TLM with female servers… not just a theory? FACT.

A while ago Cardinal Burke, not a slouch when it comes to the Church’s law, made a statement about head coverings for women in church for Mass.  In a nutshell, he said that, while the present Code of Canon Law, does not impose an obligation, with we are talking about the Extraordinary Form, it is good to go by the practices in use at the time when the Extraordinary Form was the Only Form.  This should apply also to practices such as how to receive Holy Communion: at the TLM receive on the tongue while kneeling, even though the law in the place me permit Communion in the hand.

It just makes sense.  Frankly I think that Communion on the tongue while kneeling makes sense all the time, but I digress.

There are some things which, though not strictly against the law, are simply inimical to the law’s spirit.

I received more than one note about this.

I was told yesterday that in England a priest was planning to have Holy Mass in the Extraordinary Form with female servers.

It seems to me that this is a really bad idea and deeply offensive to the sensibilities of those who revere the older form of Holy Mass.  It is hard to imagine that this is true.

UPDATE 8 May 1305 GMT:

I had first received information which was at the level of a rumor and so I anonymized the top entry.  But… now… it isn’t rumor anymore:

I had two notes…

Dear Fr Zuhlsdorf,
I am sorry to confirm the rumour about the developments at Fisher House in Cambridge. As a result of te decisions to have female servers in the Extraordinary Form all servers who have been helping with the Masses in the Extraordinary Form in Fisher house have resigned; the congregation was much smaller than usual because some of the faithful (like me) decided not to come (and probably also because of lacking information on the Mass schedule, so it was not only out of protest), and some people left during the Mass. As someone who has been deeply involved in the liturgical life of Fisher House …  I am very sorry about this development, and I hope that Ecclesia Dei will reply speedily to resolve the matter (I have written to them twice last year, when then chaplain first mooted this idea, but still have not received any official reply). However, I would like to stress that the Fr Alban has been an exemplary chaplain to Cambridge University, ….

And this…

Dr Kevin Marshall, the LMS representative, says the Mass occurred, although he left after the kyrie.   There were two male servers and one female.  The congregation was about twelve (slightly less than half the normal size) and, for the most part, a completely different crowd.  At least two people walked out.

I am sure that some of the more traditional mind-set will have a nutty about this and lose all ability to self-edit.  I urge you not to have a nutty.

Observations:

Take a lesson: If priests want to get rid of something, they sometimes will make that something a very unpleasant experience.  If they want to get rid of the Extraordinary Form, they need only do stupid stunts like this.  Therefore, keep a cool head.

If you write letters to anyone, review my tips for writing.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , ,
92 Comments

WDTPRS: 3rd Sunday of Easter – COLLECT (2002MR): restored in the glory of spiritual adoption

COLLECT: (2002 Missale Romanum):
Semper exsultet populus tuus, Deus,
renovata animae iuventute,
ut, qui nunc laetatur in adoptionis se gloriam restitutum,
resurrectionis diem spe certae gratulationis exspectet.

The genitives, adoptionis…resurrectionis… gratulationis, give the end of this collect a very cohesive feeling.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
O God, let your people always rejoice,
now that the youth of their spirit has been renewed,
so that, he who now rejoices that he has been restored in the glory of spiritual adoption
may await the day of the resurrection in the hope of sure thanksgiving.

We have an elegantly scrambled word order in the second part: qui nunc laetatur in adoptionis se gloriam restitutum, the infinitive esse being understood… laetatur se restitutum (esse) in gloriam adoptionis. The slightly odd wording puts a special emphasis on the word gloria.

This gives weight to a connection I will make to another famous Easter Latin prayer.

But first some vocabulary!

Adoptio of course is “adoption” in the sense of “to take as one’s child.” We find the phrase adoptionem filiorum Dei … “adoption of the sons of God” in the Latin Vulgate of Jerome (Romans 8,23; Gal 4,5; Eph 1,5). Gratulatio means “a manifestation of joy; a wishing joy, congratulation; a rejoicing, joy and also “a religious festival of joy and thanksgiving, a public thanksgiving.”

Now for the connection I mentioned above.

I wonder if there is not a conscious attempt on the part of the Church, now that Easter and its octave have passed, to remind us of the Easter Vigil.

Maybe we are being reminded that in the Easter season Easter itself is truly being extended. I guess at this because of the words exsultet and adoptio.

