Rome – Day 2: Stoffa and nonsense

If I am of an early morning out and about, my standard “large” Roman breakfast…

Things you see when walking about.

Lovely little neighborhood Marian shrines.  People take care of them.

I really enjoy the old “don’t be a litter bug” signs from “Monsignore Illustrissimo e Reverendissimo Presidente delle Strade”.  This is from 1 March 1741.

As you pass through side streets, look to the left and to the right.

Today in church I lit the four candles on the right on the upper part: parents, a friend, vocations for the diocese, and my benefactors.

Mass was celebrated for my benefactors.   I remember all my donors and benefactors in my prayers.  I’ll do this again for you while I am in Rome.

Kinda cool photo, shot by www.passioxp.com.

Last Gospel.

19_09_13_STrin_Mass

And flock of Dominicans invaded!

The other day, because of the rainfall, there was a little flood in the sacristy.  Hence, some wag dug this out and put it up.

Supper was a riot, with all sorts of great (traditional) people.

Mortadella di cinghiale!

On the way home, the little chapel on the hill.

In another street, however, I spotted something interesting on the facade of this church.  It has been obscured for some time with scaffolding.   In Rome it is customary to put the coat of arms of the Pope above the doors of the church.  Sometimes, if it also a cardinalatial church, the cardinal’s arms will be tacked up as well.

Here’s the stemma of Pope PIUS XI, still on this church, or newly put up.  I guess they either didn’t get the memo, or they didn’t like the memo they got.  I’ll try to get a better shot in the day light with a better camera.

Today I did lots of fabric and vestment stuff, for the “travel vestments”.

I have one donor and another potential donor.   I have acquired all the fabric and made some decisions about trim.  Now, the last thing to do is to turn in everything, hammer out the details, and then… pull the trigger.

Tomorrow, the conference for the Summorum Pontificum conference begins.  This should be interesting.

I am already running into people I know.  It’s great.  I’ll see a lot more tomorrow.

Posted in On the road, The Feeder Feed |
7 Comments

Excerpt from a conference Card. Caffarra was slated to give

carlo_card_caffarraAt Rorate there is an extract from a text that the late, great – and already deeply missed – Carlo Card. Caffarra would have delivered to a conference in Milan on 10 Sept 2017.

Some time ago, there fell into my hands the text that he would have delivered to a conference in London in October 2017.  The topic was to be “John Henry Newman and Moral Conscience”.

Here is an extract, in my translation:

On the morning of 12 May 1897, Newman received the official communication that Pope Leo XIII had created him a Cardinal, having received the proposal from many English lay people, in primis the Duke of Norfolk.  Newman expressed his gratitude to the Holy Father with a brief discourse, which has passed into history as the “Biglietto Speech”.

The text is of extraordinary importance in order both to grasp wholly Newman’s spiritual journey, as well as to grasp his thought.  I wanted that this marvelous text should conclude my reflection.

Giving an account of his life, he wrote:

For thirty, forty, fifty years I have resisted to the best of my powers the spirit of liberalism in religion. … Liberalism in religion is the doctrine that there is no positive truth in religion, but that one creed is as good as another, and this is the teaching which is gaining substance and force daily. It is inconsistent with any recognition of any religion, as true. It teaches that all are to be tolerated, for all are matters of opinion. … Men may go to Protestant Churches and to Catholic, may get good from both and belong to neither.”

It is in the liberal principle that Newman individuates the principle factor of the reduction of the conscience to a simple personal opinion, which nobody has the authority to judge.

Before this counterfeiting of conscience, what must we do?  Newman’s response is the following:

Christianity has been too often in what seemed deadly peril, that we should fear for it any new, trial now. So far is certain; on the other hand, what is uncertain, and in these great contests commonly is uncertain, and what is commonly a great surprise, when it is witnessed, is the particular mode by which, in the event, Providence rescues and saves His elect inheritance. … Commonly the Church has nothing more to do than to go on in her own proper duties, in confidence and peace; to stand still and to see the salvation of God…..  Mansueti hereditabunt terram et delectabuntur in multitudine pacis … “The meek shall inherit the land and delight themselves in abundant peace” (Ps 37:11).

