Liberals finally defend Liturgiam authenticam!

Many readers are sending me links to liturgical writers and pages and blogs, liberals, frothing about changes the Holy See is making to the English translation of the Roman Missal approved in 2008 by the USCCB and given the nod by the Holy See.

Rome is making lots of changes to the 2008 and some are not at all pleased.

I have had for a while now the texts of the 2008 and the amended 2010 texts and will one day get around to them.

That said….

Isn’t it fascinating that, now that Rome is making changes liberals don’t like, liberals claimed Liturgiam authenticam as their own?

What does Rome have to do now to get them to read Redemptionis Sacramentum… Summorum PontificumEx corde Ecclesiae… ?

Posted in Lighter fare, The Drill | Tagged
24 Comments

QUAERITUR: Mortal sin to join SSPX third order?

From a reader:

I have a question about becoming a 3rd Order member with the SSPX. Would it put me into mortal sin to become a member? I have not attended their Mass on general orders from Pope Benedict XVI though I pray for full communion for them. They are also not in my area but I’d still be able to become part of the 3rd Order.

Would you commit a mortal sin by joining?  I think that would depend in part on why you wanted to join.  If you are doing so as a protest against the Holy Father Pope Benedict, against “Rome”, then I think you might be on shaky ground.

Also, if there should be a problem down the line with members of the SSPX (which is clerical) incurring the excommunication that comes from being formally in schism (they seem not to be now and I hope they never are), that might make the situation of lay people in an associated third order a bit less secure.  We know that priests of the SSPX belong to the group, because they are ordained in their ranks, take pay checks and assignments, etc .  We don’t know right now what it means, canonically, for lay people to follow such priests.  If the SSPX eventually is determined to be in schism and that is declared by the Holy See clearly, then would laypeople following them be adhering to schism too?  That is less clear.  Lay people fulfill their Sunday Mass obligation if they go to an SSPX chapel for Mass.  They can even give some money when they go for the upkeep of the chapel.  While I don’t recommend receiving Communion at their Masses, there are conditions under which it would be okay to do so.  So, we have a harder time determining how the status of a layperson might change, than we do with those who accept Holy Orders.  We could use the help of a canonist.

I can see why a traditionally-minded person might want to be associated with a group of manifestly traditional priests such as the SSPX.  Most of the SSPX priests I have met or had dealings with have been upstanding guys.

However, you would not have the benefit of indulgences and so forth which members of approved groups can gain.   The SSPX can do great things for the intellectual formation of laypeople, but they have no authority whatsoever to grant indulgences.   This is one of the principle reasons why people join confraternities and third orders: spiritual benefits.

The Confraternity of St. Peter, associated with the FSSP, Fraternity of St. Peter, has the grant of indulgences for its members:

The Apostolic Penitentiary, by virtue of the faculties granted to it by Pope Benedict XVI, has kindly willed to grant (by decree of June 7, 2008, for 7 years ad experimentum as is customary) to the members of the Confraternity of Saint Peter at the usual conditions (sacramental confession, Eucharistic communion and prayer at the intentions of the Sovereign Pontiff):
1.  A plenary indulgence:

a)  On the day of their admission into the Confraternity;
b)  On February 22nd, Feast of the Chair of St Peter and anniversary of the foundation of the Confraternity;
c)  On June 29th, Feast of Saints Peter and Paul;

2.  A partial indulgence:

Whenever they partake in pious or charitable activities as members of the Confraternity.

This group in in manifest union with Rome and provides the possibility of spiritual benefits such as indulgences.

Something to consider.

I look forward to the day when this is all resolved and these questions never have to be raised again!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
12 Comments

What is your good news?

First, happy Feast of Sts. Simon and Jude.  St. Jude is a patron of “impossible causes”, which gives me some comfort today.

Second, today is the anniversary of the 312 AD Battle of the Milvian Bridge, when Constantine defeated Maxentius.  I think you know that story.  I consider it good news that Constantine won.

Third, after a long power outage, I have everything up and running.  Not having electricity for a while constrained me to do some things the old fashioned way, such as heat water for my morning coffee.  Mass was by candlelight, which was just fine, though my eyes aren’t as young as they used to be.  Perhaps this would have been a good moment for iPad with photos of the pages of the book.  In order to get my article in for The Wanderer I had to go to a library and get on wifi, but it eventually worked out.

Fourth, my double recipe of Boeuf Bourguignon for our literary group came off very well on Monday.  I served also braised pearl onions, sauteed mushrooms, and peas, together with buttered egg noodles.  For dessert we split up a less than impressive pumpkin cake thingy.  By that point we weren’t too interested in eating any more.   For the next meeting of the group we determined to go Roman.  I’l make buccatini all’amatriciana and saltimbocca. And we will switch from T.S. Eliot to Yeats.

Fifth, it was nice to see today that the Google Friends thingy now shows 700 people signed up.  Thanks!  I could use some additional Twitter followers, however.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
44 Comments

Unbleached beeswax candles

Over at NLM there was a post about unbleached beeswax candles, which are traditionally used for Masses for the Dead.