On the Vigil of Easter the great hymn of the diaconate was sung, the Praeconium Paschale or Exsultet. Composed perhaps as early as the fifth century and maybe in parts going back to St. Ambrose himself, this hymn (or lucernarium) came into the Roman tradition through a ninth century addition to the so-called Gregorian Sacramentary.

After the preparation of the Paschal candle and the procession to the sanctuary, dressed in his dalmatic the deacon asks a blessing from the priest/celebrant as if he were about to read the Gospel. He incenses the Paschal candle, or “Christ Candle” as it is often called. He begins the hymn much as if he were singing a Preface (Sursum corda! “Up with your hearts!”) He invites the vast array of heavenly angels to join him in praising Christ symbolized in the candle that is lit at the beginning of the Vigil liturgy.

This is a long text: sung at a normal pace the Exsultet is about ten minutes in duration. It has many beautiful and evocative images. In the medieval Church, the text was written out elegantly on long parchment rolls, with large beautiful pictures painted on it depicting the mysteries and imagery being sung. They were painted upside down, so that as the deacon sang and unrolled the scroll over the back of the ambo, the people could see the images right-side up.

The text is a long meditation on the candle as it symbolizes Christ, risen gloriously, and how He has saved humanity from sin. The famous phrase O felix culpa is found here, “O happy fault that merited so to have so great a redeemer.” Also, many times the hymn refers to the amazing nature of the night itself, during which Christ rose. There are constant contrasts of light and darkness.

One of the images of meditation in the Exsultet concerns the flame of the candle itself: the wax which nourishes the divided and yet undiminished flame of the candle is identified as the work of bees.

Above I explained that adoptio is a “spiritual adoption” in the sense of the effects of baptism making us members of the risen Christ and children of the loving Father. Adoptio is also used in a transferred sense, as The Lewis & Short Dictionary informs us, for the “admission of a bee into a new hive.” This is a classical Latin usage.

However, we must remember that these prayers, Christian though they may be, come forth from a deep culture formed and permeated in great part by two thousand years of Latin literature. The well-read will remember images and interesting usages of words from classical literature and weave them into what they compose in a conscious way. This connection with the roots of Western literature is all the more reason to provide the English speaking faithful with truly accurate and beautiful translations of the Latin prayers in the Missale Romanum.

LAME-DUCK ICEL:
God our Father,
may we look forward with hope to our resurrection,
for you have made us your sons and daughters,
and restored the joy of our youth.

This prayer touches themes found in the Latin. It eliminates what I consider a necessary reference to glory. Of course, in the Latin prayer, the word gloria is clearly present. But gloria, which I have explained in previous offerings of WDTPRS, is also that dynamic transforming power by which God will make us more and more “godlike” in the life to come. Easter is very much about gloria. Christ reigns now in glory because of the resurrection. We can share that glory because He is risen.

Another thing that might be worth mentioning is a possible connection between the theme of restored “youth” and the Psalm that the priest would say always at the beginning of Mass: Introibo ad altare Dei, ad Deum qui laetificat iuventutem meam…. “I will go unto the altar of God, of God who makes my youth joyful.” In baptism we are made members of Christ’s own mystical Person. While there is a clear qualitative distinction between the priesthood of the ordained priest and that of the baptized laity, this idea of youthful and renewed priesthood is part of our Easter joy. All of us, ordained and lay, each in our own way must in the manner of a priest offer our spiritual sacrifices to the Father, uniting them to those of Jesus our High Priest. In Him, we therefore already share that eternally youthful life that will never age. We will one day be risen and glorious, with glorified bodies that will not know age or deficiency and will reflect the beauty of the purified soul. Easter and indeed our own baptism anticipate this glory.

But the lame-duck ICEL eliminated “glory”.

NEW CORRECTED ICEL:
May your people exult for ever, O God,
in renewed youthfulness of spirit,
so that, rejoicing now in the restored glory of our adoption,
we may look forward in confident hope
to the rejoicing of the day of resurrection
.

Better? You decide.

Posted in WDTPRS | Tagged ,
4 Comments

QUAERITUR: When there is no Mass for Sunday

From a reader:

I was just reading my parish’s bulletin and noticed that next week
there is no Mass on Saturday or Sunday because the priest is away.
Instead the deacon is leading a Liturgy of the Word with a Communion Service in place of the Masses.

I live in a city that’s sufficiently large enough (around 20 Latin
Rite parishes, and a number of Eastern Rite Churches) that the vast
majority of parishoners could attend an actual Mass or Divine Liturgy on either day without any trouble.

