Card. Burke’s first big sermon as Cardinal S.R.E.

Card. BurkeFrom a sermon of now Cardinal Burke for the feast of St. Cecilia, virgin and martyr.  This was at the North American College as Mass of Thanksgiving for having been made cardinal.

Note the attention given not just to St. Cecilia, but also St. John Fisher!

I ask… is this a different sort of tone from that which we usually hear from cardinals?

The sermon is pretty long, but there is content here to digest.  My emphases and comments which I add as I read.  Read with me now…

Hos 2:16bc, 17cd, 21-22
Ps 45:11-12. 14-15, 16-17
Mt 25:1-13

Praised be Jesus Christ, now and for ever. Amen.

Saint Cecilia whose memory we celebrate today was a wise virgin who carefully provided oil for her lamp, so that when her Lord came, He found her waiting and ready to meet Him with her lamp burning brightly. We know little about her life, but, from tradition, we know the essence of her heroic holiness. She was a young Roman maiden, who was raised in the Christian faith.

She, in fact, developed so strongly in her love of our Lord, through prayer and penance, that she resolved to offer her virginity to Our Lord as a perpetual gift, that is, to espouse our Lord alone as her Bridegroom for ever. Contrary to her resolve, her father insisted that she marry a certain pagan by the name of Valerian, but, on the day of her wedding, we are told that “amid the music and rejoicing of the guests, Cecilia sat apart, singing to God in her heart and praying for help in her predicament.”[1]

[Watch the vocabulary…] One imagines that she was praying the words of the Psalms according to the ancient chant of the Church, which developed organically from the chant used in Jewish worship and continues today to be singularly suited to the raising of our minds and hearts to the Lord. [He is talking about Latin and Gregorian chant.]

The Lord heard her prayer, made even more pure and beautiful because it was offered to Him in sacred song. [St. Cecilia is the patroness of music.] Through the help of an angel, her new husband was converted to the faith and received Baptism at the hands of the Bishop of Rome, Pope Urban. Having come to life in Christ through Baptism, Valerian fully respected Cecilia’s virginal consecration. With Saint Cecilia, he rapidly grew in pure and selfless love, and soon gave, with her, the supreme witness of total and faithful love of our Lord by accepting a cruel martyrdom for the faith.

In the life [death] of Saint Cecilia, we see fulfilled, in a most striking manner, the promise of our Lord’s immeasurable and ceaseless love of all men, without exception, the divine love which we celebrate most fully and perfectly in this Eucharistic Sacrifice. Our Lord promises His holy people: “I will espouse you to me forever: I will espouse you in right and in justice, in love and in mercy; I will espouse you in fidelity, and you shall know the Lord.”[2] [Knowledge of the Lord may require death.]

Our Lord called Saint Cecilia to espouse Him in love, to offer to Him her virginity, her whole being. Saint Cecilia responded with all her heart, placing her heart completely into the glorious pierced Heart of our Lord. In the Sacred Heart of Jesus, her love was purified and strengthened, so that the witness of her virginal love reached its fullness with the crown of martyrdom. The pure white of her love as a virgin found its consummation in the courageous scarlet of her love as a martyr for the faith.

The life and martyrdom of Saint Cecilia, in the few details which have come to us, like the life of every consecrated virgin, [When in the USA Card. Burke was the USCCB’s point man for the consecrated virgins in the USA.  Unlike some diocesan bishops, he really cared about pastoral guidance to them.] teaches each of us the reality of Christ’s love in our lives, a love which invites us to espouse Him, to be one in heart with Him in loving one another as He loves us, purely and selflessly.

[…]

Providentially, our celebration of the memory of Saint Cecilia coincides with the day on which we offer to our Lord the Holy Mass in thanksgiving for the Ordinary Public Consistory, held on this past Saturday, during which our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI created new Cardinals to assist him in his shepherd’s care of the universal Church. The distinctive vesture of the Cardinal, the scarlet biretta and cassock, uncover the meaning of the position to which he is elevated.  The purity and selflessness of the Cardinal’s love of the Church, [From Your Eminence’s lips to God’s ear.] to whom he, as a priest, is espoused in a way analogous to the consecrated virgin, must be further purified and strengthened, [I think Cardinal Burke is anticipating a rough road.] in order that, in the words of the Successor of Saint Peter at the imposition of the cardinalitial biretta, the Cardinal may show himself to be “intrepid, even to the shedding of his blood for the building up of the Christian faith, the peace and harmony of the People of God, and the freedom and the extension of the Holy Roman Church.”[3] [You can hear an echo of a famous prayer here, too.]

