Very cool Benedictine Nuns in England who use technology well!

Very cool Benedictine Nuns in England who use technology well!From The Anchoress I learned about DigitalNunDaily.  This is a very cool site by some very cool Benedictine Nuns of Holy Trinity Monastery in East Hendred, England.

I have a soft spot for traditionally-minded very-cool Benedictine Nuns.

They have audio podcasts, a blog with news roundups (today includes Astronomy Pic of the Day and something about Medieval mystery plays!).  They do online retreats!

And they need money.  They are Nuns, after all.  Very cool Benedictine Nuns.  In habits.  They use technology well, too.

Check them out and give them a hand if you can.  It is Lent and time for alms giving.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool | Tagged
7 Comments

Follow up: TLM at York for St. Margaret Clitherow

You may recall that there was to be a TLM in York as part of a celebration of St. Margaret Clitherow.  Photos are available.

Apparently the Anglican Dean of the Cathedral of York, and Chapter, were very accommodating.

The music for the Mass was William Byrd’s Mass for Five Voices.

The LMS reports:

Following the Mass, there was a procession from York Minster through the city streets to St Margaret Clitherow’s shrine in the Shambles, and then across Ouse Bridge, the place of her execution. The sight of so many Catholic pilgrims publicly processing and praying the Rosary drew the notice of Saturday afternoon shoppers, and a respectful silence fell as the procession passed.

Posted in Linking Back | Tagged ,
23 Comments

Do you have any good news?

What is your good news?

For my part I am – touch wood – not ill or cold or hungry, there is sunshine, the coffee is very strong and delicious, a few encouraging donations have come in, I found large bags of grapefruit on sale, and I have a concrete list of doable things to do.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
62 Comments

Rumor about the upcoming Instruction on Summorum Pontificum.

A reader sent a link to a story about the upcoming Instruction on Summorum Pontificum. Actually, he sent two links, one to a French site Golias, not exactly conservative that, and to the Italian site Messa in Latino, which from its name you can guess is more conservative.

The bottom line is this.   The claim was made that after the Instruction was drafted by the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei“, the President of the same who is also Cardinal Prefect of the CDF, Card. Levada, perhaps with the aid of Card. Canizares of the CDW, made it far more restrictive.

The Instruction went to the Pope for his approval.

In the meantime, various people intervened.

The Pope has, if the claims are correct, caused the previous, favorable draft, to be adopted. It will favor, rather than restrict, the provisions of Summorum Pontificum.

Though this is all at the level of rumor, it is nonetheless plausible.

Not long ago I had a chat with a well-known German author much in favor of the older form of Mass.  I shared what I had heard about the Instruction with him and he told me what he knew.  I suggested that he write a personal note to the Holy Father with a single request: only to read carefully whatever Instruction they brought for his approval.   This he said he would do.  The goal was simple.  Of course the Holy Father was going to read something concerning Summorum Pontificum.   But the Pope has a lot to do.  The suggestion, coming from that source, that he should read it carefully – without additional editorializing – was designed to raise a tiny alarm bell in his mind as soon as he saw it on his desk.

I am sure that many others were able to express their concerns to His Holiness.

If nothing else, all these influences perhaps served to prevent something from being rammed through while the Pope concerns himself with many heavy cares.

I recommend that, if you are concerned about this upcoming Instruction, you remind dedicated in prayer for strength for the Holy Father and confusion for his enemies.

Posted in SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices |
20 Comments

How a bishop who thinks with the Church can’t help but get it right.

Attention seminarians, priests and bishops.

I was going to post about a fine address by the Bishop of Fargo, Most Rev. Samuel Aquila (he says Aquíla, rather than Áquila).  Like I said, I was going to post about this great talk by Bp. Aquila, at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary in Philadelphia, but… well… I forgot.

I am therefore grateful that Canonical Defender, the great Prof. Ed Peters posted about it on his fine canonical blog, In the Light of the Law.

My emphases and comments.

Ironic.

