Receiving divorced and/or remarried catechumens into the Church properly

I recently obtained a blurb from a mailing of a diocese to priests which had a great summary of how to handle the cases of catechumens who are in apparently invalid marriage situations.  I obtained permission to repost it.

This is useful mostly for parish priests, but it could be good for laypeople who are catechumens who are in the process of coming into the Church.

Lent is coming.  Many catechumens will be received into the Church at Easter.  Make sure you come into the fold properly!

Here is the blurb:

This is a reminder that no catechumen or candidate living in an apparently invalid marriage may be initiated/received into the Catholic Church. [Notice the “apparently”.  Remember that Nemo est iudex in causa sua… no one is a judge in his own cause.  The status of marriages has to be determined by a tribunal.  So, if there is something that appears to be out of order, take it to the proper authority!] This includes anyone who has attempted remarriage while their first spouse is still living or anyone who has attempted marriage to a person bound by a prior marriage. It does not matter if the parties were baptized or unbaptized, what religion they practiced, or if they were married in a civil ceremony. In some cases it may be possible to recognize the current marriage if the first marriage is proven invalid following a judicial process or if the first marriage is dissolved, but in other cases it will be necessary for the parties to separate or at least live chastely together; please refer any questions to the Tribunal. It also includes anyone who attempted marriage to a Catholic outside of canonical form, who would need to validate their marriage in the Church prior to initiation/reception. RCIA catechumens and candidates whose first marriages ended in a divorce but who have not remarried can be initiated/received, but they should be informed beforehand that the Church does not consider them free to remarry given their current status, but they may in the future seek a declaration of nullity through a judicial process, per their discretion.

Clear and helpful.

Marriage is not simply a personal act that affects nobody but the couple.  Marriage is public.  Marriage affects everyone in the community.  Marriage is important for the good ordering of the community.

In a era when lousy education and a culture dedicated to the base appetites has clouded intellect and weakened will, more than ever we need the solid teaching and practice of the Catholic Church regarding marriage.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
14 Comments

ACTION ITEM: Good books, info about Crusades, Inquisition

crusadersLies and black legends are constantly retold about both the Crusades and the Inquisition.  Recently, the First Gay President – in a spectacular display of tactless disregard for both truth and audience – chose to trot them out during the National Prayer Breakfast.

There are a lot of smart readers here.

I think we should compile a reading list about the Crusades and the Inquisition.  Good books.  Good articles.

It could also be good to point out which books are really bad, so that we recognize them when they are cited.

I’ll turn the moderation queue so that I can clean up some links, etc.

¡Hagan lío!

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Our Catholic Identity, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Drill, The Religion of Peace | Tagged , , ,
40 Comments

Of vaccination, a Pope, and anti-Catholic slander

At First Things there is an interesting piece about how enemies of truth, and therefore of God, created a “black legend” around a Pope with disinformation.  The target Pope wasn’t, this time, Pius XII, but rather Leo XII (+1829).

AN ANTI-VAXX POPE?

Just as every Easter long-falsified stories about Jesus are warmed up by journalists to increase the print-run of their magazines, so similar nonsense is brought forth whenever issues of science and religion are covered in the media. Whenever one needs to fill an empty page, magazines are quick to run a story about the “persecution” of Galileo and the “fight” of the Church against science. Therefore, I was not surprised that in the current discussions about the ethics of vaccination some claimed that Pope Leo XII (1823–1829) prohibited vaccinations.

The legend appears in a contemporary account by G. D. Godkin, who writes in his biography of King Victor Emmanuel II about the late pontiff with little respect:

He was a ferocious fanatic, whose object was to destroy all the improvements of modern times, and force society back to the government, customs, and ideas of mediaeval days. In his insensate rage against progress he stopped vaccination; consequently, small-pox devastated the Roman provinces during his reign, along with many other curses which his brutal ignorance brought upon the inhabitants of those beautiful and fertile regions.

In the words of moral theologian Fr. Richard M.Cormack, SJ [Booo!] (1922–2000):

In 1829 Leo XII declared, “Whoever allows himself to be vaccinated ceases to be a child of God. Smallpox is a judgment of God, the vaccination is a challenge toward heaven.” [Does that even pass the smell test?]

This alleged statement was often used to ridicule the Holy See and Catholic faith. It “proved” that Catholics did not use reason but blind faith and trusted rather divine providence than their intellect. Just like papacy rejected the unification of Italy and acted “irrationally,” so it had (according to Godkin) denounced all progress.

