable music was welcomed, but chant, holding “pride of place,” still remained the official music of the Roman Church. Other music was not to overshadow or displace it.

Some pastors resorted to a four-hymn Mass structure using good, solid Protestant hymns to urge singing among the faithful. Soon, an altogether foreign style pushed its way into the liturgical service, thereby sweeping away fifteen hundred years of pure, crystalline chant. Happily, it continued to flourish in monasteries and in isolated parish churches.

Gregorian Chant Banished

A stunned scholarly world looked on, appalled at the sudden appearance of poorly-composed tunes played by strummed guitars with anything that could be banged. These instruments accompanied texts, at first, non-biblical and secular. Eventually, scripture prevailed.

This seismic shock was presented as a measure to jump-start participation in the liturgy, in addition to Protestant hymns. No longer heard was the dictum, “the home of Gregorian chant is wherever there are Roman Catholics.” Was this new rage, so-called folk music, a temporary phenomenon? Or would it permanently displace Gregorian chant?

Over the years, musicologists still agree that the most consequential result of Vatican II has been the exiling of Gregorian chant from the Roman Church. It was a boorish act.  [OORAH!]

[…]

Pause for a moment and imagine the effect on the universal Church if these Mass settings were sung in all Roman churches throughout the world. Their profound beauty would lift up the Church and light up the world. Having stood the test of centuries, the melodies are easy to sing and easily memorized. This inestimable treasure is our musical inheritance. It beckons us to learn how to cherish them and hand them on to the next generation. It is not the responsibility of other faith traditions to carry on the tradition, but ours, for the sake of our Church and the world.

Training in Seminaries and Houses of Formation

The distinguished Catholic architect, Duncan Stroik, has urged major seminaries to include instruction on sacred architecture. Similarly, with painting and statuary. Most of all, knowledge and understanding of Gregorian chant should be taught to seminarians by trained instructors with a profound respect for plainchant. These seminarians are our future priests and pastors, some of whom will be appointed Ordinaries of dioceses. Proper musical training will sharpen and elevate their decisions regarding liturgical music.

[…]

Fr. Z kudos to Sr. R.

This is part of a series.  Hunt up the rest.  Fathers!  Consider posting her pieces in some serial form on your parish bulletins.  Editors!  Consider reprinting in diocesan newspapers!

We need liturgical catechesis that goes beyond a vague urging for prayer to a fuzzy notion and syrupy self-congratulatory participation.   Let’s reclaim our heritage.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
10 Comments