Brick by brick in the Netherlands

Brick by brick in Groningen, Netherlands:

Just returned from Mass celebrated in the Cathedral of Groningen (North of the Netherlands). Nothing unusual you might think. But tonight for the first in very very long time, Mass in extra-ordinary form was celebrated here. About 20-30 people were expected, about 80-90 showed up, some probably just out of curiosity, but still quite an amount. The choir was directed by the local hermit, [?] and did quite well. Even though the altar servers only practiced two times, and that they had some small failures, they did quite well. [We mustn’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.] All in all it was an amazing experience to have this Mass back in Groningen, and if all goes well, for now it will be on a monthly basis.

A little bit of good news.

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged ,
5 Comments

The great “falling away”?

Mariachi band Masses and watering-down Catholic doctrine are not the answer.

My emphases and comments.

From Real Clear Religion:

More Than 1,000 Mexicans Leave Catholic Church Daily
07/04/11 08:25 Filed in: great apostasy

The great apostasy is one of the preconditions for the return of Christ. Is there any question that it has indeed already occurred?

From Latin American Herald: “MEXICO CITY – More than 1,000 Mexicans left the Catholic Church every day over the last decade, adding up to some 4 million fallen-away Catholics between 2000 and 2010, sociologist and historian Roberto Blancarte told Efe.

Blancarte, one of the nation’s outstanding specialists on religious subjects, said that one of the main conclusions to be drawn from the 2010 census is that Mexico is no longer a predominantly Catholic country and has become a nation of religious pluralism.

According to figures from the census taken last year, out of a total 112 million Mexicans, 92.9 million are Catholics, 14.1 million belong to Protestant Christian denominations, and a lower number are devotees of Islam, Judaism and various oriental doctrines.

One of the principal novelties is that 5.2 million say they profess no religion – to the question about their religious beliefs, they answered “no religion.”

“It would be a mistake to think that these 5 million are atheists – all it means is that they profess no particular belief but they might well believe in some form of divinity,” Blancarte told Efe.

The specialist from Colegio de Mexico and the National Autonomous University of Mexico, or UNAM, said that the decline has been uninterrupted over the past 60 years.

In 1950, 98.21 percent of Mexicans said they were Catholic, in 1960 the percentage dropped to 96.47 percent, in 1970 to 96.17 percent, in 1980 to 92.62 percent, in 1990 the percentage dropped to 89.69 percent, in 2000 the country was only 88 percent Catholic, and now that percentage is lower still at 83.9 percent.

This signifies that the last decade has seen a drop of more than 4 percentage points, equivalent to almost 4 million people or an average of 1,300 people a day leaving the Catholic Church.

In contrast, the number of Protestants and Evangelicals went from 1.28 percent in 1950 to almost 8 percent of the total population in 2010, without counting Jehovah’s Witnesses or Mormons.

Blancarte said that this change is not exclusive to Mexico but extends across the region. In Brazil, for example, surveys have found that Catholics make up less than 70 percent of the population.  [Card. Hummes once told me that the Church in Brazil is losing 1% per year.]

In Central America, according to figures provided by the expert, Catholics represent between 55 percent and 73 percent of inhabitants, in both Chile and Venezuela they constitute about 70 percent, while in Cuba and Uruguay the percentage plummets to around 50 percent.

In the coming years, according to Blancarte’s projections, Mexico’s Catholics will tumble to below 80 percent.”

And when we are talking about “Catholic”, what are we really talking about?   People who remember the fact that someone had them baptized in a Catholic church a long time ago?  People who have pictures of Our Lady of Guadalupe on their wall, or their votive candle, or tattooed on their arms?

How does the “New Evangelization” effort address this?

Posted in New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
22 Comments

The Feeder Feed: spring changes

Here is an update from the feeder.

Cardinals have grey areas… which could be an ecclesiological statement in some cases… as they change to their summer plumage.

The Feeder Feed: spring changes

I may have told you about the Flying Squirrel which was visiting for a while late at night.

Posting for the webcams.

The Feeder Feed: spring changes

Remember… it is a gliding tree rat.

The Feeder Feed: spring changes

Cranes were spotted in a nearby corn field on my mail run.

The Feeder Feed: spring changes

The male Goldfinches are getting golder even as they get bolder.  The House Finch already has on his brightest feathers.

The Feeder Feed: spring changes

I know the Killdeers are back and I have heard Bluebirds, though I haven’t seen them.  I have also heard Eastern Phoebe, but haven’t yet had a glimpse.

