Bp. Egan’s first address as the new Bishop of Portsmouth

The other day I watched the live stream of the consecration of the new Bishop of Portsmouth, England, Most Rev. Philip Egan, who was a collaborator with the outstanding Bishop of Shrewsbury, Mark Davies.

At the end of the Mass in Portsmouth, the newly minted Bishop Egan gave a brief address that quickly had me sitting up straight.  Here is the transcript:

Dear fellow pilgrims on life’s journey, we inhabit a remarkable century, the 21st, which despite the current economic distemper, is witnessing momentous advances in every domain of human knowledge and endeavour, with new discoveries and new applications in science and engineering, in computing and cybernetics, in medicine and bio-technology, in the social sciences, arts and humanities, all of which manifest the limitless self-transcending reach of human experience, understanding and judgement and the cloud of burgeoning possibilities for human deciding, undreamt of by those who’ve gone before.
Indeed, even as we speak, Curiosity is roving among the sand-dunes of Mars, in anticipation of a manned space-voyage to the Red Planet. [I like this reference to Curiosity.  I’ll bet some of the people listening thought they were on Mars during what the Bishop says a little farther along…] With all these exhilarating developments, the Catholic Tradition must engage, the old with the new, in a mutually-enriching critical-conversation.
Yet the ordination of a Bishop, as Successor of the Apostles, in communion of mind, will and heart with the Pope, as the chief Shepherd, Teacher and High Priest of the diocese entrusted to him, who, like the Master, must lay down his life for his flock, reminds us that human needs ever remain essentially the same: [This is a mistake liberals make: they think man has evolved beyond certain things, such as humility before God.] the need to love and to be loved, the need for a purpose and vocation in life, the need to belong to family and community, the need for mercy and forgiveness, for peace and justice, for freedom and happiness, and most profoundly, the need for immortality and for the Divine.
All these fundamental desires, hard-wired into the human heart: theology expresses in the word ‘salvation,’ and we profess that every child, woman and man on this planet can find that salvation. [The goal of the Church is not to promote an earthly utopia.] There is a Way – and it’s the Truth! It’s the true Way that leads to Life, real life, life to the full, a life that never ends. There is a Way, and it’s not a strategy, a philosophy or a package-deal. This Way has a Name, because it’s a Person, the only Person in human history who really did rise from the dead, a Person alive here and now: Jesus of Nazareth, God the Son Incarnate. He alone can save us. He alone can give us the salvation our spirits crave. He alone can reveal to us the Truth about God and about life, about happiness and humanism, about sexuality and family values, about how to bring to the world order, justice, reconciliation and peace.
This message of Good News, and the civilisation of love it occasions, [v. Culture of Death] we Catholics must now communicate imaginatively, with confidence and clarity, together with our fellow Christians, and all people of faith and good will, to the people of England, this wonderful land, Mary’s Dowry. We must offer this salvific message to a people, sorely in need of new hope and direction, disenfranchised by the desert of modern British politics, wearied by the cycle of work, shopping, entertainment, and betrayed by educational, legal, medical and social policy-makers who, in the relativistic world they’re creating, however well-intentioned, are sowing the seeds of a strangling counterculture of death.
My brothers and sisters, today, the Feast of Our Lady of Ransom, of England’s Nazareth, let’s go forth from this Mass with joyful vigour, resolved in the Holy Spirit, to help bring about the conversions needed – intellectual, moral and spiritual – for everyone-we-meet to receive Jesus Christ, the Gospel of Life…. Please pray for me to the Lord Jesus, whose Heart yearns for us in the Blessed Sacrament, that I might be a humble and holy, orthodox, creative and courageous, Bishop of Portsmouth, one fashioned after the Lord’s own.

WDTPRS kudos to Bp. Egan!

In other news, as I watched the live stream of the Mass with a priest friend who knows Portsmouth well, I was told that during the time of the former bishop Marian hymns were not allowed during Mass.  What did we hear during the Mass of consecration?  Marian hymns.  The order of service book is HERE.

I am sure that a video of the whole Mass will eventually be available.  In advance, however, there had been some discussion of the challenge Bp Egan’s appointment would bring for the liturgical mafia of Portsmouth, including the celebrated composer of the Alleluia Cha Cha, Paul Inwood.  Inwood wrote a new Te Deum for the occasion of the consecration.   Te Dium.  But that’s another topic altogether.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
36 Comments

Enda Kenny texting during an audience with Benedict XVI

A friend sent a link about the audience Benedict XVI granted to Enda Kenny of Ireland at Castelgandolfo last Saturday.

