QUAERITUR: Orders of women religious who accept later vocations

From a reader:

Father, do your wonderful readers have suggestions about women’s religious orders that cater to late vocations (late 30’s)? Someone in our family is discerning.

I don’t, but I hope some of the readers here will.

The question of later religious vocations is a bit thorny.  As we age we get set in our ways and less able to adapt to a “rule” of a community.  I am not saying that it is impossible, but it is harder.  There are communities who don’t want to take on people who might be hard to form.

I have often hoped that some holy man or woman would rise up to found new groups precisely for men and women who are a little older.

Similarly, we could use to great effect a consecration of widows, along the lines of the ancient order of virgins which was revived after the council.  And there is the case of the single person who remains single but wants to dedicate his or her life to the service of the Lord, but not as a religious or cleric.

Times are changing.

Another idea could be to assemble a group of like-minded people and then invade one of the long-established but dying groups. Keep your heads down for a few years, get fully professed, and then take whole thing over as the aging-hippies die off or become the minority.  Imagine this applied to some of the galls lolling around under the LCWR’s vile umbrella.  Some of these once beautiful institutes and orders have a lot of property and a great heritage, both squandered and suffocated by earth-mother-goddess worshiping, labyrinth-walking, hierarchy-bashing harridans who have proudly moved “beyond Jesus”.

Invade, I say!  Into the breach!

Readers?

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, Women Religious | Tagged , ,
46 Comments

Phoenix Legatus Conference Day 1

I am in Phoenix for the annual summit of Legatus. It really fires up tonight, but registration has begun. There is “hospitality” during the day. I may take my laptop down to the common area and work from there while people watching. Already quite a few familiar faces have come into view.

As an aside, may I say how great it was to sit outside and have breakfast this morning? It was 34°F and sleeting back at the SPTDV (I checked) and in a short-sleeved shirt I enjoyed my huevos and OJ. What all those people on the patio were doing with those sweaters and jackets….

The display tables – in the set up process still – are already representative of mainstream conservative Catholicism in these USA. For example:

  • Christendom College
  • St Thomas Aquinas College
  • Lexington College
  • Relevant Radio
  • BirthChoice
  • Wyoming Catholic College
  • Thomas More Law Center
  • Napa Institute
  • Thomas More Society
  • St Gregory Retreat Center
  • Pontifical North American College
  • Ave Maria Radio

No sign of the National Schismatic Reporter. Hmmm…. oh… right… that’s not a Catholic publication.

UPDATE:

Al Kresta is here, broadcasting live.

20130207-142429.jpg
UPDATE:

A detail of the display for a Fr Z favorite, Wyoming Catholic College:

20130207-164440.jpg

20130207-164448.jpg

Before Mass with the bishops

20130207-171123.jpg

20130207-173252.jpg

UPDATE

I am at supper at table “1”, which surprised me. Tom Monaghan, Bp. Olmsted, Archbp Lori. wonderful!

UPDATE

Archbp Lori received an award for defending religious liberty.

20130207-214230.jpg

20130207-214236.jpg
Now Kenneth Cuccinelli is speaking. He is AG of Virginia about threats to religious liberty. He actually called on the bishops to lobby for smaller government. Larger government, less freedom.

THIS guy has got game.

20130207-214508.jpg

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
17 Comments

Canonist looks at Arkansas’ legislation for churches to determine concealed carry weapon policies

Prof. Ed Peters, canonist, has an thought-provoking post at his blog In The Light Of The Law.  He looks at a few canonical points regarding the state, a diocese or a parish can/could/should ban the carrying of concealed weapons from places of worship. The key concept in the issue seems to be subsidiarity – letting the decisions be made at the most local level feasible.

