Daily Rome Shot 586, etc.

I am happy to say that there is a new album of chant for ADVENT by Benedictines!

White to move and win material.  This is tricky.  Done right, at one point black should have 3 hanging pieces.  Things can change very quickly on this battlefield.

NB: I may hold comments with puzzle solutions a little longer than others so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

If you are moving and need a realtor, try Realtors for Life. They give a portion of the fee to pro-life causes.

I pray for all my benefactors, donors and stuff-from-wishlist senders.  It is my duty and pleasure.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

ASK FATHER: A vision and promise from a “archangel”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Dear Father Z, can you advise me on how to react to a Polish friend who had a vivid experience that she was promised by the Archangel Jeremiel that he would protect her?

The reason that I don’t dismiss this out of hand is that she had never heard of such a character and indeed assumed it was the Prophet Jeremiah. The voice was specific about being an Archangel, not an angel.

The circumstances seem important too. She had just successfully completed chemotherapy. In her life she has suffered generously for others and has a ton of problems. Not long ago she took a decision to reform her intimate life and started  going to confession and Mass (TLM).

My concern is that I find only one Biblical reference to an Archangel Jeremiel (2 Esdra) but masses of dodgy new age internet pages about him. On the other hand I know that my friend doesn’t read new age stuff, she’s a very serious person.

Any suggestions ?

We only have three names of archangels revealed and may not use others.

Out of caution for the good of her soul she should reject the apparition. No voice or vision is necessary for salvation.

If it is of God he will not be offended since he’ll know this is done out of prudence.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
19 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 24th and Last Sunday after Pentecost (Christ the King – N.O.)

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for the 24th and Last Sunday after Pentecost (Christ the King in the Novus)?

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.  I hear that it is growing.  Of COURSE.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

I have a few thoughts about the Gospel HERE.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
9 Comments

DIEBUS SALTEM DOMINICIS – 24th and Last Sunday after Pentecost

Excita, quaesumus, Domine, tuorum fidelium voluntates…  Stir up the wills of your people, O Lord…”.

Thus begins the Collect for Holy Mass for this 24th and Last Sunday after Pentecost.

In a few short days, shorter and shorter in the Northern Hemisphere, we will again come to Advent and a new liturgical year.  Meanwhile, this Sunday is nicknamed “Stir Up Sunday”, because of the English tradition of having everyone in the family, perhaps with friends and neighbors, take turns stirring together the many ingredients that go into preparing the rich and savory Christmas Pudding.

We Catholics are always excited to look ahead, even if what we see being stirred up on the horizon is ominous.  This is because of our confidence that this is the time when, in His ineffable plan for the cosmos, He chose for us to come into being.  This is our time, come what may.  The greater the challenges, the greater the graces, the greater the honor and joy.

Our context for the Gospel reading is the Mount Olivet Discourse, which has parallels in the three Synoptic Gospels, Matthew 24-25, Mark 13 and Luke 21.

We have on this Last Sunday of the liturgical year a long selection dealing with the “end of the world” from Matthew, from the Olivet Discourse just before the Lord’s Passion begins.

For your context, always important, Christ had mere days before He made His triumphant entry into Jerusalem on that first Palm Sunday. He cleansed the Temple and cursed the fig tree, taught in many parables, denounced the scribes and Pharisees, and – as Luke recounts – He uttered his poignant lament over Jerusalem.

On the Mount of Olives there is a place where tradition has it that the Lord looked out over Jerusalem and wept over the future destruction of the city which would come in AD 70 by the Romans.  The little Church “Dominus Flevit… the Lord wept” marks the spot.  As the priest celebrates Holy Mass ad orientem at that little church’s altar, he can look through a window directly across the valley to the Temple Mount.

The Olivet Discourse, our reading, is filled with apocalyptic language, which makes it appropriate for this Last Sunday.  As we dovetail into Advent, which is more about the Second Coming of the Lord than it is about His First Coming, we are as a Church reflecting on the Four Last Things and about the End Times.

The Matthew passage sounds as if Christ was talking about the future end of the world even while as He predicted the coming destruction of the Temple.  We must always remember with the Lord that He, like Daniel whom He cites, also was a Prophet.  As such, Christ used language and imagery like a prophet: upheavals and heavenly events and so forth.  He talked about the Son on Man coming in power and glory as lightning that flashes from the East to the West.   This is His Second Coming, upon which we seriously reflect during Advent.

At the same time, we can tell that Christ was also discoursing about something that was going to occur before the coming of the Son of Man at the end.  How is this?   He warned people that when the time came they should drop everything and flee to the mountains.  He told them to pray that their flight be not in winter, when moving quickly would be hard, or on the sabbath, when it was forbidden to walk more than a short distance (v. 16-20).

If the Lord was talking strictly about the end of the world, it wouldn’t make any difference if they fled Jerusalem or not, if it were the sabbath or not, winter or not.  Hence, He was at least talking about the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple.  His dire warnings would be fulfilled in terms even more terrifying than His bare words in the Gospels predicted.

