QUAERITUR: Seminary monitors seminarians’ email, surfing. Wherein Fr. Z administers tough love.

QUAERITUR: Seminary monitors seminarians' email, surfing. Wherein Fr. Z administers tough love.In the USA huge strides have been taken back toward sanity in the Catholic Church’s seminaries. The “biological solution” is having its way with the liberals and modernists who have dominated chanceries and seminaries for decades. Though some hang on and can still do a lot of harm out of spite as they spin down to their end, their time is effectively over in the USA.

This is not the case everywhere, however. There are some places where modernism still dominates most aspects of Church life, even with a strong dose of left-wing politics, even Marxism. This is still the case in Italy, for example.

Great steps back toward sanity have been taken, but we are not out of the trenches yet. Even after the formal end of WWII there was the problem of mopping up the partisans and die-hards.

We have been in a war. It takes a long time for wars to end.

From a reader:

Dear and Reverend Father,

If you wish to publish any of this email on your blog, please remove all references to the diocese (and perhaps even to [COUNTRY] if you think it is right).

An hour or so ago a friend spoke to a seminarian here in [PLACE]. Unlike many Seminaries in the rest of … and the rest of the world, the one here is full of traditionalists and is flourishing. The seminarian told my friend that ALL their internet access is logged and their incoming and outgoing emails are read. Those who have visited “traditionalist” sites have been warned that their chances of being ordained to the Priesthood are in jeopardy.

Our [bishop] likes to “keep in” with the trendies, although he’s not a trendy himself, deep down; however, the [important staff member] of the Seminary is a sworn enemy of the TLM and has publicly stated that the Holy Father “got it wrong” when he published Summorum Pontificum. The [bishop] sent his resignation letter to Rome, but he has been kept on for another two years. Even if he goes, the Priests with real power are those like the [staff member], in a Diocese where – it is said – something like 90% of the Priests are communists and they do everything they possibly can to stop the faithful going to the TLM.

What can be done? Leaving aside the fact that spying on people’s email is technically illegal in [country], [It might not be if you are using the seminary’s internet.] reporting the Bishop to the police would probably be the fastest way to leave the Seminary. Who should they report this to in Rome, and how should they go about it?

Thanking you in advance, dear and Reverend Father, for any help and advice you may be able to give,

Here is my tough love advice… and I’ll use “you”, because the men this is intended for will read it.

  • Keep your mouths shut.
  • Avoid using the seminary’s internet to look at anything other than neutral or liberal sites.
  • Cough up the dough to get a separate “dongle” for data for your laptops.
  • If several of you must pool resources to do that, do that, and then – discreetly – do the samizdat thing.
  • Use your hand-helds or phones for surfing good Catholic sites.
  • If you can’t find a way around their logging, or you can’t afford the data in that country (I know it is expensive), then either give up traditional sites when surfing or give up the internet completely!

Go silent and go deep.

Get ordained.

Back in the dark days of the 80’s when in my seminary to have a statue of Our Lady of Fatima or to say the rosary in public meant expulsion, I came up with the Six Rules of Seminary Survival. Where you are they may still pertain:

Rarely affirm.
Never deny.
Seldom make distinctions.
Smile a lot.
Say very little.
Never wear black.

In my day, it was as if we were officers-in-training, but in the military academy of the enemy.  That seems like the situation there.

This is what you must do: learn what these modernist oppressors have to teach, parrot it back to them, and read good books on your own, with a flashlight and shades drawn if necessary.

And if you have to give up the internet, then for the love of God and His Holy Church give it up.

Get ordained.

Your day will come.

There will be time after ordination to learn the TLM and build up that dimension of the formation they are – contrary to the Church’s law – cheating you out of.

For the sake of that day, be quiet and make sacrifices of your desire to surf around as you will.

If you have to, you can – believe me – hang by your thumbs until your hands are anointed.

Do not, by fighting or reacting suddenly, give those… aging-hippy modernists anything to beat you with.

Once you are ordained, with a joyful smile and in charity destroy their life’s work.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
113 Comments

ANNUNTIO VOBIS GAUDIUM MAGNUM! Habemus rivulum! (New iTunes feed available)

ANNUNTIO VOBIS GAUDIUM MAGNUM! Habemus rivulum! (New iTunes feed available)

I am very grateful to readers who whinged at me about the problem with my iTunes feed for my podcasts.  This lead me to gripe to you about it.  This lead to my posting a question.  This lead to comments and, eventually, help from my friend Fr. Jay Finelli, aka iPadre (go spike his stats now!).  Yesterday, through skype, we together hashed out the problems with my feed.