How could a man like Leo XII, after successful inoculations in Europe, America, Africa, and Asia, really reject a treatment that saved innumerable lives?

He didn’t. The whole “announcement” was made up to discredit Leo XII. A black legend was born. Later, when pressured to present evidence, some historians tried to justify the forgery by suggesting that Leo XII had perhaps said something of the sort as Cardinal, and thus before his election, but could again not produce the actual source of the statement.

In reality, Catholics had endorsed vaccinations since the 1720s. It was, after all, Catholic missionaries, mostly Jesuits, who began inoculating Amazon Indians against smallpox in the 1720s. In Europe, Catholic orders set up modern hospital care, and church officials, such as the archbishop of Bamberg in Germany, introduced public vaccinations in the 1780s. In Rome, Pope Pius VII (1800–1823) voiced support for the treatment, and already in 1805 more than eight-hundred newborn Roman babies were vaccinated. The president of the Jimmy Carter Center, Donald Hopkins, notes in his history of small pox, The World’s Greatest Killer. Smallpox in History, that even in the remote villages of Bohemia in the early 1800s the priests constantly reminded their parishioners of the importance of being vaccinated.

Pius VII, who resisted Napoleon, who had imprisoned him, and whom Catholics therefore venerated as a living martyr, was the immediate predecessor of Leo XII. His support for vaccinations should have made historians, who repeated the above-mentioned black legend, cautious: How often did a papal successor reverse course so completely, from endorsement to prohibition—and without a trace in the official papal pronouncements? For anti-Catholic historians the account simply had to be true, because it fit their own perception of Catholicism as intellectually and morally inferior.

For those, who wish to read a thorough refutation of the vaccination legend I recommend the article by Yves-Marie Bercé and Jean-Claude Otteni, The Practice of Smallpox Vaccination in the Papal States (in French). The story that the Catholic Church rejected vaccination as an interference with divine providence is anti-Catholic slander—nothing more.

BTW… if you want to read more about modern disinformation, try this.  It is enlightening, to say the least.

Disinformation: Former Spy Chief Reveals Secret Strategies for Undermining Freedom, Attacking Religion, and Promoting Terrorism by Ronald Rychlak and Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa.

UK link HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Biased Media Coverage, Liberals, The Drill, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , ,
20 Comments

Card. Burke: “Liturgy is absolutely the first act of the New Evangelization.”

card burke massAt The Wanderer there is part 1 of a new interview with His Eminence Raymond Card. Burke.

See if this isn’t exactly what I have been talking about for… how long now?

The Sacred Liturgy is absolutely the first act of the New Evangelization. Unless we worship God in spirit and in truth, unless we celebrate the Sacred Liturgy with the greatest possible faith in God and faith in the divine action which takes place in Holy Mass, we are not going to have the inspiration and the grace to carry out the New Evangelization. […]

If the Sacred Liturgy is celebrated in an anthropocentric way, in a horizontal way in which it is no longer evident that it is a divine action, it simply becomes a social activity that can be relativized along with everything else — it doesn’t have any lasting impact on one’s life.

I think the celebration of the Extraordinary Form can have a very significant part to play in the New Evangelization because of its emphasis on the transcendence of the Sacred Liturgy. In other words, it emphasizes the reality of the union of Heaven and earth through the Sacred Liturgy. “

I have been saying for years now that no initiative we undertake in the Church, in any of the Church’s spheres of activity, will bear good and lasting fruit unless we revitalize our sacred liturgical worship of God. Everything starts there. Everything returns there. Revitalization of our liturgical worship is the first act of New Evangelization. It is the best means of communication and evangelization both ad intra and ad extra.

This is why we need the Extraordinary Form far and wide, often and everywhere.

Summorum Pontificum is a mighty tool for the New Evangelization.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged ,
28 Comments

ASK FATHER: Laziness and accepting a paycheck

time clockFrom a reader…

Father, if one is lazy on the job and neglects some their duties over a period of, say a couple months, is that person required to make restitution to the company? does the amount of time that you are lazy and still accept pay make a difference here? im thinking 6 hours a week compared to 4o?

One good thing that the post-Conciliar liturgical reform brought to Holy Mass is the inclusion in the Confiteor of sins of omission. We commit sins “opere et omissione“- by action, and by inaction. Some sins of omission are easy to identify and to confess, “Father, I failed to say night prayers on two occasions.”

I remember a one panel cartoon I saw years ago.  Two souls are in Hell, up to their necks in fire.  One says to the other, “At least your sins were sins of commission!”