One of the most important essays by a bishop on Canon 392 (the norm setting forth a bishop’s fundamental duty to supervise the enforcement of ecclesiastical discipline in his diocese) never mentions Canon 392; [By indirection find direction out.] one of the most important essays by a bishop on Canon 915 (requiring ministers to withhold holy Communion from certain public sinners) never mentions Canon 915; and in fact, one of the most important essays on canon law generally by a bishop since the 1983 Code came out, was not written by a canonist bishop and scarcely even mentions the Code.

Instead, Fargo ND Bp. Samuel Aquila’s remarkable essay “Good Shepherd: Living Christ’s Own Pastoral Authority” shows how a bishop who thinks with the Church can’t help getting the canonical big picture right at the same time. This should surprise no one, for canon law, in its turn, is all about getting the pastoral picture right.

Any bishop who thinks with the Church, who understands that lessons in ecclesiastical leadership are woven throughout the Scriptures, and who believes, in short, that “p. c.” stands for genuine “pastoral care”, and not for “politically correct”, is going to find solid guidance for his pastoral decision-making in canon law and objective defenses of his pastoral actions under the Code. Even if he doesn’t use canonical jargon.

I loved the way Bp. Aquila, for example, drawing on the model for graduated confrontation of wrong-doing in the Church cited in Matthew 18, didn’t mention that Canon 1341, among others, sets out the same approach in canonical language. [Get this.] Or again, he asks, and not rhetorically, how many votes against basic Church values, performed over how many years, does it take to convince the minister of holy Communion that this Catholic politician or that is obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin, without ever using Canon 915’s precise language? [Do I hear an “Amen!”?]

The Eagle of Fargo delivered his remarks to seminarians, but they are well worth reading by priests and, need I say it?, by bishops who know that, someday, they will have to render an accounting of their office to Someone in a considerably more demanding setting than that of a pope during a quinquennial visit. [OOH-RAH!]

Bp. Aquila’s talk has a two particularly engaging headings:

  • Four Ways to Develop Receptive Hearts in Seminarians to Exercise the Authority of Christ
  • Contemporary Challenges in Exercising Authority

I recommend that every seminarian, priest and bishop reading this blog read Bp. Aquila’s talk.

You don’t have to tell anyone.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
5 Comments

One – first – liners

Minds are mostly dulled by mouse clicks, not delighted.

But there are those clicks which bring you to gems.

At the blog Faith and Theology I saw a great post in which a man and his daughter search their home’s bookshelves for the best opening lines of novels.  “What a great idea”, quoth I.

His favorite first sentence was “Call me Ishmael.”, and indeed that has a lot going for it.   I noted with pleasure that they, in their gleanings, did not omit another truly famous line, you know… the one from Jane Austen.

I was surprised that father/daughter treasure hunt didn’t turn up: “It was the best of times…”.  You know the rest.

I was delighted to see: ‘Marley was dead: to begin with.” Everyone knows that one, and it ain’t about ganja.

Yes, you could look for 100 years and not find a better opening than that first line crafted by Gabriel García Márquez, even though it is usually in translation.  Imagine! It’s even good in Spanish! “Muchos años después, frente al pelotón de fusilamiento, el coronel Aureliano Buendía había de recordar aquella tarde remota en que su padre lo llevó a conocer el hielo.”

And it would be Kafkaesque to forget, “Als Gregor Samsa eines Morgens aus unruhigen Träumen erwachte, fand er sich in seinem Bett zu einem ungeheuren Ungeziefer verwandelt.”

It isn’t just about the language, it is also about the image, the arresting idea which hauls you in by the eyes.

And it doesn’t have to be a novel.  For example, there is the sheer joy the following inflicts on the imagination of an Unreconstructed Ossified Manualist, to wit: “In ipso limine Theologiae, ejus notionem, partionem et  praestantiam declarare haud ingratum erit.”

How about some of you contribute great first lines of books?  Let them be one sentence, not several and not paragraphs.  Let’s not ever see, “I know this is more than one sentence… but…” … “This isn’t a first sentence, but…”.  Play fair!

