ASK FATHER: “Favor of the Faith” case approved

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Dear Father,

I am marrying a previously married woman who two weeks ago recieved a dissolution of her previous marriage in “favor of the faith” from the Holy Father.

Today she recieved the official decree from the CDF.

I’m curious how did this process work? Did the Pope actually read the case (it’s not signed by him, but stated he granted his “affirmative? Or does the CDF conditionally approve such decrees and they bring a stack to him and he approves them all at once?

With your background Vatican, I’d be curious about what exactly happened the last 4 months we were waiting on this privlidge of the faith case.

Finally, the decree has a notation in the upper lefthand corner (Prot. N . 39/17M). I assume that’s some archival notation but was just curious whatit actually means.

Anyway, I am a big fan of your blog. If you have the time to respond at all it would be most appreciated!

Since that kind of process was well outside my activity when I was there, I’ve asked help from one of my experienced, tame canonists.

GUEST CANONIST RESPONSE

Four months seems like a very fast turnaound time. This woman was fortunate (if one can be permitted to believe in fortune under such circumstances!).

I do not know how things are done under this pontificate, but the Holy Father would not personally read the cases, any more than a local bishop would personally read a formal nullity case or a Pauline Privilege case. These things are instead prepared by those who have the expertise to do so.

I assume, but do not know, that such cases are presented to the Holy Father in the course of the CDF’s routine (weekly? — in this pontificate I don’t know) meetings with him, and he simply gives a “yes” — much like when I present a formal nullity case to the Judicial Vicar or the Presiding Judge/Praeses and he knows I’ve done all the work correctly: he just says, “write the Sentence” — usually without even looking at it.

The Protocol Number is that this was the 39th Matrimonial case they received in 2017.

These are the norms: HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Canon Law, HONORED GUESTS | Tagged ,
7 Comments

My View For Awhile: Heading Home Edition

Now that I’m over my jet lag it’s time to head westward.


We are almost finished boarding and two seats are open by me.


It’s going to be a long one this time, longer than usual.  There must be fierce headwinds.  Sigh.   I have a long layover so i’m not worried about my connection, especially with expedited entry at customs. But I’m going to be beat when I get home.

UPDATE

No luck.   This could be bad.   The kid might be 3.

UPDATE

The less said about the kid the better.   Let’s just say that it wasn’t an easy ride.

I did get some reading done about Fatima.   Every time I review it it never fails to amaze and challenge.

I saw a movie – don’t recall the title – about the contribution of three black women to the early NASA Mercury program.

The food was hideous, so I passed on it.  But there was very little turbulence and we got in a bit early.  Customs and baggage was, basically, a walk through.  Re-security, on the other hand, was made unpleasant by constant shouting of TSA types.  It irritates me to see older people, who might not be quite as familiar as the TSA agents are with the process, badgered in that way without a “please” or any other courteous phrase.  I actually wrote out a comment card.

UPDATE


Finally boarding for the flight home.


This is the farthest back i’ve been in a plane for a long time. The trip was booked rather late so I get what I get.

A long layover sometimes feels like a hangover.  When I do these international trips during the last couple hours I’m running pretty much on adrenaline and caffeine.  It feels like I have Star Trek creatures crawling around inside my legs.

This crowd tonight are clearly battle hardened travellers.   The boarding is swift.  

UPDATE

My bag was loaded onto my flight!  Yay!

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
22 Comments

Belgian religious euthanizers to be investigated

Not long ago, a Belgian religious order which runs psychiatric hospitals approved euthanasia for their patients.

It seems that the Holy Father is going to let the CDF be the CDF.  Let the investigation begin!

From LifeSite:

Vatican to investigate Belgian Catholic hospitals for deciding to euthanize sick people

BELGIUM, May 9, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican has launched an investigation into Catholic psychiatric care centers in Belgium run by a Catholic order after it quietly approved euthanasia for patients earlier this year.

The Vatican’s Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin is running the investigation of the Brothers of Charity after the board of the Brothers’ institutions made a decision to allow a doctor to kill their patients who “suffer.”

The head of the Brothers of Charity, Brother Rene Stockman, had strongly opposed the decision to begin euthanizing patients. It was he who brought the matter to the attention of the Vatican as well as Belgium’s Catholic bishops.

Stockman said that he hopes for a “clear answer” from his country’s bishops as well as from the Vatican.

“I wait for the clear answer of the church and that answer will be presented to our organization, in the hope that it will adapt its vision,” he told Catholic News Service May 4.

“I hope we will not have to withdraw our responsibility in the field of mental health care in the place where we started as a congregation with such care more than 200 years ago,” he added.

[…]

More there.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
10 Comments

Ed Peters on Card. Coccopalmerio’s alarming assertion

Ed Peters – HERE – has some observations about recent comments made by Card. Coccopalmerio – who, frankly, is becoming a bit a of a concern.