In the late evening, however, the Robins are singing like crazy all over the place.


The Feeder Feed: spring changes
Posted in The Feeder Feed | Tagged
6 Comments

QUAERITUR: Holy Thursday foot washing follies

From a reader:

Well this year is a return of mass foot washings. As our bulletin
states, “This year everyone will participate in this action. Please wear socks and shoes that are easy to remove. Towels will be provided.”

Should I go and not participate? Should I just not go? The next closest parish is about 25 miles away. Maybe I should find out what is on their agenda. It probably is more normal.

Friend, I have no idea what level of absurdity and liturgical abuse you are willing to endure.

I know that gas prices are rising, but…

UPDATE:

I turned off the combox.  I gave the questioner my comment, since he asked me.  I don’t think there should be a blogosphere referendum on what parish the questioner attends, which is what the comments were turning into.

If you have something to contribute, you can send it to me via email, and if I want to share it here I will.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
Comments Off on QUAERITUR: Holy Thursday foot washing follies

Card. Burke pontificating

I was pleased to see on John Sonnen’s page that Card. Burke celebrated pontifically in the Extraordinary Form at the Station Church San Nicola in Carcere.

I have a special connection with that church which I explain in today’s LENTCAzT.

Sample photos.

Card. Burke pontificating

Card. Burke pontificating

Card. Burke pontificating

Posted in Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
25 Comments

Conference in Napa Valley with Pontifical TLM… does it get better than that?

From CNA:

Napa Institute conference to fortify Catholics for the ‘Next America’

Irvine, Calif., Apr 7, 2011 / 01:53 am (CNA).- Mother Assumpta Long, O.P., has invited Catholics to register for the inaugural Napa Institute conference to help participants respond to atheism, secularism, materialism and lukewarmness in the United States.

“I encourage you to register soon because this event should not be missed!” said Mother Assumpta, the superior of the Michigan-based Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist.

The conference, titled “Catholics in the Next America,” will take place in Napa Valley at the Meritage Resort & Spa from July 28-30. [That in itself sounds great!]

“We need to bring together serious Catholics to begin to network and discuss our faith because we continue to slip into a more secular society here in America,” explained Tim Busch, the Catholic businessman and philanthropist who helped start the Napa Institute. “As Catholics, we are challenged in our ability to influence the course of American culture.”

The Napa Institute will help Catholics meet that challenge by increasing their understanding of Catholic teaching and by helping them find their voice alongside their Catholic peers, he added.

Speakers at the event include Cardinal Roger Mahony, Archbishop José H. Gomez of Los Angeles, Bishop Jaime Soto of Sacramento and Fr. Robert J. Spitzer, S.J., of the Magis Institute. Commentator George Weigel and Prof. Timothy Gray of the Augustine Institute will also speak at the event.

Bishop Salvatore J. Cordileone of Oakland will celebrate a Solemn Pontifical Mass in the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite for conference participants.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole |
39 Comments

QUAERITUR: Female and male duet for the Exultet

QUAERITUR: Female and male duet for the ExultetFrom a reader:

Several years ago, our new husband & wife (talented but very Haugen/Haas loyal) music directors introduced/replaced the familiar English version of the Exultet at the Vigil with a modern(Haugen?) version sung as a duet by male (Deacon) & female (Mrs music director) voices. I am told that this is now also (performed) at all regular Easter Masses by male non-deacon & female voices. Is any of this stipulated pro or con?

PS. Would it be improper to listen to a more traditional version (say,
yours) with earphones & an iPod while this is going on? It’s still quite dark in the Church at this point.

That version of the Exultet sounds dreadful.  I believe there is some provision for an lay person to sing the Exultet, but my being recoils at the idea of a woman doing it.  That’s just wrong.  A female substituting for a deacon, or sharing in the singing of the text which means substituting for deacon.  No.  The rubric concerning what goes on with the Paschal candle explains that when it is not a deacon it is another minister, alius minister idoneus, which is masculine.  Also, concerning the lines to be omitted from the Exultet when sung by a non-deacon we find ab alio qui , which is masculine.   People might try to performed a philological fan dance in support of the obviously male language really including females.  I would respond “Piffle.  It is obviously foreign to the Roman mind to have a woman do any part of the deacon’s greatest liturgical moment of the whole year in the most sacred of our Holy Church’s liturgies.

As far as a duet is concerned… I don’t think that is permitted. Even if it were two deacons, it should not be done.