This made me wonder if attending a Liturgy of the Word with a
Communion Service when one can easily attend a Mass at another parish a few kilometers away would count as fulfilling one’s Sunday
Obligation? Does it have to be an actual Mass?

People are not bound to something that they cannot fulfill. If there is no Mass within a reasonable distance, then you cannot fulfill your obligation and therefore, you are not at fault.

That said, should a person chose to make a bit of a sacrifice, it would be commendable to drive somewhere more distant.  Perhaps such a person could from goodness take someone with you.

In any event, Sunday remains the Lord’s Day, and divine positive law holds us always.

In your case, it is not hard to get to another Church for Mass.  I would go to Mass elsewhere on Sunday rather than go to some liturgy of the word and Communion service.  How dreadful.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915 | Tagged ,
33 Comments

Thanks from Fr. Z for your PROTESTS

I spent a good deal of time today writing notes of thanks to people who sent in a PROTEST DONATION against the Fishwrap.

I have also added the following names to the list of those for whom I will be saying Mass.

VD, TMcN, TC, LR, FA, MP, DK, HE, MZ, NB, AB, IFA, CG, CDF,KK, T&TS, BK, ACW, RM, PC, MM, BB, Fr. RB, VR, LF, SA,  CR, JK, MPP, CM, AS, MSO – TS,  RT, BT, EE, ML, HM, RM, DB, JCR, AM, GE, MD, CB, RL, WC, NS, CK3, MP, PP

Since donations are still coming, I will also say Mass again for benefactors on Monday.

Some of the notes people added to the form when they sent the donations have been very touching. They ask me to pray for certain things, such as loved ones who are sick, to find jobs, for their own vocations.

In the meantime, Mrs. Grosbeak (left), the first I have seen this season, thinks you should still keep sending donation!

And White-Crowned Sparrow (right) looks on.

However, Mrs. Grosbeak took exception to something.  Perhaps a suggestion that Fishwrap really wasn’t all that bad.  It is.

UPDATE 8 May 0344 GMT:
I have had some very nice notes from people in the last few days, along with many requests for prayers.  Here was a nice piece of feedback:
Fr. Z, I read your blog daily; I have not only learned a whole lot, but the regular reading has strengthened my faith, hundred-fold. Your ministry has also allowed me to approach the pastor of my parish with confidence in topics associated with the liturgy. You will be glad to know that I not only have been doing more frequent (and better) confessions, but have been able to bring one person back into this good practice. For these – and many other benefits to my spiritual life – I am happy to make this donation! P.
Then my work here is done.
Posted in The Feeder Feed | Tagged
Comments Off on Thanks from Fr. Z for your PROTESTS

QUAERITUR: shaking down the Lord

From a reader:

At the Holy Thursday night mass, there were more hosts than would easily fit into the three ciboria. The deacon held the tops down and gave each one a vigorous shake. When this didn’t quite do it he repeated it. Six great shakes in all. I thought our Lord might throw up or certainly become dizzy. Is it ok to do this?

Yes.  Though priests should always be careful about how much of either Hosts or the Precious Blood they consecrate, so that there is not too much which must be reserved.

Jesus doesn’t get dizzy anymore.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

TGIF

A few minutes of what the Italians call “un pò di relax”.

20110506-070544.jpg

Fr. Z's Soon To Be Replaced Glasses

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
20 Comments

Of bishops, birds and shotguns

A reader alerted me to a blog post by His Excellency Most Rev. Paul D. Etienne, Bishop of Cheyenne in Wyoming. We have seen His Excellency before when he was with the gun-totin’ Mystic Monks, the Carmelites whose coffee I peddle.

Buy some coffee NOW. You need to refresh your coffee supply, don’t you?

Bp. Etienne hunts turkeys:

After what seemed like a long time, I thought the game was up, so I crawled to the edge to see what if anything was going on.  As luck would have it, there was a good group there, and of course, I “busted” them.  Game over.  However, they had crossed the stream, and started heading back in the direction I came from.

So, I got above them on a nice field, and moved as fast as I could to try to cut them off.  After a lengthy stretch, little did I know, the birds were still ahead of me.  As I came through a large section of brush, I saw something move off to my right, and there was a large group of Toms slowly feeding.  So, I picked the closest one. .  . now I’ll be feeding on him!

WDTPRS KUDOS to Bp. Etienne.

I will remind you that the excellent Wyoming Catholic College is in the confines the Diocese of Cheyenne.

Click HERE and go spike the bishop’s blog stats!

