WDTPRS: 4th Sunday after Epiphany – SECRET (1962MR)

Here is part of a piece I wrote for the weekly The Wanderer.

In the traditional Roman calendar this is the Season after Epiphany, called in the typical edition of the 1962 Missale Romanum the “Tempus per annum ante Septuagesimam… Time through the year before Septuagesima”.  On Monday 2 February, forty days after Christmas, we observe the feast of the Purification or “Candlemas”, third and last “peak”, bringing to a close the cycle of Advent-Christmas-Epiphany. Next Sunday is the first the pre-Lenten Sundays, Septuagesima.  

The Season after Epiphany echoes with the mystery of the revelation of Christ’s divinity.  On Epiphany itself we celebrated the coming of the Magi to the manger, the Baptism of the Lord at the Jordan, and the miracle at Cana.  On the 2nd Sunday after Epiphany we heard once again about Christ’s first public miracle at Cana. On 13 January we observed again the Baptism of the Lord.  On the Third Sunday Christ by divine power cleanses a leper and healed the Centurion’s servant from afar.  On this Sunday the Lord reveals His godhood by commanding the wind and waves. 

In this season after Epiphany, in the readings and prayers of Holy Mass, we strengthen our faith in Christ as God.

Today’s prayer survived the cutters and pasters of Fr. Bugnini’s Consilium to live on, intact, in the Novus Ordo on Thursday of the Fourth Sunday of Lent.  The prayer is ancient.  You can find it in many of the manuscripts we find in these columns.  In the Liber Sacramentorum Romanae ecclesiae ordine exscarpsus it is found on the 4th Sunday after “Theophany”, which is another word for “Epiphany”.  Therefore, it has been prayed at the same point in Mass for well over one thousand years.  But the redactors of the post-Conciliar Missale Romanum thought it should be somewhere else. 

But there might have been some method to their seemingly odd choice. 

At this point in the Season of Epiphany, which is shorter or longer depending on the moving date of Easter, we already are getting hints of Lent to come.  In the Gospel reading for today’s Mass the Apostles are terrified in their little boat as the wind and surging waves threaten to engulf them.  The Lord rises to face the danger on their behalf.  The Lord not only manifests His divinity, but stands at the juncture of conflict between the world in disharmony because of sin and the salvation that is ours through His reconciliation.  The storm on the sea foreshadows the paradigmatic struggle of the God Man Savior with sin, death and evil in His upcoming Passion.  The little boat, tossed about on the sea, is a symbol of the Church, the survival of which depends solely on the Lord’s intervention.  Lent is the season when the Church lives again this spiritual conflict so as to be cleansed before the Feast of the Resurrection.

SECRET (1962MR):
Concede, quaesumus, omnipotens Deus:
ut huius sacrificii munus oblatum fragilitatem nostram
ab omni malo purget semper et muniat
.

The vocabulary doesn’t present us with any special challenges.  Still, when we put a word under the microscope, something interesting usually pops out. The trusty Lewis & Short Dictionary reminds us that fragilitas is, “brittleness; weakness, frailness, fragility”, which includes a moral sense, human weakness from original and personal sin.  When we consult Blaise/Dumas we find that fragilitas is associated with nostra infirmitas, nostra mortalitas, and, here is an interesting bit, nostra possibilitas. Possibilitas is our “ability to do a thing; strength”. 

When we see possibilitas I suspect our modern minds turn to the lofty, the horizons open to us, the conviction that we can do anything if we set our mind to it.  But in this ancient Christian case, possibilitas is delimited by our fallen human nature.  We can go only so far on our own.  We can’t cleanse ourselves of our sins or choose by our own strength alone never to sin and simply to be safe rather than saved.  Turning the phrase around and looking at it from the other end of the microscope, St. Pope Leo the Great (+461) calls Christ possibilitas nostra in all that we do and all we are.

LITERAL VERSION:
Grant, we beg, Almighty God:
that the gift of this Sacrifice offered up
may always purge our frailness from every evil and secure it.