The Cardinal has a particular bond with the virgin martyrs. They are a sterling example to him of how he is to love Christ and the Church, while, at the same time, they intercede powerfully for him, so that he may be a sign to the faithful of our Lord’s ceaseless and immeasurable love, “to the end,”[4] to the very outpouring of His life for us, on Calvary, His Sacrifice made ever present for us in the Holy Eucharist.

[This should be of special interest to all bishops and priests who are reading.  I suggest that lay people make sure that their clergy know this part.]

The cassock, the traditional and venerable vesture of the priest, Bishop and Cardinal, in carrying out the office of pastoral charity, above all in the Sacraments of Penance and the Holy Eucharist, is a sign of his belonging totally to Christ through priestly consecration.[5] When the priest puts on the cassock, he is reminded in a visible way that he has been configured to Christ, Head and Shepherd of the flock in every time and place, and that it is Christ Who is acting in Him, most especially in the offering of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and in the forgiveness of sins in the Sacrament of Penance, for the salvation of all men and of the whole world. The cassock also helps him to avoid the temptation to see himself, instead of Christ, as the protagonist in the works of pastoral charity, and, thereby, it is a practical help in the daily conversion of life, in the day by day emptying of himself, so that his priestly being may be filled with the grace of Christ the High Priest.

The change of the color of the cassock for the Bishop expresses the gift of the fullness of the priesthood, and for the Cardinal a particular service given to the Shepherd of the universal Church, in his office of “perpetual and visible principle and foundation of the unity of the faith and of communion.”[6] For my own part, I can testify that with the changing of the color of the cassock there comes an increase of responsibility, in Christ, for the life of the Church, which is daunting, but there is likewise a wonderful outpouring of grace for the bearing of the burden. The courageous bearing of the burden for love of Christ and His flock brings deep and abiding joy and peace. In this light, we understand the importance of our daily prayers for our priests, Bishops, Cardinals and the Holy Father. In this light, you will understand that I, as a Cardinal, need your prayers now more than ever.

St. John FisherIn striving to understand the service of the Cardinal in the Church, one naturally turns to the lives of Cardinals who have been heroically virtuous in fulfilling the responsibilities of their office. I think, for example, of Saint John Fisher who received the Cardinal’s hat, when he was already in prison for his refusal to sign the Act of Supremacy of King Henry VIII, by which he would have betrayed Christ, denying that Christ alone is Head and Shepherd of the Church through His Vicar on earth, the Roman Pontiff, Successor of Saint Peter. When the Cardinal’s hat reached Calais in France on its way from Rome to London, the King was informed and immediately sent his secretary, Thomas Cromwell, to speak with Bishop Fisher in prison. When Cromwell asked the good Bishop whether he would accept the Cardinal’s hat from the Holy Father, Pope Paul III, should it be sent to him, Saint John Fisher responded:

“I know myself far unworthy of any such dignity, that I think of nothing less than such matters; but if he do send it to me, assure yourself I will work with it by all means I can to benefit the church of Christ, and in that respect I will receive it on my knees.”[7]

The King, [Henry VIII… monster…] whose heart had once been belonged to the Lord but had then turned against the Lord, understood the meaning of Saint John Fisher’s words and, in his angry rebellion against the law of Our Lord, written on his very heart, declared:

“Well, let the pope send him a hat, when he will. But I will so provide that, whensoever it cometh, he shall wear it on his shoulders, for head shall he have no more to see it on.”[8]

On June 22, 1535, Saint John Fisher was beheaded, intrepid in giving himself totally to Our Lord and His Church, to the very outpouring of his blood.