And, I don’t think it is proper to listen to anything else during the sacred action of liturgical worship, even though what is happening is … sub-optimal.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
26 Comments

How it all goes wrong. So very wrong. So sad.

What happens when you go wrong:

From the pen of Roy Bourgeois, M.M.

Rev. Edward Dougherty, M.M., Superior General
Maryknoll Fathers and Brothers
P.O. Box 303 Maryknoll, NY 10545

April 8, 2011

Dear Father Dougherty and General Council,

Maryknoll has been my community, my family, for 44 years, so it is with great sadness that I received your letter of March 18, 2011 stating I must recant my belief and public statements that support the ordination of women, or I will be dismissed from Maryknoll.

When I was a young man in the military, [Doesn’t he impress you?] I felt God was calling me to be a priest. I later entered Maryknoll and was ordained. I am grateful for finding the happiness, meaning and hope I was seeking in life. [Read: I will be sad if I must obey.]

For the past 20 years I have been speaking out and organizing against the injustice of the School of the Americas and U.S. foreign policy in Latin America. [People can disagree about this issue.] Over these years I discovered an injustice much closer to home – an injustice in my Church.  [He is attempting to set up a moral equivalence between the Church’s defined teaching on ordination and the US government School of the Americas.  See anything wrong with that?]

Devout [So?] women in our Church believe [So?] God is calling them to be priests, [He isn’t.] but they are rejected [That is the wrong word.] because the Church teaches that only baptized men can become priests. [Yes.  It does.] As a Catholic priest for 38 years, I believe our Church’s teaching that excludes women from the priesthood defies both faith and reason and cannot stand up to scrutiny for the following reasons: [He is a heretic.]

(1) As Catholics, we believe that we were created in the image and likeness of God and that men and women are equal before God. Excluding women from the priesthood implies that men are superior to women. [Does that logically follow?  All it implies is that they are different.]

(2) Catholic priests say that the call to be a priest is a gift and comes fromGod. How can we, as men, say: “Our call from God is authentic, but your call, as women, is not”? [Because Holy Church does not have the authority from God to ordain women.] Who are we to reject God’s call of women to the priesthood? [Ummm… “faithful Catholics”?] I believe our Creator who is the Source of life and called forth the sun and stars is certainly capable of calling women to be priests. [No one doubts that!  Of course He can.  He did not. ]

[Make some popcorn.] (3) We are told that women cannot be priests because Jesus chose only men as apostles. As we know, Jesus did not ordain anyone. Jesus also chose a woman, Mary Magdalene, to be the first witness to His resurrection, which is at the core of our faith. Mary Magdalene became known as “the apostle to the apostles.” [Okay.  I’m convinced.]

(4) A 1976 report by the Pontifical Biblical Commission, the Vatican’s top Scripture scholars, [He may have been a priest for a long time, but that did not make him very intelligent.  “The Vaticans” top Scripture scholars?  Is that what the members of the Biblical Commission are?] concluded that there is no valid case to be made against the ordination of women from the Scriptures.  [And when are we a “Scripture alone” Church?] In the Episcopal, Methodist, Lutheran, United Church of Christ, Presbyterian and other Christian churches, [Schismatics and heretics.  And the ordination of women has worked wonders for their groups.] God’s call of women to the priesthood is affirmed and women are ordained. Why not in the Catholic church? [He doesn’t see any difference between those groups and the Catholic Church?  Be clear: this isn’t about whether women are competent.  This is about who the Catholic Church is.]

(5) The Holy Scriptures remind us in Galatians 3:28, “There is neither male nor female. In Christ Jesus you are one.” [1 Corinthians 14:34-35] Furthermore, the Second Vatican Council’s Pastoral Constitution on The Church in the Modern World states: “Every type of discrimination … based on sex. .. is to be overcome and eradicated as contrary to God’s intent.” [Human discrimination.  And “discrimination” doesn’t imply, in this matter, inequality.  At the heart of the word is the root word concerning the ability to recognize differences.]