In this brief video from Corriere della Sera you can see that Kenny is so engaged that, while sitting in the front row, he decides to do some urgent texting in the Holy Father’s and the world’s full view as his host is speaking.

Lesson: If you are a major political figure, and you don’t have the slightest interest in what the Pope says or thinks, let your aide have your phone during papal audiences where you are sure to be recorded on video for the news.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
27 Comments

Just to catch you up on what I’ve been doing.

Although I transferred the flag to Rome this morning at Oh-Dark-Hundred…

20120925-065307.jpg

… I wanted to catch up with the few pics and news about what has been going on.

On Sunday, after some time with Fr. Finigan at Blackfen, we went off to Chistlehurst to sing Vespers for the Feast of the Dedication of their parish church.  This is the place where the late Michael Davies is buried.  He was a real gentleman.

20120925-065335.jpg

Afterwards we priests went out for some supper and clerical talk.

The other day I met with friends at The Cork and Bottle near Leicester Square and had Ham and Cheese Pie.  Very good.  Extremely filling.  You might need only this meal in the course of the day.

20120925-065413.jpg

After the super-hot spicy Chinese soup a few days ago, I went for some calmer, soothing soup with wontons and seaweed.  Good Jasmine Tea.

20120925-065451.jpg

Dunno… I think I would prefer London Pride.

Great name, though.

20120925-065603.jpg

Off to the National Gallery again.  Since the sickening loss of my commonplace book, and I wandering again in familiar galleries trying to reconstruct some of my thoughts and note them in a new edition.  Sigh.

20120925-065639.jpg

This morning I set foot once again in the Eternal City.  That weird thing happened that always happens.  It is like a switch being clicked.  It is like I never left.

A dear friend picked me up at Fiumicino and brought me into town.  We went to lunch in the Borgo Pio at a place I like a lot.  On the board today was rigatoni con coda.  I had hoped to have room for the orata, too.  This was filling!

20120925-153838.jpg

You can tell that I have switched mobile phones.  The photo quality is really bad.  I think I have dropped this phone too many times.

 

Tonight the conference on Augustine’s City of God begins at the Augustinianum with introductory remarks and then an address by my friend Prof. John Rist.

 

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , , , ,
31 Comments

An American Bishop on the Democrat Convention, intrinsic evil, and voting wisely as a Catholic

In The Catholic Times, the newspaper of the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois with my emphases and comments:

Think and pray about your vote in upcoming election
by Bishop Thomas John Paprocki

My dear brothers and sisters in Christ:

Much attention was given at the Democratic National Convention held recently in Charlotte, N.C., to the fact that all references to God had been purged from the draft version of the party platform. After outcries of protest from outside as well as within the Democratic Party, the sentence with the same reference to God used in 2008 was restored to read, “We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values and interests of working people, and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential.”

Before anyone relaxes and concludes that all is well now that the Democratic Party Platform contains a single passing reference to God, [thus throwing God a little handful of dirt.] the way that this was done should give us pause. Convention chairman Antonio Villaraigosa had to call for the voice vote three times because each time the sound level for the “ayes” and the “nays” sounded about even, far short of the two-thirds necessary according to convention rules to amend the platform. That did not stop the convention chairman from declaring, “The ayes have it!” [Goat rodeo.]

What is troubling about that is the blatant disregard for the rules and for the apparent wishes of about half the delegates. The reference to God is back in the platform apparently because President Obama wanted it back in.  [No doubt because of his deep belief in God.] That may be fine for now, but if a future president wants references to God taken out, apparently that can be done regardless of the wishes of the delegates if that is what The Leader wants. That does not bode well for democracy in the Democratic Party. [That’s about right.  That is also where the whole country is headed, more quickly, if such leaders remain in power.  But wait!  There’s more…]

Even more troubling is that this whole discussion about God in the platform is a distraction from more disturbing matters that have been included in the platform. In 1992 Presidential candidate Bill Clinton famously said that abortion should be “safe, legal and rare.That was the party’s official position until 2008. Apparently “rare” is so last century that it had to be dropped, because now the Democratic Party Platform says that abortion should be “safe and legal.” [And they know that Planned Parenthood doesn’t want it to be rare… and neither, really, do many of the queenpins of that party.] Moreover the Democratic Party Platform supports the right to abortion “regardless of the ability to pay.[Ergooooo…..] Well, there are only three ways for that to happen: either taxpayers will be required to fund abortion, or insurance companies will be required to pay for them (as they are now required to pay for contraception), or hospitals will be forced to perform them for free.  [Which do you think will be the case?]