Subsidiarity shows up in some unusual places
by Dr. Edward Peters

[…] when I saw that an Arkansas bill to allow churches to decide whether to allow guns on site was being opposed by, among others, the Diocese of Little Rock, I thought, Hmmm…is there canon law angle here?  [Bp. Taylor is in Little Rock.  ]

Currently, Arkansas is one of 10 states to prohibit persons with carry-permits from bringing weapons into places of worship; the Arkansas bill would allow each church to make that carry-decision for itself. As such, this proposal seems like a simple exercise in the vaunted principle of subsidiarity, the amply-ecclesiastically-endorsed principle by which polices affecting people should be made at the most appropriate—usually the lowest and thus most responsive—level of authority feasible. So, if the State wants to accord individual churches the right to make policy on just about anything, I say, bully for the State. It certainly seems preferable to encouraging the State to impose its policies on churches, even if, in the short run, they are policies with which churches would agree. Dangerous precedent, that, as history teaches us time and again. Anyway, back to canon law.

Assuming this bill becomes law—and setting aside some questions I can’t answer about how Arkansas defines a “church”, etc.—canonically, it seems to me that, as parishes are “juridic persons” under canon law (c. 515 § 3) and pastors represent parishes in juridic affairs (c. 532), local pastors get to make this call. For several reasons (cit. om.), I think a prohibition against carrying would have to be announced if that were desired as policy in a given parish.

That said, I think a bishop would have the authority (c. 381) to prohibit Catholics (as subjects of canon law) along with others (by dint of civil law) from carrying weapons in any Catholic sacred place (c. 1205). Of course, enacting such a policy would require of ecclesiastical leadership a conscientious weighing of its pros-s and con-s (including an assessment of the trend in recent years whereby lunatics target schools and churches as places packed with defenseless victims), of the enforceability of any policy as might be enacted, and of the consequences envisioned for violation of such a policy (which consequences might run up against certain canonical rights, say, to receive sacraments). In short, I don’t think there’s an obviously right, or wrong, answer to this one. [Right or wrong?  Not sure.  Easy or hard?  Definitely HARD!  So, maybe it is one which bishops would do well to stay away from?]

So, with all that on the table, maybe I sympathize a bit with the idea of letting the State decide this one for us. But only sympathize, not agree with.  [okaaaayyyyy….. ]

NOT an easy question.

Posted in Linking Back, SESSIUNCULA, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , ,
46 Comments

USCCB to Pres. Obama: your supposed “accommodation” falls short

Today the U.S. Bishops issued a statement about the supposed “accommodation” proffered by the Obama Administration in regard to the anti-1st Amendment HHS Mandate.

HHS Proposal Falls Short In Meeting Church Concerns; Bishops Look Forward To Addressing Issues With Administration

February 7, 2013
Bishops look forward to finding acceptable solutions to shortcomings
Concerned that first-rate charities still given second-class status
Seek clarification on confusing finance plan

WASHINGTON—The Feb. 1 Notice of Proposed Rule making from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) [Obamatax] shows some movement by the Administration but falls short of addressing U.S. bishops’ concerns.

“Throughout the past year, we have been assured by the Administration that we will not have to refer, pay for, or negotiate for the mandated coverage. We remain eager for the Administration to fulfill that pledge [Don’t hold your breath.] and to find acceptable solutions—we will affirm any genuine progress that is made, and we will redouble our efforts to overcome obstacles or setbacks,” said Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), in a February 7 statement. “Thus, we welcome and will take seriously the Administration’s invitation to submit our concerns through formal comments, and we will do so in the hope that an acceptable solution can be found that respects the consciences of all. At the same time, we will continue to stand united with brother bishops, religious institutions, and individual citizens who seek redress in the courts for as long as this is necessary.”

He listed three key areas of concern: [1] the narrow understanding of a religious ministry; [2] compelling church ministries to fund and facilitate services such as contraceptives, including abortion-inducing drugs, and sterilization that violate Catholic teaching; [3] and disregard of the conscience rights of for-profit business owners. These are the same concerns articulated by the USCCB Administrative Committee in its March 2012 statement, United for Religious Freedom.

Cardinal Dolan said the new proposal seemed to address one part of the church’s concern over the definition of a church ministry but stressed that “the Administration’s proposal maintains its inaccurate distinction among religious ministries.  [Just as the President and the administration purposely is twisting the meaning of “freedom of religion” into “freedom of worship”.]