 

Posted in The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
6 Comments

ASK FATHER: Resources to explain Collects in parish bulletin.

page_orationsFrom a deacon:

Let me begin by thanking you for your vocation and ministry. You have been a tremendous resource over these past few years, especially as I was in formation. The main reason I am emailing your today in light of a discussion I had with my pastor about the recent motu proprio. The priest I serve with dislikes the collects for all the reasons you have outlined and argued against for years. [What reasons are those?] Nonetheless, he said the people can’t understand the collects. I responded, let me write in the bulletin to explain the weekly collect. Here is the question, what are some resources I can use to explicate the collects? I just purchased Collects of the Roman Missals: A Comparative Study of the Sunday and and thinking of buying a book by Christopher Kiesling Before His majesty: A study of the spiritual doctrine in the Sunday orations of the Roman Missal (English and Latin Edition). [I don’t know that.  I’ll put it on my list.] Do you recommend anything else?

Right now, while there is a great deal that can be said about each and every prayer, I think that the most accessible explanations are probably my own.  I guess that means that I have to get those books out.  Right?  I project three volumes: Advent/Christmas cycle, Lent/Easter cycle, Ordinary Time.

Meanwhile, you can search up all sort of stuff on this blog using the search box on the sidebar.

That said, I don’t get the claim that people “can’t understand” the current ICEL translation.  Dumb the translation down any more and, well, it would be insulting, just as it was insulting for decades before the new translation came into effect.

Anyone who wants to understand the prayers, will get something from them.   Different people will gather different things from the content of the translated prayers according to their capacity, education and present concerns.

Another component is: How are they being proclaimed aloud?

If the priest has a facility with language (a think not automatically to be assumed), and his takes a little care to read them aloud thoughtfully, they are fine and comprehensible.

If many people can’t understand, perhaps Father could adjust his own style?

Also, even if a translation is little bit clunky – and they are not all clunky!  not by a long shot! – that’s just fine with me.  Why?  BECAUSE THEY ARE TRANSLATIONS!  I don’t care if translations sound like translations.  Let everyone remember that our worship should be in Latin. LATIN is the official language of prayer of the Latin Church, after all.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
8 Comments

“A Jesuit commenting on liturgy is like…”

fishwrapAt Fishwrap (aka National Sodomitic Reporter) contributors are wetting themselves – and each other – over the Motu Proprio Magnum principiumby which Pope Francis took part of the role in working up liturgical translations, etc., away from the Congregation for Divine Worship and made it more firmly the role of conferences of bishops.

The libs are really feeling their oats right now, no doubt. Reading them, you’d think that they’d received the 11th Avatar of Vishnu.

There are several rather sad offerings at Fishwrap, which have exaggerated the ramifications of the document somewhat.

The most risible of them must be that of Jesuit Thomas Reese who was so radical as editor of the Jesuit organ Amerika Magazine, that he got the heave-ho.  He has been drifting from site to site ever since.

His premise is so dopey and, frankly, anti-Catholic, that I won’t give you any samples.  You can go see for yourselves.  HERE  It’s an exercise in pure selfishness with a strong dash of malice. It’s not just that he clearly dislikes tradition, which is bad enough.  He dislikes the people who want to be traditional.

12_05_08_Clement_XVI

Clement XIV, of happy memory

I will however observe that there is an old saying about people who are completely bumfuzzled, like fish out of water: Like a Jesuit during Holy Week.

Mind you, there are few exceptions, but they prove the rule by the great contrast they offer to their confreres.

This morning brought some other apt Jesuit v. liturgy comparisons to mind.  These are from a couple of my pals, as they filled in the blank.

A Jesuit commenting on liturgy is like…

  • … Falstaff commenting on sobriety.
  • … a slave trader commenting on human rights.
  • … Judas commenting on loyalty.
  • … the KKK commenting on integration.
  • … Nero opining on religious liberty for Christians.
  • … Diocletian declaiming on the veneration of relics.
  • … Semiramis commenting on morality.

Ahhh Semiramis,…

“…that ancient queen who was the first person to castrate male youths of tender age”.

If you do go over there to read, put a dab of Vick’s under your nose before you click.

The moderation queue is ON.

 

Posted in Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
22 Comments

St. Jerome named Patron Saint of the “Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center” @DLIFLC

Screen Shot 2017-09-13 at 10.16.16This is for your Just Too Cool file.

