Daily Rome Shot 531, etc. – packed!

Daily Rome Shot 531, etc. - packed!

Catholic?  Have a site or web project?  The Catholic Signal Corps might be just the right resource for you.  Recently we helped Padre Pio Press.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.

Today, 50 years ago in Iceland, not much is going on. The great match between Bobby Fischer and Boris Spassky resumes on 15 August.

Meanwhile, I know you are hungry for more chess lore.   I am working my way, slowly, through Birth of the Chess Queen: A History by a feminist writer.  It is interesting how in some books that have an ideological goal, or some TV series or movies, the first part is balanced and even-handed, nothing too forward.  Then, slowly but surely, less subtle comments or images are put it.  It’s as if they are thinking, “If he read/watched this far into the book/TV series/movie, he is hooked and won’t stop.  Now is the time to start putting in the a) ideology b) images of homosexual PDAs, c) propaganda.  Over time, it’ll have its effect in changing people’s views.  Just think Murphy Brown.”

Anyway, I am now at the chapter about the connection between devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary in the medieval period and the development of the Queen as a piece in chess.  So far, respectful, but there are a couple of little hints that more might be on the way.  All in all, when she talks about the great queens of, say, France, especially those descending from Eleanor of Aquitaine, such as the fabled Blanche, her daughter and mother of St Louis of France, she is respectful and laudatory about the fact that they had many children and were family in their families.  However, she usually at some point throws in a comment about how “misogynistic” prevailing attitudes were.  Yawn.  Really?

Anyway, I have picked up on one common theme about the transformation of the ancient Indian/Persian Elephant and the Islamic Vizier into the European Bishop.  In literature of the day, descriptions of chess, poetry about chess – don’t for a moment underestimate its importance and popularity – pieces had moral, ethical connotations too.  Bishops were in some places Jesters (the two pronged cap and bells hat probably being a version of tusks) or were considered as sneaky and devious, because they moved on diagonals.   Here’s one passage about the chess Bishop in the time of the great Eleanor.

But getting back to the bishop, he was generally not held in high esteem.  [Alexander] Neckham referred to him as a “spy” and the Winchester Poem called him a “thief.”  The very word aufin commonly used in French and English for this piece became a term of scorn or reproach in both languages.

US HERE – UK HERE

There are quite a few snarky remarks about the chess bishop.

No bishops in sight in this puzzle.  White to move and start the net, and I don’t mean ham radio.  You might be tempted by a distraction.  Don’t waste your time.

Daily Rome Shot 531, etc. - packed!

Thank to a few more readers who have used the Wavy Flag for my upcoming Roman October.  Every donation makes a difference.  In the last couple of days, I thank especially

WH, GG, MB

Mille grazie!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
1 Comment

ASK FATHER: A priest asks, “Is it okay to learn how to say the Traditional Latin Mass?” Wherein Fr. Z rants.

From a priest…

QUAERITUR:

Is it okay to learn how to say the Traditional Latin Mass?

Where are we at with the whole overblown, skewed notion of obedience and authority today that it would enter into a priest’s mind that it might to wrong to learn to say the TLM.  Not to say the TLM publicly in defiance of authority, though that will come to pass, I predict.  But just to learn how to say it?    This points to a whole other problem in the Church today, but I digress.  Back to the topic…

Not only is it okay to learn to say the TLM, it is NOT okay NOT to learn to say the TLM. 

I would, had I power, oblige every priest of the Latin Church, the Roman Rite, at least to learn it.

Why?  Not just because by learning it you learn more about your priesthood.

Why?  Not just because by learning it you will change the way you say the Novus Ordo.

Why?  Not just because by learning it you will spark a positive knock on effect among the people you serve.

Why? Not just because by learning it you will be better positioned when the lunacy of Taurina cacata has come to an end.

I am convinced that one of the reasons certain bishops and priests seem determined to suppress the TLM and isolate, marginalize the people who want it is because the TLM unsettles, disturbs, annoys, irritates, needles, vexes clerics involved in one of the sins that cries to heaven.

