REVIEW: Robert Harris – Conclave

I am minded of a witty review back in the day by Dorothy Parker, who wrote of a book that it should not be put down lightly; it should be hurled with great force.

A scan of the acknowledgments at the back of the novel about a conclave in which a Dean of the College of Cardinals must do some sleuthing (cardinals are bumped off… the Chair of Peter, not bumped off…) will tell you a great deal about what is between the covers.   Would that I had read those acknowledgements before I turned to the opening page.

It is, mercifully, a fast read.  It deals with some current controversies.  I detest spoilers, so I won’t give you anything substantive.  There are absurdities in the plot which would allow canonists to pen some great posts about the validity of the conclave and, therefore, the election of the predictable surprise “Pope” at the end.  There are some ludicrous shots at tradition especially through its personification in unlikeable cardinals.  And there is this…

Even when I detest a book I hate spoilers. There are a few clever moments, mind you, but they in no way make up for this thing’s gross inadequacies and cheap shots.

Do yourselves a favor. Keep moving when you run across it… unless you can find a used copy in the cart outside the store which you could give to someone you don’t like.

UPDATE:


And, as I contemplate dropping it into a canal… jail for the author?   If I were Doge and he wrote that in my most serene republic…


It’s final resting place…

Posted in Liberals, REVIEWS, You must be joking! |
38 Comments

Bp. Morlino on marriage, sex craziness, the election, and “eschatological awareness”

ad orientem direction drawingHis Excellency Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino, Bishop of Madison and Extraordinary Ordinary, has a column in the recent number of the diocesan newspaper which connect three topics that you might not be immediately inclined to connect.

Eschatology (theology of the Last Things), all sorts of confusion about marriage, Holy Mass ad orientem.

HERE

Crunched down, God made us for a reason.  Many of you who studied the Baltimore Catechism can recite it immediately.

If we lose sight of our proper end, or goal, then we start to screw up other things.  For example, two people (or more, I guess) of the same sex might get a notion that they can get married, or that it is okay to have sexual relations with such a person.  They go dreadfully wrong and lost on bad paths.  To recover our sense of direction, we need to contemplate again the Last Things.  One way to do this is through the recovery of ad orientem worship!

click

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Four Last Things, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Turn Towards The Lord | Tagged , , , ,
17 Comments

Venice – Day 1-2: Of Mark and Mud-bugs

This improbable place never ceases to amaze.

St. Mark’s Square, which at about noon today will start to fill up with water.  Raised sidewalks of metal scaffolding will be set up for people to file along.  In this age of selfies, there is rich potential for real delays and splash downs.

Yesterday I went to a couple church’s to arrange Mass times for the group.  Allow to say here that the sacristan at S. Zaccaria sets a new standard for being a total jerk.  Italian sacristans can be extremely …. unhelpful.  Not are they often among the most liturgically (etc.) ignorant of all carbon-based life forms, but they are also the most likely to share their witless and ill-informed opinions.  In any event, the guy at S. Zaccaria is a first class ass.  This is not the first time I’ve tried to deal with him.  Also, some of the group I am with went by the church as the evening Mass was concluding, the minute the priest finished he started turning out lights and shooing with no regard to the people who were still praying etc.  A couple even had to use the lights on their phones to get out without falling.  In any event, the sacristan is world-class oaf.   In fact, reading this inscription in the campo outside the church kept me from saying many things.

IMG_3241

 

 

 

 
That said, the sacristan at S, Moisè was friendly and helpful, as was the fellow at S. Marco after a couple attempts at brushing us of.   Enough about sacristans.

After arranging the Mass for this morning at the altar of the Madonna Nicopeia, I slithered over into the sanctuary to spend time asking St. Mark to take in had a friend who is wondering about a vocation.

Mosaics.   Riveting.  The basilica was pretty much closed when I finished in the sacristy and with my orisons, so I lingered a little and read the Latin and followed the story.

The evening meal brought all of us granceola, a kind of spider-crab salad.   Just about to finish…

?

A couple folks in the party opted for the lobster with fresh mayonnaise.

I, however, had sarde in soar, one of my favorites in Venice.

Then spaghetti with squid ink.

The aforementioned mud-bug and its accompaniment.

From last night and moving to this morning, we had Mass, as I mentioned, at the altar of the Madonna Nicopeia, dear to the Venetians.  She was – frankly – boosted from Constantinople where once she was carried into battle and because their Lady of Victory.  The Venetians, knowing a good thing when they see it, helped themselves to the icon and used it for the same purposes.  Now she awaits your attention in a chapel inside the side door of the basilica.

The Leonine Prayers after Mass on the Feast of St. Luke.

