Military chaplains opposing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ told to “get out” if they don’t like it

Here is a disturbing story from CNA:

Chaplains opposed to ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ repeal coming under pressure

Washington D.C., Nov 3, 2010 / 06:13 am (CNA).- A federal court has again reinstated the U.S. military’s policy against open homosexuals in service. While military chaplains are “hopeful” the policy will stay in place, some have been told they should “just get out” if the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy is repealed. [That is a deeply disturbing message.  Anyone who has exercised command in the military over a significant number will confirm how important the chaplain can be.  And then there is the issue of chaplains for the wounded.  The US military is desperately short of chaplains as it is.]

On Monday two of the three judges on the panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals halted a judge’s order which forbade the enforcement of the U.S. military’s policy against open homosexuals in the armed forces.

The judges in the majority said they agreed with the U.S. Department of Justice that a federal district court judge’s global injunction against the policy “will seriously disrupt ongoing and determined efforts by the Administration to devise an orderly change” if such a change will happen.

The case will be “moot” if the administration persuades Congress to eliminate the policy, the two judges added. They said four other federal appeals courts’ decisions cast doubt on whether the lower court judge exceeded her authority and ignored existing legal precedents.

District Court Judge Virginia Phillips had ruled that homosexuals could not serve in the military without having their First Amendment Rights breached.

President Barack Obama has opposed the policy and has worked to end it legislatively. The Log Cabin Republicans, a homosexual group, has been trying to overturn the policy through the federal judiciary.

[…]

“One chaplain stood up in a high-level meeting created precisely for the purpose of getting service members’ thoughts on the repeal of the policy. And he asked ‘What should chaplains do? What should people of faith do if this policy changes and we have problems of conscience with how it’s going to affect us?’” Blomberg said.

“That individual was told by a high-ranking member of the panel that they should just get out of the military.”  [And then what?  Would they be “replaced” with chaplains who are themselves homosexual or at least pro-homosexual?  “Tolerant”?]

[…]

Archbishop for the Military Services Timothy J. Broglio has opposed repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” In an interview with CNA last month, he warned of a “latent” danger to religious liberty in the agenda advanced by some people in the name of tolerance.

(T)here is an agenda to force everyone to accept as normal and positive behavior that is contrary to the moral norms of many religions, including the Catholic Church,” he commented, voicing concern that teaching morality or forming young people in their faith could be misconstrued as intolerance.

Posted in The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

MUGS GONE WILD! This time MAGNET gone wild!

I love emails with photos of WDTPRS stuff, coffee mugs and other swag… in the wild.

A seminarian reader sent a note:

Hi Father, I thought you’d appreciate this.

This is on the…wait for it…”liturgy fridge” that has the wine and hosts for Mass in it at IHM Seminary in Winona.  Our priests, do, in fact “say the black and do the red.”  We have some truly great priests here, for whom I am very thankful.

OORAH!

Don’t forget the Oremus pro Pontifice items!

Posted in Just Too Cool |
8 Comments

QUAERITUR: “free from attachment to sin” for plenary indulgence

Several readers have asked along these lines:

To get a plenary indulgence we have to be completely detached from sin, affection for sin, even venial sins.  Since only Our Lord and Our Blessed Mother were perfectly free from attachment to sin, how can any of us ever gain a plenary indulgence?  Doesn’t the Church set an impossibly high standard?  Why bother trying?

First, having high standards is a good thing.  Shouldn’t we be free from attachment to sin?  To what degree is being attached to sin okay?

In the final analysis, perhaps we have to admit that gaining plenary indulgences is rarer than we would like.

That said, it is not impossible.  And I don’t think we have to be a hermit living on top of a tree beating his head with a rock to be free of attachment to sin so as to gain this plenary or “full” indulgence.

Also, we do not know the degree to which a “partial” indulgence is “partial”.  It could be a lot.  That in itself is something which should spur us on!

Generally, if someone is motivated to obtain an indulgence, he does so from true piety, desire to please God and to help oneself and others.

When it comes to complete detachment from sin, even venial, few of us live in that state all the time.  Nevertheless, there are times when we have been moved to sorrow for sin after examination of conscience, perhaps after an encounter with God as mystery in liturgical worship or in the presence of human suffering, that we come to a present horror and shame of sin that moves us to reject sin entirely.  That doesn’t mean that we, in some Pelagian sense, have chosen to remain perfect from that point on or that by force of will we can chosen never to sin again.  God is helping us with graces at that point, of course.  But we do remain frail and weak.

But God reads our hearts.

Holy Church offers us many opportunities for indulgences.  The presupposition is that Holy Church knows we can actually attain them.  They can be partial (and we don’t know to what extent that is) and full or plenary.  But they can be obtained by the faithful.

Holy Church is a good mother.  She wouldn’t dangle before our eyes something that is impossible for us to attain.  That doesn’t mean that a full indulgence is an easy thing.  It does mean that we can do it.  In fact, beatifications and canonizations have been more common in the last few decades and in previous centuries.  The Church is showing us that it is possible for ordinary people to live a life of heroic virtue.