I’ve been informed that the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center has made St. Jerome their patron.  HERE

During a humble ceremony at the Presidio of Monterey Chapel Sept. 11, St. Jerome, who lived from 347 to 420, became inducted as the patron saint of the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center.

St. Jerome has been associated with writing, cataloging and translating works of history, biographies, and a biblical translation and is traditionally regarded as the most learned of the Latin Fathers. Therefore it is only fitting that he be chosen as the patron saint of linguists, according to Chaplain Maj. Chan Young Ham.

The tradition of patron saints as guardians over areas of life, to include occupations, dates back to as early as the fourth century. St. Michael, paratroopers, and St. Barbara, field artillery, are examples of military occupations that have previously inducted a patron saint.

I have a couple of friends who were sent there for language studies.

If they have a challenge coin, I’d be happy to make an exchange!

Posted in Just Too Cool, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
5 Comments

Should a seminary headline a homosexualist activist as a speaker?

I’ve been made aware that Theological College in Washington DC, for their “Alumni Days” coming up in October, is scheduled to have homosexualist activist Jesuit Fr. James Martin as their speaker. HERE

Theological College is the National Seminary of Catholic University of America.

Does it seem right to you that a seminary should spotlight an open promotor of a homosexualist agenda?

Screenshot…

Screen Shot 2017-09-13 at 09.43.22

I’ll grant you that a speaker might be capable of addressing more issues than just his primary focus.  But there is no way around the fact that, right now at least, when Fr. Martin’s name comes up, the first thing you think is activist for a homosexualist agenda.

I don’t get it.

If I were a bishop or an alumnus of Theological College, I’d have some questions.

What message are they trying to send?

What are they promoting by this move?

What are they teaching those seminarians?

The moderation queue is definitely ON.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Seminarians and Seminaries, Sin That Cries To Heaven, What are they REALLY saying?, You must be joking! | Tagged , ,
24 Comments

ASK FATHER: To make or not to make responses in the Traditional Latin Mass?

schola cantorum chantFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Question: I have heard it said that during the Latin Rite Mass [Be careful with your terms.  “Latin Rite Mass” also means Novus Ordo.] the laity should NOT be heard in their responses. I really have no idea if this is the case or not, but I will probably err on the side of being silent for all responses from now on, but I’ll feel badly about it. What, if any, parts of the Latin Rite Mass should include vocal responses from the people? Is it necessary at all? I’ll be happy to clam up.

This is a tough one.   Some congregations are accustomed to make responses and some have been – well – pretty much silenced.

Popes of the 20th century were speaking about “active participation” (and they meant both interior actual participation and outward vocal participation) well before the Second Vatican Council. They advocated making responses. The Holy See clarified the different ways or “levels” of vocally active participation, depending on the sort of Mass being celebrated and the occasion.

In a nutshell, before the Council, it was strongly encouraged that people make responses, especially at Solemn and Sung Masses. This applied often to Low Masses as well, the so-called “dialogue Mass”.

It seems to me that had this been fostered as Popes indicated, there would not been a vandalic rampage through the Roman Rite in the 60’s.

There are various goods in tension.  I’ll leave aside the whole issue of having only clerics speaking the texts of Mass as a non-factor.

First, especially for a Low Mass, there is a lot to be said for stillness and silence, especially in our increasingly noisy world.

However, there is a lot to be said also, during the Missa Cantata or the Solemn Mass, for the outward manifestation of interior participation by the baptized who also share, in their own way, in Christ’s Priesthood.

Are there good reasons, in a Sung Mass or Solemn Mass, not to respond to “Et cum spirit tuo“, for example?

It is hard for me to think of one.

As a matter of fact, it would be great for congregations who are capable of doing so to sing the Ordinary chants (Kyrie, Gloria, etc.), though that takes a while to learn.  I have an experience of such a congregation at my home parish.  On Saturday mornings, they could sing whatever Mass was appropriate for the day.   It took some years to get them there, but they could do it.

At the same time, I don’t think people should be bludgeoned into responding by someone with a microphone waving her hand around, as often happens with Novus Ordo affliction liturgists.

I occasionally wonder what it would be like to have a Solemn Mass for a church full of good choir members, amateur or pro.  What would it be like to have the whole congregation burst into the Kyrie of the, say, Missa Brevis of Palestrina?

That said, if no one else at the place you are going makes responses – at all – then I don’t recommend making them loudly all by yourself.