The Bitter Pill (aka The Tablet, the UK’s … not best Catholic weekly) has Coccopalmerio opining that perhaps Anglican orders are not invalid after all.  You will recall that Pope Leo XIII determined that they are and that that is the position of the Church.

Peters looks at quite a few angles of the story.  However toward the end he put his finger directly on the most serious problem:

That said, and as important as the above questions might be, the cardinal’s further statement, one directly attributed to him, also deserves a closer look: namely, that the Church has “a very rigid understanding of validity and invalidity: this is valid, and that is not valid. One should be able to say: ‘this is valid in a certain context, and that is valid another context.’”

That, folks, is huge.

Huge is right.  Once we go down that path, we don’t know anything any more and we are pretty much Brother Billy Bob’s Faith Community in the old gas station down by the park.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , ,
38 Comments

Rome – Day 6: Guts and Glory!

Wow, what a couple days. Today we went to the amazing, and super amazing Pizzarium, which has the most amazingest of all amazing pizza. Wow.

This one has tripe.

What’s wrong with this picture in S. Maria della Vittoria?

There’s nothing wrong with this picture.

In St. Mary Major, Salus Populi Romani.

I spent a good deal of time in this chapel, praying for several things.  I have personal petitions, but I also remembered readers “Urgent Prayer Requests” and I remembered benefactors.

Supper tonight.  A friend an I did a “bis”.  Artichokes and mushrooms.

Pajjata.

Meanwhile, I said Mass at this altar in Ss. Trinita this evening.  Here are a couple charming details.

In the corner….

Closerrr………

A sacrarium drain.

Notice anything interesting here?

Meanwhile in the Basilica of the Twelve Apostles, the tomb of Philip and James (whose feast it will be when I travel).

And.. in the same basilica, the final resting place of CLEMENT XIV GANGANELLI!

There’s more, but that’s it for now.

I had a good time today, visiting churches and meeting with friends and having a couple great meals.  Also, there was some pretty serious prayer involved.  I am rethinking some things.

Anyway… tomorrow, I have to travel early.  Please pray for me.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to |
17 Comments

“If modern feminists truly knew the fundamental values Catholic priests are called to embrace…”

The other day I read about another dreadfully misguided and spiritually dangerous fraud perpetrated in North Carolina, another fake “ordination” of a woman.   Women, of course, cannot every be ordained to any of the Holy Orders (that includes diaconate).  A thousands male bishops with the laying on of hands chant prayers over a woman for a thousands days and yet the effect would only be fatigue and a pressed down hairdoo.

There is a good piece at the National Catholic Register which you might peruse about feminism.  Here’s a snip:

Feminism and the Catholic Priesthood: What’s the Root of the Matter?

Although three popes (St. John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis) have declared women’s ordination to be impossible, this attack on the sacramental priesthood and the fullness of the Catholic faith simply refuses to die. Earlier this year, 11 German priests from the Cologne Archdiocese wrote an open letter urging the Church to open the priesthood to women.

In February the Italian Jesuit journal La Civilta Cattolica questioned whether St. John Paul II’s statement against women’s ordination is a binding statement of the Church’s magisterium. [NB: It’s a Jesuit journal… undermining the Magisterium of St. John Paul II.]

And just Sunday, a schismatic group “ordained” a woman to the Catholic priesthood in Charlotte, North Carolina. A spokesman for the diocese reminded the faithful of the Church’s teaching on the sacrament of holy orders.

Meanwhile, faithful Catholics are frequently called to defend the Church against charges like: “Why does the Church hate women so much?” And “Why won’t the Church let women be equal?”

Such loaded questions, which come from a highly sophisticated propaganda campaign against the Church, are designed to be unanswerable. They fall into the category of: “Have you stopped beating your wife?”

The entire question is based on a fantasy. The notion that women should be “allowed” to be priests is rooted in a radical misunderstanding of both feminism and the priesthood.

To answer such questions accurately as Catholics, we need to get radical. At their very foundations, feminism and the call to the Catholic priesthood are so diametrically opposed that the male priesthood isn’t even a feminist issue!

The word “radical” comes from the Latin radix, which means “root.” To be “radical,” then, is to return to the roots of things.

If modern feminists truly knew the fundamental values Catholic priests are called to embrace — and how deeply those values clash with their own — they would never covet the sacramental priesthood. On the contrary, they would flee from the office as from fire.

Let’s consider the roots of feminism alongside the roots of the priesthood to see how deeply the two differ.

[…]

The next paragraph starts with the loathsome Betty Friedan.

A lot of women have lied to a lot of women.

Speaking of the loathsome Betty Friedan, may I recommend a book that describes her awful influence?   I often recommend Benjamin Wiker’s outstanding 10 Books That Screwed Up the World: And 5 Others That Didn’t Help.