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool, Linking Back | Tagged , , , ,
12 Comments

THANKS TO PROTESTERS!

As St. Augustine said in s. 238, a vigorous sermon preached during the Octave of Easter about heretic errors:

Nemo tibi fabulas uendat, non latret rabies haereticorum de angulo.

Thank many readers and donors for the signs of support for WDTPRS and, just as important, marks of protest against the Fishwrap, which – according to a recent editorial – is proud of their promotion of heresy.  They fancy themselves to be “watchdogs”.  But they are proud of promoting support of women’s ordination, artificial contraception, homsexual marriage, etc.  That’s more than being a “watchdog” and therein lies the problem.  Many of the things the write we can simply disagree about.  But on some issues, they are simply heretical.

I don’t mind watchdogs, but I do mind them when they are infected with rabies, a nasty condition which their bite passes on.

They wrote:

[Bp. Charles Helmsing of Kansas City-St. Joseph years ago] moved to have the word “Catholic” removed from our banner. He tried to shut us down. Emergency board meetings were held, compromises considered (I know because I’ve read the minutes). But it soon became clear that NCR had moved beyond the need for an episcopal imprimatur. We kept publishing, Catholics kept subscribing, and we’re still here.

So is rabies, I’m afraid.  Still around.

Here is a list of the initials of those who have recently sent donations.

HE, CB, DG, BKC, FH, EC, LL, WH, RL, AN, BJ, SW, MPO,
JN, KW, CO, MM, JP, LF, MT, MAR, VR, NS, DT, CC, VS, CC,
RC, TM, DM, DG, MR, CB, TS, CL, SL, MF, JC, JC, PF, GM, RS,
JC, JP, DM, PM, JS, CT, PK, JB, BP, DH, DC, KT, WR, JH, DS,
JC, RH, AH, KGA, LQ, DH, JC, RS, DS, RA, KB, RS, JE, DH, MC,
MH, RK, MP, CS, BAH, DT, TM, ZB, MY, SS, BE, DS, BE, DS, AE,
JL, PF, EP, SB, JV, NS, KP, BW, CW, CH, LH, FH, JB, MBD, iga,
GL, JK, JD, HPH, ML, JPP, MC, CS, SC, PS, KS, PG, MK, SS, CF,
MJ, DM, AT, SG, ED, JFD, JL, ELj, BVB, PS, SG, RT, MHW,
JF, BKC, WvZ, KT, JN, RJ, DE, JG, DL, GM, VB

These are the people… people, behind each set of initials… who have sent signs of support, each one giving a little boost.  And, though these are only initials, since I am a representative of the “Temple Police” I have taken down NAMES.

I will remember those names when I say Mass for benefactors, my pleasure and duty.

I have been trying to write a short note to every protestor.  I hope so many of you will send $5 (or more) that you force me to beg you to be excused.  Go ahead… I dare you.

Furthermore, many people added, with their donations, a request for a prayer for some intention dear to them.  I stop at the moment and say a prayer for that intention.  This is all very electronic and mediated through screens, but, as St. Augustine said, where there is charity there are no distances.

Also, a new volume of Augustine’s sermons came today, the long-lost and long-awaited vol. III/4 I thought I would never see.  The sender also sent a volume of the Exposition of the Psalms.  Thank you GPF.  CAS sent a DVD of The Natural and KS sent The King’s Speech.

One of the fruits of your donations is that, today, I will go get new glasses which I very much need.  And they won’t have rose-colored lenses.

So… let me put the bite on you now.  Keep protesting!

UPDATE: 7 May 0103 GMT:
From a donor and noble certain athlete and scholar protester:
I’ll take you up on your dare, Father. Consider this a thank you for what you do. I’ve been remiss in sending in donations to help support your efforts. But, I can’t not let a dare (hey, I lived in the Bronx, after all) just sit there. God bless. B

HAH! Say I.

Do your worst.  I can take it.  Donate.  Just keep donating.  I can write those notes.  HAH!  I laugh.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on THANKS TO PROTESTERS!

Benedict XVI and the tension of liturgical “traditio” and “progressio”

On VIS there is a summary and in the pages of L’Osservatore Romano there is the Italian text, which the same paper featured as its front page story today.

Pope Benedict gave a talk to the Ninth International Congress on the Liturgy sponsored by the Pontifical Liturgical Institute of Rome’s St. Anselm Pontifical Athenaeum, on the fiftieth anniversary of its foundation.  My emphases and comments.  It starts with the usual opening remarks blah blah.