After much reflection and many conversations with fellow priests and women, I believe sexism is at the root of excluding women from the priesthood. Sexism, like racism, is a sin. [Again, he is trying to create a moral equivalence.] And no matter how hard we may try to justify discrimination against women, in the end, it is not the way of God. [Gratis asseritur, gratis negatur. It IS the way of God.  Holy Church has said so.] Sexism is about power. [And so we get to the essence of the bid for the ordination of wyemenn and the wymenmales who support them.] In the culture of clericalism many Catholic priests see the ordination of women as a threat to their power. [blah blah]

Our Church is in a crisis today because of the sexual abuse scandal and the closing of hundreds of churches because of a shortage of priests. [Slime.] When I entered Maryknoll we had over 300 seminarians. Today we have ten. [Why does the SSPX and FSSP and solid bishops have so many?] For years we have been praying for more vocations to the priesthood. [Roy.  Your community doesn’t have vocations is because of… men like you.] Our prayers have been answered. God is sending us women priests. Half the population are women. If we are to have a vibrant and healthy Church, we need the wisdom, experience and voices of women in the priesthood.

[The rest of this is just B as in B and S as in S.  I’ll leave it, however.  Read and weep.]

As Catholics, we believe in the primacy and sacredness of conscience. Our conscience is sacred because it gives us a sense of right and wrong and urges us to do the right thing. Conscience is what compelled Franz Jagerstatter, a humble Austrian farmer, husband and father of four young children, to refuse to join Hitler’s army, which led to his execution. Conscience is what compelled Rosa Parks to say she could no longer sit in the back of the bus. Conscience is what compels women in our Church to say they cannot be silent and deny their call from God to the priesthood. And it is my conscience that compels me to say publicly that the exclusion of women from the priesthood is a grave injustice against women, against our Church and against our God who calls both men and women to the priesthood.

In his 1968 commentary on the Second Vatican Council’s document, Gaudium et Spes, Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, said: “Over the pope … there still stands one’s own conscience, which must be obeyed before all else, if necessary, even against the requirement of ecclesiastical authority.”

What you are requiring of me is not possible without betraying my conscience. In essence, you are telling me to lie and say I do not believe that God calls both men and women to the priesthood. This I cannot do, therefore I will not recant.

Like the abolition of slavery, the civil rights movement and the right of women to vote, the ordination of women is inevitable because it is rooted in justice. Wherever there is an injustice, silence is the voice of consent. I respectfully ask that my fellow priests, bishops, Church leaders in the Vatican and Catholics in the pews speak out and affirm God’s call of women to the priesthood.

Your Brother in Christ,

Roy Bourgeois, M.M.
P.O. Box 3330
Columbus, GA 31903

From the pen of Roy Bourgeois, M.M.

Rev. Edward Dougherty, M.M., Superior General
Maryknoll Fathers and Brothers
P.O. Box 303 Maryknoll, NY 10545

April 8, 2011

Dear Father Dougherty and General Council,

Maryknoll has been my community, my family, for 44 years, so it is with great sadness that I received your letter of March 18, 2011 stating I must recant my belief and public statements that support the ordination of women, or I will be dismissed from Maryknoll.

When I was a young man in the military, I felt God was calling me to be a priest. I later entered Maryknoll and was ordained. I am grateful for finding the happiness, meaning and hope I was seeking in life.

For the past 20 years I have been speaking out and organizing against the injustice of the School of the Americas and U.S. foreign policy in Latin America. Over these years I discovered an injustice much closer to home – an injustice in my Church.

Devout women in our Church believe God is calling them to be priests, but they are rejected because the Church teaches that only baptized men can become priests. As a Catholic priest for 38 years, I believe our Church’s teaching that excludes women from the priesthood defies both faith and reason and cannot stand up to scrutiny for the following reasons:

(1) As Catholics, we believe that we were created in the image and likeness of God and that men and women are equal before God. Excluding women from the priesthood implies that men are superior to women.

(2) Catholic priests say that the call to be a priest is a gift and comes fromGod. How can we, as men, say: “Our call from God is authentic, but your call, as women, is not”? Who are we to reject God’s call of women to the priesthood? I believe our Creator who is the Source of life and called forth the sun and stars is certainly capable of calling women to be priests.

(3) We are told that women cannot be priests because Jesus chose only men as apostles. As we know, Jesus did not ordain anyone. Jesus also chose a woman, Mary Magdalene, to be the first witness to His resurrection, which is at the core of our faith. Mary Magdalene became known as “the apostle to the apostles.”

(4) A 1976 report by the Pontifical Biblical Commission, the Vatican’s top Scripture scholars, concluded that there is no valid case to be made against the ordination of women from the Scriptures. In the Episcopal, Methodist, Lutheran, United Church of Christ, Presbyterian and other Christian churches, God’s call of women to the priesthood is affirmed and women are ordained. Why not in the Catholic church?