I now have a new iTunes feed which works.  I can now see multiple episodes.

In the past, in the old feed which you should now abandon, all my audio projects have been scrolling off as they scrolled off the blog’s front page.

The new feed is here.

If you have iTunes, dump the old subscription and resubscribe with the new.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, PODCAzT | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

One of the coolest measurements of all: Zettameters!

Learn something new everyday, is what I always say.

Today I learned that there is a zettameter, which is a sextillion 1021 meters and there is a yottameter, which is a septillion 1024 meters.

There is also, for really small stuff, a yoctometer!  This is for really small stuff.

And do you want to see something soooo cooool that it will make you… I mean… you’ll just… it’ll completely….

Just go HERE.

(Let it load.)

(Don’t be afraid.)

(Fr. Finigan posted about this a while back, but he didn’t talk about yoctometers.)

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , , ,
22 Comments

Bishop confirms 19 people at SSPX chapel. Can you say “Win Win Scenario”?

Bishop confirms 19 people at SSPX chapel. Can you say "Win Win Scenario"?Our friends at Rorate have publicized that a French bishop, Most. Rev. Jean Bonfils, Emeritus of Nice went to an SSPX chapel in Ajaccio, Corsica and administered the sacrament of Confirmation to 19 people.

It seems that the local SSPX priest was on his way out of the SSPX door and that Bp. Bonfils did not have anything worked out with the SSPX Superior Bp. Fellay. The SSPX priest was working out incardination in a diocese.

That said, about a zillion people have emailed me asking my take on this.

My initial thought was, “OUTSTANDING! We need more of this!”

My second thought was, “OUTSTANDING! We need more of this!”

Then I consulted a canon lawyer to find out if there was something I might have over looked in my enthusiasm.

Here is a response I received back from the canonist (My usual stuff added.):

This would seem to be something of a canonical win-win situation for the bishop and the faithful. The bishop (-then administrator) of the diocese confirmed members of his faithful [they are his faithful even if they never go to a regular church] who had been duly prepared for the sacrament. The use of the Extraordinary Form for administering confirmation is clearly an option for bishops since Universae Ecclesiae. According to canon 881, the sacrament of confirmation ordinarily is to be celebrated in a church, which might give rise to the question of whether the SSPX church is indeed a “church” according to the law (cf. canons 1214 and 1215). However, canon 881 extends permission for confirmation to be celebrated “for a just and reasonable cause…in any fitting place,” so that question is, with regards to this question, a merely academic one.

I have long thought it to be a failing of most diocesan bishops to omit proper sollicitude for the clergy and the faithful who attend the SSPX chapels in their diocese. [Do I hear an “Amen!”?] Regardless of the irregular erection of some of these chapels and the irregular status of their clergy, the faithful remain subject to the diocesan bishop, who is bound to care for them. [Do I hear another “Amen!”? … QUAERITUR:] How many priests and faithful would be brought back to unquestionably full communion with the Church if the local pastors started acting more like Bishop Bonfils, or even bolder – just showing up appropriately vested ten minutes before Mass (leaving too-little time for the chain of command to issue a bureaucratic refusal) and even merely sitting in choir during the Mass. [OORAH!] Or inviting the SSPX priests to dinner at the bishop’s house (or a neutral site, if they are particularly paranoid – some of which are with good reason). One of the taglines that gets pushed at every parish and diocesan seminar seems to be “creating a welcoming community” – how have we done in welcoming the SSPX clergy and the faithful who go to their chapels back into a more regular status with the Church? Seems to me that this action of Bishop Bonfils seems to go a long way.

Just a few more canonical details – I hope that Bishop Bonfils makes certain that these confirmations are registered in the sacramental books of the territorial parish which covers the area where the SSPX chapel is or the diocesan curia, and that he’s made certain that the notices have been sent to the baptismal churches of the faithful who were confirmed so that the appropriate notations can be made (c. 894)

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, Universae Ecclesiae, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , , ,
26 Comments

WDTPRS Monday 4th Week of Lent – Oratio super populum

The 3rd edition of the Missale Romanum restored the Lenten “Prayer over the people”.  I haven’t given them much play this Lent so far, even though this is the first year that they are used in English because of the new, corrected ICEL translation.  I could look at them more frequently if people are interested.

If you go to daily Mass in the Novus Ordo in English, are your priests using this prayer?   I don’t believe it is an option.

The prayer today, however, has a Latin problem.

ORATIO SUPER POPULUM:
Plebem tuam, Domine, quaesumus,
interius exteriusque restaura,
ut quam corporeis non vis delectationibus impedire,
[sic – ALARM BELLS!]
spiritali facias vigere proposito.