CHURCH’S LITURGY GOES BEYOND CONCILIAR REFORM
VATICAN CITY, 6 MAY 2011 (VIS) – Today the Holy Father received participants in the Ninth International Congress on the Liturgy sponsored by the Pontifical Liturgical Institute of Rome’s St. Anselm Pontifical Athenaeum, on the fiftieth anniversary of its foundation.

The Pope recalled that “Blessed John XXIII, recognizing the requests of the liturgical movement that sought to give new impetus and a new spirit to the Church’s prayer, shortly before Vatican Council II and during its celebration, asked the faculty of Benedictines on the Aventine Hill to establish a center for study and research to ensure a solid basis for conciliar liturgical reform”.

Referring to the title chosen for the congress: “The Pontifical Liturgical Institute: Between Memory and Prophecy”, the Pope said that the “‘memory’ pertains to the very life of the Institute that has offered its contribution to the Church dedicated to the reception of the Second Vatican Council over fifty years of academic liturgical formation”.

[You were, perhaps, waiting for something more interesting…]

Benedict XVI highlighted that, “with the term ‘prophecy’, our gaze opens to new horizons. The Liturgy of the Church goes beyond the ‘conciliar reform’, [pay attention… ] the objective of which in fact was not mainly to change the rites and texts but rather to renew the mentality and to put the celebration of Christ’s paschal mystery at the center of Christian life and pastoral work. [There’s more…] Unfortunately the liturgy has perhaps been seen – even by us, pastors and experts – more as an object to reform than a subject capable of renewing Christian life, [Get that?  It became the “object” when it was supposed to be the “subject”.] seeing that “a very close and organic bond exists between the renewal of the liturgy and the renewal of the whole life of the Church“.  [From the onset of the pontificate I have argue that central to Pope Benedict’s vision was a renewal of Catholic identity, and that renewal required a proper liturgical praxis in continuity, not rupture, with our tradition.  This is how the Council should be read.  This is how our liturgical worship should be conducted.]

“The liturgy, … lives a proper and constant relationship between sound ‘traditio’ and legitimate ‘progressio’, clearly seen by the conciliar constitution Sancrosanctum Concilium at paragraph 23. … Not infrequently are tradition and progress in awkward opposition. Actually though, the two concepts are interwoven: tradition is a living reality that, in itself, includes the principle of development, of progress”.  [The core of SC 23 reads: “That sound tradition may be retained, and yet the way remain open to legitimate progress….” and “Finally, there must be no innovations unless the good of the Church genuinely and certainly requires them; and care must be taken that any new forms adopted should in some way grow organically from forms already existing.”]

[…]

The concluding remarks are the usual blah blah.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , ,
3 Comments

QUAERITUR: Why is Gregorian chant better than “Gather Us In?”

From a reader:

Forgive me my ignorance – I am a relatively new Catholic, coming from the Methodist tradition. Why is Gregorian Chant more appropriate for Mass than “Gather Us In?” I like “Gather Us In.” It is singable even for the unmusical among us, and it reminds us that Jesus calls each of us by name.

As a preamble, music for liturgical worship is not a mere add on or decoration.  It is liturgical worship.  Therefore the texts used should be sacred texts.  The texts of those ditties mentioned in the question are not sacred, liturgical texts.  They are not the prayer of the Church.  Moreover, the music for liturgical worship should be art.  The ditties mentioned above are not art.  In fact, they are at about the level of the theme-song of Gilligan’s Island.  They are not worthy of use in the sacred liturgy.  They are just bad music.

When we sing hymns or ditties in the place of the assigned texts of Mass, we cut the legs out from under our proper liturgical worship and shortchange ourselves, obscuring what Christ the High Priest wants to give us through Holy Church’s choice for our liturgy.

Another view is that the Church herself told us what music should be preferred: Gregorian chant and polyphony.  I think we should do as the Council asked.

If we think we need music of no greater depth than the old Armour hot dog commercial tune in order to feel we are being “called by name” by Jesus, then we are in serious trouble.  Game over.

The ditties mentioned above, and their like, foster a purely immanent sense of God and what goes on during liturgical worship, underscoring a notion that what we do in church is all about what we do and suppressing the essentially important dimension of God’s mystery and transcendence, without which we cannot have true Catholic liturgical worship of God according to the virtue of religion and a properly oriented Catholic identity.

This is all very black and white and brutal, but I wanted to be brief and get out one view of the question.  There are other points of view, which I am sure readers will share.

This’ll be good.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
146 Comments