Although [I don’t think that Card. Burke is exaggerating at all when he frames this shift in his ministry in the context of the conflict of State and Church resulting in martyrdom of a Cardinal.] not every Cardinal will be called to give his life in red martyrdom for the sake of the Church and, above all, for the sake of the exercise of the ministry of the Vicar of Christ on earth, [See how he characterizes his service?] he is called daily to be intrepid, to give his life in white martyrdom, steadfastly and courageously defending the Catholic Church and her holy faith in the care of Saint Peter and his successors. How steadfast and courageous a Cardinal must be, today, in assisting Pope Benedict XVI in his pastoral ministry, announcing the truth of the faith, caring for the worthy celebration of the Sacraments as the privileged actions of Christ for our eternal salvation and for the life of prayer, devotion and penance, and governing lovingly and firmly the members of the Body of Christ, so that they may be one in Christ Who alone is “the way, and the truth, and the life!”[9]

[Here he moves from history and from theory to the present and the practical.] I think, for instance, of the Holy Father’s tireless teaching of the moral law to a world which, like King Henry VIII, is in rebellion against the law of God, written upon every human heart, above all in its violations of the dignity of human life and the integrity of the family as the first cell of society. In his address to representatives of British society, on this past September 17th, Pope Benedict lovingly and firmly taught the truth that our religious faith must inform our life in society, purifying and strengthening political action so that it may be coherent with right reason, with the law of God written upon every human heart. He declared:

“Religion, in other words, is not a problem for legislators to solve, but a vital contributor to the national conversation. In this light, I cannot but voice my concern at the increasing marginalization of religion, particularly of Christianity, that is taking place in some quarters, even in nations which place a great emphasis on tolerance. There are those who would advocate that the voice of religion be silenced, or at least relegated to the purely private sphere. There are those who argue that the public celebration of festivals such as Christmas should be discouraged, in the questionable belief that it might somehow offend those of other religions or none. And there are those who argue – paradoxically with the intention of eliminating discrimination – that Christians in public roles should be required at times to act against their conscience. These are worrying signs of a failure to appreciate not only the rights of believers to freedom of conscience and freedom of religion, but also the legitimate role of religion in the public square.”[10]

How pernicious it is that, in society which, for the pursuit of the common good, depends upon citizens acting in obedience to their conscience, her government attempts to compel her citizens to violate their conscience in its most fundamental tenets pertaining to the dignity of all human life and the integrity of the family!

The Church’s teaching on the service of the Church to society, also in the political realm, as the Holy Father himself noted, is not always welcome, [Can you say can. 915?] even as the Church’s teaching on the Petrine office was not welcomed by King Henry VIII, but the Church, the Virgin Mother of all the faithful, must keep her lamp trimmed and burning brightly, waiting always for the coming of Our Lord and welcoming Him each day, at every hour, as He offers us the grace of eternal salvation.

The Cardinal today is called, in a special way, to assist the Roman Pontiff in announcing all of the truths of the faith, but, in a particular way, the truth regarding the natural moral law to be observed for the good of all in society.

There are so many other aspects of the Petrine ministry of Pope Benedict XVI, to which a Cardinal must attend and be ready to offer his assistance to the Vicar of Christ on earth.

[Now we get to something we know is dear to His Eminence.  Consider that he has been talking about assisting Pope Benedict in his Petrine ministry.  Now he turns to liturgy.]

I think also of the tireless work of our Holy Father to carry out a reform of the post-Conciliar liturgical reform[11], [Would that be a “reform of the reform”?] conforming the celebration of the Sacred Liturgy to the perennial [continuity] teaching of the Church as it was presented anew at the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, so that in every liturgical action we may see more clearly the action of Christ Himself who unites heaven and earth, even now, in preparation for His Final Coming, [Advent is coming, too.] when He will inaugurate “news heaven and a new earth,”[12] when we will all celebrate the fullness of life and love in the liturgy in the heavenly Jerusalem.[13] The Cardinal today is called, in a special way, to assist the Successor of Saint Peter, in handing on, in an unbroken organic line, what Christ Himself has given us in the Church, His Eucharistic Sacrifice, “the font and highest expression of the whole Christian life.”[14] The right order of Sacred Worship in the Church is the condition of the possibility of the right order of her teaching and the right order of her conduct. [Note the connection of liturgy and identity.]