I think it would be good for congregations to make responses. People don’t have to shout, but they should not just sit there and stare when they have been addressed by the priest.

If alter Christus says something to you directly, you don’t just sit there and mutely stare or look around.

Each community has to work this out over time.

The bottom line is, however, that the first and foremost way of active participation, which should give rise to any exteriorly active participation, is the interiorly active receptivity we should foster during every Mass. Active participation begins within and then gives rise to outward expression.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
45 Comments

Rome – Day 1: Pall and Pallotti

Errands this beautiful Roman morning took me past the great Jesuit church, the Gesù, where you find the tomb of St. Ignatius. I prayed for the conversion or the eradication of the society.  I would prefer one over the other!

A glimpse at some Roman ruins of the Republican period at Largo Argentina.  The ruin used to be full of cats (much like the heads of some prelates I know). I spotted only two this time and one wasn’t moving.  Cats, that is, not prelates.

This morning took me to fabric stores and to Gammarelli.  I am putting together the plan to have the reversible travel vestments made.  I’m learning about silk. I received a donation, which allows me to start the project.   I will put the names of donors with the vestments in some way, as I described HERE.  (Thanks, JD!) This is becoming complicated but interesting.   I even got an estimate for travel dalmatics, in case when I am out and around with the portable, we must have a Solemn Mass on the fly!  (I need one of those miniature thuribles….)

I popped into Barbiconi to get a replacement pall.  A certain priest of my acquaintance whom I shall not name at a certain parish where I help on certain Sundays appropriated my pall for himself.

It helps me to remember to add prayers for him and think with gratitude about the gift of Summorum Pontificum.

Then, to my usual green grocer in the Campo near to where I am staying.  La Signora has been there for as long as I can remember… and that’s quite a long time by now.

To the other shop for necessities, like sliced meats and cheeses, etc.

Alici…  mmmm….

I stopped in the little church in the V. Pettinari (close to Ss. Trinità dei Pellegrini) to visit the tomb of San Vincenzo Pallotti.  I prayed for a particular priest serving in NYC who is a fine example of service and good cheer.

In the same church is the tomb of Bl. Elisabetta Sanna.

UPDATE:

I took a lot of cares with me to the altar today, though it was an otherwise great day, beautiful in Rome.

In the sacristy, ready for a priest to say Mass.

In the Roman way, in sacristies there were tiny wall niche “chapels” where a priest could kneel and say his prayers before and after Mass.  Two such are preserved at Ss. Trinità, the Priest-Friendliest Church in Rome™.

Here is one.  It is a little run down, but it could be fixed up again.

Note those “cards”, which are on hinges, to swing to the best angle.  And there is room on the pre-dieu for two priests.  Each “card” has the same printed text, of the prayers before Mass and the thanksgiving prayers after Mass, which are quite extensive. Given that, back in the day, there many priests saying Mass at the same time, they needed to have room for their prayers.

So, summon your powers of imagination.  The priest would kneel here, first, and get ready.

Then he would wash his hands and go to vest.

Summon your powers of imagination.  

There are some 8 altars in addition to the main altar.  Each perfectly tricked out for Mass.  The bell of the sacristy rings as priests head to an altar.  They pass each other and say either “Prosit!” or “Memento!”  People drift in and out of the church, heading to an altar where a priest is about to begin.  He enters the little side chapel, the server closes the gate.  Mass starts.  Priest after priest at all of these Roman churches did this day in and day out.  They are like mauseleums now that the “reforms” have been so effective.  However, where the tradition is living, this life is growing again.

The thanksgiving prayers begin in the third column.

So, when Father finishes his Mass –  here is a friend of mine, going out from the altar of God –  he would enter the sacristy, reverence the cross at the altar in the sacristy, give the blessing to the server, divest, and then kneel to say his prayers.

Here is the other priest niche.  Now it has a function of propping things up, but who knows?

I have a recurring dream in which I am supposed to build a church.  For years now.  I have the whole thing mapped out in my head.  The sacristy will not lack all the necessary elements.

So, that’s a little glimpse in the traditional traditional morning of the priest.

Back to the streets.  I’ve always liked this end of the Campo.

It’s time for a stroll and grocery run.

Tonight I’m brazing a roulade of chicken and pancetta and herbs in white wine with a touch of truffle and whole datteri.

