For your opportune knowledge, the Wall Street Journal is running an online poll today.
At the time of this writing these are the results:
UPDATE 1903 GMT:
For your opportune knowledge, the Wall Street Journal is running an online poll today.
At the time of this writing these are the results:
UPDATE 1903 GMT:
Comments are closed.
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
St. John Eudes
- Prosper of Aquitaine (+c.455), De gratia Dei et libero arbitrio contra Collatorem 22.61
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
“He [Satan] will set up a counter-Church which will be the ape of the Church because, he the devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the anti-Christ that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. In desperate need for God, whom he nevertheless refuses to adore, modern man in his loneliness and frustration will hunger more and more for membership in a community that will give him enlargement of purpose, but at the cost of losing himself in some vague collectivity.”
“Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, and the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops act like bishops.”
- Fulton Sheen
Therefore, ACTIVATE YOUR CONFIRMATION and get to work!
- C.S. Lewis
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
"But if, in any layman who is indeed imbued with literature, ignorance of the Latin language, which we can truly call the 'catholic' language, indicates a certain sluggishness in his love toward the Church, how much more fitting it is that each and every cleric should be adequately practiced and skilled in that language!" - Pius XI
"Let us realize that this remark of Cicero (Brutus 37, 140) can be in a certain way referred to [young lay people]: 'It is not so much a matter of distinction to know Latin as it is disgraceful not to know it.'" - St. John Paul II
Grant unto thy Church, we beseech Thee, O merciful God, that She, being gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may be in no wise troubled by attack from her foes. O God, who by sin art offended and by penance pacified, mercifully regard the prayers of Thy people making supplication unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of Thine anger which we deserve for our sins. Almighty and Everlasting God, in whose Hand are the power and the government of every realm: look down upon and help the Christian people that the heathen nations who trust in the fierceness of their own might may be crushed by the power of thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. R. Amen.
If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
Visits tracked by Statcounter since Sat., 25 Nov. 2006:
Clerical sexual abuse of children occurs at a similar rate in religions that do not have a celibacy requirement for their clergy. This makes it highly unlikely to be a factor.
School teachers are ten times as likely to molest children, if only they’d let teachers get married…
There are many more school teachers than there are Catholic priests, so in that sense teachers are far more likely to molest children. If we compare the percentage of teachers to the percentage of priests committing this crime, the numbers are similar. Either way, this is not what we would see if priestly celibacy were a major causal factor.
The poll is now running about 90% no. In the comments section, however, it seems that most disapprove of clerical celibacy. One commenter is claiming that celibacy causes sexual immaturity. It’s the world we live in, that promotes sexual activity as the highest good; on the other hand, one could think that the practice of sexual restraint might actually lead to sexual maturity.
What a ridiculous question. Would a priest who would sexually abuse a child think twice about breaking his vow of celibacy?
Father…thank you for being eagle-eyed about these things. I know you know this, but public opinion often follows the herd mentality, and these polls certainly contribute…
It was up to 90% No when I voted.
It IS a ridiculous question: Anyone inclined to pederasty and pedophilia would easily overcome a vow of celibacy. I remember reading somewhere, during the height of the scandal and when books like Goodbye Good Men were fresh, that (some) homosexuals in the priesthood reasoned thus: Since celibacy is about not getting married, and “I” as a homosexual have no intention of doing that with my friends, then pursuing homosexual activities does not break the vow of celibacy. It’s not celibacy but chastity that is the issue, it seems.
The way the question is posed, I had to vote yes and for the reason cited in the article.
As has been noted often, the problem is primarily one of predatory homosexual priests with a penchant for post-pubescent boys. It seems to me that celibacy does limit the pool of candidates for the priesthood resulting, in the past, in lowered standards and acceptance of exactly the kind of men at the root of the problem.
That said, I do not think that the Church should end priestly celibacy, but should instead address the problem exactly as it has, by restoring standards for the type of men admitted too the priesthood.
Does someone want to talk me out of this opinion?
Quasi majora sint Imperatorum scita, quam Christi – leges timemus, Evangelia contemnimus.
Just voted. “No” is now at 91.5 percent.
revueltos67, I take on your challenge.
Can we enlarge this discussion to include the fact that most seminaries do not have a class on celibacy, and that it could lead to immaturity, as one commentator noted on the poll site, if the issue is never addressed? Celibacy is not part of our mainstream culture and must be taught, explored, and prayed about before being accepted as part of the plan of God for His priests. There is not a predominance of homosexual priests, although, indeed, many of those who committed pedophilia were and are homosexuals. I can speak from first-hand knowledge in a diocese which has had the second largest settlement for abuse in the United States. The problem is and still is, the acceptance of homosexuals into the seminary system-This is still happening as we write, despite the disobedience to Rome this acceptance involves. And why is this still happening? First, for politically correct liberals who are presidents and rectors and even vocation directors to say “no” to a homosexual is outside of their comfort zone. And, second, they do not think that Rome has any right to make such guidelines.
Celibacy is not the problem.
Supertradmum,
Is it possible that what you’re really saying is that your diocese is somewhat deficient in these areas, and their curricula (or your knowledge thereof) seems to reflect that deficiency?
My experience is completely the opposite, by the way — today’s seminaries have quite a bit of focus on the notion of celibacy and affective maturity. Given that this is one of the pillars of formation, it is quite obviously the case that they’re focusing on this issue!
Last I looked, 92.5% No (& over 1300 votes)
Actually, I do think it’s a factor, among many other, more relevant, factors. So I just didn’t answer the poll because even though I think the answer should be “yes”, it’s a question that clearly designed to “lead the jury”, so to speak, toward reaching a verdict that isn’t tenable about the discipline of celibacy.