Also, I am not talking here are first lines of great books, but rather great first lines from books.

Mediocre books can have great first lines and great books can have first lines that are hardly to be later recalled.

Here are a few from my memory and rapid page flipping.

Magnus est, domine, et laudabilis valde: magna virtus tua, et sapientiae tuae non est numerus.  (Augustine of Hippo, Confessions)

arma virumque cano, Troiae qui primus ab oris
Italiam fato profugus Laviniaque venit
litora, multum ille et terris iactatus et alto
vi superum, saevae memorem Iunonis ob iram,
multa quoque et bello passus, dum conderet urbem
inferretque deos Latio; genus unde
Albanique patres atque altae moenia Romae.  (Virgil, Aeneid)

Nel mezzo del cammin di nostra vita
mi ritrovai per una selva oscura
ché la diritta via era smarrita.  (Dante, Divina Commedia, Inferno.)

Yah, I know, I read a lot of foreign stuff – in foreign!

riverrun, past Eve and Adam’s, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.  (James Joyce, Finnegan’s Wake)

Whan that Aprill, with his shoures soote
The droghte of March hath perced to the roote
And bathed every veyne in swich licour,
Of which vertu engendred is the flour;
Whan Zephirus eek with his sweete breeth
Inspired hath in every holt and heeth
The tendre croppes, and the yonge sonne
Hath in the Ram his halfe cours yronne,
And smale foweles maken melodye,
That slepen al the nyght with open eye-
(So priketh hem Nature in hir corages);
Thanne longen folk to goon on pilgrimages
And palmeres for to seken straunge strondes
To ferne halwes, kowthe in sondry londes;
And specially from every shires ende
Of Engelond, to Caunterbury they wende,
The hooly blisful martir for to seke
That hem hath holpen, whan that they were seeke. (Chaucer, Canterbury Tales)

One sentence, graceful, beautiful, telling a tale.

And it is seasonal!

And speaking of seasonal:

“My father said he saw him years later playing in a tenth-rate commercial league in a textile town in Carolina, wearing shoes and an assumed name.”

I could go on, but it is your turn.

One sentence… one great, electrifying, first sentence and it matters not if the rest of the book is good, bad or indifferent.  Tastes will differ, what grabs one may not grab another.  Not just the first sentence of a book you like, but an amazing sentence.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged
206 Comments

“Things of the 1960s should remain in the 1960s.”

In reference to my recent post: Reason #64675 for the new, corrected translation.  This was in reference to the super-bad translation of the Post Communion in the lame-duck ICEL version… of the the very worst I have ever seen.

That said, this comes from a priest reader with my edits and emphases:

I follow your translations of the ICEL text all the time but I think you will be especially pleased to know that I used your translations of the post-Communion prayer for the 3rd Sunday of Advent as an announcement after Communion and before the post-Communion prayer.

I introduced it by saying “You all have heard that there will be a new translation of the Roman Missal for use on the first Sunday of Advent this year.  Perhaps you have also heard some of the ‘conspiracy theories‘ about why we need a new translation.  Or, maybe you hear someone complain [in a mocking tone], ‘Why do we need a new translation.  I like the current one?’  So, rather than tell you why we need a new translation—and no translation will ever be perfect—listen to a ‘slavishly literal’ translation of today’s post-Communion prayer from the Latin text….”

So, I read the slavishly literal translation.

“Now, listen to the new translation,” I said and proceeded to read the new translation.  “Do you see how it is pretty closed to the slavishly literal translation and conveys a sense of uplifting the mind and heart to God?”

“So, let’s now stand for the closing prayer in its current translation for the last time.”

They laughed .

At the dismissal I said, “Don’t you think that some of the things of the 1960s should remain in the 1960s?”

Many parishioners stopped afterwards and said they’d never ask again why a new translation is needed.

Keep up the good work!