According to the 1st century Jewish historian Josephus (+c. 100) as well as modern scholars, the Romans enslaved some 100,000 and the area around the city was denuded of trees for the crucifixions of the survivors, some 500 per day.  Nearly one million died.  Not a stone was left on stone of the Temple.  It was the “end of the world”.

Indeed, for the Jews who couldn’t flee that was the end of the world, not just physical but also figuratively.  The Lord’s two-fold prophecy blends together two destructions.

For the Jews, the Temple was designed to be a representation of the entire cosmos.  It had courtyards decorated with carved palms, representing the land.  There was a huge bronze water basin called the Sea, for ritual purification.  The inner court was divided by a great curtain decorated with the constellations, like Heaven.  Inside the inner court was the Holy of Holies, where God’s presence rested when the Ark had been there.  The Temple was like the summation of and center of creation.  All sacrifice was carried out there and only there for the Jews.  The destruction of the Temple was truly the destruction of their universe, the end of the world, land, waters, and heavens.  It was, as the Lord echoing Daniel projects, the “abomination of desolation”, that is, the sacrilegious repression of the Temple sacrifices.  Of course, all those sacrifices foreshadowed Christ, and were fulfilled and replaced by Him, the Lamb who takes away the sins of the world.

Our Mother the Church is the greatest expert on humanity there has ever been.  She knows that we need to consider the end times, our personal end in our coming to Christ and the end of the world in Christ’s coming to it.   We approach these themes with honest and understandable trepidation.  However, we are also filled with the Christian hope presaged by the often dour Jeremiah, which we sing in this Sunday’s Introit chant: “The Lord says: “I think thoughts of peace, and not of affliction. You shall call upon Me, and I will hear you; and I will bring back your captivity from all places” (Jer 29).

After the exile in Babylon, the people did return home to rebuild under Nehemiah and Ezra.  They rediscovered the books of the “old religion” and, after exile and repression, rebuilt, a trowel in one hand and a sword in the other.

On Sunday we will hear what Paul wrote to the Colossians, probably written during his first imprisonment in Rome:

“May you be strengthened with all power, according to his glorious might, for all endurance and patience with joy, giving thanks to the Father, who has qualified us to share in the inheritance of the saints in light.”  (vv. 1:11-12)

What ever it is that the Lord is stirring up for us in the upcoming liturgical year, let us savor the plan He has wrought and make the best and most joyful use possible of the celebration of the sacred mysteries we are so privileged to have.

Posted in Sermons |
1 Comment

NEW chant albums by Benedictines – Gower Abbey and Clear Creek

I am delighted that there are two new albums of chants by Benedictines. CDs and MP3 available.

First in my heart are the wonderful Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles at Gower Abbey, whose singing is angelic.

The Holy Trinity at Ephesus
US HERE – UK NOT YET

More about the nuns and their new daughter house.  See what they are going to build.

Next are the Monks of Clear Creek Abbey with …

Rorate Coeli: Marian Sounds of Advent By The Monks of Clear Creek
US HERE – UK HERE

Something about the monks.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Just Too Cool, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 585, etc.

And… a puzzle from 1876.  White to move.

NB: I may hold comments with puzzle solutions a little longer than others so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

The composer was Charles Alexander Gilberg.

His introduction to a collection of problems Crumbs from the Chess-Board: A Selection From The Problems Composed By Charles A. Gilberg. New York, 1890, is delightful.    NB: Caïssa (originally called Scacchia) is a personification of chess or the “goddess” of chess which was coined in 1527 in a Latin poem in iambic hexameter by Hieronymus Vida.

As a recreation for the idle hours of life, the wide and varied domain of chess, but more especially that branch so aptly termed the Poetry of the game, has been to me during the past thirty years an unfailing source of delightful entertainment—a perennial banquet, indeed, that has never suffered the appetite for its social and intellectual fare to languish. Votaries of every clime and country have contributed the fruits of their genius and industry to the repast, and many warm and valued friendships have been cemented by kindred tastes and sympathies. But how few, alas, of the early companions remain to share the feast ! The empire of earthly pleasures is frail and uncertain, and its curfew must toll for us all. While lingering at a somewhat late and protracted dessert with an ever unsated yearning for Caissa’s bounty, I have gathered up some of the crumbs that have fallen from my table, which I wish to offer as a souvenir to the friends who still abide to minister to my enjoyment. If, to them, these morsels will serve to impart an occasional gleam of pleasant recollection, the aim and ambition which were the impelling influences that led to this collection will be fully gratified. In the following pages the conventional terms of White and Black have been retained, but the forces of the chess-board are respectively presented in Red and Blue. With the exception of a few of the older compositions included in this selection, that have been reset and remoulded, all have passed through the ordeal of public scrutiny, and I trust that it may not be unreasonable to hope that they will successfully maintain an unblemished integrity against all further analytical research.

C. A. G.

Some wonderful wine with your puzzles would also help the traditional Benedictine monks in southern France at Le Barroux.  You can get a discount by using my code.

;

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
9 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 584, etc.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

Black to move.  Mate in 3.  After yesterday’s this is a piece of cake.