Moreover, the Democratic Party Platform also supports same-sex marriage, recognizes that “gay rights are human rights,” [This is NOT… NOT… a civil or human rights issue!] and calls for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal law signed by President Clinton in 1996 that defined marriage as the legal union of one man and one woman.  [Which The First Gay President refuses to enforce.]

Now, why am I mentioning these matters in the Democratic Party Platform? There are many positive and beneficial planks in the Democratic Party Platform, but I am pointing out those that explicitly endorse intrinsic evils. [LibDems are, right now, having a nutty with little flecks of spit jetting from the corners of their mouths to either side of their monitors as they prepare to label Bp. Paprocki, and me, a Republican partisan. BUT…] My job is not to tell you for whom you should vote. But I do have a duty to speak out on moral issues. I would be abdicating this duty if I remained silent out of fear of sounding “political” and didn’t say anything about the morality of these issues. [NB:]People of faith object to these platform positions that promote serious sins. I know that the Democratic Party’s official “unequivocal” support for abortion is deeply troubling to pro-life Democrats.

So what about the Republicans? I have read the Republican Party Platform and there is nothing in it that supports or promotes an intrinsic evil or a serious sin. [Get that?  We can disagree about the best ways to solve many burning social issues, but we cannot support things that are intrinsically evil.] The Republican Party Platform does say that courts “should have the option of imposing the death penalty in capital murder cases.” But the Catechism of the Catholic Church says (in paragraph 2267), “Assuming that the guilty party’s identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor. If, however, non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people’s safety from the aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and more in conformity to the dignity of the human person. Today, in fact, as a consequence of the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm — without definitely taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself — the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity are very rare, if not practically nonexistent.”

One might argue for different methods in the platform to address the needs of the poor, to feed the hungry and to solve the challenges of immigration, but these are prudential judgments about the most effective means of achieving morally desirable ends, not intrinsic evils.  [LibDems, read that again slowly.]

Certainly there are “pro-choice” Republicans who support abortion rights and “Log Cabin Republicans” who promote same-sex marriage, and they are equally as wrong as their Democratic counterparts. But these positions do not have [NB] the official support of their party.

Again, I am not telling you which party or which candidates to vote for or against, but I am saying that you need to think and pray very carefully about your vote, because a vote for a candidate who promotes actions or behaviors that are intrinsically evil and gravely sinful makes you morally complicit and places the eternal salvation of your own soul in serious jeopardy.  [I will add that I think that it is better to vote than not to vote in this election.]

I pray that God will give you the wisdom and guidance to make the morally right choices.

May God give us this grace. Amen.

WDTPRS kudos to Bp. Paprocki.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Emanations from Penumbras, Fr. Z KUDOS, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , ,
115 Comments

Sloppy reporting about new “church tax” decision by bishops

I haven’t been following this interesting story, but I noted some of the use of language in reporting about  the German bishops and the “church tax”.  I will ramble a bit and my emphases.

From The Beeb:

German Catholics lose church rights for unpaid tax [First, the language of “rights” in the Church is problematic when it comes to juridical issues.]

Germany’s Roman Catholics are to be denied the right to Holy Communion or religious burial if they stop paying a special church tax. [“are to be denied”…?  So, it is a done deal?  That’s it?  Given that many readers don’t read very much more than the first couple paragraphs,…]

A German bishops’ decree which has just come into force says anyone failing to pay the tax – an extra 8% of their income tax bill – will no longer be considered a Catholic.  [I don’t know the answer to this, but, if it just came into force, was there reporting about this before?]

The bishops have been alarmed by the number of Catholics leaving the Church. [Finally.]

They say such a step should be seen as a serious act against the community. [D’ya think?  And it isn’t great for their souls, either.]

All Germans who are officially registered as Catholics, Protestants or Jews pay a religious tax of 8-9% on their annual income tax bill. The levy was introduced in the 19th Century in compensation for the nationalisation of religious property.

“If your tax bill is for 10,000 euros, then 800 euros will go on top of that and your total tax combined will be 10,800 euros,” Munich tax accountant Thomas Zitzelsberger told the BBC news website.