The Veronese Sacramentary has this prayer for the month of September for the anniversary of the consecration of the bishop.  It is also listed as a prayer for Thursday of the 4th week of Lent for Vespers in the Fulda and the Prayer over the people for Saturday of the 4th week in some manuscripts.  It was longer, however: continuing… et sic rebus foveas transituris ut tribuas potius inhaerere perpetuis….

Propositum, from propono, can be “a plan, intention, design, resolution, purpose”, and even first premise of an argument, and sometimes the main point of an argument.  But there is yet another, less common, understanding: “a way, manner, or course of life”.

Impedire… hmmm… infinitive.  Really?

Impedio is ” to entangle, ensnare, to shackle, hamper, hinder, hold fast”.  The root idea is that feet “pedes” are impeded.  It doesn’t seem reasonable that God would ever desire to impede His own people, so we need to understand that impedio in a different way.

“But Father! But Father!”, you are doubtlessly shouting by now.  “What would you say if you change one letter?  Could that be the passive infinitive impediri?  That would make more sense!”

It would make a great deal more sense to have a passive infinitive, impediri.

And indeed that it precisely what it is in the Liber Sacramentorum Engloismensis.  In the Gellonensis it is impedire but the Gellonensis also has “vegitare“.   This is a mess.

The Engolismensis is doubtlessly correct.  Haudquaquam dubitandum’st.

The version appearing in the 3rd edition of the Missale Romanum is wrong.  I don’t have a corrected Latin edition, but we do have the new ICEL version for an indirect confirmation.

SUPER SLAVISHLY LITERAL VERSION:
Restore Your people, O Lord, we beg,
inwardly and outwardly,
so that that (people) which You do not desire to be entangled in corporeal delectations,
You may cause to thrive by a spiritual course of life
.

NEW CORRECTED ICEL (2011):
Renew your people within and without, O Lord,
and, since it is your will
that they be unhindered by bodily delights,
give them, we pray,
perseverance in their spiritual intent
.

That idea of “entangle feet” and “course of life” suggest forward movement thwarted.

Another understanding of impedio concerns being entangled in an amorous way.  This can give a deeper sense to the delectationes down the line.  If you allow your heart and mind to dwell on some created thing, something other than God, you get entangled in a kind of adultery.  The biblical image of fornication is used for God’s people (plebs) when they were unfaithful to Him.  Entangled feet indeed.

Posted in LENT, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS | Tagged , , ,
15 Comments

Of Ordinariates, the SSPX, and the gravitational pull

Of Ordinariates, the SSPX, and the gravitational pullBenedict XVI, the Pope of Christian Unity, has made it possible by his provision in Anglicanorum coetibus, for Anglicans to enter into Holy Church in new Ordinariates.  Their liturgical traditions are being codified and approved by the Holy See and implemented.  As my friend Fr. Blake points out:

Perhaps the deepest liturgical changes are those which affect the calendar, so it is interesting that Rome’s latest moves on the liturgical front is to restore the more ancient usage, but for the Ordinariate.

  • As in England, Ordinary Time will no longer be referred to, being replaced by Sundays after Epiphany or Sundays after Trinity, [The later is an Anglican thing.  Romans talk about Sundays after Pentecost.] thus ensuring the whole liturgical year is now explicitly anchored and referenced to the mysteries of salvation.
  • The three “-gesima” Sundays are restored.
  • Rogation days before Ascension, and the Ember days in the four seasons of the year are restored.
  • The Octave of Pentecost is restored, [Huzzah! Huzzay!  See my PODCAzTs about the Octave.] to be marked properly except for the readings which will be of the particular weekday.

Already the Ordinariate have announced its liturgy should be eastward facing.

The liturgical rites of the Ordinariate will exert a “Gravitational Pull” on the rites of the Roman Church.

Imagine what impact the influx of priests of the SSPX could have on the revitalization of our liturgical worship?

The establishment of Ordinariates for Anglicans simply has herald what would be possible for the SSPXers.

I have a sensation in my bones, much as I do when weather changes, that something might be coming along soon from the Holy See about the SSPX.  May I ask you to stop and say a prayer NOW for they reconciliation as a group?

Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary,
that never was it known that anyone who fled to Thy protection,
implored Thy help or sought Thy intercession,
was left unaided.
Inspired by this confidence,
I fly unto Thee, O Virgin of virgins, my Mother;
to Thee do I come, before Thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful.
O Mother of the Word Incarnate,
despise not my petition,
but in Thy mercy hear and answer me.
Amen.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , , , , , ,
59 Comments

Cellphones, Church, Hell and You

I have actually seen with my own eyes a priest answer his phone during Mass.