WDTPRS KUDOS to Father for helping people to understand why we needed a new translation.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Mail from priests | Tagged , ,
25 Comments

Norma Jean Coon: reconciled

Norma Jean Coon, who had been involved with some wymyn who think they can be pryssssts, Norma Jean Coon, who renounced her involvement with the same women, abjured her pretend ordination as a deacon, and sought reconciliation.

She has an update on her site.

March 25, 2011

Holy God, I ask your blessings on my Bishop and my pastor and priests in Rome who have assisted me in the process of being re-instated into the Roman Catholic Church and I forsake all connection with the Roman Catholic Women Priests program via Internet or otherwise.

I thank you for the efforts of my family in my behalf and ask for Jesus’ Light and Love to pour over my husband of 47 years and my five children.

Forgive me my Beloved Jesus and Mother Mary for pursuing my own will in this matter of ordination and as I consecrate myself to your Divine Will through the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I ask you to pour out Light and Love upon any who have placed themselves outside of your Love and Light Bless us, O Lord, for these thy gifts and place us in the Heart of the Father, as we pray for more priests to serve in our church and for vocations to enrich our Church in the United States.

Forgive us for failing in obedience and enrich us in your Holy Love, I pray through Jesus and Mary. Fiat+

WDTPRS KUDOS to Norma Jean Coon.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool, Linking Back | Tagged ,
10 Comments

QUAERITUR: Vesting priests for Vespers

From a priest reader:

At my parish we celebrate solemn sung Vespers during Lent with the congregation. The pastor has asked that the priest celebrant vest in alb and stole using at the basis of his request that the Holy Father uses an alb and stole and likewise the Ceremonial of Bishops prescribes that the Bishop use and alb and stole. Saying that the bishop is properly the celebrant and that what is good for Rome and the bishop is good for the parish as well.

However, in our discussions we have looked in the various rituals for Baptism, Marriage and even exposition of the Blessed Sacrament and found that there is given the option for a priest to wear a surplice (assuming then that the cassock is used). Would you be able to point us in the right direction as to where both are valid options? I’d appreciate any direction you can shoot my way.

Kudos for having Vespers!  A fine tradition.

My understanding is that, for a priest or deacon, the proper dress for Vespers is choir dress with cope.  Cassock, surplice, biretta surmounted by cope, biretta when seated and in procession.   Stole if the Blessed Sacrament is to be exposed, and then one would not wear the biretta when seated.

I am not sure that the Pope’s dress for Vespers is the best model in this case.  It seems that these days the Pope is dressing only as any bishop would.  I am not sure that just because a bishop dresses in a certain way, priests should therefore dress that way.  Also, back in the day, the Pope would usually be present for Vespers but not the celebrant.  And the Pope’s “choir” dress is particular to the Pope.

People more knowledgeable than I can chime in on this.

That said, for priests I believe the usual vesture for Vespers is cassock, surplice, cope with biretta when appropriate.  Let not the overused alb eliminate what priests have always worn.  A sad thing when some late-innovation drives the normal into the category of optional.

Furthermore, this is a situation in which the Extraordinary (traditional) way of doing things can exert its gravitational pull on the Ordinary, and therefore enhance a sense of continuity with our way of praying for a very long time.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick | Tagged ,
11 Comments

Bp. Morlino affirms prohibition of eulogies. As night follows day, liberals whine.

We have written about H.E. Most Rev. Robert Morlino, Bishop of Madison on several occasions.  Bp. Morlino is one of the true stand-up men in the USCCB.

Now comes this from Channel 3000 which seems to have something to do with CNN.

My emphases and comments.

Some Catholics Upset Over Bishop’s Mandate Ending Eulogies
Bishop Says Eulogies Shouldn’t Be Made During Funeral Mass  [You can see from the beginning that the writer/publication/site aims at making Bp. Morlino into the bad guy.  Will they in fairness go beyond this and say that Bp. Morlino did not just make this up?  The Church’s liturgical law, which the bishop cannot change or disobey or ignore, says that eulogies at funerals are not permitted.  Right? Yes?  No?]