May our celebration of the Holy Eucharist on the Memorial of Saint Cecilia, Virgin and Martyr, unite our hearts more totally to the glorious pierced Heart of Jesus, ever open to receive us, especially in the Eucharistic Sacrifice. Lifting up our hearts, with the Immaculate Heart of Mary, to the glorious Sacred Heart of Jesus, our lives will be purified and strengthened for a more pure and selfless love of God and of one another.

Lifting up our hearts to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, we lift up to Him, in a special way, the newly created Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, thanking Him for them and praying that every Cardinal will always find in His glorious pierced Heart the purification and the strength to fulfill the particular responsibilities of service to His Vicar on earth, “intrepid, even to the shedding of his blood for the building up of the Christian faith, the peace and harmony of the People of God, and the freedom and the extension of the Holy Roman Church.”[15]

In the Heart of Jesus, may we all find the wisdom by which we will keep our lamps trimmed, provided with the unfailing oil of His grace, so that at every moment of our lives, we, with Saint Cecilia, will be waiting and ready to meet Him with our lamps burning brightly.
Heart of Jesus, King and Center of all Hearts, have mercy on us.

Our Lady of Guadalupe, Mother of America and Star of the New Evangelization, pray for us.

Saint Cecilia, Virgin and Martyr, pray for us.

Saint John Fisher, Bishop, Cardinal and Martyr, pray for us.

—Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke

Archbishop Emeritus of Saint Louis (USA)

Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura

NOTES

[1] Butler’s Lives of the Saints, Complete Edition, ed. Herbert Thurston, S.J. and Donald Attwater, Vol. 4, New York: P. J. Kenedy & Sons, 1956, p. 402; and Bibliotheca Sanctorum, Vol. 3, Roma: Istituto Giovanni XXIII nella Pontificia Università Lateranense, 1963, coll. 1064-1086.

[2] Hos 2:19-20.

[3] “usque ad effusionem sanguinis pro incremento christianae fidei, pace et quiete populi Dei, libertate et diffusione Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae [vos ipsos] intrepidos [exhibere debere].” “Imposizione della berretta,” Consistoro per la creazione di nuovi Cardinali, 20 November 2010, Città del Vaticano: Ufficio delle Celebrazioni Liturgiche del Sommo Pontefice, p. 23.

[4] Jn 13:1.

[5] Cf. Herbert Thurston, “Costume, Clerical,” The Catholic Encyclopedia, New York: The Encyclopedia Press, Inc., 1913, pp. 419-421.

[6] “perpetuum ac visibile unitatis fidei et communionis principium et fundamentum.” Sacrosanctum Concilium Oecumenicum Vaticanum II, “Constitutio dogmatica de Ecclesia, Lumen gentium, 21 November 1964, Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 57 (1965), p. 22, no. 18.

[7] Quoted in: E. E. Reynolds, Saint John Fisher, rev. ed., Wheathampstead – Hertfordshire: Anthony Clarke Books, 1972, pp. 272-273.

[8] Ibid., p. 273.

[9] Jn 14:6.

[10] Pope Benedict XVI, “Reason and faith need each other,” 17 September 2010, L’Osservatore Romano Weekly Edition in English, 22 September 2010, pp. 12-13.

[11] Benedictus PP. XVI, “Allocutio ad Romanam Curiam ob omina natalicia,” 22 Decembris 2005, Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 98 (2006), pp. 45-52; and Benedictus PP. XVI, “Epistula ad Episcopos Catholicae Ecclesiae Ritus Romani,” 7 Julii 2007, Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 99 (2007), pp. 795-799.

[12] 2 Pt 3:13; cf. Rv 21:1.

[13] Cf. Heb 12:22-24; and Rv 21:2-27.

[14] “totius vitae christianae fontem et culmen.” Sacrosanctum Concilium Oecumenicum Vaticanum II, “Constitutio Dogmatica de Ecclesia, Lumen gentium,” 21 November 1964, Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 57 (1964), p. 15, no. 11.

[15] Cf. note 3.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill |
30 Comments

Fishwrap getting Condom Conundrum wrong, but with a surprise!