What shall his fate be?  I shudder as I ponder.

In the meantime, enjoy this.  Then go vote for WDTPRS.

[wp_youtube]D2_c81Nnsc0[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
45 Comments

Pope Benedict: “Each confession … a step forward for new evangelization.” Wherein Fr. Z rants.

Pope Benedict: “Each confession ... a step forward for new evangelization.” Wherein Fr. Z rants.Every personal sin drags down the entire human race.

Every sacramental reconciliation helps to build us up.

We are in this together.

I have incessantly hollered that no initiative of renewal (New Evangelization, etc.) will succeed if we do not revitalize our liturgical worship.  (Thank God and Pope Benedict for Summorum Pontificum.)

This means, principally, our liturgical worship which is Holy Mass must be revitalized. However, to participate at Holy Mass with the culmination of active participation, which is the reception of Communion, we must be in the state of grace.

Therefore, the Sacrament of Penance must be revitalized.

Use of, celebration of the Sacrament of Penance, is a liturgical action, a form of worship of Almighty God. The Sacrament of Penance must also be revitalized if any other effort to renew Holy Church is going to succeed.

Check out this story from CNA:

Vatican City, Mar 9, 2012 / 04:20 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Confession and true conversion of people’s hearts is the “motor” of all reform and an authentic “force for evangelization,” Pope Benedict XVI told a gathering of priests and deacons March 9.

The Pope reflected on confession in an address to 1,300 participants [Holy Cow!  This course has grown over the years.  I took it several times. Repetita iuvant.] in the Apostolic Penitentiary’s annual course on the “internal forum,” a technical term for the area of personal conscience and judgment in the priest-penitent relationship.

In a novel speech, he connected the New Evangelization and confession, saying that the effort to spread the Gospel draws life from “the sanctity of the sons and daughters of the Church, from the daily process of individual and community conversion, conforming itself ever more profoundly to Christ.”  [This is precisely what I have been talking about in regard to revitalization of our liturgical worship, especially of Holy Mass.]

“Thus each confession, from which each Christian will emerge renewed, will represent a step forward for new evangelization.”

Priests are also able to become collaborators in the New Evangelization by hearing confessions, the Pope said. They have as many possible “new beginnings” as sinners they encounter, he noted, because those who truly experience the mercy of Christ in confession will become “credible witnesses of sanctity.”  [What I have been shouting for years is that we need a revitalization of liturgical worship in order to know who we are as Catholics.  If we don’t know who we are, we have nothing of value to contribute in the public square.  Our words and deeds won’t have the authority of being authentic, of being channels as it were of Christ’s own words and deeds.  Christ has no hands and feet on earth but ours.  This is also why I have been hammering away at the need to restore the Sacrament of Penance to its proper use.]

Pope Benedict also reflected on what happens spiritually during the sacrament of confession. The repentant sinner is “justified, forgiven and sanctified,” thanks to the divine mercy, which is the “only adequate response” to humankind’s need for the infinite, he said.

The forgiveness of sins has a direct impact on efforts to spread the Gospel, he explained, pointing out that only those “who allow themselves to be profoundly renewed by divine grace can internalize and therefore announce the novelty of the Gospel.” [There it is!]

The Pope also had some words for priests who hear confessions. He stressed the importance of spiritual and canonical preparation, [CANONICAL!  Get that?  We priests need to know the law well and know how to have recourse to proper authority when certain cases arise.] and reminded them that priests must be the first to renew an awareness of themselves as sinners who need sacramental forgiveness to renew their encounter with Christ. [My Jesus, mercy.]

He finished his talk by urging his fellow priests to always make “novelty of Christ” the focus of their priestly lives so that others will see Christ in them.

Reverend Bishops, Brother Priests… for the love of God and neighbor and for the sake of your future and impending judgment before God’s face, hear confessions, preach about confessions, make your own confessions.

A few final points.

Lay people:

  • In the Sacrament of Penance Christ Himself, through the priest who acts in Christ’s own Person, forgives your sins.
  • The Sacrament of Penance is the ordinary means of forgiveness of sins which Christ Himself intended for us all to use.
  • There is no sin that we little mortals can commit which God, in His infinite power and mercy, cannot and will not forgive if we are sorry, we confess it, and we receive absolution.
  • In the Sacrament of Penance, our sins are taken away.  They are not just covered over or set aside.  They are gone, removed, eradicated.  We will remember them and we need to do penance out of justice in reparation for them, but they will not be held against us in our judgement.
  • You are going to die one day and you will be judged.  This life is your time to prepare for that and the Sacrament of Penance is how Christ Himself wanted us to approach Him for forgiveness.  That is why He instituted the Sacrament of Penance: so that we would use it.