Reverend Fathers, Your Excellencies and sundry Graces… please consider the use of beeswax candles for All Souls and Requiem Masses.  They lend a different aspect to the solemn rite.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged ,
8 Comments

QUAERITUR: reconsecrating, restoring a chalice

From a reader:

Many years ago, a chalice was donated to the parish of my grandfather as a memorial after his death. After several years, my grandmother received a call from the pastor stating that they were cleaning house in the sacristy and that if she did not take possession of the chalice it would be given to the diocesan reclamations office.  She took possession of the chalice and kept it in her home. Unfortunately, it was later subject to improper handling by the family as well as profanation. After her passing it has come into my possession where it is locked in a safe until proper arrangements can be made.  Personally, I would like to give the chalice to a friend of mine who will be ordained to the priesthood this coming May, however, I would not want to give it to him unless proper reparation could be made.  Can a chalice be re-consecrated? Is there another means for dealing with these unfortunate circumstances? Any direction you can give is most appreciated.

That sounds like a good plan for that chalice.

I suggest that you have it cleaned and restored, if repair are necessary.  Sometimes the cup of the chalice needs to be re-gilded.

Then you can simply give him the chalice, telling him that it needs to be reconsecrated.  At that point the ordinandus can handle the situation himself.   He can approach a bishop and have it consecrated or, the less desirable solution, assume that it is consecrated after its first use at Holy Mass.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
7 Comments

QUAERITUR: priest adds a word to words of absolution

From a reader:

Father, i went to confession this afternoon and instead of the usual “I absolve you from your sins…” the priest said instead, “I now absolve you from your sins…”. Was my confession valid?

Yes, it was valid.

In a sense, “I now absolve” isn’t too far from “Ego… absolvo“, given that absolvo is present tense.

That change to the form isn’t enough to invalidate the absolution.

That said, priests should stick to the form as it is given by the Church.   Just say the black words on the page while doing the red words.  In this way, priests don’t a) impose themselves on the rite and b) lead anyone to have a doubt about what happened.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
13 Comments

BLOG RENEWAL: combox and mobile theme

Under another entry a commentator said that, in his experience, there is an odd glitch in the combox.  He says that the input editor suppresses a space between the punctuation at the end of a sentence and the beginning of the next sentence.

Has anyone else seen that?  I have not.

Also, he says that the new mobile mode is not as friendly as the previous one for his Palm Treo.

I have adjusted the mobile theme a couple times now.  It was my impression that it was working pretty well now.   This is a case in which I have to go with what works with the majority.  I don’t believe there is an option using a plugin that detects the type of mobile browser and then pushes a particular theme to it.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
13 Comments

“I worked so hard for that title!”

I don’t like being called anything but “Father” … except for those times when I don’t care.   After all, I worked hard for that title.

Oooops… er… um… no… um… no, wait.    It has to do with that ontological character and all that.

Remember when the Senator from California made the comment during a hearing that she wanted to be called “Senator” because she had worked so hard for that title?   As I watched that clip on the news I knew I would be hearing it again at sometime during the campaign.

I just thought that was fun.

Titles are important, even in a society in which decorum is going by the board.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
31 Comments

Minnesota Democrats: ANTI-CATHOLIC in print

I wonder if there is a federal statute that covers using the U.S Postal Service for the distribution of discriminatory printed material aimed at a specific religious group.  I am no lawyer, but I can wonder.  Right?

Yesterday I posted an entry, others posted on this also, about an election agtiprop postcard sent by Minnesota Democrats.  I and others saw the post card as anti-Catholic.  Some disagreed.  The postcard shows black and white photo (in itself a negative image technique common to political advertising) of a man in a Roman collar wearing a brightly colored button “ignore the poor”.  The button is photoshopped.  The message is that Catholic clergy hate the poor.  Catholics don’t care about the poor.  I believe this was payback aimed at Archbp. Nienstedt and the other MN bishops for initiatives against Obamacare’s federal funding of abortion, and in defense of true marriage against unnatural unions.

A local news station on this.  In this story you learn that the Democrat Party in Minnesota paid for this.

I wonder if the people who used that photograph had the written permission of the cleric whose photo they took and then distributed in the US Postal Service?  Or maybe they dressed some one up in a Roman collar.

Again, some people thought the Minnesota Democrats postcard mailing was not really anti-Catholic.

Now I see another Minnesota Democrat postcard.

MN DEMS = BIGOTS?

You decide.

When bishops raises their voices to express an opinion on moral issues that affect society, the constant drumbeat of the liberal left is that the bishops are being political.

These are anti-Catholic attack ads, pure and simple.

Remember who had them printed and mailed.

The DFL (Democrat Party in Minnesota… Democratic Farm Labor) printed and disstributed these anti-Catholic postcards.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged ,
42 Comments

Benedict XVI on regulating migration

A friend of mine, the great Roman Fabrizio noticed this and sent it along for our opportune knowledge.

The Holy Father, in his “Message” for the World Day for Migrants and Refugees, offered:

” The Church recognizes this right in every human person, in its dual aspect of the possibility to leave one’s country and the possibility to enter another country to look for better conditions of life” (Message for World Day of Migration 2001, 3; cf. John XXIII, Encyclical Mater et Magistra, 30; Paul VI, Encyclical Octogesima adveniens, 17). At the same time, States have the right to regulate migration flows and to defend their own frontiers, always guaranteeing the respect due to the dignity of each and every human person. Immigrants, moreover, have the duty to integrate into the host Country, respecting its laws and its national identity. “

Fabrizio adds:

Benedict for Jan Brewer and Joe Arpaio?

I am so glad that Fabrizio had the patience to read that whole thing.  But don’t we all await these letters on pins and needles?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
15 Comments