When it comes to the Condom Conundrum the National Catholic Fishwrap‘s commentators are living down to our expectations.

To wit one Phyllis Zagano who is “senior research associate-in-residence at Hofstra University and author of several books in Catholic Studies. Her book Women & Catholicism will be published by Palgrave-Macmillan in 2011.”

Phyllis, in the manner of one who hits something while driving and then wonders what the thud was as she heads into a ditch, misses the point of what the Pope said even as she mentions it.

But there is a very interesting bit which surprised me.

It’s not just about male prostitutes [No, Phyllis.  It isn’t.]
by Phyllis Zagano on Nov. 24, 2010

Pope Benedict XVI, a brilliant theologian, is becoming a public relations train wreck. The latest story: male prostitutes can use condoms to prevent transmission of AIDS. [That is not what the Pope said.  What did the Pope actually say?  When a male prostitute chooses to use a condom, that is a first step toward something more fully human.]

Say, what?

Male prostitutes don’t immediately come to mind when I am considering AIDS. In fact, male prostitutes don’t come to my mind at all. [Hey, Phyllis!  AIDS is being spread by male prostitutes.  This is a serious thing.  I wonder at her irresponsible comment.  Has she been duped by those who want to separate AIDS from homosexuality?] What was he thinking? It certainly took me a while to figure it out. [Don’t stop thinking about it yet.]

Of course, the media dust-up and subsequent blogitis has lots of folks laughing (again) at the Catholic Church. [Although the conservative Catholic blogs (the great majority) seem to be understanding the arguments.] Now the Catholic idea seems to be: don’t get AIDS when you hire a male prostitute. [Watch this…] But who hires male prostitutes? Recall, please, there’s been a bit of a homosexual scandal involving Catholic priests over the past few years. [She managed to situate the “clerical sexual abuse of minors scandal” in the right category of dysfunction. A writer for the Fishwrap has made the clerical abuse crisis a matter of homosexuality.]

As if things weren’t bad enough, once the pope-condom-male prostitute story began flooding newsrooms, Vatican spokesman Jesuit Fr. Federico Lombardi personally asked the pope if he meant anything specific about choosing male (as opposed to female?) prostitutes.

According to BBC-News, the answer was “no.” Lombardi continues, [Wait for it….] “The problem is this…It’s the first step of taking responsibility, of taking into consideration the risk of the life of another with whom you have a relationship.”

Nice, but not exactly a sound bite. [But it was the point.] How about: “it is immoral to infect another person with a disease.” I mean, that has a certain ring to it not lost in the clouds. Wouldn’t the church look a little better saying “Pope aims to curb AIDS,” rather than have “pope” and “male prostitute” in the same headline[And now that she is off on the wrong track, nothing goes right with the rest of her piece.]

[…]

That, folks, is another example of how people who should know better are getting this wrong.

It may be that Ms. Zagano is so fixed on one idea that she can’t interpret this story in any other way.

 

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged ,
16 Comments

Lost Roman Chinese Legion

This is for your Just Too Cool file.

From the Daily Telegraph with my emphases:

Chinese villagers ‘descended from Roman soldiers’

By Nick Squires

Genetic testing of villagers in a remote part of China has shown that nearly two thirds of their DNA is of Caucasian origin, lending support to the theory that they may be descended from a ‘lost legion’ of Roman soldiers.

Tests found that the DNA of some villagers in Liqian, on the fringes of the Gobi Desert in north-western China, was 56 per cent Caucasian in origin.

Many of the villagers have blue or green eyes, long noses and even fair hair, prompting speculation that they have European blood.
A local man, Cai Junnian, is nicknamed by his friends and relatives Cai Luoma, or Cai the Roman, and is one of many villagers convinced that he is descended from the lost legion.

Archeologists plan to conduct digs in the region, along the ancient Silk Route, to search for remains of forts or other structures built by the fabled army.

“We hope to prove the legend by digging and discovering more evidence of China’s early contacts with the Roman Empire,” Yuan Honggeng, the head of a newly-established Italian Studies Centre at Lanzhou University in Gansu province, told the China Daily newspaper.

The genetic tests have leant weight to the theory that Roman legionaries settled in the area in the first century BC after fleeing a disastrous battle.