In agreeing to a work contract, one pledges a certain amount of effort and time in return for a certain amount of remuneration.  Recognizing that not living up to one’s end of the contract can be sinful is a sign of a well-developed conscience. If I promise you five apples in return for you giving me five dollars, and I only give you four apples, I have no right to demand five dollars from you.

It is a matter of justice to give someone what is his due.

With hourly work, we come into some gray areas.

Some folks can be unnecessarily hard on themselves. If they are not working at 100% for the full eight hours of their workday, they feel as if they slacked off. A reasonable employer, on the other hand, understands that workers need time for occasional breaks, or momentary pauses.

If you really believe that you’ve slacked off at work – and you’re confident that your boss is a reasonable person – you might speak to him or her. “Boss, in looking over my timesheet and my list of responsibilities, I see that, in the last couple weeks, I’ve failed to do everything on my list. I’d like to make it up to the company somehow.” If the boss is a reasonable person, he should be impressed with your honesty, and work with you to figure out the best way to move ahead.   You will, of course, have brought future attention and scrutiny to yourself.

If the boss is less than reasonable, it might be best to simply put your nose to the grindstone and resolve to work harder from hereon in, perhaps even slowly but surely making up for “lost time”.

One of the things we need to review in a daily examination of conscience involves how we -today – fulfilled or failed in our daily duties.  That includes doing good work for a wage.  Taking money for work you didn’t do is a kind of theft.  Restitution, if possible, is necessary because of justice.

A good confessor should also be able to help keep you honest and on track.

So… GO TO CONFESSION.

Moderation queue is ON.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, GO TO CONFESSION | Tagged , , ,
14 Comments

ASK FATHER: A revert wonders about validity of previous marriage

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I was Baptized Catholic, but my mother stopped practicing when I was 5. I have been married and divorced in a Protestant ceremony, no priest or deacon was present (a myriad of protestant ministers, of varying qualifications, were involved). I am considering re-converting to the Church, but I fear an annulment might not be possible. I am only 23, and I was very young when I entered into marriage (18) with a man that obviously was not committed to the sacrament. Am I considered a Catholic due to my Baptism, making it an invalid union? Or should I seek an annulment otherwise?

Please sit down and talk with your local pastor or call the diocesan Tribunal and ask for direction. It’s difficult to make calls on situations like this over the internet, since there may be nuances that need to be attended to.

However, based on what you wrote, it seems that your first marriage is invalid.

As a baptized Catholic, you were bound to marry in the Catholic Church. In canonical circles, this is referred to as an issue of “canonical form”, that is, getting married with a qualified priest or deacon as witness. All Catholics, by baptism, are bound to observe canonical form when they marry. You were baptized Catholic. You married outside the Church. That marriage is therefore invalid.

That said, sit down with your local pastor or call the Tribunal and ask for advice.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman | Tagged , , ,
8 Comments

FSSP Training Workshop for Priests 18-22 May

Fr. Lee of the FSSP has sent me information about their spring training workshops for priests to learn the TLM (Extraordinary Form, Usus Antiquior, etc… call it what you want… JUST LEARN IT).

18-22 May in Denton, NE.

$400

Click HERE

We need the TLM in every parish.

Fathers!  Learn YOUR MASS!

If you a Latin Church priest, and don’t know the Extraordinary Form…

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , ,
12 Comments

Anthem data security breach and you

15_02_06_Anthem_letterThe other night I got an email from the vampire-like health insurance company Anthem telling me that (in exchange for the large amount of money I pay them every month) they were hacked and tens of millions of people’s records were ransacked.

Every aspect and level of vampire Anthem was compromised: Anthem Blue Cross, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Amerigroup, Caremore, Unicare, Healthlink, and DeCare….

Names, birth dates, social security numbers, addresses, member IDs….

Scary.

Lots of people are going to have to be more attentive now. One story says that the hackers now have all the information they need to submit fraudulent tax returns.

What do you do to keep your identity safe?  Do you use strong passwords?  Do you change your passwords?  How often?

I am looking for new strategies for handling passwords and I bet there are some pretty well-informed readers out there.

You might check the page that vampire Anthem set up.  HERE

Also, for a while now I have used the service LifeLock.  I have an affiliate program with Lifelock. If you are thinking about using it, click below.

The link will remain on my sidebar.

I would hate to hear that any of you have a problem with this.  We all have to be vigilant.  Semper parati.