Lest we forget...

“It appears to offer second-class status to our first-class institutions in Catholic health care, Catholic education and Catholic charities. HHS offers what it calls an ‘accommodation[He’s sooooo gracious, the President!] rather than accepting the fact that these ministries are integral to our church and worthy of the same exemption as our Catholic churches.”

Cardinal Dolan highlighted problems with the proposed “accommodation.”

“It appears that the government would require all employees in our ‘accommodated’ ministries to have the illicit coverage—they may not opt out, nor even opt out for their children—under a separate policy,” he said.

He also noted that “because of gaps in the proposed regulations, it is still unclear how directly these separate policies would be funded by objecting ministries, and what precise role those ministries would have in arranging for these separate policies. Thus, there remains the possibility that ministries may yet be forced to fund and facilitate such morally illicit activities.”

Cardinal Dolan also said the proposal refuses to acknowledge conscience rights of business owners who operate their businesses according to their faith and moral values.

“In obedience to our Judeo-Christian heritage, we have consistently taught our people to live their lives during the week to reflect the same beliefs that they proclaim on the Sabbath,” [Yes.  This rejoins what the President is trying to tear assunder.  The President would stress “freedom of worship” only, which means, effectively, that we Catholics can shut the hell up in the public square.  “Freedom of worship” is private not public.  Freedom of religion is both.] Cardinal Dolan said. “We cannot now abandon them to be forced to violate their morally well-informed consciences.”

The statement is attached.

Click HERE for the whole thing.

Remember my post on “The Most Tragikal Hystory of Obama I”? HERE.

I may need to write another scene.

Obama Unleashed

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
26 Comments

Without ladies, you will never have gentlemen

Over at the National Catholic Register there is a piece by Pat Archbold which I liked.

I have written about this topic before, but not for a while now.

My theory is that each year a new wave of young barbarians will be unleashed on the world unless they are civilized first. I mean, young men. Women civilize men. If women start acting like men, the men don’t get formed in the proper way. The end result is going to be bad for everyone and women are going to be hurt more than men in the disaster that results.

That said, let’s see this piece with some emphases and comments.

Bring Back The Fairer Sex

Question: [QUAERITUR!] Is it sexist to ask young women to be ladylike?

It would seem so. Earlier in the week it was reported that a Catholic High School asked its young women to sign a pledge not to curse.

The media descended with its charges of sexism and the school quickly relented and opened the pledge up to boys.  [Instead of caving in they should have had a “knight in shining armor pledge” for the boys.]

While I am not in favor of either gender cursing, I have no problem with asking young women to be superior to their male counterparts. Even in a coed school (which may or may not be such a great idea) [Over rated.] we need to teach our boys to be men and our girls to be ladies. And guess what, ladies don’t curse (much).  [Nor do they dress like hookers.]

I think it is perfectly sensible and reasonable to single out girls for a call to better behavior. Boys will be called to behave like men in their own way, but boys are different than girls. I think that our world and our culture already suffers from the lack of the former benign influence of ladies.  Today, we have all too many girls who grow up merely into curvier versions of the vulgar male counterparts.  [And they pay a far more horrible price.]

Bottom line, you cannot make ladies of young women by asking them to be equal parts sugar, spice, slugs, and snails.

The world does not need more women who act like men.  [Do I hear an “Amen!”? ] We need something better than that, we need ladies. We don’t merely need the other sex, we need the fairer sex back. [Notice how he, correctly, writes of “sex” and not of “gender”?   When you see “gender”, alarm bells must sound.]

Ladies soften the temperaments of men, every generation before the last few knew this. It is these young women, called to the higher purposes of being ladies, in their turn call men to the higher purpose of being gentlemen. [Yes.]

I suppose that without ladies, you will never have gentlemen.

So ask more of them, ask them to be different from the boys, ask them to be better than the boys. The world needs ladies, we need our fairer sex back.