The Saint Andrew Bible Missal (1962):
Grant us, we pray, almighty God,
that the offering of this sacrifice may always
cleanse our frailty from every evil, and be our protection
.

Roman Catholic Daily Missal (Angelus Press 2004)
Grant, we beseech Thee, almighty God,
that the offering of the gifts of this Sacrifice,
may ever cleanse us and in our frailty protect us from all evil.

And to be complete let us take a look at what people will hear during the 4th Week of Lent through the lame-duck version by…

ICEL (1973 translation of the 1970MR):
All-powerful God,
look upon our weakness.
May the sacrifice we offer
bring us purity and strength.
 

 

Posted in WDTPRS |
7 Comments

“All the wishing in the world…”

Thanks to Fr. ER of Orthometer for this!

Spurred by this.

Posted in Mail from priests |
9 Comments

I’d gladly pay you Tuesday for a poll response today

Some say the burger is the perfect food group.

So what’s it gonna be?

A hamburger?  A cheeseburger?

Of course, you can add all sorts of other things, such as lettuce or tomato, or a smear of mustard or mayo.

Call it a "California" Burger.

It can be on a regular bun, or an onion roll, or even open-face, like a patty-melt.

You can have onions raw or grilled or fried or sauteed.

You can have ketchup or … not.

You can even put pickles on it.

But I think the essential difference lies in the addition or subtraction of cheese.

Whatever sort of cheese.

POLL CLOSED

Which sort of burger do you most often choose?

  • Cheeseburger (with or without other stuff) (77%, 950 Votes)
  • Hamburger (with or without other stuff) (23%, 279 Votes)

Total Voters: 1,229

 

Posted in POLLS |
84 Comments

The Remnant: SSPX reconciliation by 2 February?

The traditional Catholic paper The Remnant has a piece by a frequent comment writer here, Brian Mershon, about a possible reconciliation of the SSPX with Rome perhaps by Candlemas, 2 February.

I will not parse Mershon’s whole piece, for it is pretty long-winded and you should in justice visit the Remnant also.  But here are some salient bits:

Brian Mershon
(Exclusive to The Remnant)

In fact, Vatican sources have indicated that the full regularization may occur as early as February 2, 2009, the Feast of the Purification of Our Lady and Candlemas, which, if true, would be quite a Christmas present to the Church and especially traditionalist Catholics worldwide!

Vatican Working on Stable Juridical Structure

Monsignor Ignacio Barreiro, chief of Human Life International’s Rome bureau, could not confirm the February 2 date, ["…not confirm…"] but said his Curial source told him that they are currently busy working out the practical arrangements for a fully regularized Society of St. Pius X.

The final solution “cannot depend upon individual diocesan bishops,” [no kidding!] Monsignor Barreiro said, noting the longsuffering many traditionalist Catholics experienced for nearly 20 years under the Ecclesia Dei Adflicta arrangement.

“They would certainly need to have guarantees that where they currently are located, they cannot be touched by the local bishop,” Barreiro said, noting the Society’s chapels being located across the globe, which he described as “de facto parishes.”  Barreiro rightly noted that the Society bishops most likely would not accept any solution that involved jurisdiction by the local territorial Ordinary. [Well… okay.  But the local bishop can’t really be ignored can he?  Even if this winds up being a personal prelature, the local bishop has to have some say.  This will need some creative thinking.  But the Commission has access to some very good canonists.  Very good.]

France’s Seminaries to be Over One-Third Traditionalist

In fact, specific resistance is most prevalent in the dying churches of France with their bishops and priests.  [One French priest I know said Mass attendance in regular churches was about 2%.  In years, he had heard a handful of confessions.  God have mercy.] Upon final regularization, Monsignor Barreiro said, “More than one-third of all seminarians in France will be in traditionalist seminaries.” This would include the SSPX, the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP), the Institute of Good Shepherd and the Institute of Christ the King (ICR) as well as some other lesser known traditionalist priestly groups.

“I expect that some structure like a universal Apostolic Administration may be the only solution,” Monsignor Barreiro said, while cautioning that he did not have direct access to the specific details.