Even if these bishops and priests have never seen or been to a TLM in their lives, they know that the TLM would remind them of what the Novus Ordo does not: sin, guilt and judgment.

The TLM reminds priests in a sobering way about their failings as men and as priests, that they are unworthy sinners who, by the grace of God alone, can stand at the altar to renew the sacred mysteries.  This is one of the Church’s precious and encouraging gifts to priests.

Contrary to the claims of those who hate the Traditional Mass, it is the best antidote to clericalism that there is.

We are our rites.  A priest gains inestimable riches and insights into who he is at altar through a knowledge of and use of the Vetus Ordo.

Liturgy is doctrine.  This is part of the reason why certain powers that be and the wormtongues behind them want to suppress the Vetus Ordo.

Say you want to change certain doctrines, not evolve organically and consistently, but just change.   With me?

The first thing you would have to do is change the way people worship.  Change how they pray, and over time over time you change what they believe.    In the Vetus Ordo the changers perceive an obstacle to changing the Church’s doctrines, especially in the sphere of sexual morality.   Therefore, they must restrict access to public celebrations of the TLM and keep as many priests as possible from learning it.   Make sure the liturgy in churches and seminaries emphasizes – on a good day – the Resurrection aspect of the Paschal Mystery and eschatological joy for everyone.  Make sure people don’t hear too much about propitiation, sin, guilt and judgment (concepts consistently stripped out of the orations of the Novus Ordo).

Cut them off from their roots in what their forebears believed and built.

Atomize them into smaller and smaller communities, each with its own liturgical expression, each with a language that keeps them from praying together as one.

Dumb it all down.

Isolate and bully.

You’ll get your way eventually.

Or so you think.

This, from men who don’t know how to say the TLM.

They would be slightly less hypocritical if they actually knew what they were trying to suppress.  They just know what they’ve been told about it.

And there is always that which whispers in their ears that they should get rid of because of… you know.

QUAERITUR: Is the rise of energy to suppress the TLM and the acceleration even at high levels of trying uncouple, so to speak, the Church’s teaching about sexuality from procreation just a coincidence?

They won’t get their way.  They can always hurt us more, but it won’t, in the end, work.

I don’t believe that the Vetus Ordo can, over time, be suppressed.  That toothpaste is out of the tube now and no amount of oppression will get it back in.

This is a battle over Catholic identity.  Catholic identity, not globalist NGO identity, will win.

Am I wrong?

Think about it this way, Fathers.  The Lord said that the “gates” (Greek “pylai“) of Hell will not “prevail against” (katisxusousin) the Church He would found.   “Gates” don’t attack.  “Gates” are defensive structures that are attacked.  It is the Church that is on the attack against Hell’s gates.  Hell cannot defend itself forever.  Hell defends itself with a powerful hellish onslaught.  A strong offence is a good defense.  But Hell cannot win this one even though it seems that, by attacking constantly, the demons are the attackers.

Even with the Novus Ordo only, properly celebrated, by priests who are devout, brave, focused, with laypeople – though fewer and fewer – trying live their vocations in the state of grace, the Church will, in the end win.

Through no fault of their own, priests and lay people are being sent into battle with only part of the armor and weapons available and they’ve never been fully trained to use them.

Still,  we will, in the end, win the day.  As Samwise said, “But in the end, it’s only a passing thing, this shadow. Even darkness must pass. A new day will come. And when the sun shines it will shine out the clearer.”

If God be for us, who can be against us?

That said, we also want God’s glory to be multiplied.  The loss of a soul to Hell means that much less joy in Heaven.  If we can win the day, eventually, with Novus Ordo, imagine what we might do together also with the Vetus Ordo.   This was Benedict XVI’s vision, not just a Marshall Plan against Hell’s defense-offensives , but a way to even greater glory in Heaven.

I’ll drag my fingers off the keyboard now and let you chew on that.

Fathers, learn the Vetus Ordo.  I’ll help.  And remember another thing Sam said, “It’s the job that’s never started as takes longest to finish!”