And the Mascherone says, “That sounds great!  What’s on for tomorrow?”

 

 

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
12 Comments

12 Sept 1683: The Battle of Vienna and the Holy Name of Mary

The Holy Roman Empire and the Ottoman Empire were at war.  Vienna had been under siege for months.  On 11 September a coalition of Christian forces, a Holy League blessed by Bl. Pope Innocent XI, arrived with Jan III Sobieski, King of Poland, to lift the siege.

When he saw that the Turks were about to breach the walls of the city, Sobieski attacked earlier than he had intended.

On 12 September at 4 am the battle was closed.   Sobieski had called on the protection of Our Lady of Czestochowa before the battle.

He sent his forces of 81,000 against the Turks’ 130,000.  In the afternoon Sobieski led a downhill charge which broke the Turkish line and then seized the abandoned tent of the Ottoman general who had fled.

The Battle of Vienna halted the spread of the Ottoman Empire into the rest of Europe.

Bl. Innocent XI commemorated the victory at Vienna by extending the Feast of the Holy Name of Mary, which had been observed in Spain and by the Carmelites, to the whole Latin Church.  One of the pair of churches in Rome near the Forum of Trajan is dedicated to the Name of Mary.

Today is the Feast of the Holy Name of Mary, which in part commemorates the defeat of the Islamist Ottoman Turks by Jan Sobieski at the walls of Vienna.

Concede, quaesumus, omnipotens Deus: ut fideles tui, qui sub sanctissimae Virginis Mariae Nomine et protectione laetantur; eius pia intercessione a cunctis malis liberentur in terris, et ad gaudia aeterna pervenire mereantur in coelis.

Perhaps you readers can offer your accurate yet smooth versions.

Holy Mary, Mother of God…

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia…

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Solitary Boast, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Religion of Peace | Tagged ,
10 Comments

A heterogeneous catalyst has been increased in the Church

smoke_satanYou have to have your feet… knees planted firmly on the ground these days to maintain equilibrium as the atmosphere becomes more and more toxic.

Stay close to the Sacraments.

The Belgian “We Kill You™” Brothers of Charity, are defying the Holy See to continue their policy of  euthanasia for non-terminal psychiatric patients..  HERE

De Belgische tak van de Broeders van Liefde blijft achter haar visietekst staan rond euthanasie bij psychiatrische patiënten die niet terminaal zijn. De raad van bestuur meent ook nadrukkelijk dat die visie strookt met de leer van de Katholieke Kerk. Dat heeft Raf De Rycke, voorzitter van de vzw Provincialaat der Broeders van Liefde, gezegd op een persconferentie.

The Swiss Bishops “We Are Full Of Holes™” Conference has issued a document dealing with the infamous issues opened by Amoris laetitia.  HERE

7.       Apprendre à intégrer

L’Église pour tous

À la suite du pape François, nous prônons également une culture de l’intégration et de la compassion (cf. AL 296), y compris pour les couples et les familles en situation objective de rupture ou d’inadéquation à la norme de l’Église. Dans cette perspective, il est toujours possible « [qu’] on puisse vivre dans la grâce de Dieu […] et qu’on puisse également grandir dans la vie de la grâce et dans la charité, en recevant à cet effet l’aide de l’Église » (AL 305), et que dans certains cas, il puisse s’agir de l’aide des sacrements (cf. AL notes 336 et 351).

Une logique de l’intégration

Nous invitons donc à préférer en tous temps la logique de l’intégration à celle de l’exclusion : « “Deux logiques parcourent toute l’histoire de l’Église : exclure et réintégrer […]. La route de l’Église, depuis le Concile de Jérusalem, est toujours celle de Jésus : celle de la miséricorde et de l’intégration […]. La route de l’Église est celle de ne condamner personne éternellement ; de répandre la miséricorde de Dieu sur toutes les personnes qui la demandent d’un cœur sincère […Car] la charité véritable est toujours imméritée, inconditionnelle et gratuite !” » (AL 296)

It’s coming faster and faster on every front.  It is as if a heterogeneous catalyst has been increased in the Church.

No, wait.  I think we have an image already.

“Through some crack the smoke of Satan has entered into the temple of God.”

Paul VI, 29 June 1972, the 9th anniversary of his coronation

I’m heading to church now to say Mass.

Posted in Liberals, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
14 Comments