More later.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
31 Comments

ASK FATHER: Why are good priests so afraid of “stirring the pot”?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

This past weekend my family and I attended Mass at a neighboring parish, which had for many years been considered very liberal. We were informed that a new pastor had been appointed in the course of the last year who was very orthodox. For his part, the pastor was in fact very reverent and celebrated the Mass accurately. However, the music was horrific, complete with Hippie hymns and rythmic clapping. At the homily the Deacon called the children forward to sit in the sanctuary while he sat facing them and led a “discussion” complete with platitudes about diversity, niceness and quotes from St Martin Luther King.

My question is: Why are good priests so afraid of “stirring the pot” or “sweeping changes” with regard to the proper and reverent celebration of Holy Mass, especially with a supportive bishop and many (perhaps quieter) faithful who just can’t stand the stupidity?

Not knowing the full situation there, one cannot be exhaustive or too precise.  However, in my experience, some priests when they arrive in a new parish wait for quite a while before making changes.  Whether that is a good idea or not, that’s what many priests do.   Of course if there are obvious abuses or sacrilege, they ought to correct them immediately.  Some do, some don’t.  Some priests are timid.  Some have been requested by the bishop, or threatened, not to make “problems”.

Also, some priests arrive in a new place and find a whole raft of things that have to be corrected.  They find it hard to tackle them all at once.  I, of course, think that liturgical worship is the main issue.  However, that is also the issue where people who are entrenched will fight you the most.   And if the bishop doesn’t support his priests – that’s common – Father might turn his attention elsewhere.  He has only so much mental energy and, perhaps, does not want to die on that particular hill.

When you’ve been beaten on for enough years by harassing libs and the bishop who will throw you to the wolves, you get a little tired.

There are many reasons for why “the stupidity” is allowed to go on.  Quite often at the root you will find bullying from parishioners and chancery staff and a lack of support from the bishop.

What can you do?

 

Fast and pray for the priest.  Ask the guardian angels of those who are obstacles to help you out.  Support the priest in the good initiatives he undertakes.  Express your hope for change in a kind way that doesn’t hector.  Get like minded people together who will offer to be of service in making the changes.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
29 Comments

Archbp. Sample on ‘Amoris laetitia’: conscience isn’t a law unto itself

At CWR my old friend Archbp. Alex Sample of Portland as some things to say about Amoris laetitia.  He issued some instructions about the controversial document and commented on the.  HERE

Especially good is this…

CWR: The first misuse you address has to do with conscience. What is, in your experience as priest and bishop, are the central misunderstandings or distortions about conscience?

Archbishop Sample: As I state in my pastoral letter, it boils down to an erroneous understanding of conscience as a law unto itself. We must indeed obey our conscience, but we must be operating with a well formed conscience. We form our conscience according to the mind of Christ and the teaching of the Church as revealed in the Sacred Scriptures and in the magisterial teaching of Tradition. The teachings of Christ and his Church are not to be taken as simply suggestions that we are free to accept, accept in part, or reject altogether. We have the duty to inform our conscience in consonance with the truth revealed to us by God. Conscience can be in error, and it is the duty of the pastors of the Church to vigorously teach the truths revealed to us in order to help our people properly form their consciences. This will enable us to make moral choices that are pleasing to God.

Fr. Z kudos.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, The Drill | Tagged ,
20 Comments

Florence – Day 5-7: Red meat and musea

Welcome to Florence.

Giotto’s bell tower.  The hotel is very close so I can hear the bells clearly.

The new Museum of the Duomo is open and it is stunning.  After a few hours in this exquisite museum I understand much better the interplay of architecture and faith.  There are preserved many inestimable treasures.

They tried to recreate the space between the baptistry and the facade of the Duomo as it was before 1557 when it was dismantled and redone.

You get a real sense of the “paradiso” that that space invoked, as you would move from the baptistry to the doors of the cathedral, from the font to the altar, from cleansing to Eucharist.

Some items, details, in the museum.

The singing gallery!

This museum really takes it out of you, so it is important to keep up your strength.

And did I mention AD ORIENTEM worship, above?  Oh, yes… I did.

We had Mass in the Church of San Marco before visiting the cells painted by Beato Angelico.

Here is what is called the pulpit of Savonarola.  I think that’s a little optimistic.

Wow.  It takes my breath every time I see it.

And then there’s this guy.

And there are these things.  Pasta stuffed with pear.  The sauce is from taleggio, with a little truffle.

These things were dressed in saffron, porcini mushrooms and sausage.

There might have been bistecca alla fiorentina more than once.

And so it is off to Venice today.  Every one is having a good time and they’ve had some edifying experiences.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
18 Comments

Hillary: ”I admire Margaret Sanger enormously… there are a lot of lessons we can learn from her”

I saw an intriguing post online called: Who said it: Adolf Hitler or Margaret Sanger?