Therefore, keep your eyes fixed on the prize of indulgences.   Never think that it is useless to try to get any indulgence, partial or full, just because

Perhaps you are not sure you can attain complete detachment from all sin, even venial.  Before you perform the indulgenced work, ask God explicitly to take away any affection for sin you might be treasuring.  Do this often and, over your lifetime, and you may find it easier and easier. Support your good project with good confessions and good communions.  You need those graces.

A person does not become expert in worldly pursuits overnight or without effort. It takes time and practice to develop skills and virtues.  It takes time to develop habits of the spirit as well.

We can do this.  And when we fall short, we still have the joy of obtaining the partial indulgence and that’s not nothing.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
23 Comments

Stephen Maturin would be delighted

Which it is great news.

From CNA:

Pope’s first words in Barcelona to be in Catalan

Rome, Italy, Nov 1, 2010 / 10:01 pm (CNA/Europa Press).- The first official words pronounced by Pope Benedict XVI during his visit to Barcelona on Nov. 7 will be in Catalan, at the Dedication Mass of the Church of the Holy Family.

The opening rites of the liturgy will be Catalan, as well as the readings for the Mass and the rite of consecration of the Church.

The Pope will also speak in Gallego—the local dialect in the Spanish region of Galicia–when he celebrates Mass Nov. 6 in Santiago de Compostela.

According to Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi, the Mass at the Church of the Holy Family will be celebrated in Spanish, Catalan and Latin.  The Gospel and the Communion rite will be in Spanish.

Father Lombardi said the Holy Father would deliver part of his homily in Catalan, but that most of the speeches during the visit would be delivered in Spanish.

He also said the Pope’s homily in Barcelona would include a reference to Antonio Gaudi, who designed the Church, and would focus on the relationship between art and faith, the Christian life and the family as the basic unit of society.

However, the spokesman explained, the motive behind the Pope’s visit “is not to support Gaudi’s  cause for beatification,” but rather “to consecrate a magnificent work that has great meaning for the Church in Catalonia.”

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged
9 Comments

QUAERITUR: “bishops in soutanes with big, gaudy riiiiiiings”

We now shift away from the less important issues – salvation outside the Church and American exceptionalism – to focus on something of momentous significance.

From a reader:

At times I have seen priests wearing a short black cape over their
cassock, and in my research, I have not been able to figure out if
there are any restrictions for their use. Certain religious orders,
Bishops and the Pope, I see, are allowed to wear it, but how about
your normal run-of-the-mill parish priest? Thank you for your time,
and keep up the good work!

The little cape over the shoulders was once upon a time a mark of jurisdiction.  Bishops use it.  Pastors of parishes could use it I believe (back when there was far more complicated ecclesiastical clothing).

These days, I think most priests use it because it looks nice.  I have a cassock with one of these.  I used it because it was warm.

Paul VI did away with a lot of the things that clerics used to wear.  For example pompoms on the ends of fascias were abolished.  Some priests use them anyway.   Back in the day, priests were not to use black watered-silk fascia.  These days some do.  Why?  They look nice.

“But Father! But Father!”, some will say.  If these things are forbidden, then they shouldn’t be used!  You are antinomian!”

To which I respond: big deal.

If using these things makes their black (or purple) socks roll up and down, great.

It was a mistake to simplify ecclesiastical garb to the degree that it was simplified.  We will see that usage, praxis, will reintegrate some of the old things back into general use.

I don’t know if this is part of the “gravitational pull” that the older forms are exerting on the new or if this is something else.

One think I do know – liberals hate stuff like thisAll the more reason to use it.

Meanwhile…

[CUE MUSIC]

From the official WDTPRS parodohymnodist to the Sound of Music tune “My Favorite Things”:

Dalmatics on deacons and cassocks on priests,
habits on nuns and immovable feasts,
bishops in soutanes with big, gaudy rings –
these are a few of my favorite things.

Devotions to Mary, novenas and stations,
fasting and penance on Days of Rogation,
High Mass and Low Mass and papal blessings –
these are a few of my favorite things.

Rosaries and incense and fiddleback vestments,
BINGO on Mondays with homemade refreshments,
statues of angels with halos and wings –
these are a few of my favorite things.

When RENEW strikes!
When the rail’s gone!
When I’m feeling sad,
I simply pop into a Solemn High Mass
and then I don’t feel so baaaaaad!

[MUSIC CONTINUES IN BACKGROUND]

When you’ve had a hard day sorting out what fancy gear priests can wear, … nay rather… when you have had a hard day biting your tongue over the shabby way most priests usually dress these days…. for the love of GOD can’t these men put on clerical clothes?  Can we have a little liturgical decorum?   In the name of all that is holy, isn’t about time that clerics start dressing as if both their own role in the Church and what they are doing in church might be slightly Buy some coffee!important, rather than throwing on something they rummaged up from the laundry bag behind the “Tasty Bakery” after the night shift?