Vatican II and All the Councils

“They won’t be asked to accept the Council,” Monsignor Barreiro said. “There is nothing dogmatic regarding faith and morals in the Council documents,” he emphasized. “Many have elevated the Council as if it were a superdogma, when in truth, it was not dogmatic at all.”  ["superdogma" ….  sounds familiar these days…]

Vatican Will Not Demand SSPX Swallow the Council

In other words, there will be no demand for the SSPX leadership to accept the “Decree on Social Communication” as an infallible, dogmatic document.  [ACK!  NO!?!  Okay… deal’s off…]

And despite the ruminations of certain bishops, cardinals, priests, Cardinal Kasper and even George Weigel, neither will they be asked to accept the Decree on Ecumenism, the Declaration of Religious Liberty, Nostra Aetate or even Lumen Gentium and Dei Verbum as dogmatic declarations that can stand alone without reading them in light of Tradition[Which would be an unreasonable claim, wouldn’t it.  All the Council’s documents must be interpreted in the light of our Tradition.]

I know Msgr. Barriero and know him to be a solid and thoughful source.  He has a good canonical view as well.

Folks… let us repeat this even as we pray over the hopeful developments:

People of good will ought to be free to disagree over things which are not crystal clear, over the difficult questions raised in the Council’s documents.

Humility is needed on both sides, on the part of those who represent the Holy See and Pope Benedict and those of the SSPX who will offer their concerns and perspectives.

At all costs the Council, or it’s "spirit" must not be elevated to a "super-dogma", which can never be questioned or challenged.

Neither should the SSPX see themselves as the sole-saviors of the Church, who have all the answers and need not submit to Peter or give assent to the Church’s teachings.

Posted in Brick by Brick, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM |
78 Comments

Are pro-lifers falling into the FOCA Trap?

I received this very interesting note from a staffer of a US Congressman whom I will not identify for obvious reasons.  I have his permission to share this:

My emphases

Fr. Z:

As a Congressional staffer, I am extremely concerned that we pro-lifers are falling into what I am starting to see as the “FOCA Trap.”

If my fellow conservatives in Congress – policy makers who actually know what’s possible and what’s not – were speaking privately, I think they would admit that FOCA doesn’t have a snowball’s chance of ever even getting a committee hearing let alone being passed or signed into law. That is because it’s so radical that even most of the pro-abortion Democrats probably wouldn’t even support it.

Now, all this begs the question: why are all the bishops and most of the pro-life activists singularly focused on it?   [Good question.  Are they falling for a head feint?]

The quick answer is because Obama said at some point that he would sign it into law. Then all the activists, talk radio, the USCCB, etc. all kicked into gear and started on the offense. But is that a good thing?

As I said, anyone serious who knows the Hill knows it will never pass – including Obama. So, while the wagons are all circled around FOCA, Obama, the Democrats and the pro-abortion lobby can pick apart the incremental progress we’ve made over the years on partial-birth, overseas abortion funding, funding for abortions on military bases, embryonic stem cell research, etc. And they’ll do it while we’re all signing post cards in church about FOCA. It’s a brilliant diversion.

[“… a brilliant diversion…”]

Then, one day, Obama will come out against FOCA and say it’s too extreme. Then he’ll be heralded as a moderate, all while our progress is wiped out, and millions more babies are murdered.

Father, unless I’m very wrong, we are falling into the FOCA Trap and we must stop now, protect the gains we have made and fight like mad every time the next Mexico City fight comes instead of just saying “Oh well, we knew he’d do this.”

We need to keep our eyes on the real enemy – and that is not FOCA.

Very interesting!

Calm discussion, please, or I will toss you.

This is too important to clutter with the bone-head stuff that adds nothing of use.

Posted in The future and our choices |
59 Comments

Soup and bird baths

Many thanks to the kind person who sent the bird bath, which I had listed on my amazon.com list. Alas, there was no invoice, so I don’t know who sent it. Also, I can’t put it out at this time, since there is no heating unit. 