Quotes are offered. Guess who said it.

May I observe that Hillary Clinton thinks that Margaret Sanger was wonderful?  She is is “awe” of her.  We can learn a lot from Margaret Sanger.

And yet it is really hard to tell who said what.  Hillary or … someone else.

“What is social planning without a quota?”

“The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature”?

“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people”?

“Sterilization would go far in reducing human misery, not to speak of the financial saving in the upkeep of the unfit offspring”?

Who wrote about “protect[ing] society against the propagation and increase of the unfit”

Who declared that the “destruction” of “sick, weak, deformed children” was more “decent” than the current “wretched” preserving of the “pathological”?

Who encouraged limiting reproduction “to make the coming generation into such physically, mentally capable, socially alert individuals as are..ideal”?

Who advocated a “rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted”?

I got only a 62% on the quiz.

Hillary and Sanger HERE and HERE and HERE.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

 

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged , , ,
25 Comments

ASK FATHER: Man regularly takes Hosts home from Mass

From a reader…

Last week I saw one of our parishioners take the host back to his pew. I mentioned this to the visiting priest after Mass and he said to talk directly to the person involved — but he’d left before the final blessing.

I was so disturbed I left a note for our regular priest under his door, but found out later he’s away on annual leave.

This week he did it again with the same visiting priest. I’d done a spot of reading through the week, so I went and sat next to him and said (quietly) that he should eat the host before the priest. He said that he had a medical condition that prevented that (no saliva). [So, he is not taking it to a sick person.]

After Mass, he came up and was obviously disturbed (and probably offended) and proceeded to aggressively argue his point.

I’ll obviously try and see our regular priest when he gets back, but it’s left me perturbed — especially as he was personally aggressive.

Was I right or wrong? Maybe I should have seen him before Mass?

You were not wrong to talk to the man.  Alas, the priest was a visitor who wasn’t able to follow up on this and your parish priest is away.  That creates a bit of an awkward situation.

It is too bad that he has to bear the cross of this medical condition, but that condition doesn’t authorize him to do as he pleases with Hosts from Mass.  The bottom line is that the fellow should not have, should not and should never take home a Host from Mass.  If he has some problem swallowing, then he should see the priest before Mass and find out if there is a way to receive the Precious Blood instead of a Host.

But he cannot take Hosts like that.  That’s just plain wrong.

This is something that the priest at the parish, even if he is not the pastor, should help with.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
32 Comments

Fr. Sirico on the Clinton’s campaign view of the Church

Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta’s emails were hacked.  We see behind the scenes.  We see what they think of Catholics and the Church.  They are simply dreadful.

I found a video commentary by Fr. Robert Sirico about what the Clinton campaign is about.  Fr. Sirico is the head of Acton Institute.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Religious Liberty, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
26 Comments

Are you hurt, disoriented, frustrated about what’s going on in the Church? Wherein Fr. Z rants.

Two things struck me with special force today.

Today I said the traditional Mass in the Duomo of Florence at the altar of St. Joseph, Patron of the Church, who protects the Church now just as he protected the Holy Family in its time of mortal peril.   I read the reading for the Mass for St. Callistus, Pope and kstyr:

… He said to them, But who do you say that I am? Simon Peter answered and said, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. Then Jesus answered and said, Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father in heaven. And I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. …

Today I spotted in a comment in the queue including this:

“At a time when the very rock upon which the Church is built is turning to sand…”

No!  In renaming Simon as Rock, Peter, Christ shared his mission and authority with him in a special way.  Peter can only be Rock because Christ is The Rock.  The Rock upon which the Church is ultimately built is Christ Himself.  Nevertheless, it is Christ’s will that the Rocky Ministry, the Petrine Ministry, not Sandy Ministry, be a necessary part of the His Church.  Just as Christ crowns His own merits in us whenever we do something worthy and beautiful, so too Peter’s rocky solidity is rocky because Christ rocks it.  This cannot change until the Doom falls and He returns in glory to take all things to Himself, submits them to the Father, and God is all in all.

So many Catholics today are hurt, disoriented, frustrated.  If they are paying attention to the news, they see all manner of stories about the doings of Popes and Prelates which leave them perplexed, pained and thoroughly pissed off.  I join their ranks for entire minutes at a time, especially on days like today when I saw Pope Francis with a statue of Martin Luther.

Such a gesture means – simultaneously – absolutely nothing and yet not quite nothing.  My visceral reaction was “blech”.  Luther?  Really?  Then I calmed down and my reaction was still “blech”.   But the second “blech” was tempered by the fact that – as a Roman says with that trademark shrug “Meh… Popes come and go.  Big deal.”