One of the trends in the entertainment industry – which probably dovetails with big-business abortion – is that female characters are turning into more efficient and extravagant killers than many of the male characters.

On a related note, if we don’t as a society, a nation, start having more babies, we are soon going to be in deeper trouble than we are in now.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
92 Comments

A great spiritual war is rising.

Have you ever heard of “Santa Muerte”?

This is a perversion of things Christian which is on the rise in certain sub-cultures, especially criminal.

There is an article at the site of the FBI “Santa Muerte: Inspired and Ritualistic Killings (Part 1 of 3)
By Robert J. Bunker, Ph.D.

If you look at this material, keep in mind that much of it is quite dark. There is great evil here and the influence of the demonic.

One of the things I learned during the exorcism conference I attended is that incidents of demonic oppression and possession have been on the rise over the last few years.

Let us keep our eyes open.  Let us tune up our antennas and radar and be on the alert.

We have to learn to engage with our Holy Angel Guardians more, I think. Ask them for help with all manner of things in our lives.

Use sacramentals and GO TO CONFESSION.

A great spiritual war is rising.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , , ,
35 Comments

Hopeful vibrant continuity v. the grim liberal watchmen

Over at Views From The Choir Loft there is a good post about music, and Latin, and our heritage in the Latin Church.  The writer is Dr. Peter Kwasniewski who teaches at Wyoming Catholic College.

Vatican II says that “care should be taken that people can sing in Latin these parts of the Mass.” Why? Because they are our heritage. They come to us from centuries of faith and prayer and art. Our heritage defines who we are. And frankly, it’s not too much to ask people to know the songs, poems, and prayers of their ancestors. How hard is it to learn that “Kyrie eleison” = “Lord, have mercy”? One figures that out in about three seconds. Or the Gloria—this is a hymn that has not changed at all in 1,500 years. We say it week in, week out. One doesn’t have to be a rocket scientist to learn what the Latin words of the Gloria correspond to in English (e.g., “miserere nobis” = “have mercy on us”). So, the idea that we must never use a sacred language for worship because it would prevent “active participation” is simply ludicrous—a thinly-veiled excuse for not making an effort to embrace our heritage, as the Council itself and the Popes before and after it have continually asked us to do.  [How condescending liberals are.  They think everyone is stupid.  On the other hand, those who embrace tradition affirm that people can do anything!]

My experience, in many different settings, has been exactly the opposite. When they are finally exposed to it (as the Council demanded), young people are proud to be the possessors of such a rich tradition: it makes them think about their faith even more, react to it as something obviously different than what the world has to offer, and embrace it more fully. In general, when we give Catholics more to take pride in and take possession of, we are surprised to find that they rise to the challenge and glory in the result. Making things “accessible” by simplification and modernization has been tried and found wanting, again and again. One wonders, with not a little vexation at human myopia, how many more decades will have to pass in which trite tunes and superficial verbiage will be shoved down the throats of Catholics around the world, while the crisis of the mainstream Church continues, escalates, radicalizes, and implodes. I see in my mind’s eye the pathetic spectacle of a Mass, ca. 2035, in which an ancient priest preaches to an empty church while, just off to his left, three or four elderly women croak out Haugen-Haas tunes to the accompaniment of a broken-down piano. [The Biological Solution.  Meanwhile, over at the Church of St. Fidelia in Tall Tree Circle, where the older form of Mass has been celebrated for a couple decades, there are lots of young people and vocations.]

I am even aware of dioceses where the new translation of the Roman Missal has occasioned the choice and imposition of musical settings of the Mass that are even worse, in their discontinuity from tradition and their egregious lack of good taste, than the tripe that was being served up before. One asks oneself: Is this what the new translation has gotten us? One wonders if the operative motto might be: “Boldly Leading the Way into the 1970s.” Quite as if Sacrosanctum Concilium 116, Blessed John Paul II’s Ecclesia de Eucharistia, Pope Benedict XVI’s Sacramentum Caritatis, and a host of other documents had never even been written and promulgated! The strategy of the dying liberals is to ignore, ignore, ignore the Magisterium in the hopes that it will just go away.