Also, many thanks to JS who sent Shadowplay: the hidden beliefs and coded politics of William Shakespeare by Clare Asquith.

In the meantime, the "amaryllis" is putting on a show.

In the background you can see my big rosemary, which has survived for many years now.

I made some split pea soup last night.

From the grocer I obtained some pork neck bones, which I roasted a bit, and salt pork, which I sliced up.

In the meantime I chopped up some celery and onion, just a bit, and added them to the bones and salt pork.

I put in the dried split peas and covered them with water and chicken broth, about 3 to 1.

Simmer on a very low heat.   It’ll take at least 45 minutes.

That’s it.

Substantial, good and cheap!  Great on a winter day.

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen |
18 Comments

CDF will recommend a “personal prelature” for traditional Anglicans

I had some interesting news forwarded by many readers.  It is a report from The Record which is getting some focus.

It seems that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has recommended that the Traditional Anglican Communion be brought into unity with the Catholic Church and perhaps given the canonical structure of a personal prelature, much like Opus Dei enjoys.

I ask, if the minimum of theological difficulties with the SSPX can be ironed out, and there is a clear manifestation of obedience to the Holy Father (manifested in actions not just words)….

Okay… you get the point.

Let’s look at the piece in The Record about this Anglicans.

Healing the Reformation’s fault lines

Wednesday, 28 January 2009

History may be in the making. It appears Rome is on the brink of welcoming close to half a million members of the Traditional Anglican Communion into membership of the Roman Catholic Church, writes Anthony Barich. Such a move would be the most historic development in Anglican-Catholic relations in the last 500 years. But it may also be a prelude to a much greater influx of Anglicans waiting on the sidelines, pushed too far by the controversy surrounding the consecration of practising homosexual bishops, women clergy and a host of other issues. [This would be a huge blow to the "liberal" or "progressivist" sector of the Anglican Communion, which remains open to women priests, bishops and actively ministry by openly homosexual men.]

The Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has decided to recommend the Traditional Anglican Communion be accorded a personal prelature akin to Opus Dei, if talks between the TAC and the Vatican aimed at unity succeed, it is understood.  [if… if…]

The TAC is a growing global community of approximately 400,000 members that took the historic step in 2007 of seeking full corporate and sacramental communion with the Catholic Church – a move that, if fulfilled, will be the biggest development in Catholic-Anglican relations since the English Reformation under King Henry VIII.

TAC members split from the Canterbury-based Anglican Communion headed by Archbishop Rowan Williams over issues such as its ordination of women priests and episcopal consecrations of women and practising homosexuals.

The TAC’s case appeared to take a significant step forwards in October 2008 when it is understood that the CDF decided not to recommend the creation of a distinct Anglican rite within the Roman Catholic Church – as is the case with the Eastern Catholic Churches – but a personal prelature, a semi-autonomous group with its own clergy and laity[So, it wouldn’t be a unique "Church".]

Opus Dei was the first organisation in the Catholic Church to be recognised as a personal prelature, a new juridical form in the life of the Church. A personal prelature is something like a global diocese without boundaries, headed by its own bishop and with its own membership and clergy.
Because no such juridical form of life in the Church had existed before, the development and recognition of a personal prelature took Opus Dei and Church officials decades to achieve.
An announcement could be made soon after Easter this year. It is understood that Pope Benedict XVI, who has taken a personal interest in the matter, has linked the issue to the year of St Paul, the greatest missionary in the history of the Church.  [Another fruit of the Pauline year.]

The Basilica of St Paul outside the Walls could feature prominently in such an announcement for its traditional and historical links to Anglicanism. Prior to the English Reformation it was the official Church of the Knights of the Garter.

The TAC’s Primate, Adelaide-based Archbishop John Hepworth, told The Record he has also informed the Holy See he wants to bring all the TAC’s bishops to Rome for the beatification of Cardinal Henry Newman, also an Anglican convert to the Catholic Church, as a celebration of Anglican-Catholic unity.

Although Cardinal Newman’s beatification is considered to be likely by many, the Church has made no announcement that Cardinal Newman will be beatified.