Bishops and Priests:

  • You are sinners who need to use the Sacrament of Penance.  Go to confession often.
  • You were ordained to say Mass and to forgive sins.  Hear confessions according to the offices you have been given.
  • You were ordained to help as many people as possible avoid hell and get to heaven.  Hear confessions.  Teach about the sacrament.
  • You are going to die go before your Judge not just as any ordinary person, but as a priest, forever. You will remain a priest in heaven or in hell and your reward will be proportioned to what you have been given, how you have used that gift, and how you have loved in response to God’s gift.  Hear confessions.
  • If you don’t willingly hear confessions and teach about the importance of the sacrament – according to the mandate you have been given – your judgment will be harsh. Hear confessions.
Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , ,
16 Comments

QUAERITUR: Holy Thursday Mandatum and female feet. Wherein advice is sought and Fr. Z ranteth.

foot-washingFrom a reader:

As it is Lent, it is undoubtedly time to ask the question of women having their feet washed on Holy Thursday.  I am well aware (from reading your blog) that it is contrary to law and custom to have women have their feet washed during the Mandatum on Holy Thursday.  However, I am somewhat deficient in cite-able resources to support this claim, particularly with the recent translational corrections to the Roman Missal that I haven’t yet studied in-depth.

Apparently, our pastor is considering opening up this year’s rite to include women for, as you may have guessed, reasons of “hospitality”, “inclusivity”, and “pastoral” reasons. [Dreadful reasons.]  Several of us young (20s-30s), conservative members of the parish would like to respectfully present a case to our pastor expressing why we find this practice to be distasteful, and would like to have concrete references to cite when doing so.

Can you offer any guidance?  I wish not to speak for myself or my own opinion, but rather that of Holy Church and Her sacred traditions.

First, if you have something to say to the pastor, make an appointment and go say it!  Respectfully, with a smile, and briefly.

This whole debate has been cleared up more than once by the Holy See, especially in the 1988 document Paschales solemnitatis of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments.

Moreover, the rubrics of the 2002 Missale Romanum retain the viri selecti.  Viri cannot include “females”.  Viri is an exclusive term.

I don’t believe any Conference of Bishops has ever received explicit approval from the Holy See for a variation, and only the Holy See can do that.

Conferences of bishops, individual bishops, and pastors all lack the authority to change this on their own.

To do it is wrong.

ADVICE:

QUAERITUR: Holy Thursday Mandatum and female feet. Wherein advice is sought and Fr. Z ranteth.

Click to buy!

When you go to meet with the pastor, take several Say The Black Do The Red coffee mugs, with one for the pastor as a gift.

Also, you might take a big thermos of Mystic Monk Coffee!

Mystic Monk, roasted and shipped by Carmelite MEN – viri – in Wyoming, is sure to put the pastor in a good frame of mind.

Mystic Monk Coffee, administered regularly and in large quantities helps priests to see reason.

Take it from me!

I’m a priest, I drink Mystic Monk Coffee in large quantities regularly, and I am exceptionally reasonable!  No liturgical abuses from me.

Therefore, I promise that, if enough people buy enough Mystic Monk Coffee, all liturgical abuses will end!

QUAERITUR: Holy Thursday Mandatum and female feet. Wherein advice is sought and Fr. Z ranteth.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , , , ,
42 Comments

The stupidest question ever asked a bishop by a newsie?

If this isn’t the stupidest question I have ever heard a newsie ask a bishop, it is near the top of the lift.

CNN’s Kyra Phillips asks:

Phillips: So, Bishop, times are changing. Views are changing. You’re changing your tactics even. Or your – I guess you say your strategy. So, why not get on board with the 43 percent of Catholics?

Bishop Malone: The 43 percent who –

Phillips: Who have no problem with gay marriage.

[This is the point at which, were I being interviewed, a viewer might actually see the animated cartoon question marks shooting out of my head.]

Bishop Malone: Well their thinking is outside the realm of Catholic teaching for 2,000 years. And those are the folks that we want to focus on so they’ll perhaps be able to have what I would call an intellectual conversion about a very key building-block of society, that is the nature of marriage as the union of one man, one woman.

(I am not making this up):

43%! Not 86% or even 50%!

(It would still be wrong even if dead people in Chicago made it 105%)

Biretta tip to Peters fils.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Lighter fare |
26 Comments