It’s enough to make you….

Why not relax with a WDTPRS mug filled to the brim with piping hot Mystic Monk Coffee?

Refresh your supply now! Not just Monk Coffee … Mystic Monk!

It’s swell!

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity, Parody Songs | Tagged ,
26 Comments

All Souls – Manhattan – Solemn TLM tonight

There will be a Solemn Mass with the 1962 Missale Romanum at Holy Innocents in Manhattan (near 37th and Broadway) for All Souls, Tuesday – election day – 2 November at 6 PM.  The choir will sing Morales’ Missa pro defunctis.

The undersigned will be celebrant.

Yesterday evening we had a solemn TLM for All Saints.  The undersigned swapped roles last night and was the deacon instead of the celebrant.  I don’t often get to be the deacon.  Good practice!  The Mass was well attended and the experience was very edifying.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

Politics and maturity

From the indefatigable Laudator:

Nicolás Gómez Dávila (1913-1994), Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección (Bogotá: Villegas Editores, 2001), p. 248 (tr. by Stephen at Don Colacho’s Aphorisms):

Man matures when he stops believing that politics solves his problems.

El hombre madura cuando deja de creer que la política le resuelve los problemas.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
5 Comments

WDTPRS POLL about your intentions for the US midterm elections

Here is a WDTPRS poll intended for US citizens.

Given the way soon-to-be Card. Burke has been subjected to anti-Catholic reporting in the mainstream press (USAToday) and how he has been derided by the NCR (blog of a dissident woman religious), I think the best way that faithful Catholics can respond and, in a way “get even”, is to…

VOTE!

Moreover, vote in accordance with what Card. Burke explained.

You might even let the dissenters and anti-Catholics know what you did and why.

In the meantime, here is a WDTPRS POLL.

There could be other possible answers.  Perhaps these options won’t perfectly describe you.

Nevertheless, please pick the answer that BEST describes you.

Please explain your choice in the combox below with all possible civility and using your God-given ability to self-edit.

For the US midterm elections:

  • I am going to vote, and I will vote in harmony with the Church's teaching about the sanctity of life of the unborn, natural marriage, etc., along the lines explained by Card. Burke. (55%, 1,083 Votes)
  • I voted already/early and I voted in harmony with the Church's teaching about the sanctity of life of the unborn, natural marriage, etc., along the lines explained by Card. Burke. (30%, 586 Votes)
  • I know I will not vote. (6%, 113 Votes)
  • I don't know if I am going to vote, I am in harmony with the Church's teaching about the sanctity of life of the unborn, natural marriage, etc., along the lines explained by Card. Burke. (4%, 74 Votes)
  • I will vote but I think other social issues are important enough that I can't be a "one issue" Catholic, letting concern for abortion override my views about the poor, healthcare, social justice, e (3%, 67 Votes)
  • I voted already/early and Card. Burke's views didn't figure. (1%, 23 Votes)
  • I will vote and I, a Catholic, am in favor of abortion rights, limited or unlimted, equality for same-sex stuff, etc. I don't agree with Card. Burke. (1%, 16 Votes)
  • I vote, but I always vote strictly along party lines. I am unconcerned with Catholic teaching one way or another. (0%, 5 Votes)

Total Voters: 1,968

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, POLLS, The Last Acceptable Prejudice |
60 Comments

C of E panic about Anglicanorum coetibus

From Damian Thompson (who is in NYC and came to the solemn TLM at Holy Innocents yesterday):

The Church of England’s determination to wreck the Ordinariate plan needs to be emphasised again and again, despite the General Synod’s offer to departing Anglo-Catholics to allow them to carry on worshipping as Catholics in their old buildings (which will stay Anglican). The offer isn’t particularly radical – it would look terrible if the C of E refused permission, particularly as it allowed this arrangement to operate when a group of Anglicans from St Stephen’s, Gloucester Road, South Kensington, converted in the early 1990s. (Cardinal Basil Hume was persuaded by liberals to put an end to that experiment, I gather.)

I’m rather impressed by the panic in Anglican circles at the Pope’s plan, even though the people panicking simultaneously assure us that it will come to nothing. Amazingly, the Church of England is now dangling the carrot of the women bishops legislation not going through in front of potential Ordinariate supporters. But women bishops certainly will be ordained before long and, in strict Anglo-Catholic terms, any bishop in any sort of communion with them will be fatally compromised. It would be unkind to describe the attempt to confuse traditionalists as dirty tactics, though if I were a supporter of women’s ordination I might wonder what the hell was going on.

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in New Evangelization, Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged ,
18 Comments

Wherein Fr. Z offers a great guest rant by Dennis Prager

From a reader.

Dennis Prager is one of the smartest people raising his voice in the public square.

While I believe the Soviet Army liberated Auschwitz, the US Army liberated other death camps.  That slight error does not touch on the substance of what he is saying.

Posted in The future and our choices | Tagged
26 Comments