Lay people, encourage your priests.  Do everything you can to help them, by prayer and by material support.

And GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Sin That Cries To Heaven, Traditionis custodes | Tagged ,
16 Comments

You thick-headed restorationists, you backwardist, dogma-refrigerating Neopelagians… there is only one unique expression of the Roman Rite! VIDEO

You thick-headed restorationists, you backwardist, dogma-refrigerating Neopelagians… there is only one unique expression of the Roman Rite!

This is how you did it – uniquely – at St. Joan of Arc Catholic Parish in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee on the 19th Sunday in Ordinary Time – 7 August 2022 – 8:00 AM.

St. Catherine of Alexandria and St. Joan of Arc… it’s a cluster.

Highlights of their “Cluster Mass” … but just click anywhere for a unique experience of the Roman Rite.

3:28 opening
20:00 sermon
41:00 offertory
45:00 consecration
49:50 doxology
53:45 instruction before communion
1:09:00 – Had enough?

Play video

Remember, the Traditional Mass must be suppressed because… you know, SHUT UP!

Posted in Traditionis custodes | Tagged ,
43 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 530, etc.

Daily Rome Shot 530, etc.

Daily Rome Shot 530, etc.

 

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

In Iceland, 50 years ago today, nothing. There will be a break until 15 August and Game 14, at Spassky’s request. Fischer leads by 3. Fischer catches a cold. During Game 13, btw, there were a couple of Soviets in the front row with binoculars.

Meanwhile, this looks interesting.  A movie about 4 women grandmasters from the former Soviet Union.

GLORY TO THE QUEEN – TRAILER from EPF Media on Vimeo.

And yesterday, I got to this crazy position.

As white, I am crushing, but this is nuts.

Daily Rome Shot 530, etc.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

10 August: Wonderful Collect for St. Lawrence

St. Lawrence the deacon and martyr is beloved of the Romans. He has many churches in the City, which is a sign of how deeply he was venerated in centuries past.

10 August: Wonderful Collect for St. LawrenceToday in the traditional form of the Roman Rite we have a wonderful Collect:

Da nobis, quaesumus, omnipotens Deus:
vitiorum nostrorum flammas extinguere;
qui beato Laurentio tribuisti
tormentorum suorum incendia superare.

I’ll let you all have at and comment!

I limit myself to these observations.

This prayer is in a vast array of the more ancient manuscripts we possess.

Its style has the elements of Roman prayers. It is terse. It is not reticent. It has an elegant verbal and conceptual parallels (the genitive – accusative – infinitive in synchesis).

Enjoy!

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Saints: Stories & Symbols |
7 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 529, etc.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Daily Rome Shot 529, etc.

Selling or buying a home?  Consider Real Estate For Life to help.
Daily Rome Shot 529, etc. 

In Reykjavík, 50 years ago today, there was one of most interesting of games between defender Spassky (white) and challenger Fischer (black), Game 13.

It was back and forth but it seemed to be a draw. At move 42 they adjourned (which is something that doesn’t happen now). Fischer stayed up all night working on it and was able to force a … victory. The Soviets were convinced only a draw might be possible. When Spassky resigned, he remained in his seat going over what had happened in shock. People look at the game even now and struggle with it: Black Fischer pulled it out with his rook trapped in the corner by a bishop and pawn: a king and five pawns against a king and rook. Download the PGN.

Meanwhile the drama about row removal and accusations from the Soviets of chemical or electronic mind control are going on.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 528, etc.

Daily Rome Shot 528, etc.

Support wonderful monks.  Get great beer.  Win.  Win.

Daily Rome Shot 528, etc.White to move and win.

Daily Rome Shot 528, etc.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Wherein Fr. Z rants and recommends a must read entry at NLM

Wherein Fr. Z rants and recommends a must read entry at NLMThe Council Fathers of Vatican II voted overwhelmingly to approve some few mandates that would result in a reform of the Roman Rite.