The clash took place in 53BC between an army led by Marcus Crassus, a Roman general, and a larger force of Parthians, from what is now Iran, bringing to an abrupt halt the Roman Empire’s eastwards expansion.

Thousands of Romans were slaughtered and Crassus himself was beheaded, but some legionaries were said to have escaped the fighting and marched east to elude the enemy.

They supposedly fought as mercenaries in a war between the Huns and the Chinese in 36BC – Chinese chroniclers refer to the capture of a “fish-scale formation” of troops, a possible reference to the “tortoise” phalanx formation perfected by legionnaries. The wandering Roman soldiers are thought to have been released and to have settled on the steppes of western China.

The theory was first put forward in the 1950s by Homer Dubs, a professor of Chinese history at Oxford University.

The Roman Empire reached its greatest territorial extent under the Emperor Trajan in the 2nd century AD, just as the Han empire was beginning to decline.

Most historians believe that the two empires had only indirect contact, as silk and spices were traded along the Silk Road through merchants in exchange for Roman goods such as glassware.

But some experts believe they could instead be descended from the armies of Huns that marauded through central Asia, which included soldiers of Caucasian origin.

Maurizio Bettini, a classicist and anthropologist from Siena University, dismissed the theory as “a fairy tale”.

“For it to be indisputable, one would need to find items such as Roman money or weapons that were typical of Roman legionaries,” he told La Repubblica. “Without proof of this kind, the story of the lost legions is just a legend.

Just too cool.  I hope they find something.

Posted in Just Too Cool |
18 Comments

Not for the weak of heart or stomach. The hideous truth.

CMR reports on the hideous truth.

Vegetarians around the planet were horrified to learn today that the popular Thanksgiving dish for vegetarians called Tofurkey doesn’t actually derive from the vegetarian bean curd known as Tofu but from a very small and extraordinarily cute endangered species called the Tofurkey.

This is the first photo of a Tofurkey taken at a farm in Rhode Island just moments before it was skinned, torn limb from limb, had its eyes removed while still alive, and was finally dipped in boiling oil.

A tofurkey farm is not a typical farm. The tofurkey is extraordinarily cute and very inexpensive to keep because they’re fed exclusively by hugs and smiles. “That’s all they need,” said one tofurkey farmer. “And they’ve got these huge expressive eyes that melt your heart.” It’s those expressive eyes that make “slaughter season” very hard for tofurkey owners.

[…]

I just can’t print the rest.  You’ll have to go over there to read … it.

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen, Lighter fare |
27 Comments

QUAERITUR: Reservation of Precious Blood in home of a sick person

From a reader:

My father-in-law has been battling tongue cancer (which has spread to
his lymph) and has been housebound for nearly 5 months. Moreover, he hasn’t eaten any solid foods for nearly 10 months. He has a feeding
tube for his nutrition.

The liturgical question regards the fact that a priest friend of the
family suggested that they have a tabernacle in their bedroom,
containing the Precious Blood in a dropper bottle so that he can
receive a drop (since he cannot eat even a particle of the host).

Is this an acceptable practice?

In general the Precious Blood may not be reserved.  Under special circumstances, the Precious Blood may be kept briefly for the sake of distribution to the sick.  Of course that must be done with great care.

Furthermore, the Blessed Sacrament  may not be reserved in a home without the permission of the local bishop.

The best solution here would be for a priest to say Mass in the room and give the poor man some of the Precious Blood consecrated at the Mass.  A second best solution would be for the true Eucharistic minister (bishop, priest or deacon) would bring the Precious Blood and give it to the fellow in the proper way.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
7 Comments

RECENT POSTS and THANKS TO READERS

It has been a busy day.

Here is one reason:

And because the Mac using PC snarkers have chimed in, I have started a “Get a Mac” fund.

Peter Seewald

CLICK TO BUY

Here are some recent posts:

I came home to a stack of boxes. People have been at my wishlist!