If you are getting worked up these days, pay a less attention to news about bishops and popes.  Believe me… it helps.

Being in Rome also helps you to gain perspective.

Although I write this from Florence, being back in Rome for a few days refreshed my ecclesial sobriety.  “Being in Rome” is, by the way, more than just flying to FCO and taking a taxi into the centro.  I’m a convert from Lutheran heresy. I am thoroughly “in Rome”.  It was a blessing and a curse to have spent all the years literally in Rome that I did.  They gave me scars and antibodies and corrective lenses for my presbyter-opia.  We have to maintain a Roman perspective on Popes and Prelates.  Sure, what they do is important… for about 10 minutes, blah blah blah.  Sure, they can be pretty strange or pretty great, for a while, sigh.  In the end…

… Holy Catholic Church is indefectible.

indefectible

What do we mean by “indefectible”, one of the three attributes of the Church, “indefectibility”?

Christ meant His Church to endure to the end of the world. It is, therefore, indefectible, that is, indestructible.

Would the Savior found something on His Incarnation, Death and Resurrection, something rooted in the agony and bloody Sacrifice of Calvary, that was so weak that men like me, some dopey cleric, could erode it?  Is that how we see the Church?  Able to be eroded by us?  Even by a Pope?  Peter, after all, betrayed the Lord.  One twelfth of the Apostles sold the Lord.  The first act of the first conference of bishops was to abandon the Lord.  And yet, here we all are… in this together.

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you hermeneutic of rupture types are sniveling, as your heads spin around and you float above your beds, “You aren’t in this with us!  We are for real change and spirit-filled dynamism of blue skying together!  We know that the spirit will guide us beyond as we church together.  She will open the doors and windows and bring perpetual revolution and ‘Catholic Spring’ and with … and…. and people like you… yooouuuuu…. will finally be BEHIND BARBED WIRE WHERE YOU BELONG!  Because… because… you …hate Vatican II!  Which didn’t go nearly far enough! Hans Küng says so! Because of people like YOOOOUUUU.  GAH!  Uglúk u bagronk sha pushdug….”

Meanwhile, I say…

The Savior knew that we in our times would need the Church just as much as the men and women in the age of martyrs needed her. Therefore, the same Church endures and cannot be turned to sand no matter what we do to it.

Christ said to Peter in Matthew that the “gates of hell” would not prevail.  Attacks of the Enemy from within and from without, through false teachings or immorality or violence cannot shake the foundation of the Church.  He did not guarantee that the Church would survive with the comfortable elements we know it in, say, 21st century Madison, WI or … wherever.  The visible Church in her members will grow and shrink like a living thing, but she will never be overcome.  History has borne out the Lord’s promise.

Christ said to the Apostles before his Ascension: “Behold, I am with you all days, even unto the consummation of the world” (Matt. 28:20).   Since the Apostles were mortal men who passed, he was talking through them to us, through the ages to our own day and beyond.  They understood this and passed this true teaching down. It has been a faithful teaching that cannot be other than as true now as it was true when it came from Christ’s own lips.

C’mon!  Where’s your faith?  This is Christ’s promise we are talking about here, right?

As seeds germinate and grow they go through many stages, but they remain what they were in the beginning: tomato or mustard.  Tomato seeds don’t grow to be mustard trees.  The newly conceived human being cannot grow into a giraffe or sea urchin.  The Church, having stages and changes and growth and decline and illness and recovery and strength and activity and rest and lassitude and energy remains precisely what Christ meant her to be: His Body on Himself the Rock with its clear constituent elements that we can perceive and which tell us which is His Church and which is not.   St. Ambrose uses the analogy of the Moon: it wanes and waxes, it is dark then bright, it can even be eclipsed, but, it’s always there and it is always the Moon.

Not only did our Lord says that He would be with us, but He sent the Holy Spirit to give life to the Church as the soul does to the Body.

How can that be inconstant and false?  WE can be inconstant and false.  Christ cannot be.  I believe Him.  The Catholic Church is so great, so strong and true that not even men like me – or any of the ridiculous clerics and prelates out there – can break her or do anything to undermine her in any fundamental way.  We – they – I – can hurt some souls – we can hurt each other – and woe to those who do, but we cannot change the Church’s very nature.

If you are irritated about something going on right now, something manifestly stupid, wicked or just ill-conceived, a well-intentioned misstep in judgment, examine your own consciences and …

… GO TO CONFESSION.

That’s what I do.

UPDATE:

On this score, One Mad Mom has a few interesting things to say.  HERE

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Our Catholic Identity, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
56 Comments