A body was assembled to implement that reform.  It was operated by radical ideologues who had their own ideas about what worship ought to be.  Guided by ideology and personal animus (in the case of Bugnini and the Congregation for Rites) Paul VI was manipulated, on the one hand, and the Consilium lied to, on the other, and sweeping changes were made to the Roman Rite that the Council Fathers never dreamed of, excepting the modernists from mainly northern Europe.

Peter Kwasniewski has a piece at NLM that is absolutely devastating regarding any claim that the Council and Council Fathers wanted an all vernacular (English) Mass.  Devastating.   He mounts up evidence that the expectation of the Council Fathers was that the Roman Canon, for example, remain in Latin.

The Council Fathers had mandated that Latin remain the language of worship, but that space could be given to the vernacular.   They mandated that no changes be made that weren’t organically consistent with the previous form.  They required that no changes by made that weren’t truly for the good of the people.

In each case, the expectations of the Council Fathers were thwarted.  Under the obscuring umbrella excuse of “the Council”, what we got what not what was voted on.   Latin was abandoned under false pretexts.  Massive changes that had nothing to do with the previous forms, total innovations, were interpolated and important, theologically founded elements were removed.  Entire Eucharistic Prayers that virtually no one even imagined about much less wanted were cobbled together and pasted in.

So much of this was accepted out of, it is possible to argue, a damaged sense of obedience.

Take a look at Peter’s entry at NLM and be amazed.  He did a huge amount of work.

Most of you are not going to read thoroughly everything Peter posts as his evidence that the Council Fathers expected that the Roman Canon be preserved in Latin.  It is overwhelming.  Just seeing it all laid out should clinch it.

We’ve been lied to for decades, to the unfathomable damage to our Catholic identity, the Church’s standing in the world, internal breakdowns and loss of moral capital like no other time in history.

Change how we pray and, over time, our beliefs change too.

Liturgy is Doctrine.

We are our Rites.

Save the liturgy.  Save the world.

Posted in Latin, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pò sì jiù, Save The Liturgy - Save The World | Tagged , , , ,
17 Comments

Meanwhile, the Novus Ordo is the only expression of the Roman Rite… not.

 

Posted in You must be joking! | Tagged
17 Comments

ASK FATHER: The faithful put blood, sweat, and tears into the building, revival of churches, parishes. Given how bishops treat them, is there recourse in Canon Law?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I’d love to hear your thoughts on where things go from here with the traditional liturgy, given the developments in DC and Chicago, as the faithful have put real blood, sweat, and tears into the building and revival of churches and parishes. I can’t help but believe that Rome will have to intervene, especially given the way that Cardinal Cupich has been treating the ICKSP’s Shrine in Chicago. Which, is there any recourse in canon law? The issue clearly isn’t going away….

Correct. It is not going away. In the meantime there will be a lot of unnecessary pain and damage.

However… not all pain is fruitless and not all damage is waste. There is such a thing as “creative destruction”, even outside of economic theory. It works in the economy of salvation as well.

We must persevere in prayer and confidence, resisting in devotion.

There would be recourse in canon law, if we were in normal times. Alas, today those appeals fall on deaf ears.

Canon 1300 establishes that

“The intentions of the faithful who give or leave goods to pious causes whether by an act inter vivos or by an act mortis causa, once lawfully accepted, are to be most carefully observed, even in the manner of the administration and the expending of the goods…”

These goods, including the labor, were given for a specific purpose: to order the churches to make them appropriate for the celebration of the Old Mass.

These goods were accepted.

It is incumbent upon the bishop to see that the wishes of the donors are respected, or, in justice, he needs to return those gifts to the donors.

An appeal could be lodged with the Holy See, but, again, such an appeal in these days would fall on completely deaf ears.

One might have more success making an appeal in civil court.

One wonders if the appellant would have any success in proving that the Church is not following it’s own internal law and therefore is violating stated rights. I don’t know civil law enough to to offer anything useful about that. Also, courts are reluctant to get involved in Church matters.

Certainly such a case would potentially draw a lot of press attention, and that might not be an altogether bad thing.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law, Si vis pacem para bellum! | Tagged ,
19 Comments