Thanks to MC who sent some Verjus, which is used in medieval recipes. BH sent San Marzano tomatoes, which are very welcome. PS of WA sent a copy of the English translation of the Manual of Indulgences. I use the Latin most of the time, but this is helpful for a reference. JL sent Fr. Marvin O’Connell’s history of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Pilgrims to the Northland. I look forward to reading of the Catholic roots of my native place. AK sent Geoffrey Hull’s Banished Heart: Origins of Heteropraxis in the Catholic Church. It will be a long read, I think, but useful. The sender asked prayers. Maybe stop and say a prayer for AK? Another PS sent network AC power controller, which I apply in a creative way once I get my other tech problem solved. CS sent Translating Tradition: A Chant Historian Reads Liturgiam Authenticam by Peter Jeffrey as well as a non-stick popover pan for when I make Yorkshire puddings. Thanks! I wasn’t wholly convinced by my last batch. JK of Ireland sent The Pilgrimage Road to Santiago: The Complete Cultural Handbook by David Gitlitz, a very light paperback which would not weigh down a walker.

And many have used the donation button on the side bar and some posts to help feed the birds and keep the blog going. Many thanks. The birds were not particularly well-fed while I was away, I’m afraid. I filled the feeders this morning and – after a little while – they started swooping in and chowing down with some vigor. I think there will be a feed sale, btw.

Furthermore, thanks to everyone who continues to help the Wyoming Carmelites by buying Mystic Monk Coffee. Refresh your coffee supply! Annoy liberals. Help some monks.

I want to remind you also of the Oremus pro Pontifice things, which will be useful to spur conversations as the present Condom Conundrum controversy develops.

Once again, thanks to all of you who have supported this blog project and everything else. I remember benefactors in my prayers.

On Thanksgiving Day (Thursday) I will say Mass for your intention.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on RECENT POSTS and THANKS TO READERS

POLL ALERT: Justification of “mercy killing”

There is a poll on the site of the New York Daily News attached to a story about an 88 year old man who shot his wife in the head to end her suffering.

As of now.

UPDATE 24 Nov 1755 GMT:

I am amazed.

UPDATE 25 Nov 1512 GMT:

I am even more amazed!

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, POLLS | Tagged ,
37 Comments

Fr. Fessio on what Pope Benedict really said: USEFUL ANALOGY ALERT

USEFUL ANALOGY ALERT

“Pope Approves Padded Pipes for Mugging”

You would do well to read this carefully and use it in conversations.

Fr. Joseph Fessio, SJ,  wrote a piece for Reuters which means that it will get a little visibility.

It begins:

Did the Pope “justify” condom use in some circumstances?

No. And there was absolutely no change in Church teaching either. Not only because an interview by the Pope does not constitute Church teaching, but because nothing that he said differs from previous Church teaching.

Then why all the headlines saying that he “approves” or “permits” or “justifies” condom use in certain cases?

With a tip of the biretta to Ignatius Insight:

[…]Equally problematically, “giustificati” = justified, was used in the Italian  translation of “begründete”, and arbitrarily resolves the ambiguity one-sidedly.

The Pope responded: “She [the Church] does not regard it as a real or moral solution, but, in this or that case, there can be nonetheless in the intention of reducing the risk of infection, a first step in a movement toward a different way, a more human way, of living sexuality”.

In the first place a solution which is not “moral” cannot be “justified”. That is a contradiction and would mean that something in itself morally evil could be “justified” to achieve a good end. Note: the concept of the “lesser evil” is inapplicable here. One may tolerate a lesser evil; one cannot do something which is a lesser evil.

But the crucial distinction here is between the “intention” of the male prostitute, viz. avoiding infecting his client, and the act itself, viz. using a condom. Since this distinction has been missed in almost every report I’ve read, it calls for some elaboration.

This distinction, in moral philosophy, is between the object of an act and the intent of an act. If a man steals in order to fornicate, the intent is to fornicate but the object is the act of theft. There is no necessary connection between stealing and fornicating.

In the case of the Pope’s remark, the intent is preventing infection and the object is use of a condom.

Here’s an example of this distinction that parallels what the Pope said.

Muggers are using steel pipes to attack people and the injuries are severe. Some muggers use padded pipes to reduce the injuries, while still disabling the victim enough for the mugging.