“This, too, shall pass.” Meanwhile, the chapels of traditional Catholicism will continue to expand and multiply, bursting their seams with countless children in homeschooling networks, altar boys in cassock and surplice, choirs and scholas, sodalities, and so many of the trimmings and trappings of a genuine Catholic culture (or, I should say, counterculture). The grim watchmen of the liberal Church try very hard not to notice this demographic shift and, when they notice it, bitterly dismiss it as reactionary nostalgia and postmodern escapism. We can be patient and put up with the whining and hand-wrining of our foes, for they will live only a few short years on this earth, but the Tradition of the Church, already 2,000 years old, will effortlessly outlast them—indeed, will never die, and will live on in the hearts of all who love the beautiful and the eternal. Daily winning to herself converts and champions, the traditional Church in her perpetual youth is the real answer to the crisis of our wayward age.

 

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
15 Comments

My view for a while

Off to Phoenix.

I could use some prayers for this cold!

20130206-153020.jpg

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to |
29 Comments

Mystic Monk Coffee K-Cups are “Monk Shots”

I have noticed that quite a few of you are buying Mystic Monk Coffee K-Cups!

They call them “Monk Shots”.

What are Monk Shots?  Let the Wyoming Carmelites explain:

After years of research and development, we are proud to release our Monk-Shots single serve coffee cups!

We wanted to create a single serve coffee pod with delicious authentically monk roasted coffee in it. We did not like the taste of many coffee pods, which end up tasting like plastic and manufactured. At long last we have a coffee pod that tastes better than a drip brewed cup of Mystic Monk Coffee!

They work with Keurig, Breville, Mr. Coffee and Cuisinart, single-serve machines.  Maybe others, I don’t know.  Chime in.

CLICK TO BUY MONK SHOTS

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

Epistomological rubbish and the dictatorship of relativism

I have been reading about “pensiero debole“… “weak” or “soft” thought. This is mostly an Italian trend in post-modernism.

Dreadful.

It is like … chaos theory meets epistomology. One interpretation is pitted against another for the sake of weakening all conclusions. Of course, it has ethical implications and it could warp the minds of readers and young students forever.

On First Things there is a short piece that mentions “weak thought” in which we read:

Vattimo is most famous for his idea of “weak thought,” writes Guarino in The Return of Religion in Europe?:

It is perhaps best to understand Vattimo’s weak thought as an attempt to reconstruct rationality in a postmodern way. By this I mean that the Torinese intends to move contemporary construals of rationality away from modern notions of reason, with their aggressive assertions about the “certainly true,” the “really real” and “absolute objectivity,” and with their insinuations that evidence and warrants are unproblematic concepts, readily available to settle questions of interpretative adequacy. Weak thought, on the contrary, holds that the world is not simply given to us as pure, uninterpreted, unmediated reality.

If contemporary philosophy has taught us anything, it is that the world is known by men and women who are already deeply enmeshed in history and tradition, who are themselves entirely theory-laden. Vattimo is convinced, then, that the world is “given” to the postmodern christianity of gianni vattimo 19us as an always-already interpreted reality. And precisely because of this, we must avoid “strong thought” with its blinkered claims to truth, finality, and objectivity and with its concomitant avoidance of historical contingency. No ultimate, normative foundations exist that are available to us outside of interpretation.

There exists no “evidence” that is not already deeply implicated in determinate sociocultural forms of life and in already elaborated interpretative structures. Consequently, we have no clearly available archai or Gründe, undisputed first principles or warrants, that could settle matters finally, that could offer definitive notions of truth that would escape perpetual provisionality.

Ad intra, with John Paul II and Benedict XVI we are moving toward “strong thought”, as the First Things piece calls it.

More about it here.

Is this the ultimate language of the dictatorship of relativism?

I suspect we will hear more about “weak thought”.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA, The Drill | Tagged , , , ,
34 Comments