Archbishop Hepworth personally wrote to Pope Benedict in April 2007 indicating that the TAC planned a meeting of its world bishops, where it was anticipated they would unanimously agree to sign the Catechism of the Catholic Church and to seek full union with the Catholic Church. [God willing!]

This took place at a meeting of the TAC in the United Kingdom. TAC bishops placed the signed Catechism on the altar of the most historical Anglican and Catholic Marian shrine in the UK, the National Shrine of Our Lady of Walsingham in Norfolk, before posting it up in the main street in an effort to gather public support.  [May Our Lady of Walsingham bring England back to the Faith.]

Archbishop Hepworth, together with TAC bishops Robert Mercer and Peter Wilkinson, presented the signed items personally to Fr Augustine Di Noia OP, the CDF’s senior ecumenical theologian, on October 11, 2007, in a meeting organised by CDF secretary Archbishop Angelo Amato.

Bishop Mercer, a monk who is now retired and living in England, is the former Anglican Bishop of Matabeleland, Zimbabwe. Bishop Wilkinson is the TAC’s diocesan bishop in Canada.

TAC’s Canadian Bishop Peter Wilkinson has close ties to the Catholic hierarchy in British Columbia, which has also met the CDF on the issue. He has already briefed Vancouver archdiocesan priests.

One potential problem for the Holy See would be the TAC’s bishops, most of whom are married. Neither the Roman Catholic nor Eastern Catholic churches permit married bishops.  [This is probably why it cannot be its own "Church" in union with the Holy See.  The personal prelature is more flexible.  And perhaps the married bishops would be willing to function as priests.  This is interesting.]

Before he became Pope, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger discussed the issue of married bishops in the 1990s during meetings of the Anglican Roman Catholic International Commission exploring unity, before the Anglican Church’s ordination of women priests derailed it.

One former Anglican priest who became a Catholic priest told The Record that the ideal end for the TAC would be to become the 28th Rite within the Catholic Church, along with the Eastern Churches, which have the same sacraments and are recognised by Rome.

The TAC’s request is the closest any section of the Anglican Church has ever come to full communion with Rome because the TAC has set no preconditions. Instead it has explicitly submitted itself entirely to the Holy See’s decisions.  [Okay… this should be the model for the SSPX.   This is why this is taking place so quickly.  No matter what, the Holy See should also offer to hear the concerns of the SSPX.  In the end, it is the attitude behind the approach that must make the difference.]

Six days prior to the October 11 meeting between TAC bishops and the Holy See – on October 5 – the TAC’s bishops, vicars-general of dioceses without bishops, and theological advisers who assisted in a plenary meeting signed a declaration of belief in the truth of the whole Catechism of the Catholic Church.

The declaration said, in part: “We accept that the most complete and authentic expression and application of the Catholic faith in this moment of time is found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and its Compendium, which we have signed, together with this letter as attesting to the faith we aspire to teach and hold.”

Statements about the seriousness of the division between the Anglican Communion and the Catholic Church caused by issues such as the ordination of women priests were emphasised at the wordwide Lambeth Conference held in the UK in 2008.

At the conference, three Catholic cardinals – Walter Kasper, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, the Archbishop of Westminster Cormac Murphy-O’Connor and the Prefect for the Vatican’s Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples, Ivan Dias, the Pope’s personal envoy, all addressed the issue.

Cardinal Dias, who favours welcoming traditionalist Anglicans into the Catholic Church, bluntly told the Anglican Communion’s 650 bishops that they are heading towards “spiritual Alzheimer’s” and “ecclesial Parkinson’s”. [Brilliant phrases!]

“By analogy, (Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s) symptoms can, at times, be found even in our own Christian communities. For example, when we live myopically in the fleeting present, oblivious of our past heritage and apostolic traditions, we could well be suffering from spiritual Alzheimer’s. And when we behave in a disorderly manner, going whimsically our own way without any co-ordination with the head or the other members of our community, it could be ecclesial Parkinson’s.”  [Well done.]