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in Liberals, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

ASK FATHER: It’s hard to be a part of a bitter community.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My friend and I have been attending Mass in the EF for several years. We are the pioneer “young ” adults in our Latin Mass community. We were discussing the other day how both of us haven’t really been attending the TLM as much as we had because, though we both love the EF and the Church’s traditional devotions and traditional spirituality, and both want to grow in holiness, we don’t like “Traditional Catholicism” and the “Traditonalist Movement”.

For example, the incessant pope/priest/bishop bashing and whining and complaining, the conspiracy theories, the looking down on everyone who doesn’t attend the TLM, etc. There’s just too much negativity. It’s hard to be part of a community that’s just so bitter and unpleasant to be around.

At first it was mainly the older members and the biological solution would take of it, but even the young adults and families are getting this way.

I get it that there have been toes stepped on, feelings hurt, unpleasant baggage in the past, but it’s time to move on and get over it. Jesus didn’t come down from the cross, and neither should we. We need to become saints, and we can only do that by embracing the cross (I suppose this is one of my crosses to bear).

Is it possible to have the EF without Traditionalism and its baggage?

Good question.   How can we have exactly what we want without any discomforts or challenges!   After all, isn’t that what we were promised?

Seriously, if there is negativity, try to bring some positive topics in and raise the discourse.   However, isn’t it also true that it helps to “vent” a little?   I’ve tried with this blog for many years to provide a place to “vent”… a little… and then move to something more positive.  How much “venting” should be allowed is hard to discern.  “Venting” can rapidly multiply into something, frankly, sinful.

Another point is that quite a few people in the more tradition loving side of the nave have been pretty badly beaten up for years.  They have suffered a lot.   During the pontificate of Benedict XVI, and especially after Summorum Pontificum, they were unclenching and settling in to being just Catholic.  Now, under this new pontificate they sense – at least this is my surmise – they sense that things might go back to the way they were before.  They are genuinely anxious, and that leads to negativity.

On the one hand, we can’t ignore what is going on.  There are undeniable  causes for concern.  Most of the issues that we might be anxious about are beyond out immediate influence.   However, much can be accomplished by determined and sincere prayer, with fasting.

We are all in this together.

Don’t under estimate the influence that one person can have on a group.  Being upright and cheerful, carefully shifting the conversation away from a topic when it has been exhausted or when it has taken a sour turn us a work of mercy.  When the conversation takes a bad tone, perhaps you might say, “Right.  This isn’t good.  Let’s say a ‘Memorare’ for ___.  ‘Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary…’.” and see if that doesn’t stop it in it’s tracks.  As a matter of fact, if several topics have come up, whip out a small notebook and write them down.  Then say, “Okay,  Tom, you bought up X, Al brought up Y and you all complained about Fr. Z.  I’m going back into church to say a Rosary for these things right now.”

When you pray sincerely for someone, even very difficult people, it becomes harder and harder to bash them.  I suspect that people on the traditional side who constantly bash the Pope probably don’t pray for him with any regularity.  I suspect that people on the liberal side who constantly bash, for example, Card. Burke (one of the kindest and best priests I’ve ever known), haven’t ever prayed for him.

Another thing that might be helpful could be to work collectively on concrete projects.  One thing I have noticed over the years is that when certain people have finally gotten what they wanted (the TLM, for instance) they stop trying to do more. They get complacent and don’t push their envelopes out any more.   For example, they’ll drive across several parishes to go to the church where the TLM is on Sunday and then never give the parish they are receiving services from another thought until the following Sunday.  Producing concrete results in projects is a great lifter of spirits.  You might consider – with the consultation of the priest, or course – some effort focused on corporal works of mercy (e.g., baby clothing drive for families that are struggling), or perhaps making improvements to the church or grounds (there’s always something that needs fixing or cleaning).  It might be that within your community some family needs help with something and you, collectively, might be of service.  Would forming a softball team help?  How about a Holy Name Society?   An HNS might remind it’s members to watch how they talk.

Think about it, all you who tend to be vociferously negative and bitter when you talk together after Mass.   Think about a guy who has been trying to convince his wife to check out the TLM across town.  They get the kids together and drive for a while.  They have enough of a challenge with the different way that Mass is celebrated, but then afterward, in the church hall for coffee and donuts or outside on the sidewalk, they hear all the bitching and moaning about how awful the Pope is.  Is that attractive?  Will that win new members?

“But Father! But Father!”, some trad people might be sputtering, “other people might do these things but would never do that!  And… and you SHOULD hate Vatican II!”

If that’s the case, you are very wonderful, I’m sure.  Please, in your examination of conscience, redoubling your efforts in matter of sins of omission.

Seriously, everyone, examine your consciences and …

GO TO CONFESSION!