(5) The Holy Scriptures remind us in Galatians 3:28, “There is neither male nor female. In Christ Jesus you are one.” Furthermore, the Second Vatican Council’s Pastoral Constitution on The Church in the Modern World states: “Every type of discrimination … based on sex. .. is to be overcome and eradicated as contrary to God’s intent.”

After much reflection and many conversations with fellow priests and women, I believe sexism is at the root of excluding women from the priesthood. Sexism, like racism, is a sin. And no matter how hard we may try to justify discrimination against women, in the end, it is not the way of God. Sexism is about power. In the culture of clericalism many Catholic priests see the ordination of women as a threat to their power.

Our Church is in a crisis today because of the sexual abuse scandal and the closing of hundreds of churches because of a shortage of priests. When I entered Maryknoll we had over 300 seminarians. Today we have ten. For years we have been praying for more vocations to the priesthood. Our prayers have been answered. God is sending us women priests. Half the population are women. If we are to have a vibrant and healthy Church, we need the wisdom, experience and voices of women in the priesthood.

As Catholics, we believe in the primacy and sacredness of conscience. Our conscience is sacred because it gives us a sense of right and wrong and urges us to do the right thing. Conscience is what compelled Franz Jagerstatter, a humble Austrian farmer, husband and father of four young children, to refuse to join Hitler’s army, which led to his execution. Conscience is what compelled Rosa Parks to say she could no longer sit in the back of the bus. Conscience is what compels women in our Church to say they cannot be silent and deny their call from God to the priesthood. And it is my conscience that compels me to say publicly that the exclusion of women from the priesthood is a grave injustice against women, against our Church and against our God who calls both men and women to the priesthood.

In his 1968 commentary on the Second Vatican Council’s document, Gaudium et Spes, Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, said: “Over the pope … there still stands one’s own conscience, which must be obeyed before all else, if necessary, even against the requirement of ecclesiastical authority.”

What you are requiring of me is not possible without betraying my conscience. In essence, you are telling me to lie and say I do not believe that God calls both men and women to the priesthood. This I cannot do, therefore I will not recant.

Like the abolition of slavery, the civil rights movement and the right of women to vote, the ordination of women is inevitable because it is rooted in justice. Wherever there is an injustice, silence is the voice of consent. I respectfully ask that my fellow priests, bishops, Church leaders in the Vatican and Catholics in the pews speak out and affirm God’s call of women to the priesthood.

Your Brother in Christ,

Roy Bourgeois, M.M.
P.O. Box 3330
Columbus, GA 31903

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged ,
81 Comments

Defending the defenseless

An interesting catch from Rush’s show made by the Motley Monk:

At the beginning of “Open Line Friday,” Rush Limbaugh took President Obama to task for his priorities in the current budget debate and potential shutdown of the federal government.

Defending the defenseless
El Rushbo
Limbaugh posed this question:

During a government shutdown, how can the President withhold paying the military to defend the defenseless while at the same time fighting to keep Planned Parenthood funded to provide abortions to the most defenseless among us?

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, The Drill | Tagged , , , ,
32 Comments

Food for… thought

From rougeclassicism:

The incipit of a piece at the CBC on the war in Afghanistan:

When a Canadian soldier dies in Afghanistan (as more than 150 have so far), it makes front-page news. In Ontario, a stretch of the 401 has been renamed the Highway of Heroes, and Canadians pay tribute by lining the overpasses from Trenton to Toronto.

Now cast your mind back a couple of millennia. In 216 B.C., 48,000 soldiers were killed in a single battle on a single day. The place was Cannae, on the Italian Peninsula, and the occasion was a battle in the Second Punic War between those imperial rivals, Rome and Carthage.

Not only did these 48,000 men – there were only male soldiers then – die in a single day, but they were butchered in what military historian Robert L. O’Connell calls a “massive knife fight.” As he told me on a recent Ideas episode, those men, mostly Roman, were herded together and slaughtered by the cunning Carthaginian general Hannibal. O’Connell is the author of The Ghosts of Cannae: Hannibal and the Darkest Hour of the Roman Republic. There is no doubt in O’Connell’s mind that the most hellish place on Earth that day was a patch of ground on the Italian peninsula.

Military historians have a way of graphically presenting their facts. Based on what O’Connell estimates was the average weight of a Roman soldier – 130 pounds, or almost 59 kilograms – there was, on the battlefield, “6-7 million pounds of freshly slaughtered human meat.” A feast for carrion, a “bonanza” for foxes, wolves, vultures and other rummaging creatures.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged
5 Comments