Cardinal Kasper warned Anglican bishops that Rome would turn to smaller ecumenical communities if the Anglican Communion at large proved unapproachable ecumenically.

This is bad news for the Anglican Communion, but good news for the TAC.

Posted in Brick by Brick |
58 Comments

Springfield, IL: regular TLM returns

Brick by heavy brick:

 I am happy to report that regular celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass will be returning to Springfield, Illinois. It will be the weekly Saturday (7 a.m.) Mass at Blessed Sacrament Parish (www.bsps.org) beginning this Saturday, January 31. This is all that our dear (and much overworked) pastor, Fr. David Hoefler, could do to begin with. And he can’t even say it himself. Despite his best efforts to learn to say it (he had two days of training last September by Institute of Christ the King, Sovereign Priest priests) he still is not ready, so he has arranged for an FSSP priest, former FSSP head Fr. Arnaud Devillers, to come over every week to say it.
 
As Fr. Devillers is assigned to Quincy, Illinois, more than two hours away, for him to come and say a 7 a.m. Mass is very generous of him.

Not much to start with, but as you say, brick by brick!! Please ask your blog readers to keep this in your prayers — and Fr. Hoefler. He is our sole priest and when I say he is overworked, he IS overworked.

Posted in Brick by Brick |
33 Comments

QUAERITUR: How long must we fast before Communion in a TLM?

From a reader:

When [receiving Holy Communion] in the Extraordinary Form Mass is one required to observe the older fast (as opposed to the 1 hour fast required for the OF)? 

If so, how many hours of fasting is required?

 

No.  You are not required to keep a Communion fast according to the old laws.  You are required to observe it according to the law presently in force.

The law at present, for Latins at least, says one hour before the reception of Communion.  That is, not before the beginning of Mass, but before Communion.

Of course you are free to do more than that.  In the old days, three hours became the length of time for the Eucharistic fast.  Before that, it was from midnight.  All this was changed.  The 1983 Code is in force now.

We must be properly disposed to receive. 

We are creatures of both soul and body.  Both need their disposition.

The spiritual disposition is being in the state of grace.

The physical disposition is fasting beforehand for the length of time determined necessary by the Church.

Holy Church would do well to return us to a three hour fast. 

Making it just a little harder might help people understand that what they are doing is important, and it has consequences.

A longer fast (i.e., making things just a little harder) would help to increase both our sense of the importance of the Eucharist and also our own need to be properly disposed, spiritually and physically, to receive. 

But no one has asked my input about that.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
35 Comments

QUAERITUR: How many times may I receive Communion in a day?

A reader in a comment under another entry asked a question about reception of Holy Communion.

Can [you] communicate twice if one Mass is 3rd Sunday of Ordinary Time and the second one is Conversion of St. Paul.

 

Yes.

For Latins the 1983 Code of Canon Law says:

Can. 917 – Qui sanctissimam Eucharistiam iam recepit, potest eam iterum eadem die suscipere solummodo intra eucharisticam celebrationem cui participat, salvo praescripto Can. 921, § 2. … Someone who has already received the Most Holy Eucharist can receive it again (iterum) on the same day only within the Eucharistic celebration in which the person participates, with due regard for the  prescription of can. 921 § 2.

Can. 921 § 2 says that if a person is in danger of death, he may receive Communion even it is not in the context of Mass.  That is Viaticum.

That iterum does not mean "again and again", but merely "again one more time".

So, say you were in the morning at some Communion service wherein you received Communion.  Later in the day you were while driving happy to stumble on a church where Mass was being celebrated.  You could receive Communion again (iterum) at that Mass.  However, if the opposite were the case, if you were at Mass in the morning and then stumbled into a Communion service at a priest-less parish in the afternoon, you could NOT receive again: it isn’t Mass.

The canon tries to walk the line between promoting frequent reception of the Eucharist and a superstitious or excessive frequency.  The key here is that the second time must be during a Mass, unless it is as Viaticum and you may not enter the Mass at some late point merely to receive.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
21 Comments