There are any number of ways to navigate the negative.  First and foremost, however, contemplate the good things that come your way each day and all the advantages.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, GO TO CONFESSION, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
63 Comments

Rome – Day 5: Food and Fabric

I really enjoy the simple meals that I assemble from walking through the markets and by the shops.

Pizza bianca, tuna, tomato, lettuce.  It is hard to find better.

I’ve been going to the same green vendor in the Campo for… 20 years?

More goodies.

So simple.  So inexpensive.  BANG! Flavor.

But in the evening, something a bit fancier.

The little elephant near Gammarelli and other clerical shops.  Today, I started negotiating the BLUE VESTMENTS for 13 October.

Heading to supper.

First, vitello tonnato.  Have you ever had it?

This is actually aglio, olio, pepperoncino, but they already gave it a dose of cheese to produce a creamy, garliky, spicy effect.  I would do it differently, but it was good.

A favorite fish which I didn’t choose to eat.

Roast suckling pig.

Back to vestments for a moment.  Given the fabric we have, perhaps these cinctures would be good for the “Marian” blue set.  These were seen at Barbiconi today.

For the lining?  Maybe?   Not sure.  I am debating the blue with gold or the blue with silver.

Shades of blue.

BTW… this is what a page of the “work order book” at Gammarelli looks like.

You can see that they have been making progress.   I covered the side (with prices) with the edge of a new fascia that I will eventually have.  I’m getting a traditional one with tassles instead of fringe for when I serve the bishop’s Masses.

Strolling… a pop into Santa Brigida.

Jasmine is blooming.  The fragrance is awesome.

A pomerium stone.

More jasmine.

From my morning stroll to San Pietro to meet with the Commandant of the Swiss Guard.

Evening again.

Today, I said Mass for my benefactors.  It is an honor to say Mass for you dear readers.

 

 

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to |
11 Comments

Wherein a Cardinal waits on tables

One of the most moving, and instructive, experiences of my life occurred one summer when I visited my boss.

One summer I took some friends with me to the Benedictine monastery of Metten, where my boss in the curia, and the former abbot of the same monastery, was passing the summer.

When we got settled in, I went to the sacristan to figure out Mass for myself with my friends.   But when we came to the church, Card. Mayer had taken the place of the sacristan.  He set up for Mass.  Served my Mass.  Asked for my blessing after Mass.  And then he served me with my friends at breakfast in the refectory.  It was a pivotal experience.   He was full of pivotal instruction, as a matter of fact, and some day I’ll tell more.

Now I have received these pics of a meal in a seminary.

17_05_09_Burke_01

17_05_09_Burke_02

I believe the great St. Roberto Bellarmino waited on tables and washed dishes with Jesuit novices.

 

Posted in Mail from priests, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
8 Comments

I just don’t get the whoopdeedoo about Luther this year in the Catholic Church.

I received a note from priest friend.  He included a PDF of an article to be published.  Here is the synopsis:

Synopsis: A close analysis of Kasper’s book on Mercy reveals a powerful embrace of Luther’s theology of grace and mercy. But Luther had no moral theology since, in his eyes, human beings are incapable  good, and God’s mercy replaces his justice. Beneath a panegyric to divine mercy, Kasper’s persistent theme is a diminution of divine justice against which mercy is revealed and illumined.  The result is a trivialization of God’s mercy, the enormity of Christ’s sacrifice, man’s freedom of moral choice and participitation in his own salvation, and by necessity, thereby, his dignity.  

Look.  I’m a former Lutheran. When I was in seminary, we had to read Kasper’s Christology books, the best Lutheran Christology I ever read!

In his book on Mercy, Kasper pretty much says what the Council of Trent anathematized.

I just don’t get the whoopdeedoo about Luther in the Catholic Church.

In the Lutheran churches (not real churches according to the CDF because they don’t have Apostolic Succession, etc.), I get it completely.  If they want to celebrate Martin Luther, great!

But… should we?

There are many things I don’t understand about this.

Another thing I don’t get is why lots of women and many Jews are not upset by the big celebration of Martin Luther.  Just read Luther, for heaven’s sake!   Why are not feminists upset?  Where are the women, for pete’s sake?  Is this an example of what McCarthy describes in The Grand Jihad?  The enemy of my enemy is my friend?  Luther didn’t say exactly kind things about Jews.  Where are they with this?   I don’t get it.  Pope Francis used an analogy the other day about Syrians and camps and lots of people were upset.  Read Luther on our Jewish elder cousins someday.

I don’t see why we are suppose to celebrate the shredding of Christendom.

I know about the blah blah about things in the Church that needed reform in the 16th c and following, and even today.  I’m a convert, remember?

Am I getting this wrong?  Where am I wrong?

 

Posted in Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
41 Comments