Catholics make up around 30% of Germany’s population but the number of congregants leaving the church swelled to 181,000 in 2010, with the increase blamed on revelations of sexual abuse by German priests.

Alarmed by their declining congregations, the bishops were also pushed into action by a case involving a retired professor of church law, Hartmut Zapp, who announced in 2007 that he would no longer pay the tax but intended to remain within the Catholic faith.

The Freiburg University academic said he wanted to continue praying and receiving Holy Communion and a lengthy legal case between Prof Zapp and the church will reach the Leipzig Federal Administrative Court on Wednesday.

“This decree makes clear that one cannot partly leave the Church,” Germany’s bishops’ conference said last week, in a decision endorsed by the Vatican.  [True. However, read that in the context of this reporting.  Questions are raised: is paying the church tax a sine qua non for membership in the Church?  No.]

‘Wrong signal’

Unless they pay the religious tax, Catholics will no longer be allowed receive sacraments, except before death, or work in the church and its schools or hospitals. [They won’t be allowed to receive Holy Communion or go to confession?  They won’t be allowed to be married in the Church?  They are… what… excommunicated?  If a person who does not pay the Church tax comes to Communion, will there be an alarm of some sort to warn the priest off?]

Without a “sign of repentance before death, a religious burial can be refused,” [Burial is not a sacrament.] the decree states. Opting out of the tax would also bar people from acting as godparents to Catholic children. [Being a sponsor is not a sacrament.]

“This decree at this moment of time is really the wrong signal by the German bishops who know that the Catholic church is in a deep crisis,” Christian Weisner from the grassroots Catholic campaign group We are Church told the BBC. [Okay… if We Are Church are against this, I am strongly tempted to be for it… whatever it is.]

But a priest from Mannheim in south-western Germany, Father Lukas Glocker, said the tax was used to do essential good works.

“With kindergarten, with homes for elderly or unemployed, we’ve got really good things so I know we need the tax to help the German country to do good things.” [Is it the mission of the Church in the world to “do good things”?  No.  It might be a part of what the Church does in the world, but Christ did not say “Go forth to all nations and open kindergartens.”]

While the decree severely limits active participation [I sense that the phrase “active participation” has been around for so long that it just slides into an article like this.] in the German Catholic Church, it does hold out some hope for anyone considering a return to the fold.  [Imagine!  Some hope remains!]

Until now, any German Catholic who stopped payment faced eventual excommunication. [?] Although the measures laid out in the decree are similar to excommunication from the church, German observers say the word is carefully avoided in the decree.

I guess I need some education/information about this.  I suspect some readers will know a lot about this.

In the meantime, I remember discussions with my old pastor years about about his misgivings concerning the German “church tax” and the temptation people might attempt formal apostasy in order to get out of paying it.

NB also that the Church’s laws concerning apostasy were altered a few years ago.

If a person make a formal act of apostasy (which I think was once needed in Germany in order to avoid paying the Church tax), she – once upon a time – would have had to go though various steps before returning to the sacraments. In 2009 a document called Omnium in mentem was issued whereby the Church’s law about these formal acts was changed.

Now, the Church no longer considers it possible to defect from the faith by formal act. Therefore, there are no canonical consequences from formal defection. Were a person to film herself signing a document and then publish the photos and take out ads in the newspaper, according to the Church they would not have formally defected from the Church.

Thus, people cannot now formally defect. They can, however, still incur a censure of excommunication – a spiritual and medicinal penalty – for heresy or schism or apostasy (cf. can 1364). In order to incur any censure she would have had to understand the consequences of the act. Therefore, if she joined another church without really understanding the canonical consequences (e.g., she married a Lutheran and started going to services with her spouse and then joins the Lutheran parish…) then it is likely that no excommunication is incurred.

I suspect that this new policy we are reading about has something to do with getting into sync with Omnium in mentem.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
63 Comments

Portsmouth, England has a new bishop

Today I watched the live stream of the consecration of the new Bishop of Portsmouth, Most. Rev. Philip Egan.

At the end of the Mass, Bishop Egan gave a brief address which, to my hearing, sounded like a program for not only the Diocese of Portsmouth, but a program for all of England.  He made some clear and bold statements I think you will like.   I don’t have  a transcript yet and the video does not yet seem to be viewable on demand.  But they both will be, soon I hope.

It seems to me that this appointment and that of Most Rev. Mark Davies the Bishop of Shrewsbury, where Bp. Egan came from, suggests a trend.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
12 Comments

RSS feed troubles

I have found a problem with my RSS feed.