MADISON, Wis. — Some in the Catholic Diocese of Madison are upset over a recent mandate ending family remembrances and eulogies at funeral Masses.   [The “recent” mandate was already made in 2000, GIRM 382: “At the Funeral Mass there should, as a rule, be a short homily, but never a eulogy of any kind.”  Is that the law?  Yes? No?]

It happened to Dane County Supervisor Dianne Hesselbein on Monday. [Soooo… she is a prominent person in the area and gets access to the CNN outlet.  I am prompted to wonder, given that she is an elected official in one of the most liberal counties in the USA, and a Catholic, what her positions are on matters about which the Church has clear teachings.] She spent hours over the weekend to come up with a few short words to remember her father.

“It was about my dad — this was about my kids’ grandfather,” Hesselbein said.  [And?  The Church’s law does not say “No eulogy unless it is about your kids’ grandfather.”]

And she said she couldn’t believe her ears when she was told just minutes before her father’s funeral on Monday that she would not be allowed to speak. [First, it may be that violation of the Church’s law for years in this area has given people the false notion that they can give eulogies.  It may be that it could have been made clearer in the pre-funeral arrangements.  Thus, correction seems new, harsh, capricious, especially to those who think the Church’s laws mean nothing.  But this has been exacerbated by the antinomian self-centeredness of priests (and former bishops?) who thought they could do as they please with the Church’s worship and, therefore, to God’s people.]

“This is a tribute to my father that we all agreed that I would be the only one to speak on,” Hesselbein said. [Who is “we”?  Her close relatives?  I suspect “we” didn’t include the pastor of the parish.] “And they said I couldn’t do it, because the bishop made this recent decision.” [“They” must be the priest and bishop.]

That decision came from Madison Bishop Robert Morlino last month. [No.  The decision came from Rome long ago. ] By phone, he told WISC-TV these “family remembrances” during a funeral Mass are a major distraction from what the Mass should be about.  [Think of the innumerable absurdities burbled in churches during these illicit and ill-advised eulogies.  Horror stories could abound, but they won’t here.]

In a letter to diocese churches, the bishop said, “I am asking that such words of remembrance not be spoken at any time during the funeral liturgy in the Diocese of Madison.”

He goes on to say family would have the opportunity to share words of remembrance “In some other setting outside of the sacred liturgy, such as during the visitation … at the cemetery … or at the funeral banquet.”

“I don’t want to be kind of piling up too many other concerns at the Mass,” Morlino told WISC-TV. [That’s because a funeral Mass is primarily for praying for the deceased, asking God’s mercy.  It is not for telling off-color stories or tales of getting drunk together or watching some poor person burst into tears.]

In fact, Morlino said such remembrances — or eulogies — have never been allowed during Catholic Mass. But he said rules have been bent over the years, so it’s been happening more often than not. [Therein lies a problem.  Correcting an abuse is very hard.]

But for those like Hesselbein who want to remember their loved ones with their words — it’s news that’s hard to take.

“There’s a way to have a compromise,” Hesselbein said. “Because I was not granted closure. I was not granted the opportunity to celebrate my dad.”  [Look at that carefully.  Her “compromise” means “Let me do what I want even though we all know it is against the Church’s law.”  Which isn’t a compromise at all.  Note also “celebrate”.  No.  Not at Mass.  That is not what the funeral Mass is for.  Folks, we need a return to black vestments, I’m afraid.  The funeral Mass, as offered in so many places for so long, has been damaging to the faith of the people, I’m afraid.]

Madison’s Call to Action group, an organization that’s been very critical of Morlino’s decisions over the years, said it is outraged over the move. [When are these heretical whiners not outraged about something.  The live to gripe.] The group is encouraging others if they’re not happy with their church, to move to another one. [Don’t let the door hit you.]

Hesselbein said she’s worried if more decisions like this are made, the Catholic Church will lose more members. [This is just a guess: could Ms. Hesselbein be involved with Call to Action?]

(This video is no longer available.)

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
80 Comments