NB: I may hold comments with puzzle solutions a little longer than others so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

The Remote Chess Academy has helped my game.  They have all sorts of courses for different levels and prices.

I received a package of candles from the wonderful Summit Dominicans.  Happily I was able to get Advent candles along with candles for the Two Trinity chapel.

They make lots things that could be great Christmas presents, and you would be supporting them, too.  Check their site.  HERE

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

ACTION ITEM! I printed a copy of de Souza’s commentary to a PDF and saved it.

I try not to pay too much attention to Jesuit-run Amerika Magazine.  It occasionally intrudes.   Even less to I want thoughts of or by Austen Ivereigh.  I am therefore grateful to my friend Fr. Raymond J. de Souza who, writing for the National Catholic Register on 9 November, [HERE] gave his take on Ivereigh’s “insider” account in Amerika on 29 October about a committee set up by the Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops (including Ivereigh) at Frascati cobbling up the instrumentum laboris for the next phase towards the Synod (“walking together”) on Synodality (“walking together-ity”).

De Souza’s scathing distillation of the “board room” process engaged at Frascati  in by the Synod’s (“walking together”) committee is brilliant.

Be warned.  Even shielded as we are by his mediation, what is related makes one want a shower with industrial strength soap.

Prompted by de Souza’s analysis, I had look at Amerika.  After I found a video of a couple of youthful Jesuits giving their deeply cringeworthy thoughts about “liturgy” (I think they meant “Mass”, but who knows), I readied my emesis basin by my keyboard and started in with Ivereigh’s account.

De Souza’s analysis is on target.  “Smarmy” isn’t enough.  It was like reading a report written by Lord Haw-Haw.  But it is no joke.  It would be easily dismissible as sycophantic twaddle were it not for the fact that this Synod (“walking together”) thing, this risible clown-car cum crushing juggernaut, is really “walking together”: the teaching of whole pontificates is being white washed from view, and a new set of buzz words is replacing history, reason, and faith.

Heaven only knows what will be done during and in the aftermath of this Synodal (“walking together”) process.  But be assured, everything done, every reasoning defying, doctrine denying transmogrification will be attributed to the inspiration of the “the Holy Spirit”.

A comment by de Souza near the end of his piece is worth recounting here.  It seems that the Synodal (“walking together”) process means that you can make Scripture mean anything you want it to, because, you know, Vatican II and all that.  It’s the Spirit at work.   So, use of Scripture is sure to be dodgy.  Hence de Souza’s observation about the imagery of “enlarging the tent” of the Church, ’cause, you know, it’s too small because of Vatican II:

This time around, the scriptural mischief has landed upon Isaiah 54 and the image of “enlarging the tent.”

“The existing containers are not adequate to hold the diversity of the Church, nor to enable the participation of all in the mission,” writes Ivereigh. Time for a bigger tent.

Yet the tent of meeting for the children of Israel required rigorous purification before entering. And the enlarged tent of Isaiah 54 is an image of Israel subduing the enemies on her borders; enlarging the tent is more an image of conquering, not walking together.

I printed a copy of de Souza’s commentary to a PDF and saved it.

 

Posted in ACTION ITEM!, Our Catholic Identity, Pò sì jiù, Synod, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, What are they REALLY saying?, You must be joking! | Tagged
7 Comments

ASK FATHER: Transplant of organ from a person who was a satanist or practitioner of witchcraft, etc.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

On Friday, I will br undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery after a farm related injury. Part of the procedure involves rebuilding my ACL by screwing a cadaver tendon in the place of my torn ACL. I am aware the Church considers donating such body parts as acceptable under a clause of Charity. But I have concerns about the spiritual side of the transplant: What if the tendon is not from a Baptised person? Or from an evil, damned or cursed person akin to a witch or satanist? I am considering saying some of the binding prayers for laity both before and after the surgery along with prayers of thanksgiving that I may have the opportunity to walk as a result of this surgery. What are your thoughts on this matter?

GUEST RESPONSE from a priest who is an exorcist and instructor of exorcists:

There is something to what he says. The interaction of the soul with body is so intimate that the spiritual state of the soul leaves a patina – much like relics.

If he could get a priest to exorcise and bless the tendon that would be best. A minor exorcism and blessing can also be done by any priest afterwards.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
8 Comments

“If the Eucharistic Revival doesn’t address these…”

There’s chatter about “Eucharistic Revival”.  I have my ideas about what will work, but I’m afraid that the spirit of Vatican II, at least under the control of the power-that-be, will not be able even to imagine giving them a try.

What sorts of things need to be addressed in order for there to be a Eucharist Revival… which I assume means belief in what the Church has always taught about the Eucharist as well as reception of Communion in the state of grace (i.e. the highest form of “active participation”)?

As seen on Twitter…

Let’s have a better look at that image:  [UPDATED with corrections on 18 Nov 22]

If people see the priest treating the Eucharistic Species with the reverence they deserve, why should they?  If people see the priest taking the greatest care in the details and also preaching about the Eucharist, there will be a knock-on effect.  And I don’t think it would take too long, either, because this is the Eucharist we are talking about!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The future and our choices | Tagged
21 Comments