Anyone else having trouble with it?

One problem is noticed is that the subscribers dropped off all of sudden, it seems on 16 Sept, from 13k to zero:

Some of you might have an insight into what happened here.  Odd.

PS: I have had problems with the feed before… grrrrr.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
22 Comments

Whither Latin?

From CNS about Latin:

[wp_youtube]-1hP_ps6JiE[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices |
14 Comments

Recent Posts, My Thanks, Some News





Here are links to some recent posts, which scroll off quickly.

But first, an ongoing entry for

Your Urgent Prayer Requests

And…

Don't wait to run out of coffee or tea before you refresh your supply!

And…

And…

Click on the waving Union Jack and send a donation.  I will earmark some of it for beer and museums, and some of it for a donation to the parish where I am staying.  This is a poor parish which nevertheless does tremendous spiritual and corporal works of mercy in a troubled area of central London.

Last week I will gave a talk to a group of young people at Brompton Oratory.  It was very well attended.  I spoke about “active participation”.  I am scheduled, weather permitting, to go to Rome for a conference on Augustine’s City of God and to take care of some “business”.

Concerning Rome: Would any you be willing to donate for a flight to Rome at the end of October so that I could attend the big pilgrimage to Rome in support of Summorum Pontificum in the first days of November?  (Information HERE) Please write me an email ( HERE) with “ROME TLM PILGRIMAGE” in the subject line.    (UPDATE 27 Sept 07:49 GMT: I have made a list of those who have contacted me about this.  I should have a better view soon of what will be involved.)  There has been a lot of buzz about the Pontifical Mass which is the central attraction of this pilgrimage.

I do pray for benefactors, as is my duty and pleasure.  I remember you at Holy Mass and often say Mass for your intentions.  I take your requests for prayers seriously and note them down.  Keep me in your prayers too. I will say Mass for my benefactors again during my few upcoming days in Rome.

(UPDATED 27 Sept 07:50 GMT) Meanwhile, special thanks to:

HE, RB, RB, MH, DM, MF, Fr LT, NF, MT, RW, Mf, JG, LS, ER, CO’C, EMcG, GK, TR, MC, BA, MR, KB, RMcE, JB, MH, BB, JH, KS, MR, DN, MG, JD, MB, MK, AN, CL, FN, JP, JG, NE, SA, JN, MH, ML, MC, RA, JS, CG, MP, MA, DR, JR, MZ, NH, CG, AR, JS, MF, DH, MF, CMcG, MK.

If you think I may have missed you, please drop me an email?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Recent Posts, My Thanks, Some News

A reader’s impression of 1st TLM (Pontifical!)

A reader sent in impression of the first Holy Mass he attended in the Extraordinary Form, and not just a Low Mass, either:

I attended my first TLM this past week. It was a beautiful Solemn Pontifical Mass said by my Bishop. During and after the mass, I had three main impressions.

1. I was taken by how serious, reverent, and solemn it was. The thought struck me during mass that serious, reverent, and solemn is exactly what mass should be. The mass put me in a “Last Things” frame of mind. That seemed appropriate since one of the purposes of Catholic worship is to help lead us to heaven. [Exactly, as I told a group of young people at Brompton Oratory last week, Mass has to help us prepare for death.] By comparison, I think the O.F. makes me / us feel too comfortable, in an “I’m OK, you’re OK” (i.e., we don’t have to change) kind of way rather than focus our attention and change us / move us interiorly.

2. The inclusion of more intricate rubrics made sense to me. The Eucharist is the sum and substance of our worship, and therefore, why shouldn’t that be reflected in all that happens during mass? [Again, BINGO!] Gestures and body posture are important, even to those not making the gestures. They take us out of the ordinary and help us to focus. Americans stand during the pledge of allegiance / national anthem. We hold our hands over our heart. We do so as a sign of respect and to show that what we are doing is different, special. Whether it is the priest or altar boys, their gestures convey to the congregation that what is happening is different and special from what happens in the outside world.

3. Kneeling while receiving communion just seemed so “right” (correct). I usually receive communion on the tongue, so that was not different, but kneeling seemed more reverent. Again, it’s a posture that reflects the seriousness of what is taking place. Standing is an indication of equal status. Kneeling is a sign of humility and reflects the fact that we do not have the same status of Him that we receive.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, HONORED GUESTS, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , ,
9 Comments