The Pope says that the intention of reducing injury (in the act of mugging) could be a first step toward greater moral responsibility. This would not justify the following headlines: “Pope Approves Padded Pipes for Mugging” “Pope Says Use of Padded Pipes Justified in Some Circumstances”, Pope Permits Use of Padded Pipes in Some Cases”.

Of course, one may morally use padded pipes in some circumstances, e.g., as insulated pipes so that hot water flowing through them doesn’t cool as fast. And one may use condoms morally in some cases, e.g. as water balloons. But that also would not justify the headline “Pope Approves Condom Use”, though in this case it could be true. But it would be intentionally misleading.

In sum, the Pope did not “justify” condom use in any circumstances. And Church teaching remains the same as it has always been—both before and after the Pope’s statements.

Read the entire post.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, The Drill | Tagged ,
33 Comments

Queen Elizabeth warns Church of England synod

The “head” of the Church of England gives the “body” of the Church of England a warning.

From BBC:

Queen gives warning to Church of England synod

Queen ElizabethThe Queen has spoken of the “difficult” and “painful” choices facing the Church of England as she formally opened the Church’s general synod.

She also spoke of the “need to communicate the gospel with joy and conviction in our society”.

The Queen addressed the 476 members of the Church’s governing body as they marked the start of a five-year term.

The synod will also debate measures to keep the Church together over issues such as same-sex blessings.

And its members are preparing to discuss Prime Minister David Cameron’s “big society” idea.

Before her address, the Queen, who is supreme governor of the Church of England, attended a service of Holy Communion at Westminster Abbey, accompanied by the Duke of Edinburgh.
Speaking at the synod meeting, she said: “The new synod will have many issues to resolve to ensure that the Church of England remains equipped for the effective pursuit of its mission and ministry.

“Some will, no doubt, involve difficult, even painful, choices.
“But Christian history suggests that times of growth and spiritual vigour have often coincided with periods of challenge and testing.
“What matters is holding firmly to the need to communicate the gospel with joy and conviction in our society.”

Marriage ‘delight’

The Queen also said a “preoccupation with our welfare and comfort” were not “at the heart of our faith” but rather “the concepts of service and of sacrifice as shown in the life and teachings of the one who made himself nothing, taking the very form of a servant”.

During her address, the Queen said the place of religion had come to be a matter of “lively discussion” in a more “diverse and secular” society.

“It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue and that the well-being and prosperity of the nation depend on the contribution of individuals and groups of all faiths and none,” she said.

Yet, as the recent visit of His Holiness the Pope reminded us, churches and the other great faith traditions retain the potential to inspire great enthusiasm, loyalty and a concern for the common good.”

There was applause at the synod meeting when the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, expressed “delight” at the forthcoming marriage of Prince William and Kate Middleton.

Addressing the Queen, he said: “I am sure I speak for everyone here in expressing our delight at the family news announced last week.”

‘Casualty stations’

Also speaking at the synod meeting, Dr Williams said he wanted to avoid the worst aspects of “secular partisanship” by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

He urged members not to reject the Anglican Covenant, a proposed agreement aimed at resolving disputes within the worldwide Anglican Communion.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged ,
10 Comments

Fox News website headline: LIE – They should be ashamed

This is the sort of shallow, asinine, perhaps even mendacious BS we all knew would crop up in the mainstream media.

NOTA BENE:  This headline is a LIE.

Note also that the URL for the story indicates something quite different.

UPDATE 2258 GMT:

I wrote  note to someone who is impossible to ignore in the Fox News organization.

I am sure many other people wrote notes as well.

And I have also been engaging an AP writer behind the story.

I noticed on the Fox News site that the headline has been revised.

UPDATE 23:10 GMT:

Okay, I have more information.  I have been in touch with the person who wrote the AP article.

For some reason some idiot editor at AP (my choice of words, not writer’s) took the writer’s name off the byline and, stupidly, imposed that gawdawful original  headline.

But we have seen in the past how very badly AP has treated the Church, haven’t we.

At best that bad headline was an unprofessional mistake based on the inability to understand what is written in black and white.  A more realistic scenario is that it was a purposeful distortion of the facts.

Meanwhile, this is from the CBC:

And…

Posted in Biased Media Coverage |
29 Comments