So, what is your SOP to handle your online identity?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Global Killer Asteroid Questions, Semper Paratus, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged , , , , ,
16 Comments

INDIA: Catholic prelates and priests denied entry visas

This is interesting, from Outlook India:

Catholic Priests From Vatican Denied Indian Visa
This comes in the wake of growing attacks on churches in the national capital.

The Indian Government this week denied entry into the country to two Catholic priests from the Vatican. Archbishop Arthur Roche [From the Congregation for Divine Worship] and Archbishop Protase Rugambwa [He’s the one who did the translation in Kinyambo for me.] had been assigned by the Vatican to attend a conference on ‘Liturgy and Life’ being held in Bangalore between February 3 and 9.

But on the inaugural day of the conference – which is organized by CCBI (Conference of Catholic Bishops of India) – the congregation was informed that the Indian Government had denied visa to the priests who had applied for it in mid-December. The congregation, according to information reaching from Bangalore, was informed that even intervention by the Vatican’s Secretary of State failed to move Indian officials. These two apparently are not the only Vatican officials or Catholic priests denied entry into the country.

The denial of visa to officials of the Vatican comes in the wake of growing attacks on churches in the national capital and reports in the media that the government plans to crack down on NGOs funded by the Catholic Church among others.

Unfortunately the Government does not seem to harbour any interest in putting its cards on the table. No reason is cited for denial of visas and one can safely assume that no reason will be cited if and when there is a crack down.

According to unconfirmed reports when a delegation of Christian Bishops called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi last year and sought his intervention to stop vandals from ransacking churches in Delhi, he apparently said nothing to reassure them. He certainly did not utter any word of reassurance in public.

Christians constitute less than two per cent of the Indian population and are unevenly spread out. In Delhi itself their number is unlikely to exceed a few hundred thousand people. Therefore they do not pose any kind of threat but if Christian churches are still being targeted, they are again unlikely to be a mere coincidence.

There are 225 churches in New Delhi and in the last two months five of them have been vandalized in Dilshad Garden, Jasola, Rohini, Vikaspuri and in Vasant Kunj this week. The Home Ministry has twice prodded Delhi Police for action and sought a report on this week’s vandalism in Vasant Kunj. But the police has brushed aside complaints by saying that they were incidents involving burglary, theft and short-circuits. And the only case in which the vandals have been apprehended is because of a CCTV camera that worked. What next?

It is worth recalling that the paranoid Indian Government had long back disallowed foreign missionaries from teaching, researching or preaching in the country. Every single Indian who has studied in missionary and Jesuit schools and colleges would possibly vouch how these scholar priests are missed.
One such Catholic priest Fr Camille Bulcke is not only recognized as the foremost authority on Ramcharit Manas of Tulsidas but is also credited with the most authentic Hindi-English dictionary. Similarly Fr Hoffman and Fr Ponnette are credited with the monumental 16-volume Encyclopedia Britannica. Such examples can be extended to show how these scholars enriched our language and culture.

Hey… wait a minute.

In his speech at the National Prayer Breakfast, didn’t Pres. Obama – even while drawing a moral equivalence between ISIS and Christianity – praise India…?  Let’s see the text (VIDEO):

(@ 1:23:47…) Humanity has been grappling with these questions throughout human history.  And lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ.  In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.  Michelle and I returned from India — an incredible, beautiful country, full of magnificent diversity — but a place where, in past years, religious faiths of all types have, on occasion,  (@ 1:24:39…) been targeted by other peoples of faith, [He stumbles around a bit, probably because he remembered that Christians aren’t attacking anyone in India.] simply due to their heritage and their beliefs — acts of intolerance that would have shocked Gandhiji, the person who helped to liberate that nation.

 

Posted in The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, The Religion of Peace | Tagged , , ,
12 Comments

Did Pres. Obama draw moral equivalence between Christianity and ISIS?

Today at the National Prayer Breakfast, in the context of talking about horrible things that ISIS does, Pres. Obama, pseudo-sophisticate in chief, said:

“Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ…. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”

Ummm…

Did he just draw a moral equivalence between Christianity and radical Islamo-Fascism? HERE

I note that the Inquisitions (there were more than one and they are not well understood) were a long time ago, and the Crusades were a lot longer ago. ISIS burned a guy a few days ago.

Also, he won’t say that what ISIS did came out of Islam, qua Islam, but he won’t hesitate to suggest that the ills that Christians perpetrated came from Christianity, qua Christianity.

UPDATE 6 Feb:

The latest Ramirez offering HERE

ramirez Obama aloof

Posted in The Drill, The Religion of Peace | Tagged , ,
51 Comments